Endoscopic 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Induced Fluorescence-Guided Intraparenchymal Brain Tumor Resection-Can the Endoscope Detect More Fluorescence Than the Microscope?

OBJECTIVES

Using a laboratory-based optical setup, we show that 5-aminolevulinic acid (5ALA) fluorescence is better detected using the endoscope than the microscope. Furthermore, we present our case series of fully endoscopic 5ALA-guided resection of intraparenchymal tumors.

METHODS

A Zeiss Pentero microscope was compared with the Karl Storz Hopkins endoscope. The spectra and intensity of each blue light source were measured. Quantitative fluorescence detection thresholds were measured using a spectrometer. Subjective fluorescence detection thresholds were measured by 6 blinded neuro-oncology surgeons. Clinical data were prospectively collected for all consecutive cases of fully endoscopic 5ALA-guided resection of intraparenchymal tumors between 2012 and 2023.

RESULTS

The intensity of blue light on the sample was greater for the endoscope than the microscope at working distances less than 20 mm. The quantitative fluorescence detection thresholds were lower for the endoscope than the microscope at both 30-/10-mm working distances. Fluorescence detection threshold was 0.65%-0.80% relative 4-dicyanomethylene-2-methyl-6-p-dimethylaminostyryl-4H-pyranthe concentration (3.20 × 10-7 to 3.94 × 10-7mol/dm-3) for the microscope, 0.40%-0.55% relative concentrations (1.97 × 10-7 to 2.71 × 10-7mol/dm-3) for the endoscope at 30 mm, and 0.15%-0.30% relative concentrations (7.40 × 10-8 to 1.48 × 10-7mol/dm-3) for the endoscope at 10 mm. In total, 49 5ALA endoscope-assisted brain tumor resections were carried out on 45 patients (mean age = 41 years, male = 28). Greater than 95% resection was achieved in 80% of cases and gross total resection in 42%. Gross total resection was achieved in 100% of tumors in noneloquent locations. There was 1 new neurologic deficit.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscope provides enhanced visualization/detection of 5ALA-induced fluorescence compared with the microscope. 5ALA endoscopic-assisted resection of intraparenchymal tumors is safe and feasible.

Advancement of fluorescent aminopeptidase probes for rapid cancer detection-current uses and neurosurgical applications

Surgical resection is considered for most brain tumors to obtain tissue diagnosis and to eradicate or debulk the tumor. Glioma, the most common primary malignant brain tumor, generally has a poor prognosis despite the multidisciplinary treatments with radical resection and chemoradiotherapy. Surgical resection of glioma is often complicated by the obscure border between the tumor and the adjacent brain tissues and by the tumor's infiltration into the eloquent brain. 5-aminolevulinic acid is frequently used for tumor visualization, as it exhibits high fluorescence in high-grade glioma. Here, we provide an overview of the fluorescent probes currently used for brain tumors, as well as those under development for other cancers, including HMRG-based probes, 2MeSiR-based probes, and other aminopeptidase probes. We describe our recently developed HMRG-based probes in brain tumors, such as PR-HMRG, combined with the existing diagnosis approach. These probes are remarkably effective for cancer cell recognition. Thus, they can be potentially integrated into surgical treatment for intraoperative detection of cancers.

Endoscope-enhanced fluorescence-guided microsurgery increases survival in patients with glioblastoma

PURPOSE

Extent of resection (EOR) predicts progression-free survival (PFS) and may impact overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma. We recently demonstrated that 5-aminolevulinic acid-(5-ALA)-fluorescence-enhanced endoscopic surgery increase the rate of gross total resection. However, it is hitherto unknown whether fluorescence-enhanced endoscopic resection affects survival.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of a consecutive series of patients who underwent surgery for non-eloquently located glioblastoma between 2011 and 2018. All patients underwent fluorescence-guided microscopic or fluorescence-guided combined microscopic and endoscopic resection. PFS, OS, EOR as well as clinical and demographic parameters, adjuvant treatment modalities, and molecular characteristics were compared between microscopy-only vs. endoscopy-assisted microsurgical resection.

