Post-radiotherapeutic left main coronary ostial stenosis: clinical and histological study

Is radiation-induced arteriopathy in long-term breast cancer survivors an underdiagnosed situation?: Critical and pragmatic review of available literature

PURPOSE

Although considered exceptional, radiation-induced arteriopathy in long-term breast cancer survivors involves three main arterial domains in the irradiated volume, namely axillary-subclavian, coronary, and carotid. Stenosis of medium-large arteries is caused by "accelerated" atherosclerosis, particularly beyond 10 years after long-forgotten radiotherapy. The present review aims at summarizing what is known about arteriopathy, as well as the state of the art in terms of diagnosis and therapeutic management.

DIAGNOSIS

Pauci-symptomatic over years, the usual clinical presentation of arteriopathy involves arm pain with coldness due to subacute or critical ischemia (arterial occlusion), wrongly attributed to an exclusive neurological disorder, and more rarely transient ischemic accident or angina. Evaluation of the supra-aortic trunks by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance angiography visualizes artery lesions, while Doppler ultrasonography in expert hands assesses diagnosis and downstream functional impact. In severe cases, more invasive angiography directly visualizes long irregular arterial stenosis (full-field radiotherapy), allowing accurate prognosis and treatment.

MANAGEMENT

Requires early diagnosis to enable initiation of medical treatment that increases blood flow (aspirin) as soon as moderate stenosis is detected, combined with correction of vascular risk factors. In intermediate cases, these therapeutic measures are completed by revascularization strategies using transluminal angioplasty-stenting (wall thickness). Antifibrotic treatment is useful in advanced cases with combined radiation injuries.

CONCLUSION

In follow-up of long-term breast cancer survivors with node irradiation, myocardial infarction is treated even if radiotherapy is forgotten, while recognition and diagnosis of chronic arm ischemia due to subclavian artery stenosis needs to be improved for appropriate therapeutic management.

Coronary Artery Stenosis following Mediastinal Radiation Therapy. Case Report and Review of the Literature

A case of coronary artery stenosis following mediastinal radiation therapy in a young woman and a review of the literature offer indications on the criteria to follow in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease secondary to mediastinal radiation therapy.

Severe bilateral isolated coronary ostial lesions as a rare manifestation of radiation-induced cardiac disease A case report

RATIONALE

With advances in contemporary radiotherapy techniques, and as cancer survival improves, severe isolated coronary ostial disease may develop many years following mediastinal radiotherapy, even in the absence of classical cardiovascular risk factors.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We describe the case of a 73-year-old woman with previous chest radiotherapy for breast cancer who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery for severe bilateral coronary ostial lesions.

DIAGNOSES

Coronary angiography demonstrated severe, isolated bilateral coronary ostial lesions.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent urgent coronary artery bypass graft surgery to treat her critical coronary artery disease.

OUTCOMES

Intra-operatively, internal mammary arteries were not amenable to harvesting due to very dense mediastinal adhesions. Therefore, saphenous vein grafts were performed to the left anterior descending, distal left circumflex, obtuse marginal and distal right coronary arteries. The patient made a satisfactory in-hospital recovery, and was subsequently discharged back to her local hospital for rehabilitation.

LESSONS

Patients successfully treated with mediastinal radiotherapy require careful long-term follow-up for the assessment of radiation-induced coronary artery disease. Importantly, mediastinal irradiation may preclude internal mammary artery utilization, and thus alter the strategy for surgical myocardial revascularization.

Isolated and Significant Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Demographics, Hemodynamics and Angiographic Features

Left main coronary artery disease carries a poor prognosis. The etiology of isolated and significant left main coronary artery (ILMCA) disease is not well understood. Studies so far were limited by small numbers. The authors identified 46 patients with ILMCA disease from their database over 10 years (group I) and compared them with 83 consecutive patients undergoing catheterization (group II). They also compared patients with ostial vs distal ILMCA disease. Group I represented 0.1% of catheterization patients. The demographic profile and atherosclerotic risk factor profile of the 2 groups as well as ostial and distal ILMCA disease were compared. This is the largest study of ILMCA disease. Risk factors for atherosclerosis were commonly seen. Nonatherosclerotic causes of ILMCA disease were not seen. This study suggests coronary atherosclerosis as the predominant cause of ILMCA disease. ILMCA disease is more common in women. Diabetes is more commonly associated with distal ILMCA lesion. There is a trend suggesting that ostial ILMCA lesion is more common in smokers and women.

