Multicenter Cohort Study of Ceftaroline versus Daptomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection

Evaluation of Daptomycin Use in Outpatients With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections

Multiple observational studies in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and enterococcal infections have suggested that higher doses of daptomycin may be associated with better clinical outcomes. However, optimal daptomycin dosing in methicillin-sensitive S aureus bloodstream infections remains unclear. In this multicentered, retrospective, observational cohort study, we compared standard dose daptomycin (<8 mg/kg) vs high dose (≥8 mg/kg) for methicillin-sensitive S aureus bloodstream infections. In a propensity-weighted model, the composite outcome of treatment failure within 90 days was lower in the high-dose group relative to the standard dose group (odds ratio, 0.496; 95% CI, .306-.804). We did not detect any significant difference in safety outcomes.

Ceftaroline versus vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia, a matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin remains the treatment-of-choice in MRSA bacteraemia (MRSAB) despite significant limitations.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of ceftaroline and vancomycin monotherapy as the initial targeted therapy for MRSAB.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study. Consecutive adult patients treated with ceftaroline in the years 2019-2021 were matched in a 1:2 ratio with patients who received vancomycin. Controls were matched for performance of trans-oesophageal echocardiography, Charlson comorbidity index and age. The primary outcome was a composite of treatment failure, defined as 90-day mortality or microbiological failure. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the ceftaroline and vancomycin-treated groups. Univariate and multivariable binary logistic regression models were created using ceftaroline treatment as the exposure variable.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients treated with ceftaroline for MRSAB were matched with 83 patients who received vancomycin. The groups were well balanced with regards to demographics and clinical characteristics. The primary outcome of treatment failure occurred at a similar rate in patients treated with ceftaroline or vancomycin (51.1%, 23/45% versus 57.8%, 48/83, respectively, P = 0.47). In the multivariable analysis, only age (aOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.1, P = 0.02) was associated with treatment failure. Acute kidney injury was more common among patients treated with ceftaroline (51.1%, 23/45% versus 18.1%, 15/83, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftaroline was not associated with improved outcomes compared to vancomycin when given as initial treatment for MRSAB, however, it appears to be a viable alternative to vancomycin. Larger studies are needed to provide definitive results and to elucidate the risk of nephrotoxicity.

Heartfelt Impact: A Descriptive Analysis of Ceftaroline-Containing Regimens in Endocarditis due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

INTRODUCTION

Infective endocarditis (IE) due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is characterized by frequent treatment failure to first-line agents and high mortality, necessitating use of alternative management strategies. Ceftaroline fosamil (CPT) is a cephalosporin antibiotic with activity against MRSA but without regulatory approval for the indication of IE. This study describes clinical experience with CPT-based regimens utilized in MRSA-IE.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational, descriptive analysis of patients from two major urban medical centers in Detroit, Michigan from 2011 to 2023. Included adult patients (≥ 18 years) had ≥ 1 positive blood culture for MRSA, met definitive clinical criteria for IE, and received CPT for ≥ 72 h. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a composite of 30-day all-cause mortality from index culture or failure to improve or resolve infectious signs/symptoms after CPT initiation.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 51 (34-63) years and 45.7% were male. Persons with injection drug use (PWID) made up 55.7% of the cohort and right-sided IE was the most prevalent subtype (50.0%). CPT was frequently employed second-line or later, often in combination with vancomycin (10.0%) or daptomycin (72.9%). Overall, 31.4% experienced treatment failure and 30-day all-cause mortality occurred in 15.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings illustrate the challenges posed by MRSA-IE, including frequent treatment failures, and highlight the utilization of CPT as salvage therapy. Comparative studies are needed to more clearly define its role in MRSA-IE.

Ceftaroline for bloodstream infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of ceftaroline vs. vancomycin or daptomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (BSIs) (MRSA-BSIs).

METHODS

This multicentre retrospective study conducted in 15 Spanish hospitals included data from the first MRSA-BSIs of adult patients between January 2019 and December 2022. The ceftaroline group included patients who received ceftaroline for ≥72 hours within the first week of BSI onset; the standard-of-care (SOC) group included patients who received vancomycin or daptomycin ≥72 hours after BSI onset. Primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Propensity-score matching and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 429 MRSA-BSIs were included: 133 in the ceftaroline group and 296 in the SOC group. More patients in the ceftaroline group had a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score >2 (51.1% vs. 36.5%; p < 0.01), complicated BSI (66.2% vs. 42.2%; p < 0.01), infective endocarditis (18.8% vs. 6.4%; p < 0.01) and prescribed in combination treatment (65.4% vs. 11.5%; p < 0.01), with no statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality: 23.3% ceftaroline (95% CI, 16.1-30.5%) vs. 16.2% SOC (95% CI, 12.0-20.4%), p 0.08. There were no statistically significant differences in 90-day mortality (33.1% ceftaroline vs. 26.7% SOC; p 0.17). After propensity-score matching, 105 patients treated with ceftaroline were matched with 105 controls: the 30-day mortality rates were 21.9% and 16.2% (p 0.38). Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort (n = 429) revealed that age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score >2 (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.50-3.65) were associated with 90-day mortality risk, although ceftaroline treatment did not demonstrate a significant effect (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02). Incidence of AEs was 12.0% in ceftaroline vs. 4.4% in the SOC group (p < 0.01). Most AEs occurred when ceftaroline was used in combination vs. monotherapy (17.2% vs. 2.2%; p 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Ceftaroline was an effective treatment for MRSA-BSIs but was commonly prescribed in combination showing a higher incidence of AEs.

Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of mecA - positive oxacillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolated from patients with bloodstream infection in a tertiary hospital in Southern Brazil

Staphylococcus aureus are extremely important microorganisms, either from an epidemiological point of view or as a pathogen, responsible for causing a series of infectious processes, whether simple, restricted to the skin, or invasive infections such as bacteremia. The emergence of Oxacillin Sensitive-Methicillin Resistant S.aureus (OS-MRSA) isolates has imposed difficulties in the treatment of patients with staphylococcal infection, as such isolates can be mistakenly classified as sensitive and lead to failure of the therapy used. Thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the prevalence, and genotypic and phenotypic characteristics, of OS-MRSA isolates, from bloodstream infections, collected from patients admitted to a hospital in southern Brazil, as well as to evaluate the treatment used. For this, 801 unique isolates of S. aureus, collected from blood cultures, between January 2011 and December 2020 were evaluated. Of these, 96 isolates were classified as sensitive to oxacillin. The isolates were identified and had their sensitivity profile performed by manual and automated methods. The minimum inhibitory concentration for vancomycin, daptomycin, oxacillin, linezolid and teicoplanine was performed by e-test. The mecA, vanA genes, typing of the SCCmec elements, as well as the search for the icaA, tst-1 and pvl virulence genes were performed by PCR. Biofilm formation was performed using the crystal violet technique. The Sequence Type (ST), as well as the Clonal Complex (CC) of the isolates was evaluated by the RTq -PCR. The clinical characteristics of the patients were evaluated through an active search in medical records. After investigating the mecA gene, 27.1% (26/96) of the isolates were considered OS-MRSA, with SCCmec type I being the most prevalent, 46.1% (12/26). Among the evaluated isolates, 41% (9/22) were included in CC5 and ST9. As for virulence, all isolates were positive for the icaA gene and characterized as strong biofilm formers. The pvl gene was found in 92.3% (24/26) of the isolates and the toxic shock syndrome toxin was present in 61.5% of the isolates (16/26). All isolates were negative for the presence of the van A gene. As for the clinical outcome, 73% (19/26) of the patients were discharged from the hospital and 27% (7/26) died. It was possible to observe a high frequency of OS-MRSA isolates causing bloodstream infections. Furthermore, such isolates contain several virulence genes, which may contribute to a worse clinical outcome.

In vitro identification of underutilized β-lactam combinations against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia isolates

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is a serious clinical challenge with high mortality rates. Antibiotic combination therapy is currently used in cases of persistent infection; however, the limited development of new antibiotics will likely increase the need for combination therapy, and better methods are needed for identifying effective combinations for treating persistent bacteremia. To identify pairwise combinations with the most consistent potential for benefit compared to monotherapy with a primary anti-MRSA agent, we conducted a systematic study with an in vitro high-throughput methodology. We tested daptomycin and vancomycin each in combination with gentamicin, rifampicin, cefazolin, and oxacillin, and ceftaroline with daptomycin, gentamicin, and rifampicin. Combining cefazolin with daptomycin lowered the daptomycin concentration required to reach 95% growth inhibition (IC95) for all isolates tested and lowered daptomycin IC95 below the sensitivity breakpoint for five out of six isolates that had daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations at or above the sensitivity breakpoint. Similarly, vancomycin IC95s were decreased when vancomycin was combined with cefazolin for 86.7% of the isolates tested. This was a higher percentage than was achieved by adding any other secondary antibiotic to vancomycin. Adding rifampicin to daptomycin or vancomycin did not always reduce IC95s and failed to produce synergistic interaction in any of the isolates tested; the addition of rifampicin to ceftaroline was frequently synergistic and always lowered the amount of ceftaroline required to reach the IC95. These analyses rationalize further in vivo evaluation of three drug pairs for MRSA bacteremia: daptomycin+cefazolin, vancomycin+cefazolin, and ceftaroline+rifampicin.IMPORTANCEBloodstream infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have a high mortality rate despite the availability of vancomycin, daptomycin, and newer antibiotics including ceftaroline. With the slow output of the antibiotic pipeline and the serious clinical challenge posed by persistent MRSA infections, better strategies for utilizing combination therapy are becoming increasingly necessary. We demonstrated the value of a systematic high-throughput approach, adapted from prior work testing antibiotic combinations against tuberculosis and other mycobacteria, by using this approach to test antibiotic pairs against a panel of MRSA isolates with diverse patterns of antibiotic susceptibility. We identified three antibiotic pairs-daptomycin+cefazolin, vancomycin+cefazolin, and ceftaroline+rifampicin-where the addition of the second antibiotic improved the potency of the first antibiotic across all or most isolates tested. Our results indicate that these pairs warrant further evaluation in the clinical setting.