RESULTS

Out of 114 patients, 73 (65%) were male, and 57 (50%) were older than 65 years. Twenty patients (18%) were operated on using additional endoscopic assistance. Both cohorts were equally distributed in terms of age, performance status, lesion location, adjuvant treatment modalities, and molecular status. Gross total resection was achieved in all endoscopy-assisted patients compared to about three-quarters of microscope-only patients (100% vs. 75.9%, p=0.003). The PFS in the endoscope-assisted cohort was 19.3 months (CI95% 10.8-27.7) vs. 10.8 months (CI95% 8.2-13.4; p=0.012) in the microscope-only cohort. OS in the endoscope-assisted group was 28.9 months (CI95% 20.4-34.1) compared to 16.8 months (CI95% 14.0-20.9), in the microscope-only group (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Endoscope-assisted fluorescence-guided resection of glioblastoma appears to substantially enhance gross total resection and OS. The strong effect size observed herein is contrasted by the limitations in study design. Therefore, prospective validation is required before we can generalize our findings.

Highlighted Advances in Therapies for Difficult-To-Treat Brain Tumours Such as Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains a challenging disease, as it is the most common and deadly brain tumour in adults and has no curative solution and an overall short survival time. This incurability and short survival time means that, despite its rarity (average incidence of 3.2 per 100,000 persons), there has been an increased effort to try to treat this disease. Standard of care in newly diagnosed glioblastoma is maximal tumour resection followed by initial concomitant radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) and then further chemotherapy with TMZ. Imaging techniques are key not only to diagnose the extent of the affected tissue but also for surgery planning and even for intraoperative use. Eligible patients may combine TMZ with tumour treating fields (TTF) therapy, which delivers low-intensity and intermediate-frequency electric fields to arrest tumour growth. Nonetheless, the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and systemic side effects are obstacles to successful chemotherapy in GBM; thus, more targeted, custom therapies such as immunotherapy and nanotechnological drug delivery systems have been undergoing research with varying degrees of success. This review proposes an overview of the pathophysiology, possible treatments, and the most (not all) representative examples of the latest advancements.

Maximal Safe Resection in Glioblastoma Surgery: A Systematic Review of Advanced Intraoperative Image-Guided Techniques

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) represents the most common and aggressive central nervous system tumor associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to depict the role of intraoperative imaging techniques in GBM surgery and how they can ensure the maximal extent of resection (EOR) while preserving the functional outcome. The authors conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines on the PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases. A total of 1747 articles were identified for screening. Studies focusing on GBM-affected patients, and evaluations of EOR and functional outcomes with the aid of advanced image-guided techniques were included. The resulting studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Review tool. Open Science Framework registration DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/3FDP9. Eighteen studies were eligible for this systematic review. Among the selected studies, eight analyzed Sodium Fluorescein, three analyzed 5-aminolevulinic acid, two evaluated IoMRI imaging, two evaluated IoUS, and three evaluated multiple intraoperative imaging techniques. A total of 1312 patients were assessed. Gross Total Resection was achieved in the 78.6% of the cases. Follow-up time ranged from 1 to 52 months. All studies assessed the functional outcome based on the Karnofsky Performance Status scale, while one used the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology score. In 77.7% of the cases, the functional outcome improved or was stable over the pre-operative assessment. Combining multiple intraoperative imaging techniques could provide better results in GBM surgery than a single technique. However, despite good surgical outcomes, patients often present a neurocognitive decline leading to a marked deterioration of the quality of life. Advanced intraoperative image-guided techniques can allow a better understanding of the anatomo-functional relationships between the tumor and the surrounding brain, thus maximizing the EOR while preserving functional outcomes.

