Limited sampling models for topotecan pharmacokinetics

Do topotecan concentrations in saliva reflect plasma concentrations?

Purpose. There is an increasing interest to use saliva as biological fluid for drug monitoring as it reflects adequately, in some cases, drug concentrations in plasma. A great advantage is that it can be obtained conveniently by a noninvasive method. We describe our experience with respect to the practical use of saliva for pharmacokinetic monitoring of the novel anticancer agent topotecan.

Patients and Methods. Eighty-one saliva sam ples and corresponding plasma samples were ob tained 2 hours after the end of infusion from 15 patients with either ovarian cancer or small cell lung cancer, receiving 1.5 mg/m 2 per day topotecan for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Saliva was obtained by a citric-acid containing dental cotton roll which stimulated the saliva flow.

Results. The plasma topotecan concentrations varied between 3.67 and 24.4 ng/mL, with an intrapa tient (day-to-day) variation of only 9.8%, and an inter patient variation of 27.2%. The saliva concentrations varied between 5.34 and 74.2 ng/mL, with an intrapa tient variation of 25.3%, and an interpatient variation of 53.5%. The mean plasma/saliva topotecan ratio was 0.66 (range 0.21 to 1.58) and was both patient dependent and dependent on the sampling time. The day-to-day variation of the plasma/saliva concentra tion ratio in this daily times five schedule was 27.6%, and the interpatient variation was 45.5%. The saliva concentrations of topotecan were not related to the occurrence of mucositis, which was noted in some patients.

Conclusion. Based on the large variability in the plasma/saliva ratios, we conclude that in our investi gational setting saliva is not a reliable matrix for topotecan analysis and that plasma sampling is to be preferred.

Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of Carboplatin and topotecan administered intravenously every 28 days to patients with malignant solid tumors

PURPOSE

Preclinical studies have shown that the combination of topotecan and carboplatin is synergistic. To evaluate the schedule dependency of this interaction, the following phase I trial was designed to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of carboplatin and topotecan in patients with malignant solid tumors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In part 1, patients received carboplatin on day 1 and topotecan on days 1, 2, and 3 (C-->T schedule). In part 2, topotecan was administered on days 1, 2, and 3, followed by carboplatin on day 3 (T-->C schedule). Pharmacokinetics were determined in plasma and DNA topoisomerase I catalytic activity and Pt-DNA adducts in WBC and tumor tissue.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were included. Dose-limiting toxicities during the C-->T schedule were grade 4 thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia (MTD: carboplatin target area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve, 4 min mg/mL; topotecan, 0.5 mg/m(2)/d). Dose-limiting toxicities during the T-->C schedule included grade 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenic fever, and grade 4 nausea and vomiting (MTD: carboplatin target area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve, 6 min mg/mL; topotecan, 0.9 mg/m(2)/d). One complete response and five partial responses were observed. The clearance of and exposure to carboplatin and topotecan did not depend on the sequence of drug administration. No schedule-dependent effects were seen in Pt-DNA levels and DNA topoisomerase I catalytic activity in WBC and tumor tissue. However, myelotoxicity was clearly more evident in the C-->T schedule.

CONCLUSION

The T-->C schedule was better tolerated because both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were milder. Other pharmacodynamic factors than the ones investigated must explain the schedule-dependent differences in toxicities.

Chemotherapy in the elderly

People over the age of 65 years constitute the fastest-growing segment of the US population. Within the next 30 years, this group will comprise over 20% of the total population. Importantly, 50% of all cancers and 70% of cancer mortality occur in this age group. Choosing the correct chemotherapy regimen and dose for the older patient can be extremely difficult due to physiological changes that occur with aging, as well as other comorbidities associated with this age group. Treatment decisions need to be based on a patient’s individual performance, functional status, life expectancy, and their wishes and opinions. Although there are no accepted algorithms to guide management decisions in elderly cancer patients, data are becoming available that will help guide the use of chemotherapy in the older patient population.

