Bilateral nephrectomy simultaneously with renal allografting does not alleviate hypertension 3 months following living-donor transplantation

Case Report: Let Us Not Forget the Treatment That Some Patients Have Received-The Brief 50-Year History of a Kidney Transplant Survivor

Background

There has been a considerable improvement in post-transplant care since the early 1960s. Some patients we meet in the clinic have personally experienced this progress and have histories to tell that one must not forget. This is the brief history of a long-time “transplant survivor.”

Case Presentation

In 1970, a young woman developed acute oedema, proteinuria, hypertension and oliguria during pregnancy. Labor was induced, but neither the child nor the kidney function could be saved. Our patient started dialysis, and 4 years later received a kidney transplant donated by her father (then 55 years of age). Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of prednisolone and azathioprine until 2011, when azathioprine was switched to everolimus due to skin cancer. Before this, our patient was highly satisfied with prednisolone/azathioprine, despite discussions regarding newer immunosuppressive drugs, and always reminded the treating physician that one should “never change a winning team.” Retrospectively, the avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors might have been beneficial for this patient who still has preserved an excellent renal function with s-creatinine levels around 100 μmol/L and just had sparse fibrosis detected in a recently performed transplant biopsy. The transplanted kidney is now 101 years old and is still working 24/7.

Conclusions

Our patient received a kidney transplant for 46 years ago and still has a remarkably stable transplant function with s-creatinine levels around 100 μmol/L. This case report illustrates the potential endurance of the kidneys and is a reminder to keep taking individualized treatment decisions even though new treatment alternatives promise superiority.

Hypertension in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Where Are We Today?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and allograft loss among kidney transplant recipients, and hypertension is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity of this patient population. The etiology of hypertension is multifactorial, including pre-transplant volume overload, post-transplant recipient and donor-associated variables, and transplant-specific causes (immunosuppressive medications, allograft dysfunction and surgical complications such as transplant artery stenosis).

RECENT FINDINGS

No randomized controlled trials have assessed the optimal blood pressure targets and explored the best antihypertensive regimen for kidney transplant recipients. According to the large observational studies, it is reasonable to achieve a blood pressure goal of equal to or less than 130/80 mmHg in the long-term follow-up for minimizing the cardiovascular morbidity. The selection of antihypertensive agents should be based on the patient's co-morbidities; however, the initial choice could be calcium channel blockers especially in the first few months of transplantation. In patients with cardiovascular indications of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition, given the well-described benefits in diabetic and proteinuric patients, it is reasonable to consider the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. There is a need for future prospective trials in the transplant population to define optimal blood pressure goals and therapies.

Changes in Blood Pressure Levels and Antihypertensive Medication Use before and after Renal Transplantation among Patients in Nairobi, Kenya: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Objectives. To determine the changes in blood pressure levels and antihypertensive medication use in the postrenal transplantation period compared to pretransplantation one. Methods. A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out on renal transplant recipients at the Kenyatta National Hospital, a national referral hospital in Kenya. Sociodemographic details, blood pressure levels, and antihypertensive medication use before and after renal transplantation were noted. Changes in mean blood pressure levels and mean number of antihypertensive medications after renal transplantation were determined using paired t-test. Results. 85 subjects were evaluated. Mean age was 42.4 (SD ± 12.2) years, with a male : female ratio of 1.9 : 1. Compared to the pretransplant period, significantly lower mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels after transplantation were noted (mean SBP 144.5 mmHg versus 131.8 mmHg; mean DBP 103.6 mmHg versus 83.5 mmHg in the pre- and posttransplant periods, respectively, p < 0.001). Mean number of antihypertensive medications also reduced significantly after transplantation, with an average of 3.3 (±1.6) versus 2.1 (±0.9) in the pre- and posttransplant periods, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion. There is a significant reduction in blood pressure levels and number of antihypertensive medications used after renal transplantation. The positive impact of renal transplantation on blood pressure control should be confirmed using prospective cohort studies of patients with end stage renal disease who then undergo renal transplantation.

Hypertension, living kidney donors, and transplantation: where are we today?

