Is there a future for cancer chemotherapy? The Michel Clavel Lecture

PDEPT: polymer-directed enzyme prodrug therapy. I. HPMA copolymer-cathepsin B and PK1 as a model combination

Polymer-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (PDEPT) is a novel two-step antitumour approach using a combination of a polymeric prodrug and polymer-enzyme conjugate to generate cytotoxic drug selectively at the tumour site. In this study the polymeric prodrug N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymer-Gly-Phe-Leu-Gly-doxorubicin conjugate PK1 (currently under Phase II clinical evaluation) was selected as the model prodrug, and HPMA copolymer-cathepsin B as a model for the activating enzyme conjugate. Following polymer conjugation (yield of 30-35%) HPMA copolymer-cathepsin B retained approximately 20-25% enzymatic activity in vitro. To investigate pharmacokinetics in vivo,(125)I-labelled HPMA copolymer-cathepsin B was administered intravenously (i.v.) to B16F10 tumour-bearing mice. HPMA copolymer-cathespin B exhibited a longer plasma half-life (free cathepsin B t(1/2alpha)= 2.8 h; bound cathepsin B t(1/2alpha)= 3.2 h) and a 4.2-fold increase in tumour accumulation compared to the free enzyme. When PK1 (10 mg kg(-1)dox-equiv.) was injected i.v. into C57 mice bearing subcutaneously (s.c.) palpable B16F10 tumours followed after 5 h by HPMA copolymer-cathepsin B there was a rapid increase in the rate of dox release within the tumour (3.6-fold increase in the AUC compared to that seen for PK1 alone). When PK1 and the PDEPT combination were used to treat established B16F10 melanoma tumour (single dose; 10 mg kg(-1)dox-equiv.), the antitumour activity (T/C%) seen for the combination PDEPT was 168% compared to 152% seen for PK1 alone, and 144% for free dox. Also, the PDEPT combination showed activity against a COR-L23 xenograft whereas PK1 did not. PDEPT has certain advantages compared to ADEPT and GDEPT. The relatively short plasma residence time of the polymeric prodrug allows subsequent administration of polymer-enzyme without fear of prodrug activation in the circulation and polymer-enzyme conjugates have reduced immunogenicity. This study proves the concept of PDEPT and further optimisation is warranted.

What is cancer chemotherapy?

The importance of chemotherapy for cure of cancer is increasing, especially with its use as adjuvants to local therapy. Furthermore, in advanced disease, when the tumour has disseminated from its place of origin, chemotherapy has an expanding role in efforts to relieve cancer-related symptoms and to prolong life. Despite its shortcomings, chemotherapy, therefore, is an important treatment modality in oncology and will probably remain so for considerable time. This presentation, within the frame of The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU) project to review cancer chemotherapy, aims to provide a brief overview of the field cancer chemotherapy. It includes a historical perspective of cancer chemotherapy, some practical aspects and theoretical considerations with respect to the action of, resistance to and metabolism of these drugs. Furthermore, some outlooks into the nearest future with respect to ways to improve and develop cancer chemotherapy are provided as well as some aspects of chemotherapy from an employee-protection perspective.

Polymer conjugates for tumour targeting and intracytoplasmic delivery. The EPR effect as a common gateway?

Tumour capillaries are frequently hyperpermeable compared with normal vasculature, and thus they offer a much sought-after gateway for targeted delivery of cancer chemotherapy. Phase I clinical trials reported recently describe the first synthetic polymer-drug conjugate to be tested in man. N-(2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymer-doxorubicin (PK1, FCE 28068) displayed antitumour activity in chemotherapy-refractory patients, considerably reduced toxicity compared with doxorubicin, and evidence of tumour-selective targeting. With increasing understanding of the vector- and tumour-related factors that govern vascular permeability, non-viral vectors are being designed for tumour-selective targeting and subsequent intracytoplasmic delivery of macromolecular medicines such as genes, antisense oligonucleotides, proteins and peptides.

In vivo evaluation of the biodistribution of 11C-labeled PD153035 in rats without and with neuroblastoma implants

The biodistribution of 11C-labeled 4-(3-bromoanilino)-6,7-dimethoxyquinazoline, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor tyrosine kinase, has been evaluated in vivo in rats using positron emission tomography (PET). Time-activity data obtained after i.v. administration in one rat revealed that the radiotracer rapidly cleared from plasma with subsequent uptake in major organs of the body (brain, heart, liver, gastrointestinal tract and bladder). Uptake in proliferating tissue in rats with human neuroblastoma xenografts indicate that [O-11C-methyl]PD153035 shows promise as a new agent for in vivo imaging of tumors with PET.

