Pathology-proven extradural ("distant") metastases of gliomas in adults in the Netherlands between 1971 and 2018: a systematic case series

Mesenchymal-Type Genetic Mutations Are Likely Prerequisite for Glioblastoma Multiforme to Metastasize Outside the Central Nervous System: An Original Case Series and Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive and prevalent type of malignant brain tumor, yet it metastasizes outside the central nervous system (CNS) in only 0.4% of cases. Little is known about what enables this subset of GBMs to take root outside the CNS, but genetic mutations likely play a role.

METHODS

We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of metastatic GBM wherein we reviewed 3579 search results and 1080 abstracts, analyzing data from 139 studies and 211 unique patients. In addition, we describe 4 cases of patients with pathologically confirmed GBM metastases outside the CNS treated at our institution.

RESULTS

We found that metastases were discovered near previous surgical sites in at least 36.9% of cases. Other sites of metastasis included bone (47.9%), lung (25.6%), lymph nodes (25.1%), scalp (19.2%), and liver (14.2%). On average, metastases were diagnosed 12.1 months after the most recent resection, and the mean survival from discovery was 5.7 months. In our patients, primary GBM lesions showed mutations in NF1, TERT, TP53, CDK4, and RB1/PTEN genes. Unique to the metastatic lesions were amplifications in genes such as p53 and PDGFRA/KIT, as well as increased vimentin and Ki-67 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

There is strong evidence that GBMs acquire novel mutations to survive outside the CNS. In some cases, tumor cells likely mutate after seeding scalp tissue during surgery, and in others, they mutate and spread without surgery. Future studies and genetic profiling of primary and metastatic lesions may help uncover the mechanisms of spread.

Extra-CNS and dural metastases in FGFR3::TACC3 fusion+ adult glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype

BACKGROUND

Adult glioblastomas (GBMs), IDH-wildtype, WHO grade 4 with FGFR3::TACC3 fusion have a better prognosis than standard GBMs. Whether this extended survival leads to late biological consequences is unknown. Although constituting only 4% of all GBMs, FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive GBMs manifest recurrent morphological features that allow prediction of this subtype, possibly affecting trial eligibility and/or targeted therapies. However, we have previously shown that an identical histological pattern can be present in wildtype examples, and conversely, occasional FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive tumors lack this stereotypic morphology; thus, ultimately molecular characterization is required. We now report for the first time an adult with FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive GBM showing archetypal histological features who developed extracranial metastases to provide further insight into potential behavior of the GBM type.

METHODS

Report of a 70-year-old man with left parietal GBM who developed 2 subsequent metastases, all 3 of which were assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and DNA methylation.

RESULTS

Biopsy-proven dural metastases occurred at 8 months and cervical lymph node metastasis at 12-month post-diagnosis before the patient succumbed at 23 months. By NGS, all 3 tumors showed FGFR3::TACC3 fusion as well as an additional PDZD2::TERT fusion of uncertain significance. DNA methylation profiling demonstrated mesenchymal subtype in the initial biopsy and RTKII subtype in subsequent dural and lymph node metastases, indicating intratumor spatial heterogeneity or temporal evolution.

CONCLUSION

Rarely, FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive GBM patients may develop dural and extracranial metastatic spread, the latter with subclass switching on epigenomic analysis.

Bone metastasis from glioblastoma: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating disease with poor overall survival. Despite the common occurrence of GBM among primary brain tumors, metastatic disease is rare. Our goal was to perform a systematic literature review on GBM with osseous metastases and understand the rate of metastasis to the vertebral column as compared to the remainder of the skeleton, and how this histology would fit into our current paradigm of treatment for bone metastases.

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant literature search was performed using the PubMed database from 1952 to 2021. Search terms included "GBM", "glioblastoma", "high-grade glioma", "bone metastasis", and "bone metastases".

RESULTS

Of 659 studies initially identified, 67 articles were included in the current review. From these 67 articles, a total of 92 distinct patient case presentations of metastatic glioblastoma to bone were identified. Of these cases, 58 (63%) involved the vertebral column while the remainder involved lesions within the skull, sternum, rib cage, and appendicular skeleton.

CONCLUSION

Metastatic dissemination of GBM to bone occurs. While the true incidence is unknown, workup for metastatic disease, especially involving the spinal column, is warranted in symptomatic patients. Lastly, management of patients with GBM vertebral column metastases can follow the International Spine Oncology Consortium two-step multidisciplinary algorithm for the management of spinal metastases.