A Randomized, Controlled Study to Assess Changes in Biomarkers of Exposures Among Adults Who Smoke That Switch to Oral Nicotine Pouch Products Relative to Continuing Smoking or Stopping All Tobacco Use

The purpose of this open-label, randomized, controlled, in-clinic, 5-parallel-group study was to assess biomarkers of exposure (BoE) to select harmful and potentially harmful constituents in adults who smoke (N = 144) switching to oral tobacco products (on!® mint nicotine pouches; test products) compared to continuing smoking cigarettes (CS) and completely quitting all tobacco products (NT). Changes in 20 BoE to select harmful and potentially harmful constituents, including 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL), were evaluated. Adult smokers smoked their usual brand of cigarettes for 2 days (baseline assessments) and then were randomly assigned to ad libitum use of 2, 4, or 8 mg test products, CS, or NT for 7 days. Analysis of covariance was used to assess the Day 7 BoE levels between each group using test products, CS, and NT. The creatinine-adjusted total urinary NNAL and other 18 of 19 BoE levels (except nicotine equivalents [NEs]) were significantly lower (P < .05) on Day 7, among all test product groups compared to CS. Geometric least-square means were reduced for all biomarkers of exposure, except NEs, in test product groups by approximately 42%-96% compared to the CS group, and reductions were comparable to the NT group. The geometric least-square means for urinary NE between the test product and the CS groups, although not significantly different, the Day 7 mean change relative to the CS group were 49.9%, 65.8%, and 101% for the 2, 4, and 8 mg test product groups, respectively. The substantial reduction in harmful and potentially harmful constituent exposure suggests complete switching from cigarettes to test products may present a harm reduction opportunity for adults who smoke.

Part three: a randomized study to assess biomarker changes in cigarette smokers switched to Vuse Solo or Abstinence

Biomarkers of exposure (BoE) can help evaluate exposure to combustion-related, tobacco-specific toxicants after smokers switch from cigarettes to potentially less-harmful products like electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). This paper reports data for one (Vuse Solo Original) of three products evaluated in a randomized, controlled, confinement study of BoE in smokers switched to ENDS. Subjects smoked their usual brand cigarette ad libitum for two days, then were randomized to one of three ENDS for a 7-day ad libitum use period, or to smoking abstinence. Thirteen BoE were assessed at baseline and Day 5, and percent change in mean values for each BoE was calculated. Biomarkers of potential harm (BoPH) linked to oxidative stress, platelet activation, and inflammation were also assessed. Levels decreased among subjects randomized to Vuse Solo versus Abstinence, respectively, for the following BoE: 42-96% versus 52-97% (non-nicotine constituents); 51% versus 55% (blood carboxyhemoglobin); and 29% versus 96% (nicotine exposure). Significant decreases were observed in three BoPH: leukotriene E4, 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2, and 2,3-dinor thromboxane B2 on Day 7 in the Vuse Solo and Abstinence groups. These findings show that ENDS use results in substantially reduced exposure to toxicants compared to smoking, which may lead to reduced biological effects.

Assessment of the Exposure to Aromatic Amines in Users of Various Tobacco/Nicotine Products

Aromatic amines such as ortho-toluidine (o-Tol), 2-aminonaphthalene (2-AN), and 4-aminobiphenyl (4-ABP) are human bladder carcinogens and occur at various workplaces, in ambient air, in food products, as well as in tobacco smoke. In a clinical study comprising a period of 74 h under confinement, we investigated the exposure to these three aromatic amines as well as to 3-aminobiphenyl (3-ABP) by measuring them in urine of habitual users of combustible cigarettes (CCs), electronic cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs), oral tobacco (OT), and nicotine replacement therapy products (NRTs). Non-users (NU) of any tobacco/nicotine products served as (negative) control group. Smokers (CC) exhibited the highest levels for all four aromatic amines measured, significantly elevated compared to NU and non-CC users. Urinary levels in users of EC, HTP, NRT (mostly nicotine gum), and OT (mostly snus) were not significantly different from those in NU. Users of HTP showed slightly elevated urinary excretion levels of o-Tol, 3-ABP, and 4-ABP compared to some other non-CC groups. Dose markers such as daily consumption, urinary nicotine equivalents (Nequ), and plasma cotinine (CotP) were found to be consistently and significantly correlated with the excretion of aromatic amines for smokers (CC) only. Excretion levels of 3- and 4-ABP in smokers were significantly lower in the urine collected overnight compared to that collected during the day, which is just the opposite of what we observed for other biomarkers in this study. The possible reason for this observation is discussed. In conclusion, in contrast to smoking of CCs, the use of ECs, HTPs, nicotine gum, and oral tobacco was not observed to be associated with significant exposure to the aromatic amines o-Tol, 2-AN, 3-ABP, and 4-ABP. The observed slight increase in o-Tol, 3-ABP, and 4-ABP excretions in HTP users has to be verified in larger studies.