Development and validation of limited sampling models for topotecan lactone pharmacokinetic studies in children

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a pharmacokinetic limited sampling model (LSM) for intravenous and oral topotecan pharmacokinetic studies in children.

METHODS

Topotecan lactone concentration-time data from five trials were used to develop and validate LSM for intravenous and oral topotecan. Based on full sampling from one intravenous study (30 patients; 195 studies), a LSM for intravenous topotecan was determined using a modification of the D-optimality algorithm. For oral topotecan we used full sampling data from one oral topotecan study (27 patients; 47 studies) to develop an LSM. Accuracy and bias of each LSM were determined relative to the full sampling method. Predictive performance of the LSM was validated using additional data and Monte-Carlo simulations based on these data.

RESULTS

LSM for intravenous topotecan includes: 5 min, 1.5, and 2.5 h after the end of the 30 min infusion. The median accuracy (absolute predicted error) and bias (predicted error) are < or =8% and < or =6.1%, respectively. For oral topotecan, the optimal LSM includes: 15 min, 1.5, and 6 h. The median accuracy and bias are 6% and 4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the optimal sampling times for the intravenous LSM for topotecan in children consist of: predose, and 5 min, 1.5, and 2.5 h after the end of infusion. For oral topotecan the sample times are predose, 15 min, 1.5, and 6 h after dose administration. These LSM are invaluable to children receiving topotecan because it minimizes inconvenience and blood collection.

Pharmacology of anticancer drugs in the elderly population

Modifications to bodily functions and physiology are known to occur with age. These changes can have a considerable impact on the pharmacokinetic processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion and the pharmacodynamic properties of administered drugs. For many drugs with a high therapeutic index, this will be clinically unimportant, but for anticancer drugs, which usually have a low therapeutic index, these pharmacological changes can lead to dramatic consequences, such as excessive drug concentrations and unacceptable toxicity, or subtherapeutic drug concentrations and ineffective treatment. Despite the increased susceptibility of the elderly to these changes, doses are rarely adapted on the basis of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, with the exception of changes secondary to altered renal function. Until recently, only a few large prospective randomised trials have provided evidence-based data for dose adaptations in elderly patients. However, with increasing knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs, advances in the knowledge of pharmacokinetic behaviour with aging, and documented efficacy and toxicity data in the elderly population, it is possible to highlight aspects of prescribing anticancer drugs in the elderly. In general, and for most drugs, age itself is not a contraindication to full-dose chemotherapy. The main limiting factors are comorbidity and poor functional status, which may be present in a significant number of the elderly population. Elderly patients with cancer are part of the daily practice of oncologists, but currently clinicians can often only estimate whether dose modification is advantageous for the elderly. This review attempts to elucidate the factors that can influence the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs frequently used in the elderly, and the clinical or biochemical parameters that form the basis for dose adjustments with age.

Increased oral bioavailability of topotecan in combination with the breast cancer resistance protein and P-glycoprotein inhibitor GF120918

PURPOSE

We discovered that breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), a recently identified adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette drug transporter, substantially limits the oral bioavailability of topotecan in mdr1a/1b(-/-) P-glycoprotein (P-gp) knockout and wild-type mice. GF120918 is a potent inhibitor of BCRP and P-gp. The aim was to increase the bioavailability of topotecan by GF120918.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In cohort A, eight patients received 1.0 mg/m(2) oral topotecan with or without coadministration of one single oral dose of 1,000 mg GF120918 (day 1 or day 8). In cohort B, eight other patients received 1.0 mg/m(2) intravenous topotecan with or without 1,000 mg oral GF120918 to study the effect of GF120918 on the systemic clearance of topotecan.

