Interpretation of Discordant Rifampicin Susceptibility Test Results Obtained Using GeneXpert vs Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility Testing

Multi-centric evaluation of Truenat MTB and MTB-RIF Dx assays for diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis

Extra-pulmonary TB (EPTB) is difficult to diagnose due to paucibacillary nature of disease. Current study evaluated accuracy of Truenat MTB and MTB-Rif Dx (TN), for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance to rifampicin. Samples were collected from 2103 treatment naive adults with presumptive EPTB, and tested by smear microscopy, liquid culture (LC) (MGIT-960) and GeneXpert MTB/RIF (GX) (Microbiological Reference Standards, MRS). TN results were compared to MRS and Composite Reference Standards (CRS, Microbiology, histopathology, radiology, clinical features prompting decision to treat, response to treatment). CRS grouped patients into 551 confirmed, 1096 unconfirmed, and 409 as unlikely TB. TN sensitivity and specificity was 73.7% and 90.4% against GX. Against LC, Overall sensitivity of GX was 67.6%, while that of TN was 62.3%. Highest sensitivity by TN was observed in pus samples (89%) and highest specificity (92%) in CSF samples, similar to GX. TN sensitivity was better in fluid and biopsy samples and slightly inferior for lymph node aspirates compared to GX. TN sensitivity for RIF resistance detection was slightly superior to GX. TN and GX results were further compared to Clinical Reference Standards. TN detected 170 TB patients initiated on treatment missed by GX, while GX detected 113 such patients missed by TN. Of 124 samples with RIF resistance discordance between GX and TN, GX reported 103/124 as sensitive, 3/124 as indeterminate and 18 as resistant (13/18 samples had low/very low DNA load) while TN reported RIF resistance indeterminate in 103/111 low/very low DNA load samples. Due to paucibacillary nature of EPTB samples, culture yield was poor and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing failed to resolve the discordance. The study establishes TN at par with GX and can be utilized for quick and accurate diagnosis of EPTB.

Factors influencing false-positive results of rifampicin resistance detected by Xpert MTB/RIF: A retrospective study in Zhejiang, China

Objective

This study aimed to explore the factors influencing false-positive results for rifampicin resistance (RIF-R) detected using Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert).

Methods

This retrospective analysis included the clinical data of patients from September 2019 to February 2023. The chi-square and rank sum tests were used to compare differences in patient characteristics between the true-positive and false-positive groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors influencing false positives in the detection of RIF-R by Xpert.

Results

A total of 384 patients were included. Logistic regression analysis revealed that, with mutation of probe E as the reference, mutations on probe A or C (OR = 72.68, P < 0.001), probe D (OR = 6.44, P < 0.001), and multiple probes (OR = 5.94, P = 0.002) were associated with false-positive results in Xpert detection of RIF-R. Taking probe delay ΔCt <4 as the reference, ΔCt (4-5.9) (OR = 13.54, P < 0.001), ΔCt (6-7.9) (OR = 48.08, P < 0.001) probe delays were associated with false positives in Xpert detection of RIF-R. When very low quantification is accompanied by a probe delay, the probability of false-positive RIF-R detection can reach 80 %.

Conclusions

Clinicians should consider factors such as probe mutation type, probe delay, and very low quantification accompanied by probe delay when interpreting Xpert results, which can reduce the misdiagnosis of tuberculosis drug resistance.

Discordant results between Xpert MTB/RIF assay and Bactec MGIT 960 culture system regarding the detection of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Wenzhou, China

