1
|
Stenlund S, Mâsse LC, Stenlund D, Sillanmäki L, Appelt KC, Koivumaa-Honkanen H, Rautava P, Suominen S, Patrick DM. Do Patients' Psychosocial Characteristics Impact Antibiotic Prescription Rates? Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1022. [PMID: 37370341 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12061022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Previous research suggests that the characteristics of both patients and physicians can contribute to the overuse of antibiotics. Until now, patients' psychosocial characteristics have not been widely explored as a potential contributor to the overuse of antibiotics. In this study, the relationship between a patient's psychosocial characteristics (self-reported in postal surveys in 2003) and the number of antibiotics they were prescribed (recorded in Finnish national registry data between 2004-2006) were analyzed for 19,300 working-aged Finns. Psychosocial characteristics included life satisfaction, a sense of coherence, perceived stress, hostility, and optimism. In a structural equation model, patients' adverse psychosocial characteristics were not related to increased antibiotic prescriptions in the subsequent three years. However, these characteristics were strongly associated with poor general health status, which in turn was associated with an increased number of subsequent antibiotic prescriptions. Furthermore, mediation analysis showed that individuals who used healthcare services more frequently also received more antibiotic prescriptions. The current study does not support the view that patients' adverse psychosocial characteristics are related to an increased number of antibiotic prescriptions. This could encourage physicians to actively discuss treatment options with their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Säde Stenlund
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland
- Research Services, Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Louise C Mâsse
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - David Stenlund
- Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, 20500 Turku, Finland
| | - Lauri Sillanmäki
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland
- Research Services, Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kirstin C Appelt
- Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
| | - Heli Koivumaa-Honkanen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine (Psychiatry), University of Eastern Finland, 70029 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Päivi Rautava
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland
- Research Services, Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Sakari Suominen
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland
- Research Services, Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland
- School of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, 54128 Skövde, Sweden
| | - David M Patrick
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bizune D, Tsay S, Palms D, King L, Bartoces M, Link-Gelles R, Fleming-Dutra K, Hicks LA. Regional Variation in Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in a Commercially Insured Population, United States, 2017. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofac584. [PMID: 36776774 PMCID: PMC9905267 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Studies have shown that the Southern United States has higher rates of outpatient antibiotic prescribing rates compared with other regions in the country, but the reasons for this variation are unclear. We aimed to determine whether the regional variability in outpatient antibiotic prescribing for respiratory diagnoses can be explained by differences in prescriber clinical factors found in a commercially insured population. Methods We analyzed the 2017 IBM MarketScan Commercial Database of commercially insured individuals aged <65 years. We included visits with acute respiratory tract infection (ARTI) diagnoses from retail clinics, urgent care centers, emergency departments, and physician offices. ARTI diagnoses were categorized based on antibiotic indication. We calculated risk ratios and 95% CIs stratified by ARTI tier and region using log-binomial models controlling for patient age, comorbidities, care setting, prescriber type, and diagnosis. Results Of the 14.9 million ARTI visits, 40% received an antibiotic. The South had the highest proportion of visits with an antibiotic prescription (43%), and the West the lowest (34%). ARTI visits in the South are 34% more likely receive an antibiotic for rarely antibiotic-appropriate ARTI visits when compared with the West in multivariable modeling (relative risk, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.33-1.34). Conclusions It is likely that higher antibiotic prescribing in the South is in part due to nonclinical factors such as regional differences in clinicians' prescribing habits and patient expectations. There is a need for future studies to define and characterize these factors to better inform regional and local stewardship interventions and achieve greater health equity in antibiotic prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Destani Bizune
- Correspondence: Destani Bizume, MPH, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Mailstop H16-2, Atlanta, GA 30329 ()
| | - Sharon Tsay
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Danielle Palms
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Laura King
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Monina Bartoces
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ruth Link-Gelles
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Katherine Fleming-Dutra
