Economic outcomes of breast cancer survivorship: CALGB study 79804

BACKGROUND

Over 80% of women diagnosed with breast cancer will be survivors. We sought to determine the economic consequences of surviving breast cancer.

METHODS

Disease-free survivors who had received adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II breast cancer on CALGB study 8541 participated in a study of long-term outcomes. Survey responses were used to determine the types and frequency of medical resources used in follow-up, annual direct medical costs, and survivor perceptions of the personal economic impact of breast cancer.

RESULTS

245 of 314 (78%) invited breast cancer survivors (median follow-up 12.2 years, range 9.3-16.4) completed the surveys. Eighty-seven percent reported having cancer specialist follow-up in the past year. The following percentages of survivors reported having had, for breast cancer follow-up, at least once in the past year: breast examination 92%, mammogram 88%, bone scan 18%, chest radiograph 59%, tumor marker studies 37%. When follow-up care included a medical oncologist, resources were more likely to be used at least according to published follow-up guidelines, or over-used. Median annual cost of follow-up per survivor was US 630 dollars (range US 0-10,817 dollars) with higher costs associated with medical oncology follow-up, lower income, and younger age. Few women reported a negative impact of breast cancer on employment, but 16% reported being denied life insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Among long-term breast cancer survivors, patient self-report data suggest that over-use of medical resources for follow-up appears common. When follow-up care included a medical oncologist, resources were more likely to be used appropriately, or over-used. Costs of follow-up are higher with medical oncology follow-up, lower income and among younger survivors. The annual cost of follow-up varies widely and may be driven by over-use of follow-up tests.

Supportive care of the older cancer patient

Aging is associated with decreased functional reserve of multiple organ systems and with changes in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodinamics of drugs. Older individuals express enhanced susceptibility to the complications of cytotoxic chemotherapy, especially to myleotoxicity, mucositis, cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity. The management of older individuals with chemotherapy involves then prevention of these complications. General precautions include proper patient selection, based on the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), dose adjustment for agents that are renally excreted to the patient creatinine clearance and maintenance of hemoglobin levels > or =12 g/dl. Filgrastim and pegfilgrastim proved effective in reducing by 50-75% the risk of neutropenic fever in older individuals treated with CHOP and CHOP-like chemotherapy and should be used for the prophilaxis of infections. When feasible, the oral agent capecitabine, should be used in lieu of intravenous fluorinated pyrimidines, to prevent mucositis. In patients at risk of cardiomyopathy from anthracyclines, dexrazoxane or liposomal compounds may be indicated. When toxicity is properly prevented, cytotoxic chemotherapy may be as effective in older individuals as it is in the younger ones.

Randomized clinical trial of an implantable drug delivery system compared with comprehensive medical management for refractory cancer pain: impact on pain, drug-related toxicity, and survival

PURPOSE

Implantable intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDSs) have been used to manage refractory cancer pain, but there are no randomized clinical trial (RCT) data comparing them with comprehensive medical management (CMM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 202 patients on an RCT of CMM versus IDDS plus CMM. Entry criteria included unrelieved pain (visual analog scale [VAS] pain scores >/= 5 on a 0 to 10 scale). Clinical success was defined as >/= 20% reduction in VAS scores, or equal scores with >/= 20% reduction in toxicity. The main outcome measure was pain control combined with change of toxicity, as measured by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, 4 weeks after randomization.

RESULTS

Sixty of 71 IDDS patients (84.5%) achieved clinical success compared with 51 of 72 CMM patients (70.8%, P =.05). IDDS patients more often achieved >/= 20% reduction in both pain VAS and toxicity (57.7% [41 of 71] v 37.5% [27 of 72], P =.02). The mean CMM VAS score fell from 7.81 to 4.76 (39% reduction); for the IDDS group, the scores fell from 7.57 to 3.67 (52% reduction, P =.055). The mean CMM toxicity scores fell from 6.36 to 5.27 (17% reduction); for the IDDS group, the toxicity scores fell from 7.22 to 3.59 (50% reduction, P =.004). The IDDS group had significant reductions in fatigue and depressed level of consciousness (P <.05). IDDS patients had improved survival, with 53.9% alive at 6 months compared with 37.2% of the CMM group (P =.06).

CONCLUSION

IDDSs improved clinical success in pain control, reduced pain, significantly relieved common drug toxicities, and improved survival in patients with refractory cancer pain.

Clinical trials: are they a good buy?

PURPOSE

Concern that clinical trials may be too costly has been used to justify traditionally restrictive insurer policies regarding clinical trials. Additionally, fear of insurer reimbursement denial can be a significant barrier to clinical trial participation. In this study, we reviewed the empirical data on costs of clinical trials versus standard care and summarized the current status of policy initiatives related to clinical trial insurance reimbursement.