Hypertension is a prevalent problem in kidney transplant recipients that is known to be a "traditional" risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease leading to premature allograft failure and death. Donor, peritransplant, and recipient factors affect hypertension risk. Blood pressure control after transplantation is inversely associated with glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Calcineurin inhibitors, the most commonly used class of immunosuppressives, cause endothelial dysfunction, increase vascular tone, and sodium retention via the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system resulting in systemic hypertension. Steroid withdrawal seems to have little impact on blood pressure control. Newer agents like belatacept appear to be associated with less hypertension. Transplant renal artery stenosis is an important, potentially treatable cause of hypertension. Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers mitigate calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity and may be associated with improved estimated GFR. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are not recommended in the first 3 to 6 months given their effects on reduced estimated GFR, anemia, and hyperkalemia. The use of ß-blockers may be associated with improved patient survival, even for patients without cardiovascular disease. Living donation may increase blood pressure by 5 mm Hg or more. Some transplant centers accept Caucasian living donors with well-controlled hypertension on a single agent if they agree to close follow-up.

Effects of moxonidine on sympathetic nerve activity in patients with end-stage renal disease

OBJECTIVE

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is characterized by markedly increased sympathetic outflow that contributes to increased cardiovascular mortality in these patients. The central sympatholytic drug moxonidine (MOX) has been shown to reduce muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in initial stages of chronic kidney disease; however, the effects in ESRD are not known. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that low-dose MOX causes sustained decreases in sympathetic outflow in ESRD patients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-three ESRD patients (mean age 46.4 +/- 16 years, 14 men, seven women, no diabetic patients) were randomized to a daily treatment of 0.3 mg MOX or placebo (PLA) in addition to pre-existing antihypertensive therapy. At baseline and after 1 and 6 months of treatment, heart rate (HR, ECG), blood pressure (mean arterial pressure, automatic sphygmanometer), calf blood flow (CBF, venous occlusion plethysmography), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) (microneurography at the peroneal nerve) were measured. Data are mean +/- SEM.

RESULTS

MOX acutely decreased MSNA within 2 h after oral intake (from 45 +/- 3.7 to 35 +/- 3.9 bursts/min, P < 0.05). This decrease was sustained over 6 months (MSNA 45 +/- 3.7, 35 +/- 4.6, 33 +/- 4.5 bursts/min at 0, 1 and 6 months, P < 0.05). PLA had no effect. Neither MOX nor PLA resulted in any significant acute or long-term changes in HR, MAP or CBF.

CONCLUSIONS

In ESRD patients, low-dose MOX produced sustained and substantial reductions in sympathetic outflow without hemodynamically compromising them. We suggest that the inhibition of central sympathetic outflow may improve cardiovascular prognosis in ESRD.

Long-term cardiovascular effects of pre-transplant native kidney nephrectomy in children

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (H) and hypertension are prevalent in children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and after renal transplantation. Severe hypertension prior to renal transplantation has traditionally been an indication for native kidney nephrectomy. The impact of nephrectomy on cardiovascular disease has not been well documented. We retrospectively evaluated echocardiographic and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) data in 67 young adults who had undergone transplantation in the pediatric age with a mean follow-up of 10.4 years. Unilateral or bilateral nephrectomies had been performed in 32 patients. The number of antihypertensive drugs used prior to transplantation was significantly higher in the nephrectomized groups. At follow-up the amount of antihypertensive medications was similar between groups and no significant differences were observed in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) or LV mass index (LVMi). LVH was observed in 50% of non-nephrectomized patients, 45.4% of patients with unilateral nephrectomy, and 44.4% of patients without native kidneys (p = n.s.). In conclusion, unilateral or bilateral nephrectomies prior to transplantation do not appear to influence blood pressure control or the prevalence of LVH after renal transplantation. Longitudinal studies with repeated assessment of LVMi, before and after renal transplantation, are needed to assess the impact of residual activity of native kidneys on arterial blood pressure and cardiac structural changes, even in normotensive patients, to evaluate cardiovascular morbidity.

It takes time after bilateral nephrectomy for better control of resistant hypertension in renal transplant patients

Severe resistant hypertension in end-stage renal disease patients has traditionally been an indication for bilateral nephrectomy (BN) before kidney transplantation. Nevertheless the influence of BN on successful control of hypertension has not been well documented. We sought to clarify the effect of BN on blood pressure patterns and control in renal transplant patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients who underwent BN between November 2003 and May 2009 before or after kidney transplantation. Nineteen of them were under treatment with 4 or 5 antihypertensives according to the international guide lines; they had BN for resistant hypertension. They were considered as group 1 (G1). Nine patients operated for indications other than resistant hypertension; they constitute group 2 (G2) and considered as a control group. All patients received triple immunosuppression according to our local protocol. BN was done either before, simultaneously or after transplantation. Antihypertensives were recorded before and after BN. We evaluated our patients at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years. Acute rejection episodes and calcinurein nephrotoxicity were reported.