This study aimed to assess the possible causes of discordant results between Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Bactec MGIT 960 Culture System (MGIT960) regarding rifampicin (RIF) susceptibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Patients with previous RIF-resistant tuberculosis who were admitted to Wenzhou Central Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were enrolled. The isolates obtained from these patients were subjected to RIF susceptibility tests using Xpert and MGIT960, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of RIF was determined by the MYCOTB MIC plate test. Additionally, molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed to evaluate the binding efficacy of rpoB and RIF based on rpoB mutations detected in the isolates with discordant RIF susceptibility results. A total of 28 isolates with discordant RIF susceptibility test results were detected, 15 of them were RIF susceptible with MICs ≤ 0.5 µg/mL. Twelve out of 15 isolates contained borderline RIF resistance-associated mutations [L430P (n = 6), H445N (n = 6)], 1 isolate had D435Y and Q429H double mutation, and the remaining 2 isolates had a silent (Q432Q) mutation. Compared with the affinity of RIF toward the wild type (WT) (-45.83 kcal/mol) by MD, its affinity toward L452P (-55.52 kcal/mol), D435Y (-47.39 kcal/mol), L430P (approximately -69.72 kcal/mol), H445N (-49.53 kcal/mol), and Q429H (-55.67 kcal/mol) increased. Borderline RIF resistance-associated mutations were the main cause for the discordant RIF susceptibility results between Xpert and MGIT960, and the mechanisms of the resistance need further investigated.IMPORTANCEThis study is aimed at assessing discordant results between Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay and Bactec MGIT 960 Culture System (MGIT960) regarding the detection of rifampicin (RIF)-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Wenzhou, China. The discordant results of RIF between these two assays were mainly caused by borderline RIF resistance-associated mutations, subsequently by silent mutations of rpoB. Borderline RIF resistance- associated mutations detected in our study were demonstrated to not be affected by the affinity of rpoB and RIF by molecular dynamics, and the mechanism of resistance was needed to be clarified. For the discordant results of RIF by Xpert and MGIT960 that occurred, rpoB DNA sequencing was recommended to investigate its association with resistance to RIF.

Insidious transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ordos, China: a molecular epidemiology study

BACKGROUND

In this study, we conducted this population-based study to evaluate the genetic diversity and clustering rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) strains using the whole-genome sequencing (WGS), to better understand its transmission in Ordos.

METHODS

All patients with culture-positive TB notified in Ordos from January 2021 to December 2022 were recruited. WGS was performed to analyze single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and to identify genotypic drug susceptibilities of MTB isolates.

RESULTS

Overall, a total of 186 patients were included in the present study, of whom 35 (18.8%) had no symptoms suggestive of active TB. Lineage 2 was the predominant MTB sublineage, accounting for 186 of isolates tested. When the pairwise SNP difference ≤ 12 was used as the cutoff for WGS-based clusters, we identified 17 genotypic clusters, and 38 isolates belonged to these 17 clusters, resulting in a clustering rate of 20.4%. The Beijing genotype was an independent factor associating with genomic-clustering (adjusted OR 4.219, 95% CI 0.962-18.502). The overall sensitivity on WGS-based resistance prediction was 85.7% for rifampicin, 73.1% for isoniazid, 60.0% for Ethambutol, 72.7% for streptomycin, and 72.7% for fluoroquinolones.

CONCLUSION

To conclude, the present study demonstrates the extensive recent transmission of Beijing genotype strains in the community of Ordos. The failure to provide a comprehensive pattern of transmission indicated the missed diagnosis of active TB within the community. A substantial proportion of subclinical TB cases are recognized in the bacteria-positive cases, emphasizing that we must interrupt transmission by finding people with active TB before they infect others.

Accuracy of Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra test for posterior oropharyngeal saliva for the diagnosis of paucibacillary pulmonary tuberculosis: a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Posterior oropharyngeal saliva (POS) is increasingly recognized as an alternative specimen for detecting respiratory pathogens. The accuracy of Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra (X-Ultra), when performed on POS obtained from patients with paucibacillary pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is unclear.

METHODS

We consecutively recruited adults with symptoms suggestive of pulmonary TB who were negative by both smear microscopy and Xpert MTB/RIF (X-Classic). Each participant was required to provide one bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and one POS specimen, respectively. Diagnostic performances of X-Ultra and X-Classic on POS were compared against clinical and mycobacterial reference standards.

