1
|
Havermans A, Mallock N, Zervas E, Caillé-Garnier S, Mansuy T, Michel C, Pennings JLA, Schulz T, Schwarze PE, Solimini R, Tassin JP, Vardavas CI, Merino M, Pauwels CGGM, van Nierop LE, Lambré C, Bolling AK. Review of industry reports on EU priority tobacco additives part A: Main outcomes and conclusions. Tob Prev Cessat 2022; 8:27. [PMID: 35860504 PMCID: PMC9255285 DOI: 10.18332/tpc/151529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The European Union Tobacco Products Directive (EU TPD) mandates enhanced reporting obligations for tobacco manufacturers regarding 15 priority additives. Within the Joint Action on Tobacco Control (JATC), a review panel of independent experts was appointed for the scientific evaluation of the additive reports submitted by a consortium of 12 tobacco manufacturers. As required by the TPD, the reports were evaluated based on their comprehensiveness, methodology and conclusions. In addition, we evaluated the chemical, toxicological, addictive, inhalation facilitating and flavoring properties of the priority additives based on the submitted reports, supplemented by the panel's expert knowledge and some independent literature. The industry concluded that none of the additives is associated with concern. Due to significant methodological limitations, we question the scientific validity of these conclusions and conclude that they are not warranted. Our review demonstrates that many issues regarding toxicity, addictiveness and attractiveness of the additives have not been sufficiently addressed, and therefore concerns remain. For example, menthol facilitates inhalation by activation of the cooling receptor TRPM8. The addition of sorbitol and guar gum leads to a significant increase of aldehydes that may contribute to toxicity and addictiveness. Titanium dioxide particles (aerodynamic diameter <10 µm) are legally classified as carcinogenic when inhaled. For diacetyl no report was provided. Overall, the industry reports were not comprehensive, and the information presented provides an insufficient basis for the regulation of most additives. We, therefore, advise MS to consider alternative approaches such as the precautionary principle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Havermans
- Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Nadja Mallock
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany
| | - Efthimios Zervas
- Hellenic Thoracic Society, Athens, Greece.,School of Applied Arts and Sustainable Design, Hellenic Open University, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Thibault Mansuy
- French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Michel
- French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Paris, France
| | - Jeroen L A Pennings
- Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Thomas Schulz
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Miguel Merino
- Andalusia Agency For Agriculture and Fisheries Development, Seville, Spain
| | - Charlotte G G M Pauwels
- Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Lotte E van Nierop
- Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Claude Lambré
- National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bolling AK, Mallock N, Zervas E, Caillé-Garnier S, Mansuy T, Michel C, Pennings JLA, Schulz T, Schwarze PE, Solimini R, Tassin JP, Vardavas C, Merino M, Pauwels CGGM, van Nierop LE, Lambré C, Havermans A. Review of industry reports on EU priority tobacco additives part B: Methodological limitations. Tob Prev Cessat 2022; 8:28. [PMID: 35860505 PMCID: PMC9255286 DOI: 10.18332/tpc/150361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
The Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) defines enhanced reporting obligations applying to 15 priority additives added to cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco. A consortium of 12 international tobacco companies submitted 14 reports that were reviewed by an independent scientific body within the Joint Action on Tobacco Control (JATC). The reports were evaluated in accordance with the TPD with regard to their comprehensiveness, methodology and conclusions. Here we present their significant identified methodological limitations. The toxicological and chemical evaluation in the industry reports was mainly based on comparative testing, which lacks discriminative power for products with high toxicity and variability, like cigarettes. The literature reviews were biased, the comparative chemical studies did not assess previously identified pyrolysis products, the toxicological evaluation did not include the assessment of inhalation toxicity, and pyrolysis products were not assessed in terms of toxicity, including their genotoxic and carcinogenic potential. For both chemistry and toxicity testing, the statistical approach applied to test the difference between test and additive-free control cigarettes resulted in a high chance of false negatives. The clinical study for inhalation facilitation and nicotine uptake had limitations concerning study design and statistical analysis, while addictiveness was not assessed. Finally, the methodology used to assess characterizing flavors was flawed. In conclusion, there are significant limitations in the methodology applied by the industry. Therefore, the provided reports are of insufficient quality and are clearly not suitable to decide whether a priority additive should be banned in tobacco products according to the TPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nadja Mallock
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany
| | - Efthimios Zervas
- Hellenic Thoracic Society, Athens, Greece
- Hellenic Open University, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Thibault Mansuy
- French Agency for Food, Environment and Occupational Health and Safety, France
| | - Cécile Michel
- French Agency for Food, Environment and Occupational Health and Safety, France
| | - Jeroen L. A. Pennings
- Center for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Schulz
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Miguel Merino
- Andalusian Agency for Agriculture and Fisheries, Valencia, Spain
| | - Charlotte G. G. M. Pauwels
- Center for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte E. van Nierop
- Center for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Claude Lambré
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France
| | - Anne Havermans
- Center for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|