Endoscope-assisted visualization of 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence in surgery for brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

Fluorescence-guided resection of cerebral metastases has been proposed as an approach to visualize residual tumor tissue and maximize the extent of resection. Critics have argued that tumor cells at the resection margins might be overlooked under microscopic visualization because of technical limitations. Therefore, an endoscope, which is capable of inducing fluorescence, has been applied with the aim of improving exposure of fluorescent tumor tissue. In this retrospective analysis, authors assessed the utility of endoscope assistance in 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence-guided resection of brain metastases.

METHODS

Between June 2013 and December 2016, a standard 20-mg/kg dose of 5-ALA was administered 4 hours prior to surgery in 26 patients with suspected single brain metastases. After standard neuronavigated microsurgical tumor resection, a microscope capable of inducing fluorescence was used to examine tumor margins. The authors classified the remaining fluorescence into 3 grades (0 = none, 1 = weak, and 2 = strong). Endoscopic assistance was employed if no or only weak fluorescence was visualized at the resection margins under the microscope. Endoscopically identified fluorescent tissue at the margins was resected and evaluated separately via histological examination to prove or disprove tumor infiltration.

RESULTS

Under the microscope, weakly fluorescent tissue was seen at the margins of the resection cavity in 15/26 (57.7%) patients. In contrast, endoscopic inspection revealed strongly fluorescent tissue in 22/26 (84.6%) metastases. In 11/26 (42.3%) metastases no fluorescence at the tumor margins was detected by the microscope; however, strong fluorescence was visualized under the endoscope in 7 (63.6%) of these 11 metastases. In the 15 metastases with microscopically weak fluorescence, strong fluorescence was seen when using the endoscope. Neither microscopic nor endoscopic fluorescence was found in 4/26 (15.4%) cases. In the 26 patients, 96 histological specimens were obtained from the margins of the resection cavity. Findings from these specimens were in conjunction with the histopathological findings, allowing identification of metastatic infiltration with a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 75% using endoscope assistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorescence-guided endoscope assistance may overcome the technical limitations of the conventional microscopic exposure of 5-ALA-fluorescent metastases and thereby increase visualization of fluorescent tumor tissue at the margins of the resection cavity with high sensitivity and acceptable specificity.

5-Aminolevulinic acid-enhanced fluorescence-guided treatment of high-grade glioma using angled endoscopic blue light visualization: technical case series with preliminary follow-up

OBJECTIVE

5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-enhanced fluorescence-guided resection of high-grade glioma (HGG) using microscopic blue light visualization offers the ability to improve extent of resection (EOR); however, few descriptions of HGG resection performed using endoscopic blue light visualization are currently available. In this report, the authors sought to describe their surgical experience and patient outcomes of 5-ALA-enhanced fluorescence-guided resection of HGG using primary or adjunctive endoscopic blue light visualization.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 30 consecutive patients who underwent 5-ALA-enhanced fluorescence-guided biopsy or resection of newly diagnosed HGG was performed. Patient demographic data, tumor characteristics, surgical technique, EOR, tumor fluorescence patterns, and progression-free survival were recorded.

RESULTS

In total, 30 newly diagnosed HGG patients were included for analysis. The endoscope was utilized for direct 5-ALA-guided port-based biopsy (n = 9), microscopic to endoscopic (M2E; n = 18) resection, or exoscopic to endoscopic (E2E; n = 3) resection. All endoscopic biopsies of fluorescent tissue were diagnostic. 5-ALA-enhanced tumor fluorescence was visible in all glioblastoma cases, but only in 50% of anaplastic astrocytoma cases and no anaplastic oligodendroglioma cases. Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 10 patients in whom complete resection was considered safe, with 11 patients undergoing subtotal resection. In all cases, endoscopic fluorescence was more avid than microscopic fluorescence. The endoscope offered the ability to diagnose and resect additional tumor not visualized by the microscope in 83.3% (n = 10/12) of glioblastoma cases, driven by angled lenses and increased fluorescence facilitated by light source delivery within the cavity. Mean volumetric EOR was 90.7% in all resection patients and 98.8% in patients undergoing planned GTR. No complications were attributable to 5-ALA or blue light endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

The blue light endoscope is a viable primary or adjunctive visualization platform for optimization of 5-ALA-enhanced HGG fluorescence. Implementation of the blue light endoscope to guide resection of HGG glioma is feasible and ergonomically favorable, with a potential advantage of enabling increased detection of tumor fluorescence in deep surgical cavities compared to the microscope.