- National Center for Immunization and Emerging Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Effects of social norm feedback on antibiotic prescribing and its characteristics in behaviour change techniques: a mixed-methods systematic review. THE LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2022; 23:e175-e184. [PMID: 36521504 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00720-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Low-cost and low-barrier antibiotic stewardship strategies are urgently needed to deal with the widespread problem of antibiotic resistance. Social norm feedback could be a promising strategy. In this mixed-methods systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42022361039), we aimed to identify the key behaviour change techniques used in social norm feedback for antibiotic stewardship and assess their effectiveness in reducing antibiotic prescribing. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus for peer-reviewed studies published between Jan 1, 2000, and Jan 20, 2022. 3547 studies were screened, of which 23 studies reporting the effects of social norm feedback interventions on antibiotic prescribing met the inclusion criteria. 19 behaviour change techniques were tested in the included studies. The meta-analyses showed that social norm feedback is an effective strategy for reducing antibiotic prescribing, with an overall rate difference of 4% (p<0·0001). The behaviour change technique with the highest effective ratio (ER=13) was information about health consequences, followed by instruction on how to perform the behaviour (ER=9) and adding objects to the environment (ER=9). Social norm feedback is a promising strategy to reduce antibiotic prescribing, and can be incorporated into the clinical decision-making support system.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kassamali Escobar Z, Thomasson S, Bouchard T, Kvak S, Lee KM, Lansang JM, Lynch JB, May L, D’Angeli M, Bryson-Cahn C. Experience with two antimicrobial prescribing tools in ambulatory care settings. ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP & HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY : ASHE 2022; 2:e141. [PMID: 36483410 PMCID: PMC9726541 DOI: 10.1017/ash.2022.278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
We compared experiences with The Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infection for Adult and Children in Emergency Department and Urgent Care Settings versus Choosing Wisely to evaluate inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing in ambulatory care. Both identified the same clinics, diagnoses, and antibiotics for high-yield antibiotic stewardship interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Kassamali Escobar
- University of Washington Medicine, Valley Medical Center Renton, Washington
- University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington
| | - Scott Thomasson
- University of Washington Medicine, Valley Medical Center Renton, Washington
| | - Todd Bouchard
- University of Washington Medicine, Valley Medical Center Renton, Washington
| | - Staci Kvak
- University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kyung Min Lee
- University of Washington Medicine, Valley Medical Center Renton, Washington
| | - Jose Mari Lansang
- University of Washington Medicine, Valley Medical Center Renton, Washington
| | - John B. Lynch
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Larissa May
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California–Davis Health, Sacramento, California
| | - Marisa D’Angeli
- Healthcare Associated Infections Program, Washington State Department of Health, Shoreline, Washington
| | - Chloe Bryson-Cahn
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amin AN, Dellinger EP, Harnett G, Kraft BD, LaPlante KL, LoVecchio F, McKinnell JA, Tillotson G, Valentine S. It's about the patients: Practical antibiotic stewardship in outpatient settings in the United States. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:901980. [PMID: 35966853 PMCID: PMC9363693 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.901980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibiotic-resistant pathogens cause over 35,000 preventable deaths in the United States every year, and multiple strategies could decrease morbidity and mortality. As antibiotic stewardship requirements are being deployed for the outpatient setting, community providers are facing systematic challenges in implementing stewardship programs. Given that the vast majority of antibiotics are prescribed in the outpatient setting, there are endless opportunities to make a smart and informed choice when prescribing and to move the needle on antibiotic stewardship. Antibiotic stewardship in the community, or "smart prescribing" as we suggest, should factor in antibiotic efficacy, safety, local resistance rates, and overall cost, in addition to patient-specific factors and disease presentation, to arrive at an appropriate therapy. Here, we discuss some of the challenges, such as patient/parent pressure to prescribe, lack of data or resources for implementation, and a disconnect between guidelines and real-world practice, among others. We have assembled an easy-to-use best practice guide for providers in the outpatient setting who lack the time or resources to develop a plan or consult lengthy guidelines. We provide specific suggestions for antibiotic prescribing that align real-world clinical practice with best practices for antibiotic stewardship for two of the most common bacterial infections seen in the outpatient setting: community-acquired pneumonia and skin and soft-tissue infection. In addition, we discuss many ways that community providers, payors, and regulatory bodies can make antibiotic stewardship easier to implement and more streamlined in the outpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alpesh N. Amin
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | | | - Glenn Harnett
- No Resistance Consulting, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Bryan D. Kraft
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Kerry L. LaPlante
- College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, United States
| | - Frank LoVecchio
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Valleywise Health, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - James A. McKinnell
- Infectious Disease Clinical Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Infectious Disease, Lundquist Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Antibiotic stewardship to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in integrated academic health-system urgent care clinics. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022; 44:736-745. [DOI: 10.1017/ice.2022.164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective:
To develop and implement antibiotic stewardship activities in urgent care targeting non–antibiotic-appropriate acute respiratory tract infections (ARIs) that also reduces overall antibiotic prescribing and maintains patient satisfaction.