FINDINGS

686 participants meeting inclusion criteria were consecutively enrolled into the study. The overall diagnostic sensitivities of X-Ultra and X-Classic on POS samples were 78.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 72.8-83.8] and 56.4% (95% CI: 49.7-62.9), respectively; the specificities were 96.6% (95% CI: 94.3-98.1) for X-Ultra and 97.6 (95CI: 95.5-98.8) for X-Classic in POS specimens. Notably, the sensitivity of X-Ultra on POS was as sensitive as X-Classic on BALF against microbiological reference standard (78.9% VS 73.1%). Against clinical diagnosis as a reference standard, the sensitivities of X-Ultra and X-Classic on POS were 55.9% (95% CI: 50.5-61.2; 193/345) and 40.0% (95% CI: 34.8-45.4; 138/345), respectively. The risk of negative results with POS was dramatically increased with decreasing bacterial loads.

CONCLUSIONS

The testing of POS using X-Ultra shows promise as a tool to identify patients with paucibacillary TB. Considering that bronchoscopy is a semi-invasive procedure, POS testing ahead of bronchoscopy, may decrease the need for bronchoscopic procedures, and the cost of care.

Accuracy of the InnowaveDX MTB/RIF test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: a prospective multicentre study

Early and accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is necessary to initiate proper therapy for the benefit of the patients and to prevent disease transmission in the community. In this study, we developed the InnowaveDX MTB/RIF (InnowaveDX) to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and rifampicin resistance simultaneously. A prospective multicentre study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of InnowaveDX for the detection MTB in sputum samples as compared with Xpert and culture. The calculated limit of detection (LOD) for InnowaveDX was 9.6 CFU/ml for TB detection and 374.9 CFU/ml for RIF susceptibility. None of the other bacteria tested produced signals that fulfilled the positive TB criteria, demonstrating a species-specificity of InnowaveDX. Then 951 individuals were enrolled at 7 hospitals, of which 607 were definite TB cases with positive culture and/or Xpert results, including 354 smear-positive and 253 smear-negative cases. InnowaveDX sensitivity was 92.7% versus bacteriologically TB standard. Further follow-up revealed that 61 (91.0%) out of 67 false-positive patients with no bacteriological evidence met the criteria of clinically diagnosed TB. Among 125 RIF-resistant TB patients diagnosed by Xpert, 108 cases were correctly identified by InnowaveDX, yielding a sensitivity of 86.4%. Additionally, the proportion of very low bacterial load in the discordant susceptibility group was significantly higher than in the concordant susceptibility group (P = 0.029). To conclude, we have developed a novel molecular diagnostic with promising detection capabilities of TB and RIF susceptibility. In addition, the discordant RIF susceptibility results between InnowaveDX and Xpert are more frequently observed in samples with very low bacterial load.

Performance of the MeltPro TB assay as initial test for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis with drug-resistance detection

BACKGROUND

The MeltPro TB assay (MeltPro) is a molecular rapid diagnostic test designed for detecting resistance to antituberculosis drugs. However, the performance of MeltPro as an initial diagnostic test for simultaneously detecting the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and drug resistance has not been evaluated. This study aims to assess the performance of MeltPro as initial diagnostic test for simultaneous detection of MTB and drug resistance in clinical samples from patients with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1283 patients with presumptive PTB from two clinical centers, out of which 875 were diagnosed with PTB. The diagnostic accuracy of MeltPro, Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), and MGIT 960 for PTB detection was evaluated. Rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH), ethambutol (EMB), streptomycin (STR), and fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance were detected using MeltPro, with Xpert and/or the broth microdilution plate method (MYCOTB) results as references.