A Randomized, Controlled Study to Assess Biomarkers of Exposure in Adult Smokers Switching to Oral Nicotine Products

This open-label, randomized, controlled, in-clinic, 6-parallel-group study evaluated changes in biomarkers of exposure (BoEs) to select harmful and potentially harmful constituents in adult smokers (N = 213) not planning to quit smoking. Adult smokers were randomized to continue smoking (CS), reduce smoking by 50% and dual use oral tobacco-derived nicotine (OTDN) products (VERVE chews/discs), stop smoking and exclusively use discs or chews, or stop using all tobacco products (NT). The primary objective compared 24-hour urinary total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL; a biomarker for the carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone) in dual and exclusive use of discs and chews to continue smoking and NT on day 7. NNAL levels on day 7 were significantly lower (P < .05) among dual and exclusive users of discs/chews compared to continue smoking; median percent reductions were ≈30% and ≈73%, respectively. NNAL levels were not significantly different between those who used discs/chews and the NT group. Many of the additional secondary biomarkers of exposure were significantly lower in dual users (10/19) and exclusive users of discs/chews (17/19) compared to the continue smoking group. Overall, reductions in secondary biomarkers of exposure were greater in exclusive users than dual users. The 24-hour urinary nicotine equivalents were significantly lower (P < .05) among exclusive users of discs/chews compared to continue smoking. The discs/chews appeared to be well tolerated. These results demonstrate that while switching completely to discs/chews substantially reduces exposure to select harmful and potentially harmful constituents, dual use with 50% reduction in cigarette consumption also reduces exposure. oral tobacco-derived nicotine products like discs/chews may present a harm reduction opportunity for adult smokers, particularly those not intending to quit smoking.

Understanding heterogeneity among individuals who smoke cigarettes and vape: assessment of biomarkers of exposure and potential harm among subpopulations from the PATH Wave 1 Data

Introduction

People who both smoke cigarettes and vape are often considered as a homogenous group even though multiple subgroups may exist. We examined biomarkers of exposure (BOE) and biomarkers of potential harm (BOPH) to differentiate between subgroups of people who smoke and vape based on PATH Study Wave 1 (2013–2014) data.

Methods

We compared people who only smoke cigarettes everyday (Group A, n = 2442) and people who only vape everyday (Group C, n = 169) against people who smoke and vape segmented into subgroups of people who frequently smoke and vape (Group B1, n = 169), frequently smoke and infrequently vape (Group B2, n = 678), frequently vape and infrequently smoke (Group B3, n = 57), and infrequently smoke and vape (Group B4, n = 66). Eighteen BOEs (representing exposure to TSNAs, nicotine, heavy metals, PAHs, and volatile organic compounds) and four BOPHs (representing inflammation and oxidative stress) were compared within the subgroups.

Results

Levels of many BOEs/BOPHs were higher among Group B2 relative to Groups B1, B3, and B4. Compared to Group A, many BOEs were significantly lower in Groups B3 (15/18) and B4 (17/18), and some BOEs were higher among B2 (4/18). Compared to Group C, significantly lower BOEs were observed for Group B4 (2/18).

Conclusions

Overall, the levels of BOEs and BOPHs in people who smoke and vape are associated with frequency of cigarette smoking. Our findings indicate that not all people who smoke and vape are the same, and tobacco product use frequency should be considered when categorizing people who smoke and vape.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-022-00673-x.

Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective response among adult smokers using different flavors of on!® nicotine pouches compared to combustible cigarettes

RATIONALE

on!® nicotine pouches (NPs) are oral tobacco-derived nicotine products that are tobacco-leaf free and are available in a variety of flavors and nicotine strengths. Switching completely to NPs from cigarettes may present the potential to reduce harm in adult smokers (AS) unable or unwilling to quit smoking. We characterized the abuse potential of six different flavor variants of NPs compared to cigarettes.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the nicotine pharmacokinetics (PK) and subjective effects of different flavor variants of NPs compared to participants' own brand cigarettes (OBCs) in AS.

