One-stage En bloc resection of thoracic spinal chondrosarcoma with huge paravertebral mass through the single posterior approach by dissociate longissimus thoracis

Study design

Retrospective case series.

Objective

To describe the technique details and therapeutic outcomes of 3-D printing model-guided en bloc resection of chondrosarcoma (CHS) with huge paravertebral mass via the combined posterior median and Wiltse approach.

Summary of background data

Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) technique is conventionally based on the single posterior approach or combined anterior-posterior approach. However, the single posterior approach imposes a high technical demand on the surgeon due to the narrow field of vision, limited surgical space and the delicate spinal cord, while the combined anterior-posterior approach not only requires greater patient tolerance but is time consuming and runs the risk of more blood loss and injury to the visceral pleura and large blood vessels during surgery. In addition, it is difficult to completely remove the thoracic CHS with paravertebral mass through simple en bloc resection when it involves the aorta, vena cava, costa and lung.

Material and methods

Between August 2010 and January 2016, we performed a retrospective study to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of en bloc resection of thoracic spinal CHS with paravertebral mass through the combined posterior median and Wiltse approach. Postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Altogether 15 patients received en bloc resection of thoracic spinal CHS with paravertebral mass through the combined posterior median and Wiltse approach. The mean age of these patients was 37.0 ± 12.8 years (median 36; range 15–64). This combination approach provided more extensive exposure and wider marginal resection of the tumor within a mean operation duration of 288 ± 96 min (median 280; range 140–480) and mean intraoperative blood loss of 1,966 ± 830 ml (median 2,000; range 300–3,000). Of the 15 patients, 5 experienced local recurrence of the disease; the mean time from surgery to recurrence was 22 ± 9.85 months (median 17, range 13–35). RFS in patients with recurrent CHS was significantly lower than that in patients with primary CHS on admission (p = 0.05).

Conclusions

The combined posterior median and Wiltse approach is a technically viable option for en bloc resection of thoracic spinal CHS with huge paravertebral mass, and can give a favorable local control of CHS.

Level of evidence

Level V.

[Lateral retropleural and retrodiaphragmatic approach in patients with spine trauma and diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis]

BACKGROUND

Retropleural and/or retrodiaphragmatic approach is one of the options for anterolateral access to the thoracic spine and thoracolumbar region. This technique has no disadvantages associated with thoracotomy or extensive tissue dissection following posterolateral approaches.

OBJECTIVE

Systematic analysis of foreign and national researches devoted to the possibility, safety and effectiveness of lateral retropleural approach to the thoracic spine and meta-analysis of the most common complications associated with this approach.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Initial searching revealed 133 abstracts for further study. Inclusion criteria: 1) available full-text version of the manuscript in English or Russian; 2) age of patients over 18 years; 3) description of lateral retropleural or retrodiaphragmatic approach complicated or not complicated by access-associated complications. According to these criteria, we enrolled 10 manuscripts.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis showed high (10.6%) probability of pleural injury associated with surgical approach. Compared to endoscopic transthoracic interventions, the above-mentioned access is characterized by similar or slightly greater blood loss (401.2 ml vs. 100-775 ml) and slightly longer surgery time (200.5 vs. 97.5-186 min) that may be due to small number of interventions and relatively little experience of such operations. The number of patients with approach-related complications is comparable to that for endoscopic transthoracic access (5% vs. 3.7-13.3%). Compared to transthoracic minithoracotomy, this approach is characterized by similar blood loss (401.2 vs. 391 ml), longer surgery time (200.5 vs. 168 min) and similar or lower morbidity (5% vs. 5-13.5%).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive anterolateral retropleural and/or retrodiaphragmatic approach to the thoracic spine and thoracolumbar junction for corpectomy and discectomy ensures effective spinal canal decompression and less incidence of complications following open or thoracoscopic thoracic spine surgery. Dissection of parietal pleura should be of special attention because injury of this structure occurs in 10.6% of cases. Skin incision 7.1 cm and rib resection for at least 5 cm may be valuable to prevent plural damage.