RESULTS

For the diagnosis of PTB, MeltPro showed a sensitivity of 69.0%, which was similar to Xpert (72.7%; P > 0.05) and higher than MGIT (58.1%; P < 0.001). The specificity of MeltPro was 97.1%, similar to Xpert (98.0%; P > 0.05). In smear-negative patients, MeltPro's sensitivity was 50.9%, similar to Xpert (56.5%; P > 0.05), and higher than MGIT (33.1%; P < 0.001). Based on Xpert and/or MYCOTB results, MeltPro exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 98.3% and 99.2%, respectively, for detecting RIF resistance. Based on MYCOTB results, MeltPro's sensitivity for detecting resistance to INH, EMB, STR, and FQ was 96.4%, 89.1%, 97.5%, and 90.3%, respectively, with specificities of 96.0%, 96.0%, 95.2%, and 99.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The MeltPro TB assay could potentially be an effective alternative as the initial test for rapid diagnosis of PTB with drug-resistance detection in clinical practice.

Analysis of Xpert MTB/RIF results in retested patients with very low initial bacterial loads: A retrospective study in China

BACKGROUND

The Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay has been widely used to diagnose suspected active tuberculosis (TB) and rifampicin-resistant TB cases. Despite its excellent performance record, false-positive Xpert rifampicin (RIF) resistance results are obtained for specimens with extremely low bacterial loads.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to study the feasibility of repeat Xpert testing as a strategy for reducing the odds of obtaining false-positive results when testing paucibacillary TB patients.

METHODS

We enrolled previously tested TB patients with very low initial bacterial loads from May 2016 to February 2022 for Xpert retesting. A total of 251 TB patients were retested using the Xpert assay.

RESULTS

RIF resistance was noted in 65 (25.9 %) patients when tested by Xpert at initial diagnosis. Only 107 (42.6 %) of 251 patients tested positive for MTB when retested via Xpert. The majority (98.6 %) of RIF-susceptible cases were still susceptible to RIF when retested. Initial Xpert testing yielded 35 positive results for MTB in the RIF-resistant group, of whom 25 (71.4 %) still exhibited RIF resistance when retested. All culture-positive MTB isolates in the RIF-susceptible group were also RIF-susceptible by phenotypic DST. In the RIF-resistant group, 10 of 14 culture-positive MTB isolates exhibited RIF resistance, of which 4 isolates were deemed RIF-susceptible by phenotypic DST. The proportion of double mutations within the MTB rpoB RRDR sequence, as detected by hybridization of Xpert D and E probes, was significantly higher in the RIF-susceptible group than in the RIF-susceptible group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that initial RIF-susceptible results were more accurate than RIF-resistant results. Additionally, patients with double mutations that delayed probe D/E hybridization were more likely to have false-positive Xpert results. Our findings emphasize that repeat Xpert MTB/RIF testing is necessary for TB patients with extremely low bacterial loads who are at high risk for RIF-resistant TB.

The Practical Value of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in a High Tuberculosis Burden Setting: a Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Due to the probability of decreased specificity, the practical value of performing the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) assay over the Xpert assay for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and rifampicin (RIF) resistance in a high TB burden setting was evaluated. Participants were recruited consecutively in three tertiary hospitals in China and allocated to the TB case detection and/or rifampicin (RIF) resistance detection group. Each sputum specimen was subjected to smear, MGIT960 liquid culture, and Xpert, and Xpert Ultra assay in parallel. Drug susceptibility testing was conducted for all recovered isolates in the RIF resistance detection group. In total, 1,079 patients were recruited to the case detection group and 450 to the RIF resistance detection group. Xpert Ultra had higher sensitivity than Xpert (92.26%, 322/349 versus 89.40%, 312/349; P = 0.006), whereas the most prominent increase was identified in the smear-negative patients (83.70% versus 78.52%; P = 0.039). The specificity of Xpert Ultra was slightly lower than that of Xpert (96.30%, 495/514 versus 98.25%, 505/514; P = 0.055). Reclassifying trace results as negative resulted in a 4.01% loss of sensitivity (from 92.26% to 88.25%) accompanied by a 1.37% gain in specificity (from 96.30% to 97.67%). Both the sensitivity (97.64% versus 99.21%, P = 0.313) and specificity (96.90% versus 97.21%, P = 0.816) of Xpert Ultra and Xpert for detection RIF resistance were comparable. In conclusion, Xpert Ultra could improve the diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary TB in contrast to the Xpert assay. A high percentage of TB history did not significantly decrease the specificity of the test, which supports the potential role of Xpert Ultra as an initial diagnostic tool for TB. IMPORTANCE Xpert Ultra is more sensitive than Xpert, especially in smear-negative TB. A high percentage of TB history in the non-TB population did not significantly affect the reliability of the assay, which supports the potential role of Xpert Ultra as an initial diagnostic tool for TB.