METHODS

In this single-blind, randomized, 7-way crossover study, we assessed nicotine PK, subjective measures (using well-established questionnaires), and product use behavior associated with six flavors of 4 mg NPs and OBCs in AS that remained in clinic for the duration of the test period.

RESULTS

Nicotine C_max values ranged from 9.0 to 11.5 ng/mL for the NPs and 16.3 ng/mL for OBCs. The t_max ranged from 30.1 to 34.9 min for ONPs and 7.5 min for OBCs. Use of NPs resulted in lower ratings of urge to smoke or craving a cigarette. All the NPs were considered pleasant, but not as much as OBCs. Flavor did not appear to influence the nicotine PK or subjective responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the nicotine PK parameters and subjective responses, we conclude that NPs, regardless of flavor, likely have lower abuse potential than cigarettes. Overall, this study suggests that the NPs may be potentially acceptable switching products for adult smokers.

Biomarkers of Tobacco Exposure Decrease After Smokers Switch to an E-Cigarette or Nicotine Gum

Introduction

The aerosol composition of electronic cigarettes (ECs) suggests that exposure to toxicants during use is greatly reduced compared to exposure from combustible cigarettes (CCs).

Methods

This randomized, parallel-group, clinical study enrolled smokers to switch to Vuse Solo (VS) Digital Vapor Cigarettes (Original or Menthol) or Nicorette 4 mg nicotine gum (NG) in a controlled setting. Subjects who smoked CCs ad libitum for 2 days during a baseline period were then randomized to ad libitum use of either VS or NG for 5 days. Biomarkers of 23 toxicants were measured in 24-hour urine samples and blood collected at baseline and following product switch.

Results

A total of 153 subjects completed the study. Total nicotine equivalents decreased in all groups, but higher levels were observed in the VS groups compared to the NG groups, with decreases of 38% and 60%–67%, respectively. All other biomarkers were significantly decreased in subjects switched to VS, and the magnitude of biomarker decreases was similar to subjects switched to NG. Decreases ranged from 30% to greater than 85% for constituents such as benzene and acrylonitrile.

Conclusions

These results indicate that exposure to toxicants when using VS is significantly reduced compared to CC smoking, and these reductions are similar to those observed with use of NG. Although statistically significantly decreased, nicotine exposure is maintained closer to CC smoking with VS use compared to NG use. This research suggests that use of VS exposes consumers to fewer and lower levels of smoke toxicants than CCs while still providing nicotine to the consumer.

Implications

This is the first study to report changes in nicotine delivery and biomarkers of tobacco exposure following a short-term product switch from CCs to either an EC or NG in a controlled environment. The study shows that nicotine exposure decreased in both groups but was maintained closer to CC smoking with the EC groups. Biomarkers of tobacco combustion decreased to similar levels in both EC and gum groups.

The US SimSmoke tobacco control policy model of smokeless tobacco and cigarette use

Background

Smokeless tobacco (SLT) prevalence had been declining in the US prior to 2002 but has since increased. Knowledge about the impact of tobacco control policies on SLT and cigarette use is limited. This study examines the interrelationship between policies, cigarette use, and SLT use by applying the SimSmoke tobacco control policy simulation model.

Methods

Using data from large-scale Tobacco Use Supplement and information on policies implemented, US SimSmoke was updated and extended to incorporate SLT use. The model distinguishes between exclusive SLT and dual use of SLT and cigarettes, and considers the effect of implementing individual and combined tobacco control policies on smoking and SLT use, and on deaths attributable to their use. After validating against Tobacco Use Supplement (TUS) survey data through 2015, the model was used to estimate the impact of policies implemented between 1993 and 2017.

Results

SimSmoke reflected trends in exclusive cigarette use from the TUS, but over-estimated the reductions, especially among 18–24 year olds, until 2002 and under-estimated the reductions from 2011 to 2015. By 2015, SimSmoke projections of exclusive SLT and dual use were close to TUS estimates, but under-estimated reductions in both from 1993 to 2002 and failed to estimate the growth in male exclusive SLT use, especially among 18–24 year olds, from 2011 to 2015. SimSmoke projects that policies implemented between 1993 and 2017 reduced exclusive cigarette use by about 35%, dual use by 32.5% and SLT use by 16.5%, yielding a reduction of 7.5 million tobacco-attributable deaths by 2067. The largest reductions were attributed to tax increases.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that cigarette-oriented policies may be effective in also reducing the use of other tobacco products. However, further information is needed on the effect of tobacco control policies on exclusive and dual SLT use and the role of industry.