Patients and setting:
Patients and clinicians at the urgent care clinics of an integrated academic health system.
Intervention and methods:
The stewardship activities started in fiscal 2020 and included measure development, comparative feedback, and clinician and patient education. We measured antibiotic prescribing in fiscal years 2019, 2020, and 2021 for the stewardship targets, potential diagnosis-shifting visits, and overall. We also collected patient satisfaction data for ARI visits.
Results:
From FY19 to FY21, 576,609 patients made 1,358,816 visits to 17 urgent care clinics, including 105,781 visits for which stewardship measures were applied and 149,691 visits for which diagnosis shifting measures were applied. The antibiotic prescribing rate decreased for stewardship-measure visits from 34% in FY19 to 12% in FY21 (absolute change, −22%; 95% confidence interval [CI], −23% to −22%). The antibiotic prescribing rate decreased for diagnosis-shifting visits from 63% to 35% (−28%; 95% CI, −28% to −27%), and the antibiotic prescribing rate decreased overall from 30% to 10% (−20%; 95% CI, −20% to −20%). The patient satisfaction rate increased from 83% in FY19 to 89% in FY20 and FY21. There was no significant association between antibiotic prescribing rates of individual clinicians and ARI visit patient satisfaction.
Conclusions:
Although it was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, an ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship program that focused on improving non–antibiotic-appropriate ARI prescribing was associated with decreased prescribing for (1) the stewardship target, (2) a diagnosis shifting measure, and (3) overall antibiotic prescribing. Patient satisfaction at ARI visits increased over time and was not associated with clinicians’ antibiotic prescribing rates.
Collapse
|
7
|
Yau JW, Thor SM, Tsai D, Speare T, Rissel C. Antimicrobial stewardship in rural and remote primary health care: a narrative review. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2021; 10:105. [PMID: 34256853 PMCID: PMC8278763 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-021-00964-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial resistance is an emerging problem worldwide and poses a significant threat to human health. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes are being implemented in health systems globally, primarily in hospitals, to address the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance. Despite the significance of primary health care services in providing health care to communities, antimicrobial stewardship programmes are not well established in this sector, especially in rural and remote settings. This narrative review aims to identify in rural and remote primary health care settings the (1) correlation of antimicrobial resistance with antibiotic prescribing and volume of antibiotic use, (2) appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing, (3) risk factors associated with inappropriate use/prescribing of antibiotics, and (4) effective antimicrobial stewardship strategies. METHODS The international literature was searched for English only articles between 2000 and 2020 using specified keywords. Seven electronic databases were searched: Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed, Ovid Medline and Ovid Emcare. Publication screening and analysis were conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute systematic review tools. RESULTS Fifty-one eligible articles were identified. Inappropriate and excessive antimicrobial prescribing and use directly led to increases in antimicrobial resistance. Increasing rurality of practice is associated with disproportionally higher rates of inappropriate prescribing compared to those in metropolitan areas. Physician knowledge, attitude and behaviour play important roles in mediating antimicrobial prescribing, with strong intrinsic and extrinsic influences including patient factors. Antimicrobial stewardship strategies in rural and remote primary health care settings focus on health care provider and patient education, clinician support systems, utility of antimicrobial resistance surveillance, and policy changes. Results of these interventions were generally positive with decreased antimicrobial resistance rates and improved appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing. CONCLUSIONS Inappropriate prescribing and excessive use of antimicrobials are an important contributor to the increasing resistance towards antimicrobial agents particularly in rural and remote primary health care. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes in the form of education, clinical support, surveillance, and policies have been mostly successful in reducing prescribing rates and inappropriate prescriptions. The narrative review highlighted the need for longer interventions to assess changes in antimicrobial resistance rates. The review also identified a lack of differentiation between rural and remote contexts and Indigenous health was inadequately addressed. Future research should have a greater focus on effective interventional components and patient perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Wern Yau
- Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
| | - Sze Mun Thor
- Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
| | - Danny Tsai
- Flinders University- Rural and Remote Health NT, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, NT, 0810, Australia
- Alice Springs Hospital, Central Australian Health Service, Alice Springs, NT, 0870, Australia
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Tobias Speare
- Flinders University- Rural and Remote Health NT, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, NT, 0810, Australia
- Alice Springs Hospital, Central Australian Health Service, Alice Springs, NT, 0870, Australia
| | - Chris Rissel
- Flinders University- Rural and Remote Health NT, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, NT, 0810, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wattles BA, Vidwan NK, Feygin Y, Jawad KS, Creel LM, Smith MJ. Antibiotic prescribing to Kentucky Medicaid children, 2012-2017: Prescribing is higher in rural areas. THE JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN RURAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION AND THE NATIONAL RURAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION 2021; 38:427-432. [PMID: 33978987 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Antibiotic resistance is a major public health threat. Antibiotic use is the main driver of resistance, with children and the state of Kentucky having particularly high rates of outpatient antibiotic prescribing. The purpose of this study was to describe patient and provider characteristics associated with pediatric antibiotic use in Kentucky Medicaid children. METHODS We used Medicaid prescription claims data from 2012 to 2017 to describe patterns of pediatric antibiotic receipt in Kentucky. Patient and provider variables were analyzed to identify variations in prescribing. FINDINGS Children who were female, less than 2 years old, White, and living in a rural area had consistently higher rates of antibiotic prescriptions. There was significant geographic variability in prescribing, with children in Eastern Kentucky receiving more than 3 courses of antibiotics a year. Most antibiotic prescriptions for children were written by general practitioners and nurse practitioners rather than pediatricians. CONCLUSION These findings support the need for extensive antibiotic stewardship efforts inclusive of rural outpatient practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany A Wattles
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Navjyot K Vidwan
- Norton Children's and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Yana Feygin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Kahir S Jawad
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Liza M Creel
- School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Michael J Smith
- Duke University Medical Center, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huang Z, Weng Y, Ang H, Chow A. Determinants of antibiotic over-prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections in an emergency department with good primary care access: a quantitative analysis. J Hosp Infect 2021; 113:71-76. [PMID: 33891986 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) account for the highest proportion of non-urgent visits to the emergency department (ED), resulting in unnecessary antibiotic use. AIM This study sought to understand the determinants of antibiotic prescribing for URTI among 130 junior physicians in a busy adult ED in Singapore. METHODS Forty-four Likert-scale statements were developed with reference to a prior qualitative study, followed by an anonymous cross-sectional survey among ED junior physicians. Data analysis was performed with factor reduction and multivariable logistic regression. FINDINGS One-in-six (16.9%) physicians were high antibiotic prescribers (self-reported antibiotic prescribing rate of >30% of URTI patients). After adjusting for place of medical education and years of practice as a physician, perceived over-prescribing of antibiotics in the ED (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.15, 4.86), P=0.019) and perceived compliance with the antibiotic prescribing practices in the ED (adjusted OR 2.10, 95% CI (1.02, 4.30), P=0.043) were positively associated with high antibiotic prescribing. In contrast, high antibiotic prescribers were 6.67 times (95% CI (1.67, 25.0), P=0.007) less likely to treat and manage patients with URTI symptomatically and 7.12 times (95% CI (1.28, 39.66), P=0.025) more likely to depend on diagnostic tests to prescribe antibiotics than the regular antibiotic prescribers. CONCLUSION Organizational-related factors (organizational norms and culture) were strong determinants of antibiotic prescribing practices for uncomplicated URTI in the ED. Other contributing factors include diagnostic uncertainty and knowledge gaps. Role-modelling of institutional best practice norms and clinical decision support tools based on local epidemiology can optimize antibiotic prescribing in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Huang
