Can serial PEF measurements separate occupational asthma from allergic alveolitis?

Occupational asthma in teachers

BACKGROUND

Work-related asthma symptoms are common in teachers and teaching assistants, there are few studies evaluating their causes.

AIMS

To identify causes of occupational asthma in teachers and teaching assistants referred to the Birmingham Occupational Lung Disease clinic 2000-20 using evaluation of serial Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) records.

METHODS

Teachers and teaching assistants with possible occupational asthma were asked to record PEF 2-hourly at home and work for 4 weeks. Their records were evaluated with the Oasys programme. Those with a positive score for any of the three scores (area between curves (ABC), timepoint and Oasys score from discriminant analysis) were included. Repeat records were made as indicated to help identify the cause and the effects of remedial actions.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight teachers or teaching assistants met the inclusion criteria with all three Oasys scores positive in 24, 2/3 scores in nine and 1/3 in five. The building was the likely cause in 17 (in new builds particularly acrylates from carpet adhesives and in old buildings mould and construction dust), bystander exposure to agents in the schools in 12 (cleaning agents, acrylates from photocopiers and chloramines from indoor pools) and materials used in the classroom in 9 (most commonly MDF in design and technology classes). We illustrate how the PEF records helped identify the cause.

CONCLUSIONS

Oasys analysis of PEF records is a useful method of evaluating occupational asthma in teachers and identified difficult to confirm causes where successful remediation or redeployment was achieved.

Occupational respiratory and skin diseases among workers exposed to metalworking fluids

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine respiratory and skin diseases that occur among workers exposed to metalworking fluids (MWFs) used during machining processes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Five cases of a severe and previously unrecognized lung disease characterized by B-cell bronchiolitis and alveolar ductitis with emphysema (BADE) were identified among workers at a machining facility that used MWFs, although MWF exposure could not be confirmed as the etiology. In the United Kingdom, MWF is now the predominant cause of occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Under continuous conditions associated with respiratory disease outbreaks, over a working lifetime of 45 years, workers exposed to MWF at 0.1 mg/m3 are estimated to have a 45.3% risk of acquiring HP or occupational asthma under outbreak conditions and a 3.0% risk assuming outbreak conditions exist in 5% of MWF environments. In addition to respiratory outcomes, skin diseases such as allergic and irritant contact dermatitis persist as frequent causes of occupational disease following MWF exposure.

SUMMARY

Healthcare providers need to consider MWF exposure as a potential cause for work-related respiratory and skin diseases. Additional work is necessary to more definitively characterize any potential association between MWF exposures and BADE. Medical surveillance should be implemented for workers regularly exposed to MWF.

Assessment and Management of Occupational Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

The diagnosis and treatment of occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis (OHP) remain complex and challenging in the absence of diagnostic gold standards or clinical guidelines. This review provides an update of the recent literature regarding the different presentations of OHP and the diagnostic yield and value of the diagnostic tests currently available, which include occupational and medical history, laboratory tests (serum-specific immunoglobulins, environmental sampling), imaging, bronchoalveolar lavage, transbronchial biopsy, transbronchial cryobiopsy, surgical lung biopsy, and specific inhalation challenges. These tools provide a precise differential diagnosis within the framework of interstitial lung diseases. However, among the chronic fibrotic forms, distinguishing OHP from sarcoidosis, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis remains a diagnostic challenge. Avoidance of exposure is pivotal for OHP management, whereas corticosteroids are fundamental in the pharmacological approach to this disease. In addition, studies describing the long-term benefits of immunosuppressive and antifibrotic agents have increased the use of these treatments in OHP.

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis Due to Metalworking Fluid Aerosols

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarises the clinical knowledge of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in workers exposed to aerosols of metalworking fluid, reviewing published outbreaks and clinical cases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Metalworking fluid exposure has become the commonest recognised cause of occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis, having been rare before 2000. There are many possible agents in the metalworking fluid which may be the cause of disease including bacteria, mycobacteria, fungae, biocides, emulsifiers, reodorants and dissolved chrome and cobalt. Causes are likely to be different in different outbreaks. Mycobacteria growing in the metalworking fluid have generated immune responses in some workers, but their role in disease causation is not yet established. Many outbreaks have been identified in large workplaces using common sumps. It is not possible to prevent microbial contamination of metalworking fluids in use. Disease prevention should focus on stopping inhalation of aerosols, particularly by re-engineering to remove recirculation.