RESULTS

In G1, the mean age was 30.2 years (range, 10-62). In G2, the mean age was 33.6 years (range, 11-61). Before BN, G1 patients used antihypertensive drugs (3.6 +/- 1.05 drugs per day; mean +/- SD), which was significantly higher than in G2 patients (2.0 +/- 1.65 drugs per day; P = .02). Three months after BN, G1 patients used 2.6 + 0.9 drugs per day, with gradual reduction in number of antihypertensives to 1.4 +/- 1.3 drugs per day at 3 years (P = .008). In G2, there was reduction in antihypertensive drug number per day, which was insignificant during the follow-up period. No difference was noted between G1 and G2 drug administered after BN. We conclude that BN is effective to help blood pressure control, in resistant hypertension in renal transplant patients, but it starts to show up 3 months after surgery, and continues to work for a year and more.

Posttransplant diabetes and hypertension: pathophysiologic insights and therapeutic rationale

New-onset diabetes after transplantation and hypertension are very common after renal transplantation and are associated with adverse graft and cardiovascular outcomes. A thorough understanding of the unique factors that operate in renal transplant recipients is essential for the proper evaluation and management of these important disorders. This review outlines the pathogenesis, diagnostic workup, and therapeutic rationale for diabetes and hypertension after transplantation.

Hypertension After Renal Transplant

Hypertension is common after renal transplant and is associated with adverse graft and patient outcomes. A thorough understanding of the unique factors that operate in renal transplant recipients is essential for the proper evaluation and management of this disorder. In this review, the authors outline the pathogenesis, diagnostic workup, and treatment of hypertension after renal transplant.

Kidney Transplantation with Concomitant Unilateral Nephrectomy: A Matched-Pair Analysis on Complications and Outcome

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine the impact of kidney transplantation with simultaneous unilateral nephrectomy on perioperative morbidity and patient and graft survival.

METHODS

From January 1990 to May 2004, 75 kidney transplantations with simultaneous unilateral nephrectomy (group NE+) were performed at the University of Freiburg. Of these, 49 had polycystic kidney disease. Patients of group NE+ were matched with 75 kidney transplants without nephrectomy (group NE-). Immunosuppressive maintenance therapy in both groups was based on cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine, and prednisone. Mean follow up was 4.1 yrs (range 0.3-11.7 yrs).

RESULTS

Patient survival rate at 1 and 5 yrs was 95% and 84% versus 95% and 93% in group NE+ and NE-, resp. (P=0.56). Accordingly, kidney function rate was 85% and 74% in group NE+ versus 89% and 79% in group NE- (P=0.89). Perioperative (90 days) mortality rate in group NE+ was 1.3% and 2.7% in group NE- (P=0.56). Perioperative surgical complications were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney transplantation with concomitant unilateral nephrectomy has no negative impact on patient or graft survival and is associated with a reasonable morbidity rate.

Concomitant nephrectomy of massively enlarged kidneys and renal transplantation in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

OBJECTIVES

We compared perioperative and intraoperative data of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) who received a renal allograft without native nephrectomy with ADPKD patients who underwent concomitant native nephrectomy of massively enlarged kidneys and renal transplantation to determine whether the latter approach is reasonable and safe.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1987 to December 2003, 13 patients with ESRD due to ADPKD were stratified as 6 patients who underwent bilateral and 7 patients who underwent unilateral native nephrectomy in conjunction with renal transplantation (group A), versus 20 patients with ESRD due to ADPKD underwent renal transplantation without native nephrectomy (group B). Operative time, need for intraoperative transfusion, time to oral intake, duration of hospital stay, serum creatinine level on the day of discharge, readmission rate, and postoperative complications were compared for both groups.

RESULTS

Mean intraoperative duration was significantly longer for patients in group A, but there was no statistically significant difference in the findings between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant native nephrectomy of massively enlarged kidneys at the time of renal transplantation is reasonable and safe for patients with ESRD due to ADPKD.