RESULTS

After oral topotecan, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of total topotecan increased significantly from 32.4 +/- 9.6 microg.h/L without GF120918 to 78.7 +/- 20.6 microg.h/L when GF120918 was coadministered (P =.008). The mean maximum plasma concentration of total topotecan increased from 4.1 +/- 1.5 microg/L without GF120918 to 11.5 +/- 2.4 microg/L with GF120918 (P =.008). The apparent bioavailability in this cohort increased significantly from 40.0% (range, 32% to 47%) to 97.1% (range, 91% to 120%) (P =.008). Interpatient variability of the apparent bioavailability was 17% without and 11% with GF120918. After intravenous administration of topotecan, coadministration of oral GF120918 had a small but statistically significant effect on the AUC and systemic clearance of total topotecan but no statistically significant effect on maximum plasma concentration and terminal half-life of total topotecan.

CONCLUSION

Coadministration of the BCRP and P-gp inhibitor GF120918 resulted in a significant increase of the systemic exposure of oral topotecan. The apparent oral bioavailability increased from 40.0% without to 97.1% with GF120918.

Treatment of refractory acute leukemia with timed sequential chemotherapy using topotecan followed by etoposide + mitoxantrone (T-EM) and correlation with topoisomerase II levels

A phase I/II clinical study evaluated 17 patients with refractory/recurrent acute leukemia treated with 1.5 mg/m2/day topotecan on days 1-3 followed by etoposide (100 mg/m2/day)+mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2/day) on days 4, 5 and 9, 10. Timed sequential chemotherapy using the topoisomerase I-inhibitor topotecan before the topoisomerase II-inhibitors, etoposide+mitoxantrone (T-EM) treatment is proposed to induce topoisomerase II protein levels and potentiate the cytotoxic activity of the topoisomerase II-directed drugs. Fourteen patients had refractory and three had recurrent acute leukemia. The majority of patients were heavily pre-treated with greater than three re-induction chemotherapy regimens. Ten patients responded to T-EM treatment (59%). Four of seventeen (24%) had a complete remission and one had a partial remission. Four additional patients (24%) who scored complete leukemia clearance had no evidence of disease with complete white and red blood cell recovery but with platelet counts less than 100,000. The lack of platelet recovery in one patient having a partial response was scored as a partial leukemia clearance. The toxicity profile included major non-hematological toxicity including grade 3 mucositis (29%) and neutropenic fever (65%). Paired measurements of intracellular levels of topoisomerase II isoforms alpha and beta in leukemia blast cells (bone marrow) collected before (day 0) and after topotecan treatment (day 4) showed that a relative increase of topoisomerase IIalpha (Topo IIalpha) > or = 40% strongly correlated with response after T-EM treatment. Increased Topo IIalpha levels also corresponded to increased DNA fragmentation. Two patients who had an increase of Topo IIalpha of 20-25% had either a PR or PLC while patients with a < 10% increase showed no response to T-EM treatment. We conclude that timed sequential chemotherapy using topotecan followed by etoposide+mitoxantrone is an effective regimen for patients with refractory acute leukemia, and demonstrate Topo IIalpha protein level increases after topotecan treatment.

Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents

The current practice for the dose calculation of most anticancer agents is based on body surface area in m2, although lower interpatient variation in pharmacokinetic parameters has been reported with pharmacokinetically guided administration. As chemotherapeutic agents have a narrow therapeutic window, pharmacokinetically guided administration may lead to less toxicity and higher efficacy than administration on the basis of body surface area. Pharmacokinetically guided administration, using parameters such as area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), steady-state plasma drug concentration and drug exposure time above a certain plasma concentration, has been studied for many antineoplastic agents. Assessment of pharmacokinetic profiles allows the characterisation of relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters and efficacy and toxicity. AUC appears to be more closely correlated with pharmacodynamics than does the dose per unit of body surface area. In particular, the AUC-guided administration of carboplatin has been extensively studied, based on the close relationship between the renal clearance of the drug and glomerular filtration rate. Several formulae and limited sampling models have been derived to predict the AUC of carboplatin. The relationship between AUC and pharmacodynamics has also been studied for other anticancer agents, for example fluorouracil, topotecan, etoposide, cisplatin and busulfan, but all less extensively than for carboplatin. The pharmacokinetically guided administration of these agents needs to be investigated further before the use of alternative administration formulae can become standard clinical practice. Prospective studies of pharmacokinetically guided versus surface area-based administration should be performed to validate pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships and to facilitate optimal dosage of anticancer agents in the clinic.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of the combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and topotecan administered intravenously every 21 days as first-line therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of administering topotecan in combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin without and with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support as first-line chemotherapy in women with incompletely resected stage III and stage IV ovarian carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Starting doses were paclitaxel 110 mg/m2 administered over 24 hours (day 1), followed by cisplatin 50 mg/m2 over 3 hours (day 2) and topotecan 0.3 mg/m2/d over 30 minutes for 5 consecutive days (days 2 to 6). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. After encountering dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) without G-CSF support, the maximum-tolerated dose was defined as 5 microg/kg of G-CSF subcutaneously starting on day 6.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients received a total of 116 courses at four different dose levels. The DLT was neutropenia. At the first dose level, all six patients experienced grade 4 myelosuppression. G-CSF support permitted further dose escalation of cisplatin and topotecan. Nonhematologic toxicities, primarily fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and neurosensory neuropathy, were observed but were generally mild. Of 15 patients assessable for response, nine had a complete response, four achieved a partial response, and two had stable disease.

CONCLUSION

Neutropenia was the DLT of this combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and topotecan. The recommended phase II dose is paclitaxel 110 mg/m2 (day 1), followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (day 2) and topotecan 0.3 mg/m2/d (days 2 to 6) with G-CSF support repeated every 3 weeks.

Clinical pharmacology of camptothecins

Camptothecins (CPTs) are a unique class of chemotherapeutic agent which inhibit DNA synthesis by inhibiting topoisomerase I activity. Structure-activity studies on the original CPT alkaloid led to the development of the new analogues irinotecan (CPT-11), topotecan, and 9-aminocamptothecin, which have improved water solubility and lower toxicity. CPT analogues exhibit interesting pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and metabolic properties that are of major research and clinical interest. This review describes the clinical pharmacology of these 3 CPT analogues. Specific areas such as absorption after extravascular administration, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic variability, metabolism, and administration in special populations are discussed.

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) study of topotecan using a five-day course in children with refractory solid tumors: a pediatric oncology group study

PURPOSE

A phase I trial was conducted in children with refractory solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics for topotecan administered by a 30-min infusion for 5 consecutive days.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty children with a variety of recurrent solid tumors, including nine patients with neuroblastoma and 10 with brain tumors, were given topotecan as a 30-min infusion for 5 consecutive days, beginning with a dose of 1.4 mg/m2/day. The dose was escalated in 20% increments after establishing that DLT was not present at the prior dose. Drug toxicity was graded using standard criteria. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade 3 or 4 nonhematopoietic toxicity or grade 4 hematopoietic toxicity lasting > 7 days. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during the first infusion course.

RESULTS

The DLT was hematopoietic and involved both platelets and neutrophils. Grade 4 hematopoietic toxicity of brief duration was seen at all dose levels. Over half of the patients received red blood cell transfusion support, and 19/40 received platelet transfusions. Hospital admissions for fever and neutropenia or for documented infections occurred in 32 of 169 courses of therapy. Gastrointestinal symptoms with nausea and vomiting or diarrhea were mild to moderate in 12 of the 40 patients. Antitumor responses were seen in three patients with neuroblastoma. An additional four patients (one with neuroblastoma, two with anaplastic astrocytomas, one with Ewing) had stable disease with continued therapy for > 6 months. Using a limited sampling model, pharmacokinetic studies were performed in 36 of the 40 patients. Topotecan lactone and total clearance were similar to those reported in other pediatric populations receiving topotecan by continuous infusion. A pharmacodynamic relation between systemic exposure to topotecan lactone and myclosuppression was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In heavily pretreated children, the MTD for topotecan given by intermittent 30-min infusion for 5 days is 1.4 mg/m2 without GCSF and 2.0 mg/m2/day with GCSF. The dose-limiting toxicity is hematopoietic. Data from this study provide the basis for further studies of topotecan in children with cancer.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topotecan administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks

