Smoking Patterns and Receipt of Cessation Services Among Pregnant Women in Argentina and Uruguay

What components of smoking cessation care during pregnancy are implemented by health providers? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy is an opportunity for health providers to support women to stop smoking.

OBJECTIVES

Identify the pooled prevalence for health providers in providing components of smoking cessation care to women who smoke during pregnancy.

DESIGN

A systematic review synthesising original articles that reported on (1) prevalence of health providers' performing the 5As ('Ask', 'Advise', 'Assess', 'Assist', 'Arrange'), prescribing nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and (2) factors associated with smoking cessation care.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases searched using 'smoking', 'pregnancy' and 'health provider practices'.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies included any design except interventions (self-report, audit, observed consultations and women's reports), in English, with no date restriction, up to June 2017.

PARTICIPANTS

Health providers of any profession.

DATA EXTRACTION, APPRAISAL AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted, then appraised with the Hawker tool. Meta-analyses pooled percentages for performing each of the 5As and prescribing NRT, using, for example, 'often/always' and 'always/all'. Meta-regressions were performed of 5As for 'often/always'.

RESULTS

Of 3933 papers, 54 were included (n=29 225 participants): 33 for meta-analysis. Health providers included general practitioners, obstetricians, midwives and others from 10 countries. Pooled percentages of studies reporting practices 'often/always' were: 'Ask' (n=9) 91.6% (95% CI 88.2% to 95%); 'Advise' (n=7) 90% (95% CI 72.5% to 99.3%), 'Assess' (n=3) 79.2% (95% CI 76.5% to 81.8%), 'Assist (cessation support)' (n=5) 59.1% (95% CI 56% to 62.2%), 'Arrange (referral)' (n=6) 33.3% (95% CI 20.4% to 46.2%) and 'prescribing NRT' (n=6) 25.4% (95% CI 12.8% to 38%). Heterogeneity (I2) was 95.9%-99.1%. Meta-regressions for 'Arrange' were significant for year (p=0.013) and country (p=0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Health providers 'Ask', 'Advise' and 'Assess' most pregnant women about smoking. 'Assist', 'Arrange' and 'prescribing NRT' are reported at lower rates: strategies to improve these should be considered.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42015029989.

Prevalence of pre-gestational and gestational smoking and factors associated with smoking cessation during pregnancy, Brazil, 2011-2012

Gestational smoking is associated with various adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Over the last three decades, despite considerable advances in tobacco control policy in Brazil, gestational smoking has caused a considerable number of fetal deaths and disabilities. The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence of pre-gestational and gestational smoking and to identify the factors associated with smoking cessation up to the 20th gestational week.

METHODS

"Birth in Brazil" was a nationwide hospital-based study conducted from February 2011 to October 2012. Smoking prevalence and smoking cessation during pregnancy was estimated through face-to-face interviews with postpartum women during hospitalization for birth care. We performed multivariate logistic regression to verify the factors associated with smoking cessation up to the 5th month of pregnancy.

RESULTS

prevalence of pre-gestational smoking of 16.1% (CI 95% 15.3%-16.9%); prevalence of smoking any time during pregnancy of 9.6% (CI 95% 9.0%-10.3%); and prevalence of smoking cessation up to the 5th month of pregnancy of 56.7% (CI 95% 54.0%-59.4%). The factors associated with smoking cessation were residence in the North, Northeast, and Central-West of Brazil, having received at least one prenatal consultation (OR 3.51 CI 95% 1.85-6.67), more years of schooling (15 or more vs less than 7 years of schooling OR 5.54 CI 95% 2.97-10.34), living with a partner (OR 1.35 CI 95% 1.01-1.79), no children prior to the index pregnancy (OR 2.77 CI 95% 2.13-3.61), and absence of alcohol use (1.74 CI 95% 1.39-2.18) or of suspected alcohol abuse (OR 1.62 CI 95% 1.07-2.45).

CONCLUSION

The estimated smoking rate during pregnancy in Brazil is still high and is associated with factors of increased maternal social vulnerability, which may contribute to the increased occurrence of unfavorable perinatal outcomes.

