Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery for Resection of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations Utilizing Image-Guided BrainPath System

Cerebral cavernous malformations - An overview on genetics, clinical aspects and therapeutic strategies

Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are abnormally packed blood vessels lined with endothelial cells, that do not exhibit intervening tight junctions, lack muscular and elastic layers and are usually surrounded by hemosiderin and gliosis. CCMs may be sporadic or familial autosomal dominant (FCCMs) caused by loss of function mutations in CCM1 (KRIT1), CCM2 (MGC4607), and CCM3 (PDCD10) genes. In the FCCMs, patients have multiple CCMs, different family members are affected, and developmental venous anomalies are absent. CCMs may be asymptomatic or may manifest with focal neurological deficits with or without associated hemorrhage andseizures. Recent studies identify a digenic "triple-hit" mechanism involving the aquisition of three distinct genetic mutations that culminate in phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PIK3CA) gain of function, as the basis for rapidly growing and clinically symptomatic CCMs. The pathophysiology of CCMs involves signaling aberrations in the neurovascular unit, including proliferative dysangiogenesis, blood-brain barrier hyperpermeability, inflammation and immune mediated processes, anticoagulant vascular domain, and gut microbiome-driven mechanisms. Clinical trials are investigating potential therapies, magnetic resonance imaging and plasma biomarkers for hemorrhage and CCMs-related epilepsy, as well as different techniques of neuronavigation and neurosonology to guide surgery in order to minimize post-operatory morbidity and mortality. This review addresses the recent data about the natural history, genetics, neuroimaging and therapeutic approaches for CCMs.

Impact of Preoperative Mapping and Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery for Deep-Seated Lesions

BACKGROUND

Transsulcal tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular surgery changes the surgical strategy for deep-seated lesions by promoting a deficit-sparing approach. When integrated with preoperative brain mapping and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), this approach may potentially improve patient outcomes. In this study, we assessed the impact of preoperative brain mapping and IONM in tubular retractor-assisted neuro-oncological surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients who underwent transsulcal tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular surgery for resection of deep-seated brain tumors from 2016 to 2022. The cohort was divided into 3 groups: group 1, no preoperative mapping or IONM (17 patients); group 2, IONM only (25 patients); group 3, both preoperative mapping and IONM (38 patients).

RESULTS

We analyzed 80 patients (33 males and 47 females) with a median age of 46.5 years (range: 1-81 years). There was no significant difference in mean tumor volume (26.2 cm3 [range 1.07-97.4 cm3]; P = 0.740) and mean preoperative depth of the tumor (31 mm [range 3-65 mm], P = 0.449) between the groups. A higher proportion of high-grade gliomas and metastases was present within group 3 (P = 0.003). IONM was related to fewer motor (P = 0.041) and language (P = 0.032) deficits at hospital discharge. Preoperative mapping and IONM were also related to shorter length of stay (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative and intraoperative brain mapping and monitoring enhance transsulcal tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular surgery in neuro-oncology. Patients had a reduced length of stay and prolonged overall survival. IONM alone reduces postoperative neurological deficit.

Use of tubular retractors to access deep brain lesions: A case series

BACKGROUND

Deep-seated intracranial lesions can be accessed using blade retractors that may disrupt white matter tracts, exert pressure on adjacent tissue, and lead to post-operative venous injury. Tubular retractors may minimize disruption to white matter tracts by radially dispersing pressure onto surrounding tissue. This study characterizes perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing biopsy or resection of intracranial pathologies using tubular retractors.

METHODS

Adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing neurosurgical intervention using tubular retractors at a single health system (January 2016-February 2022) were identified through chart review. Demographics, disease characteristics, management data, and clinical outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients were included; 23 (47%) had primary brain tumors, 8 (16%) metastases, 6 (12%) intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), 5 (10%) cavernomas, and 7 (14%) other pathologies. Lesions were located subcortically (n = 19, 39%), intraventricularly (n = 15, 31%), and in deep gray matter (n = 11, 22%). Gross total resection (GTR) or near GTR was achieved in 21 of 26 (80.8%) patients with intracranial lesions where GTR was the goal of surgery; 10 of 11 (90.9%) biopsies in patients with masses were diagnostic. Five of six (83.3%) ICHs were totally or near totally evacuated. Seventeen patients (35%) had major complications post-operatively. The most common complications were DVT/PE (n = 7, 14%) and seizures (n = 6, 12%). For patients who experienced post-operative seizures, 3 had seizures preoperatively and 1 had seizures in the context of electrolyte derangements. No patients died of post-operative complications.

CONCLUSION

This operative approach may facilitate safe and efficacious biopsy or resection of deep-seated intracranial pathologies.

Surgical Resection of Deep-Seated Arteriovenous Malformations Through Stereotactically Guided Tubular Retractor Systems: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in the subcortical and/or periventricular regions can cause significant intraventricular and intracranial hemorrhage. These AVMs can pose a unique surgical challenge because traditional, open approaches to the periventricular region require significant cortical/white matter retraction to establish sufficient operative corridors, which may result in risk of neurological injury. Minimally invasive tubular retractor systems represent a novel, feasible surgical option for treating deep-seated AVMs.

OBJECTIVE

To explore 5 cases of NICO BrainPath-assisted resection of subcortical/periventricular AVMs.

METHODS

Five patients from a single institution were operated on for deep-seated AVMs using tubular retractor systems. Collected data included demographics, AVM specifications, preoperative neurological status, postoperative neurological status, and postoperative/intraoperative angiogram results.

RESULTS

Five patients, ranging from age 10 to 45 years, underwent mini-craniotomy for stereotactically guided tubular retractor-assisted AVM resection using neuronavigation for selecting a safe operative corridor. No preoperative embolization was necessary. Mean maximum AVM nidal diameter was 8.2 mm. All deep-seated AVMs were completely resected without complications. All AVMs demonstrated complete obliteration on intraoperative angiogram and on 6-month follow-up angiogram.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive tubular retractors are safe and present a promising surgical option for well-selected deep-seated AVMs. Furthermore, study may elucidate whether tubular retractors improve outcomes after microsurgical AVM resection secondary to mitigation of iatrogenic retraction injury risk.