Contact-free transposition and interposition techniques for trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TGN), by means of interposition of material between nerve and offending vessel, has been shown to be highly efficient. In recent years, treatment by means of vessel transposition has become more frequent, as in singular cases of recurrence, nerval reactions towards interposed material have been noted. In this review we research the classic microvascular decompression (MVD) techniques (interposition) as well as the more recent transposition and their effectiveness, considering patient outcomes as well as complications and recurrences.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched online databases MEDLINE and LIVIVO, using key words trigeminal neuralgia AND transposition/ AND sling/ AND non compressive technique/ AND microvascular decompression.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We included 8 studies for transposition and 20 studies for the interposition, combining for 2045 patients (302 for transposition and 1743 for interposition). 96.1% of patients in the transposition and 93.1% in the interposition group reported a positive outcome immediately postoperatively. At follow-up, 87.4% in the transposition group (follow-up 51.2 months) and 87.9% of patients in the interposition group (follow-up 36.5 months), reported a positive outcome. 16.2% of patients in the transposition and 13.1% in the interposition group had postoperative complications. Recurrence was reported in 5.6% of patients treated with transposition and 2.3% of patients treated with interposition.

CONCLUSIONS

Transposition presents similar results concerning short- and long-term patient satisfaction for treatment of TGN as well as similar numbers of complications of recurrences as interposition. Yet, current evidence is restricted to a few retrospective studies, thus, evidence is limited so far.

Petrosal Vein Involvement in Neurovascular Conflict in Trigeminal Neuralgia: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Contact of the main stem of the petrosal vein (PV) to the nerve root is a rare cause of trigeminal neuralgia (TGN). The implication of the PV in relation with neurovascular contact (NVC) is not fully understood.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the operative procedures in microvascular decompression (MVD) in patients with PV involvement in the long-term.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 34 cases (7.0%) in 485 consecutive MVDs for TGN, whose PV main stem had contact with the trigeminal nerve root (PV-NVC). PV-NVCs were divided into 2 groups: concomitant arterial contact or no concomitant arterial contact. Surgical techniques, outcomes, complications, and recurrence were assessed.

RESULTS

The anatomical relationship of the PV with the trigeminal nerve root was consistent with preoperative 3-dimensional imaging in all patients. Pain relief was obtained in most patients immediately after surgery (97.1%) by separating the PV from the nerve root. Postoperative facial numbness was noted in 9 patients (26.5%). Symptomatic venous infarctions occurred in 2 patients (5.9%). Recurrence of facial pain occurred in 3 patients (8.8%) with a median 48 mo follow-up period. Re-exploration surgery revealed adhesion being the cause of recurrence. The statistical analyses showed no difference in the surgical outcomes of the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Separating the PV from the nerve root contributes to pain relief in patients with PV conflict regardless of concomitant arteries. Preserving venous flow is crucial to avoid postoperative venous insufficiency.

Location of the abducens nerve stretched by a tortuous vertebrobasilar artery in trigeminal neuralgia

BACKGROUND

Trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) caused by the vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) is uncommon. The abducens nerve root is frequently dislocated by a tortuous VBA near the trigeminal nerve root. This unusual location of the root is not well known. This study aimed to investigate the location of the stretched abducens nerve root.

METHODS

The objective is 26 patients with VBA-related TGN who underwent microvascular decompression (MVD). We retrospectively investigated the course of the abducens nerve root with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with three-dimensional (3D) imaging and surgical findings. The displacement of the abducens nerve root on the affected side was compared to the contralateral side.

RESULTS

The abducens nerve root was distorted by a tortuous VBA (46.2%) or the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (53.8%). The average length of the cisternal segment was stretched to 23.4 mm versus 12.4 mm on the contralateral side. The peak point of the elevated abducens nerve root was mostly located rostro-medial (65.4%) or caudo-medial (34.6%) to the neurovascular compression site of the trigeminal nerve with a mean distance of 9.1 mm. Contact with the trigeminal nerve root was observed in 7 patients (26.9%). Three-dimensional imaging was consistent with the surgical findings and useful in predicting the location of the abducens nerve root. No abducens nerve palsy was noted in our series.

CONCLUSIONS

The abducens nerve root is located near the trigeminal nerve root in VBA-related TGN. Preoperative understanding of the unusual course of the abducens nerve root contributes to avoiding accidental nerve injury during MVD.