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge [OCEAN], Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Y Weng
- Department Emergency Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - H Ang
- Department Emergency Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - A Chow
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge [OCEAN], Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Livorsi DJ, Nair R, Dysangco A, Aylward A, Alexander B, Smith MW, Kouba S, Perencevich EN. Using Audit and Feedback to Improve Antimicrobial Prescribing in Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Study in the Veterans Health Administration. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8:ofab186. [PMID: 34113685 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In this pilot trial, we evaluated whether audit-and-feedback was a feasible strategy to improve antimicrobial prescribing in emergency departments (EDs). Methods We evaluated an audit-and-feedback intervention using a quasi-experimental interrupted time-series design at 2 intervention and 2 matched-control EDs; there was a 12-month baseline, 1-month implementation, and 11-month intervention period. At intervention sites, clinicians received (1) a single, one-on-one education about antimicrobial prescribing for common infections and (2) individualized feedback on total and condition-specific (uncomplicated acute respiratory infection [ARI]) antimicrobial use with peer-to-peer comparisons at baseline and every quarter. The primary outcome was the total antimicrobial-prescribing rate for all visits and was assessed using generalized linear models. In an exploratory analysis, we measured antimicrobial use for uncomplicated ARI visits and manually reviewed charts to assess guideline-concordant management for 6 common infections. Results In the baseline and intervention periods, intervention sites had 28 016 and 23 164 visits compared to 33 077 and 28 835 at control sites. We enrolled 27 of 31 (87.1%) eligible clinicians; they acknowledged receipt of 33.3% of feedback e-mails. Intervention sites compared with control sites had no absolute reduction in their total antimicrobial rate (incidence rate ratio = 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.01). At intervention sites, antimicrobial use for uncomplicated ARIs decreased (68.6% to 42.4%; P < .01) and guideline-concordant management improved (52.1% to 72.5%; P < .01); these improvements were not seen at control sites. Conclusions At intervention sites, total antimicrobial use did not decrease, but an exploratory analysis showed reduced antimicrobial prescribing for viral ARIs. Future studies should identify additional targets for condition-specific feedback while exploring ways to make electronic feedback more acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Livorsi
- Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Rajeshwari Nair
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Andrew Dysangco
- Indiana University School of Medicine and the Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Andrea Aylward
- Sioux Falls VA Health Care System, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
| | - Bruce Alexander
- Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Matthew W Smith
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Sammantha Kouba
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Eli N Perencevich
- Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Finding the path of least resistance: Locally adapting the MITIGATE toolkit in emergency departments and urgent care centers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021; 42:1376-1378. [PMID: 33602365 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.1394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The MITIGATE toolkit was developed to assist urgent care and emergency departments in the development of antimicrobial stewardship programs. At the University of Washington, we adopted the MITIGATE toolkit in 10 urgent care centers, 9 primary care clinics, and 1 emergency department. We encountered and overcame challenges: a complex data build, choosing feasible outcomes to measure, issues with accurate coding, and maintaining positive stewardship relationships. Herein, we discuss solutions to challenges we encountered to provide guidance for those considering using this toolkit.
Collapse
|