Grin AA, Kordonskiy AY, Lvov IS, Arakelyan SL, Sytnik AV. [Lateral retropleural and retrodiaphragmatic approach in patients with spine trauma and diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis].
ZHURNAL VOPROSY NEIROKHIRURGII IMENI N. N. BURDENKO 2021;
85:94-103. [PMID:
34156211 DOI:
10.17116/neiro20218503194]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Retropleural and/or retrodiaphragmatic approach is one of the options for anterolateral access to the thoracic spine and thoracolumbar region. This technique has no disadvantages associated with thoracotomy or extensive tissue dissection following posterolateral approaches.
OBJECTIVE
Systematic analysis of foreign and national researches devoted to the possibility, safety and effectiveness of lateral retropleural approach to the thoracic spine and meta-analysis of the most common complications associated with this approach.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Initial searching revealed 133 abstracts for further study. Inclusion criteria: 1) available full-text version of the manuscript in English or Russian; 2) age of patients over 18 years; 3) description of lateral retropleural or retrodiaphragmatic approach complicated or not complicated by access-associated complications. According to these criteria, we enrolled 10 manuscripts.
RESULTS
Meta-analysis showed high (10.6%) probability of pleural injury associated with surgical approach. Compared to endoscopic transthoracic interventions, the above-mentioned access is characterized by similar or slightly greater blood loss (401.2 ml vs. 100-775 ml) and slightly longer surgery time (200.5 vs. 97.5-186 min) that may be due to small number of interventions and relatively little experience of such operations. The number of patients with approach-related complications is comparable to that for endoscopic transthoracic access (5% vs. 3.7-13.3%). Compared to transthoracic minithoracotomy, this approach is characterized by similar blood loss (401.2 vs. 391 ml), longer surgery time (200.5 vs. 168 min) and similar or lower morbidity (5% vs. 5-13.5%).
CONCLUSION
Minimally invasive anterolateral retropleural and/or retrodiaphragmatic approach to the thoracic spine and thoracolumbar junction for corpectomy and discectomy ensures effective spinal canal decompression and less incidence of complications following open or thoracoscopic thoracic spine surgery. Dissection of parietal pleura should be of special attention because injury of this structure occurs in 10.6% of cases. Skin incision 7.1 cm and rib resection for at least 5 cm may be valuable to prevent plural damage.
Collapse