Who's assessing tobacco use in cancer clinical trials?

Provision of smoking cessation support for patients following a diagnosis of cancer in Ireland

There is growing evidence that smoking cessation (SC) improves outcomes following diagnosis of cancer. Notwithstanding adverse outcomes, a significant number of those diagnosed with cancer continue to smoke. Our objective was to document the SC services provided for patients with cancer by specialist adult cancer hospitals across Ireland, a country with a stated tobacco endgame goal. A cross-sectional survey based on recent national clinical guidelines was used to determine SC care delivery across eight adult cancer specialist hospitals, and one specialist radiotherapy centre. Qualtrics was used. The response rate was 88.9% with data reported from seven cancer hospitals and one specialist radiotherapy centre, all indicating they had some SC related provision (100%). Stop smoking medications were provided to cancer inpatients in two hospitals, at outpatients and attending day ward services in one hospital. Smokers with cancer were referred automatically to the SC service in two hospitals at diagnosis. While stop smoking medications were available 24 h a day in five hospitals, most did not stock all three (Nicotine Replacement Therapy, Bupropion, Varenicline). One hospital advised they had data on uptake of SC services for smokers with cancer but were unable to provide detail. There is considerable variation in SC information and services provided to cancer patients across adult cancer specialist centres in Ireland, reflecting the suboptimal practice of smoking cessation for patients with cancer found in the limited international audits. Such audits are essential to demonstrate service gaps and provide a baseline for service improvement.

Potential effects of nicotine on glioblastoma and chemoradiotherapy: a review

Introduction: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has a poor prognosis despite maximal surgical resection with subsequent multi-modal radiation and chemotherapy. Use of tobacco products following diagnosis and during the period of treatment for non-neural tumors detrimentally affects treatment and prognosis. Approximately, 16-28% of patients with glioblastoma continue to smoke after diagnosis and during treatment. The literature is sparse for information-pertaining effects of smoking and nicotine on GBM treatment and prognosis. Areas covered: This review discusses cellular pathways involved in GBM progression that might be affected by nicotine, as well as how nicotine may contribute to resistance to treatment. Similarities of GBM pathways to those in non-neural tumors are investigated for potential effects by nicotine. English language papers were identified using PubMed, Medline and Scopus databases using a combination of keywords including but not limited to the following: nicotine, vaping, tobacco, e-cigarettes, smoking, vaping AND glioblastoma or brain cancer OR/AND temozolomide, carmustine, methotrexate, procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine, and neural tumor cell lines. Expert opinion: Understanding the impact of nicotine on treatment and resistance to chemotherapeutics should allow physicians to educate their patients with GBM with evidence-based recommendations about the effects of continuing to use nicotine-containing products after diagnosis and during treatment.

National cancer institute conference on treating tobacco dependence at cancer centers

The National Cancer Institute cancer centers possess the credibility to help smokers quit. With the greater life expectancies forecast for patients with cancer, addressing smoking at cancer centers has taken on greater importance.

Tobacco assessment in actively accruing National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group Program Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

Substantial evidence suggests that tobacco use has adverse effects on cancer treatment outcomes; however, routine assessment of tobacco use has not been fully incorporated into standard clinical oncology practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate tobacco use assessment in patients enrolled onto actively accruing cancer clinical trials.

METHODS

Protocols and forms for 155 actively accruing trials in the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Clinical Trials Cooperative Group Program were evaluated for tobacco use assessment at enrollment and follow-up by using a structured coding instrument.

RESULTS

Of the 155 clinical trials reviewed, 45 (29%) assessed any form of tobacco use at enrollment, but only 34 (21.9%) assessed current cigarette use. Only seven trials (4.5%) assessed any form of tobacco use during follow-up. Secondhand smoke exposure was captured in 2.6% of trials at enrollment and 0.6% during follow-up. None of the trials assessed nicotine dependence or interest in quitting at any point during enrollment or treatment. Tobacco status assessment was higher in lung/head and neck trials as well as phase III trials, but there was no difference according to year of starting accrual or cooperative group.

CONCLUSION

Most actively accruing cooperative group clinical trials do not assess tobacco use, and there is no observable trend in improvement over the past 8 years. Failure to incorporate standardized tobacco assessments into NCI-funded Cooperative Group Clinical Trials will limit the ability to provide evidence-based cessation support and will limit the ability to accurately understand the precise effect of tobacco use on cancer treatment outcomes.