Classification of the relationship between suprasellar arachnoid cyst and hydrocephalus based on treatment modalities: shunting versus neuroendoscopic approaches

PURPOSE

Children diagnosed with suprasellar arachnoid cysts often concurrently have hydrocephalus. This study aims to classify the relationship between suprasellar arachnoid cysts and hydrocephalus, discussing surgical strategies-shunting or neuroendoscopic approaches-and their sequence, based on this classification.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 14 patients diagnosed with suprasellar arachnoid cysts and hydrocephalus, treated surgically by the first author between January 2016 and December 2020. Clinical features, radiological findings, surgical strategies, and outcomes were reviewed. The classification of the relationship between the suprasellar arachnoid cysts and hydrocephalus was developed and illustrated with specific cases. Recommendations for future surgical management based on this classification are provided.

RESULTS

We classified the relationship between suprasellar arachnoid cysts and hydrocephalus into three categories. SACH-R1, the direct type, represents cases where the cysts cause obstructive hydrocephalus. Here, neuroendoscopic ventriculocystocisternostomy (VCC) effectively treats both conditions. SACH-R2, the juxtaposed type, involves concurrent occurrences of cysts and hydrocephalus without a causative link. This is further subdivided into SACH-R2a, where acute progressive communicating hydrocephalus coexists with the cyst, initially managed with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, followed by VCC upon stabilization of hydrocephalus; and SACH-R2b, where the cyst coexists with chronic stable communicating hydrocephalus, first addressed with VCC, followed by monitoring and potential secondary shunting if needed. Key factors differentiating SACH-R2a from SACH-R2b include the patient's age, imaging signs of fourth ventricle and cisterna magna enlargement, and the rapid progression or chronic stability and severity of hydrocephalus symptoms. SACH-R3, the reverse type, describes scenarios where shunting for hydrocephalus leads to the development or enlargement of the cyst, managed via neuroendoscopic VCC with precautions to prevent infections in existing shunt systems.

CONCLUSION

The simultaneous presence of suprasellar arachnoid cysts and hydrocephalus requires a nuanced understanding of their complex relationship for optimal surgical intervention. The analysis and classification of their relationship are crucial for determining appropriate surgical approaches, including the choice and sequence of shunting and neuroendoscopic techniques. Treatment should be tailored to the specific type identified, rather than blindly opting for neuroendoscopy. Particularly for SACH-R2a cases, we recommend initial ventriculoperitoneal shunting.

Cranial Nerve Palsies in the Setting of Arachnoid Cysts: A Case Series and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Arachnoid cysts (ACs) are benign lesions typically believed to not cause neurologic defects in the adult population and are most often found incidentally on imaging. We describe 2 patients with ACs potentially leading to isolated cranial nerve (CN) dysfunction.

METHODS

We describe 2 patients, 1 with a fourth nerve palsy and the other with a sixth nerve palsy found to have ACs on MRI brain imaging in locations that potentially caused a compressive CN palsy. We review previous literature of ACs presenting with CN III, IV, or VI palsy.

RESULTS

Patient 1 was a 62-year-old man who presented with a 22-year history of diplopia with strabismus examination consistent with a congenital CN IV palsy. Despite multiple surgeries, his CN IV palsy insidiously worsened. An AC in the posterior fossa with mass effect on the quadrigeminal plate and asymmetric atrophy of the right superior oblique was identified on imaging. Patient 2 was an 80-year-old man who presented with an 18-year history of diplopia and was found to have a left esotropia and abduction deficit consistent with complete CN VI palsy. An AC in the left cavernous sinus was identified on imaging. He underwent strabismus surgery with satisfactory resolution of diplopia. We identified a total of 18 previously published cases: 8 reports of CN III palsy, 4 reports of CN IV palsy, and 6 reports of CN VI palsy. Patient ages ranged from 1 to 67 with a median of 34.5. In 16/18 (89%) cases, the diagnosis of ACs was made within 1 year of symptom onset. Surgical removal of the AC was successful in resolving diplopia in 7/12 (58%) cases. In no case was strabismus surgery performed as primary treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ACs are typically congenital asymptomatic lesions, we present a case series of 2 patients with ACs in anatomic locations that potentially caused chronic, progressive, isolated CN palsies leading to strabismus. Our literature review revealed that most published cases detailing this clinical scenario resulted in neurosurgical fenestration of ACs with mixed results. Our cases represent 2 patients with AC-associated CN palsy treated with strabismus surgery.