Large multi-centre pilot randomized controlled trial testing a low-cost, tailored, self-help smoking cessation text message intervention for pregnant smokers (MiQuit)

AIMS

To estimate the effectiveness of pregnancy smoking cessation support delivered by short message service (SMS) text message and key parameters needed to plan a definitive trial.

DESIGN

Multi-centre, parallel-group, single-blinded, individual randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Sixteen antenatal clinics in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred and seven participants were randomized to the intervention (n = 203) or usual care (n = 204). Eligible women were < 25 weeks gestation, smoked at least one daily cigarette (> 5 pre-pregnancy), were able to receive and understand English SMS texts and were not already using text-based cessation support.

INTERVENTION

All participants received a smoking cessation leaflet; intervention participants also received a 12-week programme of individually tailored, automated, interactive, self-help smoking cessation text messages (MiQuit).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Seven smoking outcomes, including validated continuous abstinence from 4 weeks post-randomization until 36 weeks gestation, design parameters for a future trial and cost-per-quitter.

FINDINGS

Using the validated, continuous abstinence outcome, 5.4% (11 of 203) of MiQuit participants were abstinent versus 2.0% (four of 204) of usual care participants [odds ratio (OR) = 2.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.93-9.35]. The Bayes factor for this outcome was 2.23. Completeness of follow-up at 36 weeks gestation was similar in both groups; provision of self-report smoking data was 64% (MiQuit) and 65% (usual care) and abstinence validation rates were 56% (MiQuit) and 61% (usual care). The incremental cost-per-quitter was £133.53 (95% CI = -£395.78 to 843.62).

CONCLUSIONS

There was some evidence, although not conclusive, that a text-messaging programme may increase cessation rates in pregnant smokers when provided alongside routine NHS cessation care.

A Multifaceted Strategy to Implement Brief Smoking Cessation Counseling During Antenatal Care in Argentina and Uruguay: A Cluster Randomized Trial

INTRODUCTION

Argentina and Uruguay have a high prevalence of smoking during pregnancy. However, and despite national recommendations, pregnant women are not routinely receiving cessation counseling during antenatal care (ANC). We evaluated a multifaceted strategy designed to increase the frequency of pregnant women who received a brief smoking cessation counseling based on the 5As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange).

METHODS

We randomly assigned (1:1) 20 ANC clusters in Buenos Aires, Argentina and Montevideo, Uruguay to receive a multifaceted intervention to implement brief smoking cessation counseling into routine ANC, or to receive no intervention. The primary outcome was the frequency of women who recalled receiving the 5As during ANC at more than one visit. Frequency of women who smoked until the end of pregnancy, and attitudes and readiness of ANC providers towards providing counseling were secondary outcomes. Women's outcomes were measured at baseline and at the end of the 14- to 18-month intervention, by administering questionnaires at the postpartum hospital stay. Self-reported cessation was verified with saliva cotinine. The trial took place between October 03, 2011 and November 29, 2013.

RESULTS

The rate of women who recalled receiving the 5As increased from 14.0% to 33.6% in the intervention group (median rate change, 22.1%), and from 10.8% to 17.0% in the control group (median rate change, 4.6%; P = .001 for the difference in change between groups). The effect of the intervention was larger in Argentina than in Uruguay. The proportion of women who continued smoking during pregnancy was unchanged at follow-up in both groups and the relative difference between groups was not statistically significant (ratio of odds ratios 1.16, 95% CI: 0.98-1.37; P = .086). No significant changes were observed in knowledge, attitudes, and self-confidence of ANC providers.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention showed a moderate effect in increasing the proportion of women who recalled receiving the 5As, with a third of women receiving counseling in more than one visit. However, the frequency of women who smoked until the end of the pregnancy was not significantly reduced by the intervention.

IMPLICATIONS

No implementation trials of smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women have been carried out in Latin American or in middle-income countries where health care systems or capacities may differ. We evaluated a multifaceted strategy designed to increase the frequency of pregnant women who receive brief smoking cessation counseling based on the 5As in Argentina and Uruguay. We found that the intervention showed a moderate effect in increasing the proportion of women receiving the 5As, with a third of women receiving counseling in more than one visit. However, the frequency of women who smoked until the end of the pregnancy was not significantly reduced by the intervention.