Detection and clinical importance of micrometastatic disease

Metastatic relapse in patients with solid tumors is caused by systemic preoperative or perioperative dissemination of tumor cells. The presence of individual tumor cells in bone marrow and in peripheral blood can be detected by immunologic or molecular methods and is being regarded increasingly as a clinically relevant prognostic factor. Because the goal of adjuvant therapy is the eradication of occult micrometastatic tumor cells before metastatic disease becomes clinically evident, the early detection of micrometastases could identify the patients who are most (and least) likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy. In addition, more sensitive methods for detecting such cells should increase knowledge about the biologic mechanisms of metastasis and improve the diagnosis and treatment of micrometastatic disease. In contrast to solid metastatic tumors, micrometastatic tumor cells are appropriate targets for intravenously applied agents because macromolecules and immunocompetent effector cells should have access to the tumor cells. Because the majority of micrometastatic tumor cells may be nonproliferative (G0 phase), standard cytotoxic chemotherapies aimed at proliferating cells may be less effective, which might explain, in part, the failure of chemotherapy. Thus, adjuvant therapies that are aimed at dividing and quiescent cells, such as antibody-based therapies, are of considerable interest. From a literature search that used the databases MEDLINE(R), CANCERLIT(R), Biosis(R), Embase(R), and SciSearch(R), we discuss the current state of research on minimal residual cancer in patients with epithelial tumors and the diagnostic and clinical implications of these findings.

HPMA copolymer platinates as novel antitumour agents: in vitro properties, pharmacokinetics and antitumour activity in vivo

The aim of this study was to compare in vitro and in vivo HPMA copolymer platinates with cisplatin in terms of platinum release, toxicity and antitumour activity. N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA) conjugates containing peptidyl side-chains (Gly-Gly or Gly-Phe-Leu-Gly) terminating in either carboxylate or amino species were prepared. The carboxylate polymeric intermediate was reacted with cisplatin, and the polymeric diamine with potassium tetrachloroplatinate to produce HPMA copolymer platinates of Mw 25,000-31,000 Daltons with a platinum loading of 3-7 wt%. The diglycyl spacer was selected because it is non-biodegradable, whereas the tetrapeptide spacer is known to be cleaved by the lysosomal thiol-dependent proteases. In vitro the HPMA copolymer platinates displayed a range of platinum release rates at pH 7.4 and 5.5; from < 5%/24 h in the case of the diamino species which require enzymatic activation, to > 80%/24 h in the case of the carboxylate. Cisplatin and the fast releasing carboxylate species displayed IC50 values of 10 micrograms/ml Pt-equivalent against B16F10 cells in vitro, whereas the slow releasing conjugates were not cytotoxic over the dose range studied. Antitumour activity of HPMA copolymer platinates was first evaluated against L1210 and B16F10 tumours inoculated intraperitoneally (i.p.). When conjugates were administered i.p., the antitumour activity observed against L1210 tumours was within the range seen for free cisplatin (ratio of mean survival of treated animals to mean survival of controls, T/C, 1.20-1.70). Neither cisplatin nor HPMA copolymer platinates were active against intraperitoneal (i.p.) B16F10 tumours when administered i.p. However, when conjugates were administered intravenously (i.v.) to treat subcutaneous (s.c.) B16F10 tumours grown to palpable size, free cisplatin was still not active but the HPMA copolymer platinates bearing carboxylate and diamine platinates showed significant antitumour activity (T/C > 1.35). Throughout these studies, the polymer platinates were 5-15-fold less toxic than cisplatin in vivo. After i.v. administration, the blood clearance of HPMA copolymer platinate was considerably slower (t1/2 alpha approximately 10 h) than seen for free cisplatin (t1/2 alpha < 5 min). HPMA copolymer platinates (15 mg/kg Pt-equivalent) gave rise to an approximately 60-fold increase in Pt AUC in B16F10 tumour tissue than was achieved after administration of cisplatin at its maximum tolerated dose (MTD) (1 mg/kg).

Immunoprevention of cancer poses a challenge to pharmacological research

The evolving understanding of the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis establishes that the long latency period would offer numerous opportunities for intervention before the final step of fully developed malignancy has been reached. Immunoprevention of cancer may be a new approach to cancer control, by eliminating the cellular minimal deviations that are seen in the early phases of carcinogenesis. Available results of immunotherapy of preneoplastic lesions and data on anticarcinogenesis with immunoregulators in experimental models are in good accordance with theoretical expectations. However, clinical research on immunoregulators still focuses on the treatment of advanced cancer. The major problem hampering a wider application of immunoregulators in cancer prevention is the possibility of potential adverse effects, which are largely unknown. The promotion of future research in this area is essential. Moreover, the ethical issues of intervention trials in cancer must be discussed, by considering the potential psychological and social consequences.