5-ALA Enhanced Fluorescence-Guided Microscopic to Endoscopic Resection of Deep Frontal Subcortical Glioblastoma Multiforme

Glioblastoma multiforme remains the most common adult primary brain tumor with a life expectancy of 15-18 months following best treatment strategies. Current paradigms incorporate maximal safe resection, chemotherapy, and radiation.¹ Multiple variables correlate with increased survival; perhaps most notably are stepwise survival advantages following 78% and 98% extent of resection thresholds.^2,3 5-Aminolevulinic acid has become a vital tool in the intraoperative identification and differentiation of high-grade glioma as it provides a fluorescent effect capable of distinguishing tumor from normal brain tissue when observed under blue light, which to date has been used primarily via a microscopic light source.⁴ However, this effect is attenuated with increasing distance between the blue light source and the tumor, as in the case of deep seated resection cavities.⁵ We aimed to overcome this obstacle by using a blue light endoscope as the primary visualization platform, thereby advancing the light source directly into the resection cavity. We present the case of a 69-year-old man with a deep left frontal subcortical lesion proven to be glioblastoma multiforme on prior biopsy. He consented to undergo an interhemispheric "M2E" (microscopic-to-endoscopic) approach with subcortical motor mapping. Tumor fluorescence under blue light visualization was not appreciated by the operating microscope but was easily observed with the blue light endoscope. Tumor resection proceeded under direct blue light endoscopy with intermittent subcortical motor mapping until a threshold of 4 mA was reached. The patient had transient right arm and leg weakness. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging confirmed >98% resection (Video 1).

Endoscope-assisted fluorescence-guided resection allowing supratotal removal in glioblastoma surgery

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have proven the benefits of a wide extent of resection (EOR) of contrast-enhancing tumor in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Thus, gross-total resection (GTR) is the main surgical goal in noneloquently located GBMs. Complete tumor removal can be almost doubled by microscopic fluorescence guidance. Recently, a study has shown that an endoscope with a light source capable of inducing fluorescence allows visualization of remnant fluorescent tumor tissue even after complete microscopic fluorescence-guided (FG) resection, thereby increasing the rate of GTR. Since tumor infiltration spreads beyond the borders of contrast enhancement on MRI, the aim of this study was to determine via volumetric analyses of the EOR whether endoscope-assisted FG resection enables supratotal resection beyond the borders of contrast enhancement.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of a consecutive series of patients with primary GBM presumed to be noneloquently located and routinely operated on at their institution between January 2015 and February 2018 using a combined microscopic and endoscopic FG resection. A 20-mg/kg dose of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) was administered 4 hours before surgery. After complete microscopic FG resection, the resection cavity was scanned using the endoscope. Detected residual fluorescent tissue was resected and embedded separately for histopathological examination. Nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced 3D T1-weighted MR images acquired before and within 48 hours after tumor resection were analyzed using 3D Slicer. Bias field-corrected data were used to segment brain parenchyma, contrast-enhancing tumor, and the resection cavity for volume definition. The difference between the pre- and postoperative brain parenchyma volume was considered to be equivalent to the resected nonenhancing but fluorescent tumor tissue. The volume of resected tumor tissue was calculated from the sum of resected contrast-enhancing tumor tissue and resected nonenhancing tumor tissue.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with GBM were operated on using endoscopic after complete microscopic FG resection. In all cases, residual fluorescent tissue not visualized with the microscope was detected. Histopathological examination confirmed residual tumor tissue in all specimens. The mean preoperative volume of brain parenchyma without contrast-enhancing tumor was 1213.2 cm3. The mean postoperative volume of brain parenchyma without the resection cavity was 1151.2 cm3, accounting for a mean volume of nonenhancing but fluorescent tumor tissue of 62.0 cm3. The mean relative rate of the overall resected volume compared to the contrast-enhancing tumor volume was 244.7% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined microscopic and endoscopic FG resection of GBM significantly increases the EOR and allows the surgeon to achieve a supratotal resection beyond the borders of contrast enhancement in noneloquently located GBM.