Topotecan is a novel semisynthetic derivative of the anticancer agent camptothecin and inhibits the intranuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. The lactone structure of topotecan, which is in equilibrium with the inactive ring-opened hydroxy acid, is essential for this activity. The open form predominates at physiological pH. We performed a pharmacokinetic study as part of a phase I study in patients with various types of solid tumors, where topotecan was administered in a 30-min infusion daily on 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. The plasma kinetics of topotecan could be described best using an open two-compartment model with t1/2(alpha) and t1/2(beta) of 8.1 (range 0.3 to 40.7) min and 132 (range 49 to 286) min, respectively. The plasma concentration-time profiles of the metabolite, however, could be described using a one-compartment model with t1/2(formation) of 29.0 (range 5.6-99.5) min and t1/2 (elimination of 123.2 (range 32-265) min, respectively. The lactone was the predominate form during the first hour from the start of infusion, but was rapidly converted into its ring-opened structure. The elimination rate of topotecan was independent of the dose. There were linear relationships between the dose (mg m-2 day-1), the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of topotecan and its metabolite, the total AUC, peak plasma lactone concentrations, and the time period that the topotecan concentrations remained above 10 nM. Different models were used to correlate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. The percentage decrease in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was related to these parameters and plots were well fitted by linear and sigmoidal Emax models.

Limited sampling models for simultaneous estimation of the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38

Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor with clinical activity in human malignancies. The objective of this study was to develop efficient limited sampling models (LSMs) to estimate simulataneously the area under the plasma concentration versus time curves (AUC) for both CPT-11 and its active metabolite SN-38. A total of 64 pharmacokinetic sets (> or = 24-h sampling) were obtained in phase I studies at doses ranging from 50 to 750 mg/m2 (0.5-h i.v. infusion). The patients were randomly assigned to a training data set (n = 32) and a test set (n = 32). Multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine the optimal LSMs based on the correlation coefficient (r), bias (MPE%, percentage of mean prediction error), and precision (RMSE%, percentage of root mean squared prediction error). Of these LSMs, the ones including maximal concentrations of CPT-11 (0.5 h, the end of the i.v. infusion) and metabolite SN-38 (approximately 1 h) were favored along with predictive precision and clinical constraints. Several bivariate models including a 6-h time point as the last sampling time (or 7 h) were found to be highly predictive of either the CPT-11 AUC or the SN-38 AUC. The chosen sampling time points were the ones that allowed the best compromise between the accurate determination of either compound alone with the same sampling times. The simultaneously best prediction of both CPT-11 and SN-38 AUCs was obtained with sampling time points harvested at 0.5, 1, and 6 h (or 7 h). With these sampling time points a trivariate model was selected for the determination of CPT-11 AUC namely, CPT-11 AUC (ng h ml-1) = 0.820 x C0.5h + 0.402 x C1h + 15.47 x C6h + 928, and a corresponding model was selected for the determination of metabolite AUC, i.e., SN-38 AUC (ng h ml-1) = 4.05 x C0.5h -0.81 x C1h + 23.01 x C6h - 69.78, where C(t) is the concentration in nanograms per milliliter of either compound at a given time t. These models performed well with the test data sets for CPT-11 AUC (r = 0.98, MPE% = -1.4, RMSE% = 13.9) and for SN-38 AUC (r = 0.95, MPE% = -6.5, RMSE% = 37.7). In addition to the determination of AUCs (and hence clearance), these models also allow the determination of the maximal concentrations of both compounds, which might be needed for pharmacodynamics studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)