Development and challenges of antimicrobial peptide delivery strategies in bacterial therapy: A review

The escalating global prevalence of antimicrobial resistance poses a critical threat, prompting concerns about its impact on public health. This predicament is exacerbated by the acute shortage of novel antimicrobial agents, a scarcity attributed to the rapid surge in bacterial resistance. This review delves into the realm of antimicrobial peptides, a diverse class of compounds ubiquitously present in plants and animals across various natural organisms. Renowned for their intrinsic antibacterial activity, these peptides provide a promising avenue to tackle the intricate challenge of bacterial resistance. However, the clinical utility of peptide-based drugs is hindered by limited bioavailability and susceptibility to rapid degradation, constraining efforts to enhance the efficacy of bacterial infection treatments. The emergence of nanocarriers marks a transformative approach poised to revolutionize peptide delivery strategies. This review elucidates a promising framework involving nanocarriers within the realm of antimicrobial peptides. This paradigm enables meticulous and controlled peptide release at infection sites by detecting dynamic shifts in microenvironmental factors, including pH, ROS, GSH, and reactive enzymes. Furthermore, a glimpse into the future reveals the potential of targeted delivery mechanisms, harnessing inflammatory responses and intricate signaling pathways, including adenosine triphosphate, macrophage receptors, and pathogenic nucleic acid entities. This approach holds promise in fortifying immunity, thereby amplifying the potency of peptide-based treatments. In summary, this review spotlights peptide nanosystems as prospective solutions for combating bacterial infections. By bridging antimicrobial peptides with advanced nanomedicine, a new therapeutic era emerges, poised to confront the formidable challenge of antimicrobial resistance head-on.

New Antimicrobials and New Therapy Strategies for Endocarditis: Weapons That Should Be Defended

The overall low-quality evidence concerning the clinical benefits of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE), which has made it difficult to strongly support or reject any regimen of antibiotic therapy, has led to a discrepancy between the available guidelines and clinical practice. In this complex scenario, very recently published guidelines have attempted to fill this gap. Indeed, in recent years several antimicrobials have entered the market, including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, and the long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin. Despite being approved for different indications, real-world data on their use for the treatment of IE, alone or in combination, has accumulated over time. Furthermore, an old antibiotic, fosfomycin, has gained renewed interest for the treatment of complicated infections such as IE. In this narrative review, we focused on new antimicrobials and therapeutic strategies that we believe may provide important contributions to the advancement of Gram-positive IE treatment, providing a summary of the current in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence supporting their use in clinical practice.

Contemporary Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia-Controversies in Clinical Practice

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) carries a high risk for excess morbidity and mortality. Despite its prevalence, significant practice variation continues to permeate clinical management of this syndrome. Since the publication of the 2011 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines on management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, the field of SAB has evolved with the emergence of newer diagnostic strategies and therapeutic options. In this review, we seek to provide a comprehensive overview of the evaluation and management of SAB, with special focus on areas where the highest level of evidence is lacking to inform best practices.

New Antimicrobials for the Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis Caused by Multi-Drug-Resistant Bacteria: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Infections by multi-drug-resistant (MDR) organisms are sharply increasing in newborns worldwide. In low and middle-income countries, a disproportionate amount of neonatal sepsis caused by MDR Gram negatives was recently reported. Newborns with infections by MDR organisms with limited treatment options may benefit from novel antimicrobials.

METHODS

We performed a literature search investigating the use in newborns, infants and children of novel antimicrobials for the treatment of MDR Gram negatives, namely ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, and Gram positives with resistance of concern, namely ceftaroline and dalbavancin. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched.

RESULTS

A total of 50 records fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most articles were case reports or case series, and ceftazidime/avibactam was the most studied agent. All studies showed favorable efficacy and safety profile in newborns and across different age cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

novel antibiotics may be considered in newborns for the treatment of MDR Gram negatives with limited treatment options and for Gram positives with resistance concerns. Further studies are needed to address their effectiveness and safety in newborns.