Differential Impact of the rpoB Mutant on Rifampin and Rifabutin Resistance Signatures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Is Revealed Using a Whole-Genome Sequencing Assay

Drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) has long been a serious health issue worldwide. Most drug-resistant MTB isolates were identified due to treatment failure or in clinical examinations 3~6 months postinfection. In this study, we propose a whole-genome sequencing (WGS) pipeline via the Nanopore MinION platform to facilitate the efficacy of phenotypic identification of clinical isolates. We used the Nanopore MinION platform to perform WGS of clinical MTB isolates, including susceptible (n = 30) and rifampin- (RIF) or rifabutin (RFB)-resistant isolates (n = 20) according to results of a susceptibility test. Nonsynonymous variants within the rpoB gene associated with RIF resistance were identified using the WGS analytical pipeline. In total, 131 variants within the rpoB gene in RIF-resistant isolates were identified. The presence of the emergent Asp531Gly or His445Gln was first identified to be associated with the rifampin and rifabutin resistance signatures of clinical isolates. The results of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test further indicated that the Ser450Leu or the mutant within the rifampin resistance-determining region (RRDR)-associated rifabutin-resistant signature was diminished in the presence of novel mutants, including Phe669Val, Leu206Ile, or Met148Leu, identified in this study.

IMPORTANCE Current approaches to diagnose drug-resistant MTB are time-consuming, consequently leading to inefficient intervention or further disease transmission. In this study, we curated lists of coding variants associated with differential rifampin and rifabutin resistant signatures using a single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing platform with a shorter hands-on time. Accordingly, the emerging WGS pipeline constitutes a potential platform for efficacious and accurate diagnosis of drug-resistant MTB isolates.

Doubled Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Isolation as a Consequence of Changes in the Diagnosis Algorithm

Background

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and their associated diseases remain neglected. Through minor modifications in our diagnostic algorithm, we observed an unexpected higher number of cultivable NTM isolates. Therefore, a retrospective study was performed thoroughly to investigate the effect of changed laboratory procedures on NTM isolation in a specialized tuberculosis hospital.

Methods

NTM isolation rates and composition of NTM species were compared for the two diagnostic algorithms: (1) by using traditional p-nitrobenzoic acid (PNB) selective medium as a preliminary test to identify NTM isolates among the positive cultures (procedure I) and (2) by using the MPT64 antigen detection method to distinguish between Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) isolates and possible NTM isolates after a positive MGIT960 liquid culture (procedure II).

Results

The NTM isolation rate in procedure II was significantly higher than the procedure I (18.08% vs 9.71%; P<0.001). A noticeable increase in the ratio of NTM isolates among the identified mycobacteria was observed over the studied years (ie, from 58.18% in 2019 to 72.93% in 2021), which indicated a more precise prescription of species identification test after prompt information was provided in procedure II. In addition, the consistency of the identified species using multiple specimens from the same patient did not present a significant difference between the procedures.

Conclusion

According to our study, NTM infection might be far more underestimated than it is. A diagnostic procedure combining MGIT960 culture and MPT64 antigen detection could timely and easily identify clues of NTM isolates and improve the diagnosis of NTM infections.

