Evaluation of atrial vulnerability with transoesophageal stimulation in patients with atrioventricular junctional reentrant tachycardia. Comparison with patients with ventricular pre-excitation and with normal subjects

Speckle-tracking echocardiography can predict atrial fibrillation in patients with supraventricular tachycardia

PURPOSE

Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common supraventriculer arrhythmia in daily clinical practice. Comorbidity of AVNRT and atrial fibrillation (AF) has been well documented in some patients and AF development has been observed more frequently in AVNRT patients during their long-term follow-up. This study was conducted in order to investigate the left atrial two-dimensional-speckle-tracking echocardiographic (STE) parametres as the predictors of the occurence of AF in long-term follow-up in patients with spontaneously developed AF during AVNRT ablation.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty two consecutive AVNRT patients who developed spontaneous AF during ablation procedure were included in the study. The patients were followed up for a mean follow-up period of 6.2 ± 2.1 years. All patients were evaluated using the 2D-STE method. AF was developed in 34 patients during the follow-up period. Cox regression analysis was performed in order to identify the independent predictors of AF occurence.

RESULTS

Left atrial LA-res, LA-pump, LA-SRs, LA-SRe, and LA-SRa values were found to be significantly decreased in the group of patients that developed AF during the follow-up period (p < .001 for all aforementioned values). Multivariate cox regression analysis revealed that LA-res (hazard ratio [HR], 0.367; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.161-0.0.683, p < .001) and SRe (HR, 0.472; 95% CI, 0.346-0.825, p = .006) were independent risk factors associated with the occurrence of AF.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, it was demonstrated for the first time with this study that 2D-STE can effectively predict the development of AF in long-term follow-up in patients with spontaneously developed AF during AVNRT ablation.

Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of the patients with relatively slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to retrospectively investigate clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of typical AVNRT with relatively slow tachycardia rates below the average value compared to faster ones, in patients without structural heart disease.

METHODS

The present study retrospectively included a total of 1,150 patients receiving successful slow-pathway radio frequency ablation for typical slow-fast AVNRT. Patients were divided into two groups according to their tachycardia cycle length: group I included 1,018 patients with tachycardia cycle length < 400 msn and group II included 132 patients with cycle length > 400 msn. Patients with another form of arrhythmia other than typical AVNRT, the existence of structural heart disease, preexisting prolonged PR interval, history of clinically documented AF, and reasons capable of causing AF were accepted as exclusion criterias.

RESULTS

The patients in group II were older than those in group 1 (p=0.039), and male ratio was significantly higher in group II compared to group I (p=0.02). Wenckebach cycle length and AV node antegrade effective refractory period values before the RF ablation were significantly higher in group II compared to group I (p=0.0001 and 0.01, respectively). Right atrium effective refractory period values in both pre- and post-ablation period were significantly higher in group I compared to group II (p=0.0001 and 0.004, respectively). The existence of atrial vulnerability before ablation was significantly higher in group II compared to group I (p=0.007); however, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of atrial vulnerability after the ablation. In addition, while the ratio of anterior location as an ablation site near the His-bundle region was significantly higher in group II, the ratio of posterior location was significantly higher in group I (p=0.0001 for both).

CONCLUSION

Our experience demonstrates that clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of AVNRT patients with relatively slower tachycardia rates were quite different compared to the faster AVNRT cases.

P wave dispersion predicts recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia treated with radiofrequency catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) recurs in up to one-third of patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) treated with slow pathway ablation. Therefore, identification of patients at risk for recurrence of AF after slow pathway ablation is important because of the necessity for additional therapies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether successful slow pathway ablation influences P wave parameters and whether these parameters predict the recurrence of paroxysmal AF in patients with both AVNRT and paroxysmal AF after ablation.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with AVNRT and documented paroxysmal AF (Group 1) were compared to 36 age-matched controls with AVNRT only (Group 2). P wave durations and P dispersion were measured before and after ablation.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between P wave parameters observed before and after ablation. Maximum P wave durations (Pmax) and P dispersion (Pdisp) were significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P < 0.001 for both) whereas minimum P wave durations did not differ between groups, both before and after ablation. Ten patients (28%) in Group-1 had recurrence of AF during a mean follow-up of 34 +/- 11 months. Univariate predictors of AF recurrence were Pdisp > or =35.5 ms (P < 0.010), left atrial diameter >40 mm (P < 0.010), mitral or aortic calcification (P < 0.010), Pmax > or =112 ms (P < 0.050), valvular heart disease (P < 0.050), and atrial vulnerability (induction of AF lasting >30 second) after ablation (P < 0.050). However, only Pdisp > or =35.5 ms (P < 0.050) and left atrial diameter >40 mm (P < 0.010) were independent predictors of AF recurrences.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that P wave dispersion could identify patients with AVNRT susceptible to recurrence of AF after slow pathway ablation.

Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical and Electrophysiological Features and Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Following Elimination of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been studied in a large patient cohort. We aimed to define the clinical features and cardiac electrophysiological characteristics of these patients, and to examine the incidence and identify predictors of AF recurrences after elimination of AVNRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with AVNRT and documented paroxysmal AF (Group 1) and 497 patients with AVNRT alone undergoing ablation in the same period (Group 2) were studied. There were no significant differences between groups regarding clinical features, except age, which was higher in Group 1 (p<0.001). Presence of atrial vulnerability (induction of AF lasting>30 seconds) and multiple AH jumps (>or=50 ms) before ablation were significantly more prevalent in Group 1 (p<0.001, p=0.010 respectively). During follow-up of 34 +/- 11 months, AF recurred in 10 patients (28%) in Group 1, while 2 patients in Group 2 (0.4%) developed paroxysmal AF (p<0.001). Univariate predictors of AF were: left atrial diameter>40 mm (p=0.001), presence of mitral or aortic calcification (p=0.003), atrial vulnerability after ablation (p=0.015) and valvular disease (p=0.042). However, independent predictors of AF recurrences were left atrial diameter>40 mm (p=0.002) and the presence of atrial vulnerability after ablation (p=0.034).

CONCLUSION

In patients with both AVNRT and paroxysmal AF, the recurrence rate of AF after elimination of AVNRT is 28%. Left atrial diameter greater than 40 mm and atrial vulnerability after elimination of AVNRT are independent predictors of AF recurrences in the long term.

Clinical usefulness of slow pathway ablation in patients with both paroxysmal atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and atrial fibrillation

Some patients with atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia (AVN RT) also presented with atrial fibrillation (AF). In this study we demonstrate that slow pathway ablation is able to suppress both AVN RT and AF in subjects without structural heart abnormalities, whereas in patients with structural heart abnormalities after ablation AF frequently recurs.