Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Among Individuals With Spinal Implant Infections: A Descriptive Study

An Assessment of the Safety of Surgery and Hardware Placement in de-novo Spinal Infections. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature

OBJECTIVES

Primary objectives were outcomes comparison of instrumented surgery used for de-novo spinal infections in terms of infection recurrence, reoperations, primary failure, mortality, and length of stay relative to non-instrumented surgery. Secondary objectives were outcomes for surgical and non-surgical treatment of de-novo spinal infections regarding recurrence of infection, mortality, quality of life, and length-of-stay.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed database. Studies comparing outcome variables of patients with de-novo spinal infections (DNSI) treated with and without instrumentation and surgical versus non-surgical treatment were included. Studies primarily focusing on epidural abscesses or non-de-novo infections were excluded. A meta-analysis was performed for infection recurrence, reoperation, primary treatment failure, mortality, and quality-of-life parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 17 retrospective studies with 2.069 patients met the inclusion criteria. 1.378 patients received surgical treatment with or without instrumentation; 676 patients were treated non-surgically. For the comparison of instrumented to non-instrumented surgery Odds-Ratios were .98 (P = .95) for infection recurrence, .83 (P = .92) for primary failure, .53 (P = .02) for mortality and .32 (P = .05) for reoperation. For the comparison of non-surgical to surgical treatment, Odds-Ratios were .98 (P = .95) for infection recurrence, and 1.05 (P = .89) for mortality.

CONCLUSION

Available data support that instrumented surgery can be performed safely without higher rates of infection recurrence or primary failure and lower reoperation and mortality rates compared to nonsurgical treatment for DNSI. Furthermore, spine surgical treatment may generally be performed without higher risk of infection recurrence and mortality and better quality-of-life outcomes compared to generic non-surgical treatment.

Surgical Site Infections after Spinal Surgery in a Tropical Area: A Prospective Monocentric Observational Study

To date, no study has described the microbiological profile of surgical site infections (SSIs) after spine surgery in a tropical environment. The main objective of this study is to describe the microbiology and the risk factors of SSI after spinal surgery in a tropical climate. Our hypothesis is that the microbiology of SSIs in tropical areas is different to what is mainly described in temperate countries. As a consequence, the recommendation for antibiotic prophylaxis administered in the operative room, which mainly relays on the literature, might not be adequate in such countries. We included 323 consecutive patients who underwent a spinal intervention between 2017 and 2019, with a 2-year minimum follow-up. Objective ISO criteria were established in accordance with the criteria accepted by the Center of Disease Control in Atlanta. The identification of risk factors for SSI was carried out by uni- and multivariate analysis with a significance threshold of P < 0.05. The incidence of SSI was 7.7%. A total of 54.8% were in favor of a predominantly digestive origin of germs with an average of 1.68 bacteria found by ISO. Inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis was found in 54.8%. Age and body mass index were found to be independent risk factors for SSI. We report here an unusual microbiological profile of SSI with a predominance of gram-negative bacteria and a low proportion of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Spinal implant-associated infections: a prospective multicentre cohort study

This study evaluated the clinical, laboratory, microbiological, radiological and treatment characteristics of patients with early-onset and late-onset spinal implant-associated infections. Patients diagnosed with spinal implant-associated infection between 2015-2019 were prospectively included and treated according to a standardised algorithm. Infections were classified as early-onset (≤6 weeks) and late-onset (>6 weeks). Among 250 patients, 152 (61%) had early-onset and 98 (39%) had late-onset infection. Local inflammatory signs was the most common manifestation in early-onset infections (84%), whereas late-onset infections presented mainly with persisting or increasing local pain (71%). Sonication fluid was more often positive than peri-implant tissue samples (90% vs. 79%; P = 0.016), particularly in late-onset infections (92% vs. 75%; P = 0.005). Predominant pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus and Cutibacterium spp. Debridement and implant retention was the most common surgical approach in early-onset infections (85%), whereas partial or complete implant exchange was mainly performed in late-onset infections (62%). Of the 250 patients, 220 (88%) received biofilm-active antibiotics, and median treatment duration was 11.7 weeks. Moreover, 49 patients (20%) needed more than one revision for infection and six patients (2.4%) died during hospital stay. Concluding, most spinal implant-associated infections were acquired during surgery and presented within 6 weeks of surgery. Infections presented mainly with local inflammatory signs in early-onset and with persisting or increasing pain in late-onset infections. Sonication was the most sensitive microbiological method, particularly in late-onset infections. Debridement and implant retention was used in well-integrated implants without loosening, independent of the time of infection onset.