Reevaluating Rifampicin Breakpoint Concentrations for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates with Disputed rpoB Mutations and Discordant Susceptibility Phenotypes

In this study, rifampicin resistance breakpoints based on MICs of disrupted rpoB mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) were explored using the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) system and microplate alamarBlue assay (MABA). Sixty-one MTB isolates with disputed low-level rifampicin resistance-associated rpoB mutations and 40 RIF-susceptible wild-type isolates were included. Among the 61 resistant isolates, 25 (41.0%) had MICs ≥2.0 mg/L via MABA, while 16 (26.2%) were identified as RIF resistant via MGIT. Epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values obtained using MABA and MGIT were 0.25 and 0.125 mg/L, respectively. Based on 0.125 mg/L as a tentative critical concentration (CC), MABA RIF resistance-detection sensitivity was 93.4%, prompting the reduction of the MGIT CC to 0.125 mg/L, given that only a single isolate (1.6%) with the borderline mutation would be misclassified as susceptible to RIF based on this CC. Based on DNA sequencing of RRDR as the gold standard, the diagnostic accuracy of MGIT (99.0%) was significantly higher than that of MABA (91.1%). MICs of Leu⁵¹¹Pro mutant isolates were negatively correlated with time to liquid culture positivity (TTP) in our analysis (R = 0.957, P < 0.01). In conclusion, our results demonstrated missed detection of a high proportion of rifampicin-resistant isolates based on the WHO-endorsed CC. Such missed detections would be avoided by reducing the optimal MGIT RIF CC to 0.125 mg/L. In addition, MGIT based on reduced CC outperformed MABA in detecting borderline RIF resistance, with MABA MIC results obtained for isolates with the same mutation correlating with MTB growth rate.

IMPORTANCE Tuberculosis (TB) is still one of the world's leading infectious disease killers. The early and accurate diagnosis of RIF resistance is necessary to deliver timely and appropriate treatment for TB patients and improve their clinical outcome. Actually, a proportion of MTB isolates with disputed rpoB mutations present a diagnostic dilemma between Xpert and phenotypical drug susceptibility testing (pDST). Recently, WHO reported a pragmatic approach by lowering critical concentration (CC) to boost sensitivity of resistance detection of pDST. Therefore, a detailed analysis of the association between RIF susceptibility and disrupted mutations within rpoB gene would lay a foundation to assess the diagnostic accuracy of pDST with lowering RIF CC. In this study, we aim to determine the MICs of MTB isolates with disrupted mutations by MGIT and microplate alamarBlue assay (MABA). We also aimed to determine the optimal breakpoints for MTB isolates with these mutations.

Dependence of Xpert MTB/RIF Accuracy for Detecting Rifampin Resistance in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid on Bacterial Load: A Retrospective Study in Beijing, China

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the effect of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) bacterial load on Xpert MTB/RIF accuracy for detection of rifampicin (RIF)-resistant MTB in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimens obtained at a national tuberculosis (TB) specialized hospital in Beijing, China.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at Beijing Chest Hospital. Patients with symptoms suggestive of pulmonary TB who provided BALF specimens for routine MTB detection between June 2019 and July 2020 were enrolled in the study. Chi-square test and Student's t-test were used to compare results across groups stratified according to BALF bacterial load.

RESULTS

In total, 1125 patients with positive Xpert results who were enrolled in final analysis, 263 provided BALF specimens that tested positive for RIF-resistant MTB via Xpert MTB/RIF. The RIF-resistance rate of specimens with very low MTB bacterial load was 30.9%, a resistance rate significantly greater than rates obtained for groups with high (25.0%), medium (17.3%) and low (19.2%) MTB loads (P<0.01). Notably, false-positive results obtained for the very low bacterial load group led to markedly reduced positive predictive value of Xpert MTB/RIF to provide correct RIF-resistance predictions for that group (67.1%, 95% CI: 56.1%-78.1%5) relative to the predictive value obtained for all other groups combined (about 90%, P<0.05). Sanger sequencing data obtained for 20 (32.8%) MTB isolates deemed RIF-resistant via Xpert (Probe E) lacked rpoB RRDR mutations. Meanwhile, of another group of 23 isolates deemed RIF-susceptible via DST but RIF-resistant via Xpert MTB/RIF, 20 isolate sequences (87.0%) lacked rpoB RRDR mutations, while sequences of the remaining 3 isolates harbored single rpoB RRDR mutations predicted to cause amino acid substitutions.

