Reporting Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Positivity May Reduce Carbapenem Overuse

Impact of removing ESBL status labelling from culture reports on the use of carbapenems for non-bacteraemic patients diagnosed with ESBL-positive urinary tract infections

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate carbapenem prescribing rates for initial definitive treatment of urinary tract infections and clinical outcomes before and after removing ESBL status labels on antibiotic susceptibility reports.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients treated for at least 48 h for an ESBL-producing/ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales urinary tract infection. ESBL status reporting ceased in September 2022 for a network of seven community hospitals within the USA. The primary endpoint was the rate of carbapenem prescribing for initial definitive treatment of urinary tract infections. Secondary endpoints included total days of therapy for initial definitive treatment with carbapenems, clinical cure rates, time to transition to oral antibiotic therapy for initial definitive treatment, rate of guideline-compliant therapy, rate of relapsed infection within 30 days, 30 day readmission rate, and 30 day all-cause in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Of 3055 patients screened, 199 were included in the pre group and 153 were included in the post group. The rate of carbapenem prescribing for initial definitive treatment was 156 patients (78%) in the pre group, compared with 93 patients (61%) in the post group (P = <0.01). Days of therapy for initial definitive therapy with carbapenem was 620 in the pre group compared with 372 in the post group (P < 0.01). There was no difference between other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Removing ESBL status labels from laboratory reports reduced carbapenem use for initial definitive treatment of urinary tract infections from 78% to 61% (P < 0.01) without impacting clinical outcomes.

Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: an update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Gram-negative pathogens are a major cause of resistance to expanded-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics. Since their discovery in the early 1980s, they have spread worldwide and an are now endemic in Enterobacterales isolated from both hospital-associated and community-acquired infections. As a result, they are a global public health concern. In the past, TEM- and SHV-type ESBLs were the predominant families of ESBLs. Today CTX-M-type enzymes are the most commonly found ESBL type with the CTX-M-15 variant dominating worldwide, followed in prevalence by CTX-M-14, and CTX-M-27 is emerging in certain parts of the world. The genes encoding ESBLs are often found on plasmids and harboured within transposons or insertion sequences, which has enabled their spread. In addition, the population of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli is dominated globally by a highly virulent and successful clone belonging to ST131. Today, there are many diagnostic tools available to the clinical microbiology laboratory and include both phenotypic and genotypic tests to detect β-lactamases. Unfortunately, when ESBLs are not identified in a timely manner, appropriate antimicrobial therapy is frequently delayed, resulting in poor clinical outcomes. Several analyses of clinical trials have shown mixed results with regards to whether a carbapenem must be used to treat serious infections caused by ESBLs or whether some of the older β-lactam-β-lactamase combinations such as piperacillin/tazobactam are appropriate. Some of the newer combinations such as ceftazidime/avibactam have demonstrated efficacy in patients. ESBL-producing Gram-negative pathogens will continue to be major contributor to antimicrobial resistance worldwide. It is essential that we remain vigilant about identifying them both in patient isolates and through surveillance studies.

Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate

ESBLs are a group of plasmid-mediated, diverse, complex and rapidly evolving enzymes that pose a therapeutic challenge today in hospital- and community-acquired infections. Thirty-six years after the first report, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for ESBLs are still the subject of controversy. Detection of these enzymes is recommended for epidemiological purposes and facilitates targeted therapy, necessary for antimicrobial stewardship. On the other hand, ESBLs are not confined to specific species, phenotypic detection methods have pitfalls, and concerns exist about the accuracy of antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems to rely on MIC values for cephalosporins and β-lactam combination agents. In this issue, we present a PRO/CON debate on ESBL testing for ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales.

PRO: Testing for ESBL production is necessary for ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales: perfect should not be the enemy of progress

The MERINO trial has seemingly laid to rest the question: ‘Are carbapenems the preferred therapy for ESBL-producing infections?’ It has, however, brought another important question to the forefront: ‘How do we know when we have an ESBL-producing infection?’ A commonly used approach is the interpretation that non-susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins (e.g. ceftriaxone MICs of ≥2 mg/L) is an accurate proxy for ESBL production. We believe that relying on antibiotic susceptibility results alone to predict ESBL production in clinical isolates is fraught with issues. Rather, we believe accurate molecular assays that detect a comprehensive range of ESBL genes, along with other relevant β-lactamase genes, are well within the reach of existing technology and necessary to optimize patient care. Herein, we elaborate on why the current approach for determining whether an organism is likely to be an ESBL producer (i) is inaccurate; (ii) encourages carbapenem overuse; (iii) ignores the potential for ESBL production in other Enterobacterales species; and (iv) promotes the silent epidemic of ESBL transmission.

Molecular Epidemiology of Ceftriaxone Non-Susceptible Enterobacterales Isolates in an Academic Medical Center in the United States

Background

Knowledge of whether Enterobacterales are not susceptible to ceftriaxone without understanding the underlying resistance mechanisms may not be sufficient to direct appropriate treatment decisions. As an example, extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing organisms almost uniformly display nonsusceptibility to ceftriaxone. Regardless of susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam or cefepime, carbapenem antibiotics are the treatment of choice for invasive infections. No such guidance exists for ceftriaxone-nonsusceptible organisms with mechanisms other than ESBL production. We sought to investigate the molecular epidemiology of ceftriaxone-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales.

Methods

All consecutive Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, or Proteus mirabilis clinical isolates with ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ≥2 mcg/mL from unique patients at a United States hospital over an 8-month period were evaluated for β-lactamase genes using a DNA microarray–based assay.

Results

Of 1929 isolates, 482 (25%) had ceftriaxone MICs of ≥2 mcg/mL and were not resistant to any carbapenem antibiotics. Of the 482 isolates, ESBL (bla_CTX-M, bla_SHV, bla_TEM) and/or plasmid-mediated ampC (p-ampC) genes were identified in 376 (78%). ESBL genes were identified in 310 (82.4%), p-ampC genes in 2 (0.5%), and both ESBL and p-ampC genes in 64 (17.0%) of the 376 organisms. There were 211 (56%), 120 (32%), 41 (11%), and 4 (1%) isolates with 1, 2, 3, or ≥4 ESBL or p-ampC genes. The most common ESBL genes were of the bla_CTX-M-1 group (includes bla_CTX-M-15), and the most common p-ampC gene was bla_CMY-2.

Conclusions

There is considerable diversity in the molecular epidemiology of ceftriaxone-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales. An understanding of this diversity can improve antibiotic decision-making.