1
|
Karschnia P, Dietrich J, Bruno F, Dono A, Juenger ST, Teske N, Young JS, Sciortino T, Häni L, van den Bent M, Weller M, Vogelbaum MA, Morshed RA, Haddad AF, Molinaro AM, Tandon N, Beck J, Schnell O, Bello L, Hervey-Jumper S, Thon N, Grau SJ, Esquenazi Y, Rudà R, Chang SM, Berger MS, Cahill DP, Tonn JC. Surgical management and outcome of newly diagnosed glioblastoma without contrast enhancement (low-grade appearance): a report of the RANO resect group. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:166-177. [PMID: 37665776 PMCID: PMC10768992 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection of the contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor represents the standard of care in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. However, some tumors ultimately diagnosed as glioblastoma lack contrast enhancement and have a 'low-grade appearance' on imaging (non-CE glioblastoma). We aimed to (a) volumetrically define the value of non-CE tumor resection in the absence of contrast enhancement, and to (b) delineate outcome differences between glioblastoma patients with and without contrast enhancement. METHODS The RANO resect group retrospectively compiled a global, eight-center cohort of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma per WHO 2021 classification. The associations between postoperative tumor volumes and outcome were analyzed. Propensity score-matched analyses were constructed to compare glioblastomas with and without contrast enhancement. RESULTS Among 1323 newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, we identified 98 patients (7.4%) without contrast enhancement. In such patients, smaller postoperative tumor volumes were associated with more favorable outcome. There was an exponential increase in risk for death with larger residual non-CE tumor. Accordingly, extensive resection was associated with improved survival compared to lesion biopsy. These findings were retained on a multivariable analysis adjusting for demographic and clinical markers. Compared to CE glioblastoma, patients with non-CE glioblastoma had a more favorable clinical profile and superior outcome as confirmed in propensity score analyses by matching the patients with non-CE glioblastoma to patients with CE glioblastoma using a large set of clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS The absence of contrast enhancement characterizes a less aggressive clinical phenotype of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. Maximal resection of non-CE tumors has prognostic implications and translates into favorable outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Karschnia
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Francesco Bruno
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Dono
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Nico Teske
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Jacob S Young
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tommaso Sciortino
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Levin Häni
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Ramin A Morshed
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alexander F Haddad
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Annette M Molinaro
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nitin Tandon
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Juergen Beck
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Schnell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lorenzo Bello
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Shawn Hervey-Jumper
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Niklas Thon
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan J Grau
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Yoshua Esquenazi
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mitchel S Berger
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel P Cahill
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Teske N, Teske NC, Niyazi M, Belka C, Thon N, Tonn JC, Forbrig R, Karschnia P. Frequency and Prognostic Relevance of Volumetric MRI Changes in Contrast- and Non-Contrast-Enhancing Tumor Compartments between Surgery and Radiotherapy of IDHwt Glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061745. [PMID: 36980633 PMCID: PMC10046652 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
In newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, the frequency and prognostic relevance of tumor regrowth between resection and the initiation of adjuvant radiochemotherapy are unclear. In this retrospective single-center study we included 64 consecutive cases, for whom magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was available for both the volumetric assessment of the extent of resection immediately after surgery as well as the volumetric target delineation before the initiation of adjuvant radiochemotherapy (time interval: 15.5 ± 1.9 days). Overall, a median new contrast-enhancement volume was seen in 21/64 individuals (33%, 1.5 ± 1.5 cm3), and new non-contrast lesion volume in 18/64 patients (28%, 5.0 ± 2.3 cm3). A multidisciplinary in-depth review revealed that new contrast-enhancement was either due to (I) the progression of contrast-enhancing tumor remnants in 6/21 patients or (II) distant contrast-enhancing foci or breakdown of the blood–brain barrier in previously non-contrast-enhancing tumor remnants in 5/21 patients, whereas it was unspecific or due to ischemia in 10/21 patients. For non-contrast-enhancing lesions, three of eighteen had progression of non-contrast-enhancing tumor remnants and fifteen of eighteen had unspecific changes or changes due to ischemia. There was no significant association between findings consistent with tumor regrowth and a less favorable outcome (overall survival: 14 vs. 19 months; p = 0.423). These findings support the rationale that analysis of the postsurgical remaining tumor-volume for prognostic stratification should be carried out on immediate postoperative MRI (<72 h), as unspecific changes are common. However, tumor regrowth including distant foci may occur in a subset of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients diagnosed per WHO 2021 classification. Thus, MRI imaging prior to radiotherapy should be obtained to adjust radiotherapy planning accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nico Teske
- Department of Neurosurgery, Munich University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence: (N.T.); (P.K.); Tel.: +49-(0)89-4400-711361 (N.T.); +49-(0)89-4400-711365 (P.K.); Fax: +49-(0)89-4400-72592 (N.T. & P.K.)
| | - Nina C. Teske
- Department of Neurosurgery, Munich University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Niklas Thon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Munich University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Munich University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Robert Forbrig
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Munich University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Karschnia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Munich University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence: (N.T.); (P.K.); Tel.: +49-(0)89-4400-711361 (N.T.); +49-(0)89-4400-711365 (P.K.); Fax: +49-(0)89-4400-72592 (N.T. & P.K.)
| |
Collapse
|