CONCLUSION

Xpert MTB/RIF assay performed alarmingly poorly when used to detect RIF-resistant MTB in BALF specimens with very low bacterial loads. A high rate of Xpert probe E hybridization failure was the main driver of false-positive RIF-resistant results.

Discordance of the Repeat GeneXpert MTB/RIF Test for Rifampicin Resistance Detection Among Patients Initiating MDR-TB Treatment in Uganda

BACKGROUND

The Global Laboratory Initiative (GLI) guidelines recommend repeat for GeneXpertMTB/RIF (XpertMTB/RIF) in patients with a low pretest probability of rifampicin resistance (RR).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study using results of sputum specimens collected from participants screened for the STREAM 2 trial. We recruited all patients with XpertMTB/RIF RR-TB detected who were referred for RR/multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB treatment initiation at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, between September 2017 and October 2019. At baseline, smear microscopy, repeat XpertMTB/RIF, Xpert Ultra, and MTBDRplus assays were done on sputum specimens. Culture-based drug susceptibility testing (DST) was performed on discordant specimens. We analyzed the prevalence and factors associated with discordance between initial and repeat XpertMTB/RIF RR and false XpertMTB/RIF RR. False XpertMTB/RIF RR was defined as no RR detected by any of Xpert Ultra, LPA, or culture DST (reference comparator).

RESULTS

A total of 126/130 patients had repeat XpertMTB/RIF results, of whom 97 (77.0%) had M. tuberculosis detected, 81 (83.5%) had RR detected, and 1 (1.0%) had RR indeterminate. The prevalence of discordant XpertMTB/RIF RR was 15/96 (15.6%), whereas false XpertMTB/RIF RR prevalence was 10/96 (10.4%).Low-bacillary load sputum specimens were more likely to have discordant XpertMTB/RIF RR and false XpertMTB/RIF RR results (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00-0.37; P = .01; aOR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.35; P = .01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show a high false-positive rifampicin resistance rate in low-TB burden patients, which calls for repeat testing in order to prevent unnecessary prescription of anti-MDR-TB therapy.

Comparative in vitro susceptibility of a novel fluoroquinolone antibiotic candidate WFQ-228, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

OBJECTIVE

WFQ-228 is a novel developed fluoroquinolone (FQ) displaying potent antimicrobial activity against various clinical isolates of pathogens, including FQ-resistant isolates. The aim was to comparatively analyze in vitro susceptibilities of WFQ-228, levofloxacin (LFX), and moxifloxacin (MFX) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) isolates, especially with gyrA mutations.

METHODS

We selected a panel of 75 MTB isolates, consisting of 25 FQ-susceptible and 50 FQ-resistant isolates determined by conventional drug susceptibility testing. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of FQs to MTB isolates were assessed.

RESULTS

MFX exhibited the most potent activity against FQ-susceptible MTB, demonstrating a MIC₅₀ of 0.031 mg/L, which was lower than that of LFX and WFQ-228. Against FQ-resistant MTB isolates, the MIC₅₀ of WFQ-228 was higher than that of MFX but lower than that of LFX. For WFQ-228, there was a significant overlap existing in the MIC distributions between the probable susceptible (PS) and probable resistant (PR) groups. Six out of 50 PR isolates were classified as susceptible based on a proposed critical concentration (CC) of 0.5 mg/L, yielding a poor sensitivity of 88.0%. These discordant isolates had GyrA substitution in Ala90Val, Ser91Pro, and Asp94Tyr. Additionally, MFX exhibited bactericidal activity against MTB isolates without gyrA mutations, which was significantly higher than that of isolates with gyrA mutations.

CONCLUSION

WFQ-228 is more efficacious than LFX in isolates with specific mutations conferring low-level FQ resistance. The bactericidal effect is noted more frequently in FQ-susceptible isolates than FQ-resistant isolates for MFX.

