1
|
Lee JS, Son DW, Lee SH, Lee JH, Kim YH, Lee SW, Oh BK, Sung SK, Song GS, Yi S. Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery: Role in Training the Next Generation of Spine Surgeons. Neurospine 2024; 21:116-127. [PMID: 38569638 PMCID: PMC10992654 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448006.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the degree of interest in robot-assisted spine surgery (RASS) among residents and to investigate the learning curve for beginners performing robotic surgery. METHODS We conducted a survey to assess awareness and interest in RASS among young neurosurgery residents. Subsequently, we offered a hands-on training program using a dummy to educate one resident. After completing the program, the trained resident performed spinal fusion surgery with robotic assistance under the supervision of a mentor. The clinical outcomes and learning curve associated with robotic surgery were then analyzed. RESULTS Neurosurgical residents had limited opportunities to participate in spinal surgery during their training. Despite this, there was a significant interest in the emerging field of robotic surgery. A trained resident performed RASS under the supervision of a senior surgeon. A total of 166 screw insertions were attempted in 28 patients, with 2 screws failing due to skiving. According to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification, 85.54% of the screws were rated as grade A, 11.58% as grade B, 0.6% as grade C, and 1.2% as grade D. The clinical acceptance rate was approximately 96.99%, which is comparable to the results reported by senior experts and time per screw statistically significantly decreased as experience was gained. CONCLUSION RASS can be performed with high accuracy within a relatively short timeframe, if residents receive adequate training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Seok Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Dong Wuk Son
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Su Hun Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Jong Hyeok Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Young Ha Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Sang Weon Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Bu Kwang Oh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Soon Ki Sung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Geun Sung Song
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Seong Yi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao W, Wang Y, Zhang H, Guo J, Han J, Lin A, Zhou C, Ma X. Analysis of the Screw Accuracy and Postoperative Efficacy of Screw Placement in Single Position and Bipedal Position in Robot-Assisted Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Preliminary Results of Mazor X Stealth Usage. Orthop Surg 2024; 16:401-411. [PMID: 38151861 PMCID: PMC10834206 DOI: 10.1111/os.13972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Traditional manual OLIF combined with pedicle screw implantation has many problems of manual percutaneous screw implantation, such as high difficulty of screw placement, many fluoroscopies, long operation time, and many adjustments, resulting in greater trauma. The robot can perform various types of screw placement in the lateral recumbent position, which allows OLIF combined with posterior screw placement surgery to be completed in a single position. To compare the screw accuracy and initial postoperative results of oblique anterior lumbar fusion with robot-assisted screw placement in the lateral position and screw placement in the prone position for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS From May to June 2022, 45 patients with single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis underwent Mazor X-assisted oblique lumbar fusion in one position and Renaissance-assisted surgery in two different positions, and screw accuracy was assessed on computed tomography scans according to a modified Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Patients were divided into a single position group and a bipedal position group (the lateral position for complete oblique lumbar fusion and then changed to the prone position for posterior screw placement), and the perioperative parameters, including operative time, number of fluoroscopies, and operative complications, were recorded separately. The results of the clinical indicators, such as the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, were obtained. RESULTS There were no significant differences in the patients' demographic data between the two groups. The single position group had a shorter operative time and fewer fluoroscopies than the bipedal position group; the single position group had a higher percentage of screw accuracy at the A level than the bipedal position group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at the acceptable level (A + B) (p > 0.05). The single-position group had better outcomes at the 1-week postoperative follow-up back pain VAS scores (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative leg pain VAS scores or the ODI scores when compared to the control group. CONCLUSION Robot-assisted lateral position oblique lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw placement has the same accuracy as prone positioning. Single position surgery can significantly shorten the operation time and reduce the fluoroscopy. There was no significant difference in the long-term efficacy between the two groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhao Zhao
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Jianwei Guo
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Jialuo Han
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Antao Lin
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Chuanli Zhou
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Xuexiao Ma