METHODS

Electronic and print data sources were searched for studies on the costs of oncology clinical trials. Information on policy initiatives for clinical trial reimbursement was obtained from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the American Society of Hematology, and the Coalition of National Cancer Cooperative Groups and from searches of World Wide Web sites.

RESULTS

Five pilot studies provided information for 377 patients on phase II/III clinical trials matched with controls on standard care. Cost estimates ranged from 10% lower to 23% higher costs/charges for clinical trials in comparison to standard medical care. Medicare, 14 states, and several private insurers now cover the costs of patient care in "qualifying" clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

Findings from small pilot studies suggest that phase II and III clinical trials result in at most modest increases in cost over standard treatment costs. Also, an increasing number of policy makers have decided to support clinical trial reimbursement initiatives. It is hoped that economic data from large observational studies will facilitate widespread and permanent decisions that support reimbursement for phase I, II, and III clinical trial participation.

The search for cancer risk factors: when can we stop looking?

In recent decades, countless cohort, case-control, and ecologic studies have been conducted in the search for cancer risk factors. On the basis of knowledge gained from these studies, various influential commentaries have endeavored to classify the extent to which the total cancer burden is attributable to general categories of risk, such as diet, tobacco, sun exposure, and others. These commentaries have led to the conventional wisdom that most of the cancer burden is caused by environmental factors and relatively little is directly attributable to genetic susceptibility. In the face of the apparent knowledge that the cancer burden is essentially fully "explainable" on the basis of known environmental risks, this article addresses the conceptual and empirical basis of the continued search for new risk factors. It proposes that the extent of the aggregation of cancer within individuals in the population--that is, the occurrence of second primary cancers--is a crucial statistic in this context. A study of the incidence of second primary melanoma suggests that the bulk of the risk variation in this disease cannot be explained by known risk factors. The implications of these ideas for research strategy and for public health policy are discussed.

Tamoxifen should be cost-effective in reducing breast cancer risk in high-risk women

PURPOSE

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of tamoxifen in the prevention of breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical trial results of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Program P-1 compared tamoxifen versus placebo in the prevention of breast cancer, and direct medical care costs were estimated from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and local sources. The base estimate of effectiveness included all women on the trial.

RESULTS

For every 100 women treated for 5 years, 1.665 expected cancers would not be detected. If breast cancer death is fully prevented by this strategy, then the cost-effectiveness of tamoxifen compared with no intervention is $8,479 per additional year of life gained. If lifetime prevention of the risk of death from breast cancer exceeded 17%, then the cost-effectiveness ratio would be less than $50,000 per year of life gained (a common benchmark).

CONCLUSIONS

Tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention should be cost-effective under nearly all circumstances. Its use will require additional resources because it is not cost saving, but it fits within accepted guidelines.

The costs of managing patients with advanced colorectal cancer in 10 different European centres

With the aim of estimating and comparing the direct hospital costs of managing patients with advanced colorectal cancer in various countries, data on resource utilisation and unit prices were collected. Data on the consumption of medical resources were collected by a retrospective examination of the hospital charts for 20 patients in each of 10 centres in five European countries. To make cost comparisons meaningful, a complete and consistent set of unit prices for all the medical resources used in each of the countries would be required, but this could not be achieved. As an alternative method of comparison, the most complete set of unit prices (from Belgium) was used here to estimate the imputed average total cost of patient management in each centre. By using this approach, a summary index was created, which reflected only differences in resource utilisation. This index showed that there were considerable differences in the amounts of resources used for treating these patients, between, as well as within, countries. Differences of the same order of magnitude were found, when the treatment of subgroups of patients, according to site and stage of disease, were examined.

Cancer control in susceptible groups: opportunities and challenges

Cancer mortality rates in the United States have risen throughout most of this century, and a downward trend has just emerged in recent years. Nevertheless, it is predicted that cancer will soon be the leading cause of death among Americans. To gain new knowledge of etiology, we have studied persons at highest risk as human models of cancer susceptibility. Clinical observations at the bedside are used to generate etiologic hypotheses that are tested in epidemiologic studies. Companion laboratory studies can identify biologic mechanisms of predisposition. Data show that inborn mutations in cancer-predisposing genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, markedly increase the risk of cancers at unusually early ages. Increasing numbers of these highly penetrant genes are being identified. These discoveries have created new opportunities for genetic testing to identify cancer-prone individuals. Individuals found to be carriers can be offered counseling to avoid environmental exposures that further elevate risk, intensive medical surveillance for early detection, participation in chemoprevention trials, and prophylactic surgery to remove at-risk tissues. However, genetic knowledge can have adverse effects, including psychologic distress, social stigmatization, and loss of health insurance. Research is needed to maximize benefits and minimize risks to the susceptible populations. Professional and public education can promote appropriate use of genetic data, and legislation may be required to prevent discrimination. Knowledge of these highly penetrant genes can be extended to common polymorphisms that modify cancer risk associated with exposures to environmental carcinogens.