[Old and new tobacco products]

Tobacco use is not just about manufactured cigarettes. Rolling tobacco, highly prized in the wake of price increases, is estimated to carry more toxic agents than its counterpart. This study shows that the use of cigar, pipe, cigarillos and narghile also leads to a cohort of pathologies similar to or more than what is known for smoking single cigarettes. Exotic, liquid or heated forms do just as much. The non-smoked tobacco, often fallen into disuse in France is very used in the United States and especially in Scandinavia. Denuded of inhaled products, it is often pointed as a form of reduction of smoking risks. Its use by athletes in all countries as a doping attitude, especially in ski disciplines, required a campaign of prevention within the federations concerned.

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Smokeless Tobacco Use, 2014-2016

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine whether the prevalence of current use of smokeless tobacco products (STPs) changed during 2014-2016 and examine factors associated with use among adults in the United States (US).

METHODS

Data were obtained from Tobacco Products and Risk Perceptions Surveys of probability samples representative of US adults in 2014, 2015, and 2016. Change over time in current (past 30 day) STP use was examined using pairwise comparisons of proportions and multivariable logistic regression. Associated factors were examined using Rao-Scott χ2 and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The prevalence of current STP use was higher in 2015 (3.6%) than in 2014 (2.3%, p < .001) and 2016 (2.7%, p = .018) among US adults. In 2016, current STP use was associated with being male, under age 60, currently using hookah or e-cigarettes, and having less than a college degree. Rates of use did not vary by cigarette smoking status, race/ethnicity, income, or metropolitan statistical area (MSA).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of current STP use peaked in 2015. In 2016, current STP use was more prevalent among males and adults with lower education. Continuous monitoring of STP use is needed, particularly non-cigarette tobacco product users.

Magnitudes of biomarker reductions in response to controlled reductions in cigarettes smoked per day: a one-week clinical confinement study

Tobacco toxicant-related exposure reduction is an important tool in harm reduction. Cigarette per day reduction (CPDR) occurs as smokers migrate from smoking cigarettes to using alternative tobacco/nicotine products, or quit smoking. Few reports characterize the dose-response relationships between CPDR and effects on exposure biomarkers, especially at the low end of CPD exposure (e.g., 5 CPD). We present data on CPDR by characterizing magnitudes of biomarker reductions. We present data from a well-controlled, one-week clinical confinement study in healthy smokers who were switched from smoking 19-25 CPD to smoking 20, 10, 5 or 0 CPD. Biomarkers were measured in blood, plasma, urine, and breath, and included smoke-related toxicants, urine mutagenicity, smoked cigarette filter analyses (mouth level exposure), and vital signs. Many of the biomarkers (e.g., plasma nicotine) showed strong CPDR dose-response reductions, while others (e.g., plasma thiocyanate) showed weaker dose-response reductions. Factors that lead to lower biomarker reductions include non-CPD related contributors to the measured response (e.g., other exposure sources from environment, life style, occupation; inter-individual variability). This study confirms CPDR dose-responsive biomarkers and suggests that a one-week design is appropriate for characterizing exposure reductions when smokers switch from cigarettes to new tobacco products.

Consumption patterns and biomarkers of exposure in cigarette smokers switched to Snus, various dissolvable tobacco products, Dual use, or tobacco abstinence

The objectives of this clinical study were to evaluate changes in tobacco product use behavior and levels of selected biomarkers of exposure (BOEs) for smokers who switched to one of six conditions during clinical confinement: exclusive use of; Camel Snus, Sticks, Strips or Orbs, controlled Dual use of cigarettes and Camel Snus, or tobacco abstinence. The controlled Dual use (DU) condition mandated a 60% reduction in cigarettes smoked per day (CPD). 167 healthy U.S. male and female smokers were randomized to the six groups (n=25-30/group). Subjects smoked their usual brand of cigarette for 1 day prior to switching to their designated intervention condition. Levels of thirty-two BOEs in plasma, whole blood, urine and feces were determined before and after switching. Questionnaires that scored nicotine dependence and withdrawal discomfort were also administered. After 5 days, exclusive Snus, Sticks, Strips, or Orbs use averaged 6.1, 5.9, 13.5, and 8.5 units/day, respectively. DU subjects smoked 7.6 CPD and used 3.2 Snus pouches/day, on average. After 5 days, substantial reductions of most biomarkers, including nicotine, were observed in all groups. Toxicant exposures were similar to being tobacco abstinent after switching exclusively to Camel Snus, Sticks, Strips or Orbs. DU reductions were more modest.