Comparison of Panitumumab-IRDye800CW and 5-Aminolevulinic Acid to Provide Optical Contrast in a Model of Glioblastoma Multiforme

Maximal safe resection of malignant tissue is associated with improved progression-free survival and better response to radiation and chemotherapy for patients with glioblastoma (GBM). 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is the current FDA-approved standard for intraoperative brain tumor visualization. Unfortunately, autofluorescence in diffuse areas and high fluorescence in dense tissues significantly limit discrimination at tumor margins. This study is the first to compare 5-ALA to an investigational new drug, panitumumab-IRDye800CW, in the same animal model. A patient-derived GBM xenograft model was established in 16 nude mice, which later received injections of 5-ALA, panitumumab-IRDye800CW, IRDye800CW, 5-ALA and IRDye800CW, or 5-ALA and panitumumab-IRDye800CW. Brains were prepared for multi-instrument fluorescence imaging, IHC, and quantitative analysis of tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) and tumor margin accuracy. Statistical analysis was compared with Wilcoxon rank-sum or paired t test. Panitumumab-IRDye800CW had a 30% higher comprehensive TBR compared with 5-ALA (P = 0.0079). SDs for core and margin regions of interest in 5-ALA-treated tissues were significantly higher than those found in panitumumab-IRDye800CW-treated tissues (P = 0.0240 and P = 0.0284, respectively). Panitumumab-IRDye800CW specificities for tumor core and margin were more than 10% higher than those of 5-ALA. Higher AUC for panitumumab-IRDye800CW indicated strong capability to discriminate between normal and malignant brain tissue when compared with 5-ALA. This work demonstrates that panitumumab-IRDye800CW shows potential as a targeting agent for fluorescence intraoperative detection of GBM. Improved margin definition and surgical resection using panitumumab-IRDye800 has the potential to improve surgical outcomes and survival in patients with GBM compared with 5-ALA.

Surface-Registration Frameless Stereotactic Navigation Is Less Accurate During Prone Surgeries: Intraoperative Near-Infrared Visualization Using Second Window Indocyanine Green Offers an Adjunct

BACKGROUND

Frameless neuronavigation allows neurosurgeons to visualize and relate the position of surgical instruments to intracranial pathologies based on preoperative tomographic imaging. However, neuronavigation can often be inaccurate. Multiple factors have been proposed as potential causes, and new technologies are needed to overcome these challenges.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of neuronavigation systems compared to near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging using Second Window Indocyanine Green, a novel technique, and to determine factors that lead to neuronavigation errors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 56 patients who underwent primary resections of intracranial tumors. Patients received 5 mg/kg ICG approximately 24 h preoperatively. Intraoperatively, neuronavigation was used to plan craniotomies to place the tumors in the center. After craniotomy, NIR imaging visualized tumor-specific NIR signals. The accuracy of neuronavigation and NIR fluorescence imaging for delineating the tumor boundary prior to durotomy was compared.

RESULTS

The neuronavigation centers and NIR centers were 23.0 ± 7.7 % and 2.6 ± 1.1 % deviated from the tumor centers, respectively, relative to the craniotomy sizes. In 12 cases, significant changes were made to the planned durotomy based on NIR imaging. Patient position was a significant predictor of neuronavigation inaccuracy on both univariate and multivariate analysis, with the prone position having significantly higher inaccuracy (29.2 ± 8.1 %) compared to the supine (16.2 ± 8.1 %, p value < 0.001) or the lateral (17.9 ± 5.1 %, p value = 0.003) positions.

CONCLUSION

Patient position significantly affects neuronavigation accuracy. Intraoperative NIR fluorescence imaging before durotomy offers an opportunity to readjust the neuronavigation image space to better align with the patient space.