Purely Endoscopic Treatment for Arachnoid Cysts

Arachnoid cysts are benign, mostly congenital lesions that are asymptomatic in most patients. In some cases, due to their location or sheer size, they produce a mass effect or hydrocephalic obstruction of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow and thus might warrant surgical treatment. The goal of the surgery is usually to reduce pressure inside the cysts, to reduce the mass effect, or to restore the CSF pathway. Surgical treatment options are resection, fenestration, or shunting of the cyst. Over the past decades, treatment under sheer endoscopic control either through a tube or via craniotomy of arachnoid cysts has been studied thoroughly and replaced open microsurgical cyst surgery in the opinion of many neurosurgeons. Endoscopic treatment has proven to be a safe and feasible technique for both patients and surgeons. In the following chapter, the authors describe their indications for surgery and pre- and postoperative workup, where precautions should be taken, and discuss the different possibilities and techniques of endoscopic cyst fenestration. The aim is to give detailed instructions and present cases for ventriculocystostomy, cystocisternostomy, ventriculocystocisternostomy, and cystoventriculostomy and point out specifics deemed to be important to avoid complications and to ensure the best possible outcome for each patient.

Effectiveness of multiple endoscopic fenestrations for the treatment of Sylvian fissure arachnoid cysts: a multicenter study

PURPOSE

Arachnoid cysts are usually asymptomatic lesions. However, they can sometimes cause intracranial hypertension, headache, seizures, focal neurological deficits, and bleeding. The most commonly used surgical techniques are microsurgical cyst fenestration/excision/drainage, cyst shunting, and endoscopic procedures. We aimed to investigate the success of different surgical techniques.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2021, patients with Sylvan fissure arachnoid cysts who received treatment via an endoscopic approach chosen as the first-line treatment in three centers were enrolled. All case notes and radiological studies were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

The study included 131 (female, n = 28; male, n = 103) patients with a mean age of 87.04 ± 66.76 (range, 0-216) months. Of the patients, 25 had Galassi type II left-sided arachnoid cysts, 33 had Galassi type II right-sided arachnoid cysts, 40 had Galassi type III left-sided arachnoid cysts, and 32 had Galassi type III right-sided arachnoid cysts. No difference was found between patients who underwent single and multiple fenestrations in terms of Galassi type, side, clinical outcome, and cyst size (p > 0.05). On the contrary, the rate of additional surgical intervention was lower in patients with multiple fenestrations than in those with single fenestration (36.10% vs. 5.30%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic fenestration of Sylvian fissure arachnoid cysts is a good alternative to open surgery or cystoperitoneal shunting, and the number of fenestrations made during this surgery decreases the need for a second surgical procedure.

Controversies in the Treatment of Arachnoid Cysts with Special Emphasis on Temporal Arachnoid Cysts

Intracranial arachnoid cysts (ACs) are benign lesions. The incidence in children is 2.6%. ACs are often diagnosed incidentally. Because of the broad use of CT and MR imaging, the frequency of AC diagnosis has increased. In addition, prenatal diagnosis of ACs is becoming more common. This places clinicians in a difficult situation with regard to the optimal treatment, since the presenting symptoms are often vague and operative management includes not negligible risks. It is generally accepted that conservative management is indicated in cases with small and asymptomatic cysts. In contrast, patients with definite signs of raised intracranial pressure should be treated. There are however clinical situations in whom the decision about the preferred treatment is difficult to make. Unspecific symptoms such as headaches and neurocognitive or attention deficits can be challenging to evaluate, whether they are related to the presence of the AC or not. The treatment techniques intent to establish a communication between the cyst and the normal cerebrospinal spaces or consist of a diversion of the cyst fluid by a shunt system. Which surgical method (open craniotomy for cyst fenestration, endoscopic fenestration, or shunting) is preferred differs between neurosurgical centers or the pediatric neurosurgeon in charge. Each treatment option has a unique profile of advantages and disadvantages which should be considered when discussing treatment with the patients or their caregivers.

Intracranial drainage versus extracranial shunt in the treatment of intracranial arachnoid cysts: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature and analyze the efficacy and safety of two surgery procedures, intracranial drainage and extracranial shunt, for intracranial arachnoid cysts.

METHODS

We searched the online Medlars, PubMed, and Cochrane Central electronic databases and collected studies of patients with intracranial arachnoid cysts treated with two surgical methods.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis results shows that there were not statistically significant in clinical symptoms improvement, cyst reduction, the improvement of epilepsy, epidural hematoma, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and recurrence rate (P > 0.05, with RR values are 0.99, 0.94, 1.00, 0.94, 1.21, and 0.75 respectively). There was statistically significant in the occurrence rate of intracranial infection (P = 0.0004, RR = 0.28). The intracranial drainage group was lower than extracranial shunt group.

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that the efficacy and safety of two surgery procedures are similar in the treatment of intracranial arachnoid cysts, but the intracranial drainage was better than extracranial shunt in reducing the risk of intracranial infection.