Isolated left main coronary artery stenosis after thoracic radiation therapy: to operate or not to operate

Radiation therapy of neoplasms involving the chest or mediastinum results in a wide spectrum of cardiac complications including coronary artery disease, which can present in patients with few or no traditional cardiac risk factors. We report a case of radiation induced coronary artery disease in a 60-year-old female with a history of stage IIIA nonsmall cell lung carcinoma which was diagnosed eight years earlier and treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. She presented to the hospital with atypical chest pain that had occurred intermittently over the preceding week. Her initial electrocardiogram and cardiac enzymes were within normal limits. However, following an indeterminate exercise nuclear stress test, she developed chest pain and elevated cardiac enzymes. Coronary angiography demonstrated 90% stenosis of the left main coronary artery ostium, without any evidence of atherosclerotic disease or stenosis in other coronary arteries. She underwent surgical revascularization, which revealed dense adhesions surrounding the heart. During surgery, she developed severe bleeding and died. Coronary artery disease can present within years of radiation exposure, and ostial lesions are typical. Treatment is often challenging because of the effects of radiation on other tissues and the risks of revascularization procedures. Therefore, a multidisciplinary team approach should be considered.

Ostial Lesions of Left Main and Right Coronary Arteries: Demographic and Angiographic Features

In 258 patients with left main tract disease, the atherosclerotic risk factors were compared between patients with ostial and nonostial lesions of the left main coronary artery. Also, it was done for patients with ostial right coronary artery. Women were more likely to have ostial left main coronary artery and/or ostial right coronary artery. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the female sex (odds ratio: 2.336) and hypertriglyceridemia (odds ratio: 1.004) were independent risk factors of ostial left main coronary artery lesion. For ostial right coronary artery lesion, the female sex and family history of coronary artery disease were independent predictors. Ostial left main coronary artery and right coronary artery lesions were strongly correlated. The demographic and clinical profiles of ostial stenosis suggest that this group may represent a distinct entity, different from the more common atherosclerotic left main trunk stenosis (LMTD). The female sex and serum triglyceride level can be considered as independent predictors of ostial left main tract disease.

Left main coronary artery stenosis: state-of-the-art

Patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery present difficult challenges. The risks associated with this lesion have been known since the early days of angiography when patients were found to have increased mortality during follow-up. This information led to the general guidelines that surgical revascularization should be considered the treatment of choice in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis. Current advances in invasive cardiology have brought important information to the field. Intravascular ultrasound is now used routinely to evaluate angiographically indeterminate lesions with criteria now set forward as to what constitutes an indication for revascularization. Stents have even further dramatically changed the landscape. There are substantial issues, however, that need to addressed. These include the following: (1) the effect of specific lesion location on outcome - it is known that patients with distal bifurcation left main disease have worse outcome; (2) the potential for subacute thrombosis of the left main coronary artery; (3) the impact of left ventricular function and patient comorbidities irrespective of the degree and location of left main coronary artery stenosis; and (4) the risk-benefit ratio of stenting versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery. These issues are currently being addressed in two seminally important trials including the SYNTAX trial, which randomizes patients with left main and/or three-vessel disease to either coronary artery bypass graft surgery or a TAXUS drug-eluting stent. This trial is in the final stages of patient recruitment and will have important implications for the field. The other trial is the COMBAT trial, which is focused exclusively on left main coronary artery stenosis and randomizes patients with left main coronary artery disease either to a Sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher, Johnson and Johnson Cordis, USA) or to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The field of left main coronary artery disease continues to expand in terms of the evidence available for optimal patient evaluation and selection of treatment modalities.

Screening for coronary artery disease after mediastinal irradiation for Hodgkin's disease

PURPOSE

Incidental cardiac irradiation during treatment of thoracic neoplasms has increased risks for subsequent acute myocardial infarction or sudden cardiac death. Identifying patients who have a high risk for a coronary event may decrease morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether stress imaging can identify severe, unsuspected coronary stenoses in patients who had prior mediastinal irradiation for Hodgkin's disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 294 outpatients observed at a tertiary care cancer treatment center after mediastinal irradiation doses 35 Gy for Hodgkin's disease who had no known ischemic cardiac disease. Patients underwent stress echocardiography and radionuclide perfusion imaging at one stress session. Coronary angiography was performed at the discretion of the physician.