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shahi P, Subramanian T, Singh S, Sheha E, Dowdell J, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Perception of Robotics and Navigation by Spine Fellows and Early Attendings: The Impact of These Technologies on Their Training and Practice. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:e330-e338. [PMID: 37839568 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is scant data on the role that robotics and navigation play in spine surgery training and practice of early attendings. This study aimed to assess the impact of navigation and robotics on spine surgery training and practice. METHODS A survey gathering information on utilization of navigation and robotics in training and practice was administered to trainees and early attendings. RESULTS A total of 51 surveys were returned completed: 71% were attendings (average practice years: 2), 29% were trainees. During training, 22% were exposed to only fluoroscopy, 75% were exposed to navigation, 51% were exposed to robotics, and 40% were exposed to both navigation and robotics. In our sample, 87% and 61% of respondents who had exposure to navigation and robotics, respectively, felt that it had a positive impact on their training. In practice, 28% utilized only fluoroscopy, 69% utilized navigation, 30% utilized robotics, and 28% utilized both navigation and robotics. The top 3 reasons behind positive impact on training and practice were: 1) increased screw accuracy, 2) exposure to upcoming technology, and 3) less radiation exposure. The top 3 reasons behind negative impact were: 1) compromises training to independently place screws, 2) time and personnel requirements, and 3) concerns about availing it in practice. In sum, 76% of attendings felt that they will be utilizing more navigation and robotics in 5 years' time. CONCLUSIONS Navigation and robotics have a perceivably positive impact on training and are increasingly being incorporated into practice. However, associated concerns demand spine surgeons to be thoughtful about how they integrate these technologies moving forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sumedha Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Evan Sheha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - James Dowdell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Heard JC, Lee YA, D’Antonio ND, Narayanan R, Lambrechts MJ, Bodnar J, Purtill C, Pezzulo JD, Farronato D, Fitzgerald P, Canseco JA, Kaye ID, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK, Schroeder GD. The impact of robotic assistance for lumbar fusion surgery on 90-day surgical outcomes and 1-year revisions. JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE 2024; 15:15-20. [PMID: 38644906 PMCID: PMC11029112 DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_145_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the (1) 90-day surgical outcomes and (2) 1-year revision rate of robotic versus nonrobotic lumbar fusion surgery. Methods Patients >18 years of age who underwent primary lumbar fusion surgery at our institution were identified and propensity-matched in a 1:1 fashion based on robotic assistance during surgery. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and surgical outcomes, including 90-day surgical complications and 1-year revisions, were collected. Multivariable regression analysis was performed. Significance was set to P < 0.05. Results Four hundred and fifteen patients were identified as having robotic lumbar fusion and were matched to a control group. Bivariant analysis revealed no significant difference in total 90-day surgical complications (P = 0.193) or 1-year revisions (P = 0.178). The operative duration was longer in robotic surgery (287 + 123 vs. 205 + 88.3, P ≤ 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that robotic fusion was not a significant predictor of 90-day surgical complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.76 [0.32-1.67], P = 0.499) or 1-year revisions (OR = 0.58 [0.28-1.18], P = 0.142). Other variables identified as the positive predictors of 1-year revisions included levels fused (OR = 1.26 [1.08-1.48], P = 0.004) and current smokers (OR = 3.51 [1.46-8.15], P = 0.004). Conclusion Our study suggests that robotic-assisted and nonrobotic-assisted lumbar fusions are associated with a similar risk of 90-day surgical complications and 1-year revision rates; however, robotic surgery does increase time under anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy C. Heard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Yunsoo A. Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nicholas D. D’Antonio
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rajkishen Narayanan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark J. Lambrechts
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John Bodnar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Caroline Purtill
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua D. Pezzulo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dominic Farronato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pat Fitzgerald
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jose A. Canseco
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ian David Kaye
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alan S. Hilibrand
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander R. Vaccaro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher K. Kepler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gregory D. Schroeder
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang J, Miao J, Zhan Y, Duan Y, Wang Y, Hao D, Wang B. Spine Surgical Robotics: Current Status and Recent Clinical Applications. Neurospine 2023; 20:1256-1271. [PMID: 38171293 PMCID: PMC10762389 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2346610.305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
With the development of artificial intelligence and the further deepening of medical-engineering integration, spine surgical robot-assisted (RA) technique has made significant progress and its applicability in clinical practice is constantly expanding in recent years. In this review, we have systematically summarized the majority of literature related to spine surgical robots in the past decade, and not only classified robots accordingly, but also summarized the latest research progress in RA technique for screw placement such as cervical, thoracic, and lumbar pedicle screws, cortical bone trajectory screws, cervical lateral mass screws, and S2 sacroiliac screws; guiding targeted puncture and placement of endoscope via the intervertebral foramen; complete resection of spinal tumor tissue; and decompressive laminectomy. In addition, this report also provides a detailed evaluation of RA technique's advantages and disadvantages, and clarifies the accuracy, safety, and practicality of RA technique. We consider that this review can help clinical physicians further understand and familiarize the current clinical application status of spine surgical robots, thereby promoting the continuous improvement and popularization of RA technique, and ultimately benefiting numerous patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiangtao Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
