Efficacy of Rilpivirine-Based Regimens as Switch Therapy From Nevirapine-Based Regimens in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients With Virological Suppression: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Long-Term Effectiveness of Rilpivirine-Based Single-Tablet Regimens in a Seven-Year, Two-Center Observational Cohort of People Living with HIV

Data on the long-term durability of rilpivirine (RPV) are still scarce. A two-center retrospective study was performed, including all people living with HIV (PLWH) treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC)/RPV or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)/FTC/RPV in the period January 2013-December 2019. Aims of the study were to assess the rate of discontinuation of the RPV single-tablet regimen (STR) and identify factors associated with the risk of discontinuation according to Cox's regression analysis. A total of 684 PLWH were enrolled. Mean duration of RPV-STR treatment was 192.5 (±99.5) weeks for 123 antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve participants (18%) and 173.3 (± 85.6) weeks for 561 ART-experienced study participants (82%). During the study period, the incidence of discontinuation was 7.7 per 100 person-years. The estimated proportions of discontinuation after 48 and 96 weeks were 5.6% and 13.4%, respectively. Causes of discontinuation were loss to follow-up (30%), side effects (15%), ART optimization (14%), virological failure (VF) (12%), death or transfer to another center (9%), low adherence (7%), drug interactions (6%), simplification to dual therapy (3%), and unknown (3%). No differences were observed in cumulative probability of discontinuation between ART-naïve and -experienced PLWH. Heterosexual (hazard ratio [HR] 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-6.8) and mother-to-child (HR 5.3, 95% CI 1.8-15.3) transmission of HIV infection and history of previous VF (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.5) were associated with higher risk of discontinuation. High RPV-STR effectiveness and durability were confirmed in our real-life population of PLWH. Given these data, RPV has the potential to be a drug for life in patients selected according to current guidelines.

Use of rilpivirine in HIV-1-infected individuals in routine clinical practice from 2012 to 2017 in France

OBJECTIVES

We assessed virological outcomes of rilpivirine use in France from 2012 to 2017, in three groups of people living with HIV (PLHIV): (i) antiretroviral (ARV)-naive PLHIV; (ii) ARV-experienced PLHIV switching to rilpivirine while failing therapy; and (iii) ARV-experienced PLHIV switching to rilpivirine while virologically controlled.

METHODS

Virological success (VS) was defined as a plasma HIV-1 viral load (VL) <50 copies/mL and virological failure (VF) as two consecutive VL >50 copies/mL or one VL >50 copies/mL followed by a treatment switch prior to the next VL measurement. The cumulative incidence of VS was assessed considering rilpivirine discontinuation, loss to follow-up and death as competing risks, while estimates of cumulative incidence of VF accounted for loss to follow-up and death.

RESULTS

Among the 2166 ARV-naive PLHIV initiating rilpivirine, the 4 year cumulative incidence of VS was 91.0% and was associated with baseline VL. Among the 2125 ARV-experienced PLHIV switching to rilpivirine while failing therapy, the 4 year cumulative incidence of VS was 82.5% and was associated with lower VL, higher CD4 and less than three prior ARVs. Among the 11 828 ARV-experienced PLHIV switching to rilpivirine while virologically controlled, the 4 year cumulative incidence of VF was 9.6%. The risk of VF was lower among MSM, for PLHIV with CD4 ≥ 500 cell/mm3, without a prior AIDS event, or with a longer VL suppression at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Rilpivirine-containing regimens yielded high rates of viral suppression in most participants, while it was ineffective when used outside the marketing authorization in naive participants.

Long-term efficacy and safety of nevirapine-containing regimens in virologically suppressed patients: a 17-year follow up

Background: To evaluate long term outcomes in patients maintaining a NVP based regimen for more than 10 years.Materials and methods: Retrospective, multicenter, cohort study including virologically suppressed patients, currently receiving a NVP-based regimen that had been started at least 10 years previously. Demographic, clinical, and analytical variables were recorded.Results: Two hundred and seventy four subjects were included. Median (IQR) follow up was 17.1 (13.8-18.5) years. Dyslipidemia (29.9%), hypertension (11.4%) and diabetes (8%) were the most common reported co-morbidities. After a median of 17 years of follow-up we observed a significant increase in general health markers such as hemoglobin and CD4 cells (all p<0.001) as well as a significant reduction in CD8 and ALT [-111 cells/uL (-346.5-151) p 0.003 and ALT median (IQR) -4.2 (-18.5-4) p<0.001 respectively]. LDL-c and serum triglyceride levels decreased significantly [-0,1 (-1-0.6) p:<0.001 and -0,3 (-1.2-0.4) p:0.002 respectively]. HDL-c increased significantly 0.3 (00.5-0.6). Median (IQR) time with persistent HIV VL <50 copies was 16 (13-18) years. During follow up, subjects presented with median (IQR) 1 (0-2) blip (HIV VL >50<1000 copies/ml).Conclusions: Based on the extensive experience as well as a good tolerance and efficacy profile, NVP should be considered for treatment continuation in those patients already receiving this inexpensive generic drug.

Current and emerging non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) for HIV-1 treatment

Introduction: Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are essential components of highly active antiretroviral therapy against HIV-1 infections. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of approved and emerging NNRTIs. Areas covered: This review covers the latest trend of NNRTIs regarding their pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, mechanisms of drug action, drug resistance as well as new applications such as two-drug regimens and long-acting formulations. Expert opinion: Since the first NNRTI, nevirapine, was approved in 1996, antiviral drug discovery led to the approval of seven NNRTIs, including nevirapine, delavirdine (discontinued), etravirine, elsulfavirine, efavirenz, rilpivirine, and doravirine. The latter three compounds with favorable pharmacodynamic profiles and minimal adverse effects are often combined with one integrase inhibitor or two NRTIs in once-daily fixed-dose tablets. NNRTI-anchored regimens have been approved as initial therapies in treatment-naïve patients (efficacy: 72% to 86%) or maintaining therapies in virologically-suppressed patients (efficacy: 91% to 95%). Future development of NNRTIs includes: (i) better resistance and cross-resistance profiles; (ii) reduction of drug burden by optimizing two-drug or three-drug combinations; and (iii) improvement of patient adherence by novel long-acting formulations with weekly or monthly administration. Overall, NNRTIs play an important role in the management of HIV-1 infections, especially in resource-limited countries.