RESULTS

Among the 294 participants, 63 (21.4%) had abnormal ventricular images at rest, suggesting prior myocardial injury. During stress testing, 42 patients (14%) developed perfusion defects (n = 26), impaired wall motion (n = 8), or both abnormalities (n = 8). Coronary angiography showed stenosis 50% in 22 patients (55%), less than 50% in nine patients (22.5%), and no stenosis in nine patients (22.5%). Screening led to bypass graft surgery in seven patients. Twenty-three patients developed coronary events during a median of 6.5 years of follow-up, with 10 acute myocardial infarctions (two fatal).

CONCLUSION

Stress-induced signs of ischemia and significant coronary artery disease are highly prevalent after mediastinal irradiation in young patients. Stress testing identifies asymptomatic individuals at high risk for acute myocardial infarction or sudden cardiac death.

Late total occlusion after intracoronary brachytherapy for patients with in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES

The study sought to determine the incidence and predictors of late total occlusion (LTO, >30 days) in-patients with in-stent restenosis who were treated with intracoronary radiation.

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary radiation both with beta and gamma emitters has been shown to reduce recurrent in-stent restenosis.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 473 patients who presented with in-stent restenosis and who were enrolled in various radiation protocols, whether randomized to placebo versus radiation or entered into registries. There were 165 placebo and 308 radiated patients, including both gamma and beta emitters. Maximum dose to the vessel wall was 30 to 55 Gy. Following radiation, all patients received antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and either ticlopidine or clopidogrel for one month. All patients completed at least six months of angiographic follow-up.

RESULTS

The LTO was documented in 28 patients (9.1%) from the irradiated group versus 2 placebo patients (1.2%), p < 0.0001. The LTO rates were similar across studies and emitters. In the irradiated group, LTO presented as acute myocardial infarction in 12 patients (43%), unstable angina in 14 (50%), and asymptotic in 2 (7%). Mean time to LTO was 5.4 +/- 3.2 months in the irradiated group versus 4.5 +/- 2.1 in placebo patients (p = NS). The overall rate of restenting for the entire study group at the time of radiation was 48.6%. Importantly, new stents were placed in 82% of the irradiated and in 100% of the placebo patients who presented with LTO. Multivariate analysis determined that new stenting was the main predictor of LTO.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary radiation for patients with in-stent restenosis is associated with a high rate of LTO. Restenting may contribute late thrombosis. Prolonged antiplatelet therapy (up to six months) should be considered for these patients.

Complete AV block following mediastinal radiation therapy: electrocardiographic and pathologic correlation and review of the world literature

The clinical, features, serial electrocardiograms, and autopsy findings of a patient with symptomatic complete AV block, who had received mediastinal radiation therapy 8 1/2 years previously, are presented. The cardiac histopathology disclosed immense fibrosis of the conduction system and of the atria and ventricles. The enormous amount of fibrosis was similar in location and intensity to that observed in our previously reported patient (Cohen et al., Arch Intern Med 1981; 141:676-679) who had undergone mediastinal radiation. We conclude that the severe fibrosis was primarily due to radiation, rather than secondary to atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, which also has been described as a consequence of mediastinal radiotherapy. This patient's serial electrocardiograms disclosed evidence of complete block both in the AV nodal area and infra His system, which correlated well with the histopathology. The characteristic clinical features of patients with symptomatic complete AV block post mediastinal radiation therapy are presented, along with a review of the world literature.

Silent ischemic cardiomyopathy and left coronary ostial stenosis secondary to radiation therapy

A 55-year-old woman presented with profound congestive heart failure 23 years following mediastinal radiation. Ejection fraction (EF) was 35%. Symptoms markedly improved and EF increased to > 55% following saphenous vein bypass for > or = 80% ostial left main stenosis. Radiation therapy, a known risk factor for coronary atherosclerosis, may present with reversible severe silent ischemia.

Left main coronary artery disease: assessment, diagnosis, and therapy

This article reviews and updates the current literature concerning the assessment, diagnosis, and therapy of coronary disease involving the LMCA. Included is recent information regarding the natural history, congenital abnormalities, noninvasive diagnostic studies, and role of coronary bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions in treating disease of the LMCA. At present, it remains that the LMCA is a difficult segment to assess angiographically. The use of noninvasive imaging does not specifically distinguish LMCA from other types of coronary disease. Coronary bypass surgery has a proven benefit in the treatment of disease of the LMCA. Currently, interventional procedures are limited by significant risks, and surgical treatment with coronary bypass surgery remains the therapy of choice.

Severe coronary artery disease after radiation therapy of the chest and mediastinum: clinical presentation and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To define the clinical and angiographic features and the therapeutic problems in patients with coronary artery disease after therapeutic irradiation of the chest.

DESIGN

An observational retrospective study.