- Medical School of Yan’an University, Yan’an, China
| | - Junxian Miao
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
- Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xi’an, China
| | - Yi Zhan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
- Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xi’an, China
| | - Yongchao Duan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
- Department of Intraoperative Imaging, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Yuanshun Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third People’s Hospital of Xining, Qinghai, China
| | - Dingjun Hao
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Biao Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Foley D, Hardacker P, McCarthy M. Emerging Technologies within Spine Surgery. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:2028. [PMID: 37895410 PMCID: PMC10608700 DOI: 10.3390/life13102028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
New innovations within spine surgery continue to propel the field forward. These technologies improve surgeons' understanding of their patients and allow them to optimize treatment planning both in the operating room and clinic. Additionally, changes in the implants and surgeon practice habits continue to evolve secondary to emerging biomaterials and device design. With ongoing advancements, patients can expect enhanced preoperative decision-making, improved patient outcomes, and better intraoperative execution. Additionally, these changes may decrease many of the most common complications following spine surgery in order to reduce morbidity, mortality, and the need for reoperation. This article reviews some of these technological advancements and how they are projected to impact the field. As the field continues to advance, it is vital that practitioners remain knowledgeable of these changes in order to provide the most effective treatment possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Foley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Pierce Hardacker
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Silvestre J, Qureshi SA, Fossett D, Kang JD. Impact of Specialty on Cases Performed During Spine Surgery Training in the United States. World Neurosurg 2023; 175:e1005-e1010. [PMID: 37087030 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Two general pathways exist for spine surgery training in the United States: orthopedic surgery and neurological surgery. Previous studies have not quantified the impact of fellowship training when comparing case volumes between these 2 training pathways. This study compares reported spine surgery case volume upon graduation from orthopedic surgery and neurological surgery training. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of recent graduates from orthopedic surgery and neurological Surgery training programs in the United States (2018-2021). The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provided case logs for residents in neurological surgery and orthopedic surgery as well as fellows in orthopedic spine surgery. Case volumes were compared for adult and pediatric spine surgery cases using parametric tests. RESULTS Case logs from 3146 orthopedic surgery residents, 107 orthopedic spine surgery fellows, and 766 neurological surgery residents were included in this study. Across each cohort, neurological surgery trainees reported more total adult spine surgery cases than orthopedic surgery trainees (514 ± 206 vs. 383 ± 171, P < 0.001). Orthopedic surgery trainees reported more total pediatric spine surgery cases (21 ± 14 vs. 17 ± 12, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Neurological surgery training affords a greater volume of adult spine surgery cases, but orthopedic surgery affords more pediatric spine surgery cases. Identification of relative strengths and weaknesses can help facilitate multidisciplinary training experiences in spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Silvestre
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Damirez Fossett
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - James D Kang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Safa A, De Biase G, Gassie K, Garcia D, Abode-Iyamah K, Chen SG. Reliability of YouTube videos on robotic spine surgery for patient education. J Clin Neurosci 2023; 109:6-10. [PMID: 36634473 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic surgical systems developed to improve spine surgery accuracy. Studies have found significant reductions in screw revisions and radiation exposure with robotic assistance compared with open surgery. YouTube is the largest online video platform for medical education. Therefore, there is a need for the continuous critical assessment of healthcare-related YouTube videos. Our objective is to assess the reliability of YouTube videos on robotic spine surgery for patient education. METHODS In April of 2022, YouTube was queried for the following keywords: "Robotic Spine Surgery". The "Relevance-Based Ranking" filter was applied, and the first 3 result pages were considered. Videos had to be uploaded by universities or hospitals and be in the English. Three independent healthcare personnel evaluated the videos' education quality using the DISCERN tool. RESULTS Our study found that 33 % of videos analyzed scored above a 3 on the DISCERN scoring scale (considered a ''good" video), with overall mean DISCERN score of 2.8 ± 1.3 (SD). The duration of videos was significantly different between the two groups (Good = 16 min ± 21 vs Unhelpful = 4 min ± 4, p = 0.01). In the helpful group, other characteristics were number of views (16331 ± 31308), likes (88 ± 168) and dislikes (5 ± 8). No statistically significant differences were observed compared to the unhelpful group: number of views (6515 ± 9074; P = 0.20), likes (39 ± 55; P = 0.21) and dislikes (3 ± 4; P = 0.33). CONCLUSION Our study shows that YouTube videos on robotic spine surgery lack accuracy and have poor educational value. There should be increased institutional oversight to combat the spread of misinformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Safa
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Gaetano De Biase
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Kelly Gassie
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Diogo Garcia