Outcomes of Daptomycin Plus Ceftaroline Versus Alternative Therapy for Persistent Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Bacteraemia

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate both efficacy and safety of combination therapy with daptomycin plus ceftaroline (DAP/CPT) versus alternative therapy in the treatment of persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (MRSAB).

METHODS

This retrospective, single-centre study investigated adult patients who underwent a change in antibiotic therapy for persistent MRSAB. Daptomycin plus ceftaroline was compared with alternative therapy after initial treatment with vancomycin or DAP monotherapy was modified. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and several secondary efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients with persistent MRSAB had initial therapy switched to DAP/CPT (n = 43) or alternative therapy (n = 25). In-hospital mortality was similar with DAP/CPT versus alternative therapy (16.3% vs. 16%; P = 1.0). On average, the total duration of bacteraemia was numerically 1 day less in patients switched to DAP/CPT (11.4 days vs. 12.5 days; P = 0.5). Daptomycin plus ceftaroline was de-escalated in 81% of patients after receiving combination therapy for an average of 12.5 days. Secondary outcomes, including rates of adverse events and emergence of antimicrobial resistance, were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to DAP/CPT after approximately 1 week of persistent MRSA bacteraemia may result in similar clinical outcomes when compared with alternative therapy. Rates of adverse events and emergence of antimicrobial resistance were low without a statistically significant difference observed between DAP/CPT and alternative therapy. These findings, as well as the impact of earlier switch or prolonged treatment with the combination, require further investigation.

Investigating forthcoming strategies to tackle deadly superbugs: current status and future vision

INTRODUCTION

Superbugs are microorganisms that cause disease and have increased resistance to the treatments typically used against infections. Recently, antibiotic resistance development has been more rapid than the pace at which antibiotics are manufactured, leading to refractory infections of pathogenic bacteria. Scientists are concerned that a particularly virulent and lethal "superbug" will one day join the ranks of existing bacteria that cause incurable diseases, resulting in a global health disaster on the scale of the Black Death.

AREAS COVERED

Therefore, this study highlights the current developments in the management of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and recommends strategies for further regulating antibiotic-resistant microorganisms associated with the healthcare system. This review also addresses the origins, prevalence, and pathogenicity of superbugs, and the design of antibacterial against these growing multidrug-resistant organisms from a medical perspective.

EXPERT OPINION

It is recommended that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) should be addressed by limiting human-to-human transmission of resistant strains, lowering the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and developing novel antimicrobials. Using the risk-factor domains framework from this study would assure that not only clinical but also community and hospital-specific factors are covered, lowering the chance of confounders. Extensive subjective research is necessary to fully understand the underlying factors and uncover previously unexplored areas.

Comparing the Outcomes of Ceftaroline plus Vancomycin or Daptomycin Combination Therapy versus Vancomycin or Daptomycin Monotherapy in Adults with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia—A Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Combination therapy with daptomycin plus ceftaroline to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia has been reported to reduce methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia-related mortality. The purpose of the current meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients treated with daptomycin or vancomycin plus ceftaroline combination therapy versus daptomycin or vancomycin monotherapy. Methods: Studies were included if they directly compared the efficacy of daptomycin or vancomycin plus ceftaroline combination therapy with that of daptomycin or vancomycin monotherapy in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in adult patients. Results: One randomized controlled trial and five retrospective studies were included in the meta-analysis. The combination therapy group had an in-hospital mortality, duration of bacteremia, and adverse event rate similar to those patients who had monotherapy. There was less bacteremia recurrence in the combination group. Initial combination therapy with ceftaroline for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia showed a trend of reducing the risk of in-hospital mortality in the current meta-analysis. Conclusions: Randomized controlled trials are needed to further study the role of initial combination therapy with daptomycin or vancomycin plus ceftaroline in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Approaching 65 Years: Is it Time to Consider Retirement of Vancomycin for Treating Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Endovascular Infections?

Vancomycin was introduced nearly 65 years ago and remains the standard antibiotic for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Staphylococcus aureus remains highly susceptibility to vancomycin (>97%). Despite this, MRSA treatment failure with vancomycin is high in complicated bacteremia. Additionally, vancomycin can cause nephrotoxicity, leading to new therapeutic drug monitoring guidance. This demonstrates how difficult it is to dose vancomycin in a way that is both efficacious and safe, especially during long courses of therapy. Often underappreciated are the cost, resources, and complexity of vancomycin care at a time when alternative antibiotics are becoming cost comparable. This perspective highlights a bigger picture of how the treatment repertoires of many other diseases have changed and advanced since vancomycin’s introduction in the 1950s, yet the vancomycin MRSA treatment standard remains. While vancomycin can still have a role, 65 years may be a practical retirement age for vancomycin in highly complex endovascular infections.