On the Consequences of Poorly Defined Breakpoints for Rifampin Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex

In a recent report of a systematic review of critical concentrations (CCs), the World Health Organization (WHO) lowered the rifampin (RIF) CC for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex using Middlebrook 7H10 medium and the Bactec Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 system from 1 to 0.5 μg/ml. The previous RIF CC for 7H10 had been in use for over half a century. Because it had served as the de facto reference standard, it contributed to the endorsement of inappropriately high CCs for other AST methods, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved MGIT system. Moreover, this resulted in confusion about the interpretation of seven borderline resistance mutations in rpoB (i.e., L430P, D435Y, H445L, H445N, H445S, L452P, and I491F). In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Shea et al. (J Clin Microbiol 59:e01885-20, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01885-20) provide evidence that the CC endorsed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for the Sensititre MYCOTB system, which is not FDA approved but is CE-IVD marked in the European Union, is likely also too high. These findings underscore the importance of calibrating AST methods against a rigorously defined reference standard, as recently proposed by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, as well as the value of routine next-generation sequencing for investigating discordant AST results.

The Xpert® MTB/RIF diagnostic test for pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients: Benefits and experiences over 2 years in different clinical contexts

Xpert^® MTB/RIF has been widely used for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis in Brazil, since 2014. This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the performance of Xpert in different contexts during a two-year period: (i) laboratory and clinical/epidemiological diagnosis; (ii) HIV-positive and -negative populations; (iii) type of specimens: pulmonary and extrapulmonary. Overall, 924 specimens from 743 patients were evaluated. The performance of the assays was evaluated considering culture (Lowenstein Jensen or LJ medium) results and composite reference standard (CRS) classification as gold standard. According to CRS evaluation, 219 cases (29.5%) were classified as positive cases, 157 (21.1%) as ‘possible TB’, and 367 (49.3%) as ‘not TB’. Based on culture, Xpert and AFB smear achieved a sensitivity of 96% and 62%, respectively, while based on CRS, the sensitivities of Xpert, AFB smear, and culture were 40.7%, 20%, and 25%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert were 96% and 94%, respectively. Metric evaluations were similar between pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples against culture, whereas compared to CRS, the sensitivities were 44.6% and 29.3% for the pulmonary and extrapulmonary cases, respectively. The Xpert detected 42/69 (60.9%) patients with confirmed TB and negative culture on LJ medium, and 52/69 (75.4%) patients with negative AFB smear results. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy based on the types of specimens and population (positive- and negative-HIV). Molecular testing detected 13 cases of TB in culture-negative patients with severe immunosuppression. Resistance to rifampicin was detected in seven samples. Herein, Xpert showed improved detection of pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB cases, both among HIV-positive and -negative patients, even in cases with advanced immunosuppression, thereby performing better than multiple other diagnostic parameters.

Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF in diagnosis of lymphatic tuberculosis from fresh and formaldehyde-fixed and paraffin embedded lymph nodes

In this study, we aimed to assess the performance of Xpert in fresh tissue and formaldehyde-fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimens from suspected lymphatic tuberculosis for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). A total of 52 suspected lymphatic tuberculosis (TB) samples and 10 non-tuberculous lymph nodes samples were collected from outpatients. Using the comprehensive diagnostic criteria as the gold standard, the specificity in fresh and FFPE samples was 100% and the sensitivity was 82.7% and 67.3%, respectively. The majority of fresh tissue specimens had medium and low MTB content, while the low and very low MTB content were noted in 42.9% and 54.3% of FFPE tissue specimens, respectively. There were statistical differences in the MTB content between the two specimen groups detected by Xpert. Three rifampicin-resistant cases in FFPE samples were noted as rifampicin-susceptible in fresh tissue samples. Notably, all three cases with contradictory results of rpoB gene mutation test in fresh and FFPE samples had very low MTB content in FFPE samples. Fresh tissue specimens are more likely to yield Xpert results with high greater MTB content than FFPE specimens from lymphatic TB. The false detection of rpoB mutants is associated with the low bacterial content in the specimens.