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Selby G Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mallela AN, Beiriger J, Gersey ZC, Shariff RK, Gonzalez SM, Agarwal N, González-Martínez JA, Abou-Al-Shaar H. Targeting the Future: Developing a Training Curriculum for Robotic Assisted Neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 2022; 167:e770-e777. [PMID: 36030012 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Technological advances have significantly fostered the use of robotics in neurosurgery. Due to their novelty, there is a need to develop training methods within neurosurgical residency programs that provide trainees the skills to utilize these systems in their future practices safely and effectively. METHODS We describe a detailed curriculum for trainees with significant responsibilities in the operating room, as well as hands-on and theoretical didactics. The curriculum for robot-assisted stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implantation technique and assessment tool has been designed based on Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME's) milestone requirement for surgical treatment of epilepsy and movement disorders. Residents were surveyed to assess their use of robotics in their surgical training. RESULTS Since 2019, more than 100 patients have undergone robot-assisted SEEG and DBS depth electrode implantations at our institution. Residents and fellows were involved in all aspects of surgical planning and execution and were encouraged to take an active role during procedures. Didactic sessions led by experienced faculty are emphasized as important learning tools prior to hands-on experience in the operating room. The results of the survey show that residents receive more training intraoperatively as compared to training sessions, yet trainees would benefit from more instruction on informative cadaveric simulation sessions. CONCLUSIONS Our curriculum was developed to become a structured tool for assessment of robotic education in neurosurgical training. This curriculum based on ACGME milestone requirements serve as a template for resident and fellow education in robotics in neurosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arka N Mallela
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Justin Beiriger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zachary C Gersey
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rimsha K Shariff
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sophia M Gonzalez
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nitin Agarwal
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jorge A González-Martínez
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rossi VJ, Wells-Quinn TA, Malham GM. Negotiating for new technologies: guidelines for the procurement of assistive technologies in spinal surgery: a narrative review. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY (HONG KONG) 2022; 8:254-265. [PMID: 35875618 PMCID: PMC9263739 DOI: 10.21037/jss-21-107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE This is a narrative review with the objective to discuss available assistive technologies for spinal surgery. Characteristics, costs, and compatibility of the different systems are summarized and recommendations made regarding acquiring these technologies. The availability of assistive technologies in spine surgery continues to evolve rapidly. The literature is lacking a collective summary of the available technologies and guidelines for acquisition. This is a narrative review which (I) presents an up-to-date summary of the currently available assistive technologies in spinal surgery; (II) makes comment on the utility of imaging, navigation, and robotics; (III) makes recommendations for the utility of the platform based on hospital size and (IV) discuss factors involved in negotiating for the purchase of these new technologies. METHODS We assemble the most up-to-date collection of description, characteristics and pricing of assistive technologies in spinal surgery. We compare and contrast these technologies and make recommendations regarding acquisition. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS These technologies require a learning-curve for the surgeon and the operating room staff to understand how to use them efficiently. Surgeons need to be involved in the process of purchase decisions. Surgeons occupy a unique position in the health care infrastructure as their approach to care has significant ramifications on both the quality and cost of care. Surgeons should maintain conviction that their training and practice has allowed the use of these technologies to provide safer and more effective care for patients. CONCLUSIONS Assistive technologies and prostheses for spinal fusion are evolving rapidly. This article serves as an encompassing reference to the current technologies. These technologies will play a significant role in the delivery of spinal health care in the future. All stakeholders stand to benefit from the increased value these technologies bring to patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent J. Rossi
- Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC, USA
- Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | | - Gregory M. Malham
- Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Simulation Training in Spine Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:400-408. [PMID: 35446299 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simulated surgery is part of a growing paradigm shift in surgical education as a whole. Various modalities from cadaver models to virtual reality have been developed and studied within the context of surgical education. Simulation training in spine surgery has an immense potential to improve education and ultimately improve patient safety. This is due to the inherent risk of operating the spine and the technical difficulty of modern techniques. Common procedures in the modern orthopaedic armamentarium, such as pedicle screw placement, can be simulated, and proficiency is rapidly achieved before application in patients. Furthermore, complications such as dural tears can be simulated and effectively managed in a safe environment with simulation. New techniques with steeper learning curves, such as minimally invasive techniques, can now be safely simulated. Hence, augmenting surgical education through simulation has great potential to benefit trainees and practicing orthopaedic surgeons in modern spine surgery techniques. Additional work will aim to improve access to such technologies and integrate them into the current orthopaedic training curriculum.
Collapse
|