Endoscopic Endonasal Versus Transoral Odontoidectomy for Non-Neoplastic Craniovertebral Junction Disease: A Case Series

Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Craniovertebral Junction Lesions: A Case Series of 18 Patients

Introduction  Odontoid pathologies constitute a special category because they may lead to instability. Instability is defined by abnormal spinal alignment under physiologic conditions (loads) such as standing, walking, bending, or lifting. Since instability poses a risk of cord damage, surgical interventions may be required for durable long-term stabilization. This study demonstrates operative technique and results of endoscopic endonasal approach to the odontoid pathologies. Methods  We conducted a retrospective study involving 18 patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy (EEO) due to craniovertebral pathologies. Demographic data, clinical features of the patients, risk factors, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were reported in this series. Results  Satisfactory outcomes achieved in 16 patients based on comparing the modified Rankin scale before and after the surgery ( p  = 0.0001). The mean duration for EEO was 232.6 ± 18.8 minutes. The mean blood loss during surgery was 386.67 ± 153.04 mL. The mean duration of hospital stay was 7 days. All patients were extubated within a few hours after surgery. Despite of successful anterior decompression in the aforementioned cases, intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, postoperative meningitis, and pulmonary thromboembolism occurred as complications. However, two intraoperative CSF leakages were managed by direct dural repair and fat graft; two patients died due to postoperative meningitis and pulmonary thromboembolism at 7 and 4 days after the second surgery. Conclusion  In conclusion, EEO can be effectively used for anterior decompression of the odontoid pathologies, despite the risk of complications.

The Impact of C1 Anterior Arch Preservation on Spine Stability After Odontoidectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Odontoidectomy for symptomatic irreducible ventral brainstem compression at the craniovertebral junction may result in spine instability requiring subsequent instrumentation. There is no consensus on the importance of C1 anterior arch preservation in prevention of iatrogenic instability. We conducted a systematic review of the impact of C1 anterior arch preservation on postodontoidectomy spine stability.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched following the PRISMA guidelines to include studies of patients undergoing odontoidectomy. Random-effect model meta-analyses were performed to compare spine stability between C1 anterior arch preservation versus removal and posttreatment outcomes between transoral approaches (TOAs) versus endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs).

RESULTS

We included 27 studies comprising 462 patients. The most common lesions were basilar invagination (73.3%) and degenerative arthritis (12.6%). Symptoms included myelopathy (72%) and neck pain (43.9%). Odontoidectomy was performed through TOA (56.1%) and EEA corridors (34.4%). The C1 anterior arch was preserved in 16.7% of cases. Postodontoidectomy stabilization was performed in 83.3% patients. Median follow-up was 27 months (range, 0.1-145). Rates of spine instability were significantly lower (P = 0.004) when the C1 anterior arch was preserved. Postoperative clinical improvement and pooled complications were reported in 78.8% and 12.6% of patients, respectively, with no significant differences between TOA and EEA (P = 0.892; P = 0.346). Patients undergoing EEA had significantly higher rates of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Odontoidectomy is safe and effective for treating craniovertebral junction lesions. Preservation of the C1 anterior arch seems to improve maintenance of spine stability. TOA and EEA show comparable outcomes and complication rates.

Basilar decompression via a far lateral transcondylar approach: technical note

BACKGROUND

Treatments for symptomatic or unstable basilar invagination (BI) include posterior decompression, distraction/fusion, trans-nasal or trans-oral anterior decompression, and combined techniques, with the need for occipitocervical fusion based on the degree of craniocervical instability. Variations of the far lateral transcondylar approach are described in limited case series for BI, but have not been widely applied.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing a far lateral transcondylar approach for odontoidectomy (± resection of the inferior clivus) followed by occipitocervical fusion over a 6-year period (1/1/2016 to 12/31/2021) is performed. Detailed technical notes are combined with images from cadaveric dissections and patient surgeries to illustrate our technique using a lateral retroauricular incision.

RESULTS

Nine patients were identified (3 males, 6 females; mean age 40.2 ± 19.6 years). All patients had congenital or acquired BI causing neurologic deficits. There were no major neurologic or wound-healing complications. 9/9 patients (100%) experienced improvement in preoperative symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The far lateral transcondylar approach provides a direct corridor for ventral brainstem decompression in patients with symptomatic BI. A comprehensive knowledge of craniovertebral junction anatomy is critical to the safe performance of this surgery, especially when using a lateral retroauricular incision.