Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Concomitant Cardiac Pacemakers: A Case Series

New Perspectives of Deep Brain Stimulation Indications for Parkinson's Disease: A Critical Review

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment option for patients with dopaminergic complications of Parkinson's disease (PD) and drug-refractory PD tremor. However, DBS and its indications can be challenging, and they are not often debated in the medical community. Through a critical narrative review, the objective of this paper is to improve the comprehension of DBS indications and help to solve the puzzle that this process can be. Proper patient selection is the first step for a good surgical outcome. In this review, then, relevant considerations are discussed, involving PD genes, PD phenotypes, indications of early stages, non-motor symptoms, neuroimaging predictors, comorbidities, and age. Individualized approaches are encouraged, including clinical and radiological factors. Social support during the whole follow-up and expectations alignment are necessary through this process and are also debated.

Deep brain stimulation in patients on chronic antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment

BACKGROUND

In the aging society, many patients with movement disorders, pain syndromes, or psychiatric disorders who are candidates for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery suffer also from cardiovascular co-morbidities that require chronic antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment. Because of a presumed increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage during or after surgery and limited knowledge about perioperative management, chronic antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment often has been considered a relative contraindication for DBS. Here, we evaluate whether or not there is an increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage or thromboembolic complications in patients on chronic treatment (paused for surgery or bridged with subcutaneous heparin) as compared to those without.

METHODS

Out of a series of 465 patients undergoing functional stereotactic neurosurgery, 34 patients were identified who were on chronic treatment before and after receiving DBS. In patients with antiplatelet treatment, medication was stopped in the perioperative period. In patients with vitamin K antagonists or novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), heparin was used for bridging. All patients had postoperative stereotactic CT scans, and were followed up for 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

In patients on chronic antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment, intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 2/34 (5.9%) DBS surgeries, whereas the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 15/431 (3.5%) in those without, which was statistically not significant. Implantable pulse generator pocket hematomas were seen in 2/34 (5.9%) surgeries in patients on chronic treatment and in 4/426 (0.9%) without. There were only 2 instances of thromboembolic complications which both occurred in patients without chronic treatment. There were no hemorrhagic complications during follow-up for 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

DBS surgery in patients on chronic antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment is feasible. Also, there was no increased risk of hemorrhage in the first year of follow-up after DBS surgery. Appropriate patient selection and standardized perioperative management are necessary to reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage and thromboembolic complications.

Coexistence of deep brain stimulators and cardiac implantable electronic devices: A systematic review of safety

As the number of patients implanted with deep brain stimulation systems increases, coexistence with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) poses questions about safety. We systematically reviewed the literature on coexisting DBS and CIED. Eighteen reports of 34 patients were included. Device-device interactions were reported in 6 patients. Sources of complications were extensively reviewed and cautious measures which could be considered as part of a standard checklist for careful consideration are suggested.

Surgical Management of Parkinson's Disease in the Elderly

Background

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an increasingly popular therapy for Parkinson's Disease (PD). Despite the experience gained over time with DBS of either the subthalamus or the globus pallidus pars interna, there is still no consensus regarding the age limit for DBS indication.

Objectives

This narrative review of the literature discusses the issues of age and DBS, emphasizing the critical need for good quality evidence to support the surgical management of elderly patients with PD.

Methods

We searched PubMed using the terms Parkinson's Disease; Parkinson's Disease therapy; deep brain stimulation; antiparkinsonian agents therapeutic use; age factors; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; treatment outcome; and risk assessments.

Results

We identified several limitations of the available evidence, such as under-representation of older patients in DBS studies, small sample sizes in studies with older participants, heterogeneity of outcomes, and conflicting results.

Conclusions

Despite preliminary suggestions that age might affect the outcomes of DBS, the evidence to support the hypothesis of age as an independent predictor of DBS outcomes is limited and results are controversial. Ultimately, finding an age-independent biomarker predicting DBS outcome is the final goal to expand this powerful treatment to all patients age in an effective and safe manner.