Treatment of hypertension in renal transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypertension is very common in renal transplant recipients and is a significant risk factor for mortality from cardiovascular diseases and for development of graft dysfunction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent guidelines for the treatment of hypertension (Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure VI Report and World Health Organization Guidelines) do not directly address post-transplant hypertension. Specific recommendations for the drug treatment of hypertension in renal allograft recipients have not been given in the Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation or those of the European Renal Association.

SUMMARY

The present paper summarizes some important aspects of post-transplant hypertension and discusses potential treatment strategies aimed at reducing blood pressure and thus improving patient and allograft survival.

Risk factors for and management of post-transplantation cardiovascular disease

The mortality rates due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) in transplant recipients are greater than in the general population. CVD is a major cause of both graft loss and patient death in renal transplant recipients, and improving cardiovascular health in transplant recipients will presumably help to extend both patient and graft survival. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the effectiveness of risk modification on subsequent CVD morbidity and mortality. There is no reason to consider risk factors for CVD such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and diabetes mellitus in transplant recipients differently from in the general population. In addition, there are specific transplantation risk factors such as acute rejection episodes and the use of immunosuppressive drugs. It is obvious that several of the immunosuppressive agents used today have disadvantageous influences on risk factors for CVD such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM), but the relative importance of immunosuppressant-induced increases in these risk factors is basically unknown. This may be a strong argument for the selective use and individual tailoring of immunosuppressive agents based upon the risk factor profile of the patient, without jeopardising the function of the graft. Hyperlipidaemia is common after transplantation, and immunosuppression with corticosteroids, cyclosporin, or sirolimus (rapamycin) causes different types of post-transplantation hyperlipidaemia. However, to date, no studies have demonstrated that lipid lowering strategies significantly reduce CVD morbidity or mortality and improve allograft survival in transplant recipients. Several studies using preventive or interventional approaches are ongoing and will be reported in the near future. Post-transplantation hypertension appears to be a major risk factor determining graft and patient survival, and immunosuppressive agents have different effects on hypertension. Controlled studies support the opinion that post-transplantation hypertension must be treated as strictly as in a population with essential hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or chronic renal failure. As increasing numbers of immunosuppressive agents become available for use, we may be in a better position to tailor immunosuppressive therapy to the individual patient, avoiding the use of diabetogenic drugs, drug combinations, or inappropriate doses in patients susceptible to PTDM. Multiple acute rejection episodes have also been demonstrated to be a risk factor for CVD - a strong argument for the use of immunosuppressive drugs to reduce acute rejection. Until we have a better understanding from ongoing landmark studies on the management of CVD, presently available therapy to reduce risk factors needs to be used together with individual tailoring of immunosuppressive therapy with the aim of reducing CVD in these patients.

Mechanisms of hypertension after renal transplantation

Hypertension is extremely prevalent after renal transplantation, affecting up to 70% of all patients. An elevation in blood pressure is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk and may also contribute to chronic allograft failure. Renal transplantation provides interesting insights into the pathogenesis of hypertension. Experimental and human data show that the kidney is an essential organ for blood pressure regulation. In clinical practice a differential diagnosis that is based on excretory allograft function has proved useful.

Treatment of posttransplant hypertension by laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomy?

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is an important risk factor for the development of chronic graft failure and decreased graft and patient survival after renal transplantation.

METHODS

Between September 1994 and August 1996, 14 patients underwent laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomy for treatment of drug-resistant hypertension after successful renal transplantation. Common causes of hypertension were largely excluded before bilateral nephrectomy. A scoring system was developed for comparison of different antihypertensive regimes. In this system, points were given according to type and dosage of each antihypertensive drug.

RESULTS

At 6-month follow-up, all patients showed well-controlled blood pressure (median of mean arterial pressure: 104 vs. 130 mmHg preoperatively, P<0.001, n=14), and significantly fewer antihypertensive drugs were needed according to the scoring system (48.9+/-20.9 points vs. 105.9+/-23.5 points preoperatively, P<0.001, n=14). During laparoscopy, three conversions to open surgery were necessary. Postoperatively, four complications occurred. After laparoscopy, immunosuppression and other oral medication were given continuously. The hospital stay ranged between 3 and 6 days (median: 5 days).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that bilateral nephrectomy using the laparoscopic technique can be an effective alternative method for a selected group of patients with severe hypertension, which is unresponsive to conservative management after successful renal transplantation with regard to improving the long-term graft survival.