SETTING

The cardiac catheterisation laboratory, university medical school.

PATIENTS

15 subjects (8 men and 7 women, aged 25-56 years, mean 44) examined in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory, who had significant coronary artery disease years after having radiation treatment to the chest and anterior mediastinum. In the early stages of the study angiography was performed because of typical symptoms of ischaemic heart disease. Later on it was performed because of a high index of suspicion in people with signs of extensive radiation heart damage.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical and electrocardiographic evidence of ischaemic heart disease; echocardiographic signs of pericardial, myocardial or valvar involvement; angiographic evidence of coronary arterial stenosis, with special attention to the ostia; haemodynamic and angiographic signs of pericardial, myocardial, and valvar disease. Survival and symptomatic and functional status were ascertained after medical or surgical treatment.

RESULTS

The patients were relatively young and had no risk factors. Seven patients had no signs or symptoms of ischaemic heart disease. Ten patients had ostial stenosis, which was associated with extensive involvement of other cardiac structures in nine of them. Seven required surgical treatment for coronary artery disease. Two died, one at surgery and the other one six months later. Five patients had complications associated with irradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary arterial disease can be reasonably ascribed to the effects of chest irradiation when the patients are young and free from risk factors, especially if the obstructions are ostial and there is important damage to other cardiac structures. In patients with damage to other cardiac structures angina and infarction are often absent and coronary angiography seems to be mandatory. Patients often require surgical treatment and postoperative complications are common.

Associated cardiac lesions in patients with radiation-induced complete heart block

We investigated the clinical, electrophysiological, haemodynamic and angiographic aspects of four patients (two men and two women, aged 31-46 years) who developed complete heart block 13-20 years after therapeutic irradiation of the chest for Hodgkin's disease. The initial cardiac symptom was syncope in three, effort intolerance in one. The electrocardiogram recorded third-degree atrioventricular block in three patients, right bundle branch block and posterior fascicular block in one. The electrophysiological study, performed in three cases, showed that the block was infranodal in two. Three patients had significant coronary arterial stenoses, that involved the ostia in two. All patients had mild-to-moderate aortic and mitral regurgitation. One patient had haemodynamic signs of constriction. Another patient had recurrent pericardial effusions. All had echocardiographic evidence of a thickened pericardium. Cardiac involvement can be extensive in patient with radiation-induced heart block. Because coronary artery disease can be particularly severe, coronary angiography appears to be warranted in such patients.

Radiation-induced stenosis of the left main coronary artery

Isolated left main coronary artery stenosis induced by mediastinal radiation is a well-documented but rare entity. Its clinical manifestations can be latent for many years, but its ominous sequela cannot be ignored. We report here such a patient presenting 16 yr postmediastinal radiation, the longest documented latency to date.

Radiation-induced coronary artery disease

Excessive unprotected radiation to the heart appears to lead to the development of CAD, even in the absence of significant cardiovascular risk factors. The coexistence of such factors may enhance the probability of CAD. The presence of hypercholesterolemia and concomitant or sequential use of chemotherapeutic agents (especially doxorubicin) could further increase this risk. Therapeutic decisions, as with any other manifestation of CAD, relate to the extent of myocardium at jeopardy and to the overall diffuseness of CAD. Management options possible are PTCA or coronary artery bypass surgery. The latter may be required in left main artery stenosis and complicated ostial lesions. Use of shielding should decrease the associated risk of radiation-induced CAD in future years. However, clinicians should continue to have a high degree of suspicion of CAD in patients treated with thoracic radiation without cardiac shielding.

Cardiovascular sequelae of therapeutic thoracic radiation

Mediastinal radiation damages endothelial cells, with resulting loss of capillaries and ischemia at the level of the microcirculation. These changes lead to increases in collagen and proliferation of fibrous tissue throughout the heart. Cardiac dysfunction following radiotherapy is surprisingly common and may be due to pericardial, myocardial, valvular, conduction system, or coronary artery disease. Greater awareness of cardiotoxicity has prompted changes in radiation techniques that appear to reduce clinical cardiovascular complications.

Coronary ostial stenosis after radiotherapy: angioplasty or coronary artery surgery?

A thirty year old man underwent coronary angioplasty for an isolated ostial stenosis of the ostium of the right coronary artery after mediastinal radiotherapy given ten years previously. Despite an angiographically acceptable angioplasty result, he had a myocardial infarction two months later and coronary artery surgery was performed. The most effective form of myocardial revascularisation for radiotherapy related coronary artery lesions remains to be established.