Prevention of contrast-associated acute kidney injury in an era of increasingly complex interventional procedures

Radiological and interventional cardiology procedures are in continuous expansion, leading to an important increase in the incidence of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). Although numerous methods of CA-AKI prevention have been studied, at present, there is no consensus on the definition of this entity or on its prevention. In this paper, we aim to provide a critical analysis of the existing data on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance of CA-AKI. Existing and emergent approaches for CA-AKI prevention are also discussed, with a focus on parenteral fluid administration and on the most recent clinical and experimental data. We also emphasize a number of questions that remain to be answered, and we identify hotspots for future research.

An in vivo and in vitro model on the protective effect of cilnidipine on contrast-induced nephropathy via regulation of apoptosis and CaMKⅡ/mPTP pathway

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an acute kidney injury (AKI) observed after the administration of contrast media. Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have been reported to exert a renal protective effect. This study aims to investigate the role of cilnidipine, a novel CCBs, on CIN by regulating the calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase Ⅱ(CaMKⅡ)/mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) pathway. Here, iohexol, a representative contrast media, was used to establish CIN model. KN-93 (CaMKⅡ inhibitor) and atractyloside (mPTP opener) were administered in rats, and CaMKⅡ overexpression was used in Human proximal tubular epithelial cells. Markers of renal injury (serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and urinary NAGL), hematoxylin-eosin stain, oxidative stress (ROS, superoxide dismutase [SOD], and malondialdehyde [MDA] levels), cell death (MTT and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling [TUNEL]), mitochondrial function (mPTP, mitochondrial membrane potential [MMP], and ATP) were assessed. Western blots were used to measure the expression levels of Bax/Bcl-2, caspase-3, CaMKⅡ/mPTP signaling pathways. Results showed that cilnidipine markedly improved kidney function, and alleviated tubular cell apoptosis, oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage induced by iohexol in vitro and in vivo. The underlying mechanism may be that cilnidipine relieved CaMKⅡ activation and mPTP opening induced by iohexol. All of these protective effects of cilnidipine were attenuated by CaMKⅡ overexpression and atractyloside (mPTP opener) pretreatment. Moreover, KN-93 (CaMKⅡ inhibitor) treatment showed a similar renal protective effect with cilnidipine, while the protective effect of cilnidipine on kidney in CIN rats was not further suppressed by KN-93 cotreatment. These in vitro and in vivo results point toward the fact that cilnidipine might be a novel therapeutic drug against contrast-induced nephrotoxicity in a CaMKⅡ-dependent manner.

Methods for Reducing Contrast Use and Avoiding Acute Kidney Injury During Endovascular Procedures

Iodinated Contrast Media (CM) has a plethora of applications in routine non-invasive or percutaneous invasive imaging examinations and therapeutic interventions. Unfortunately, the use of CM is not without complications, with contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) being among the most severe. CI-AKI is a syndrome defined as a rapid development of renal impairment after a few days of CM endovascular injection, without the presence of any other underlying related pathologies. Although mostly transient and reversible, for a subgroup of patients with comorbidities related to renal failure, CI-AKI is directly leading to longer hospitalization, elevated rates of morbidity and mortality, as well as the increased cost of funding. Thus, a need for classification in accordance with clinical and peri-procedural criteria is emerged. This would be very useful for CI-AKI patients in order to predict the ones who would have the greatest advantage from the application of preventive strategies. This article provides a practical review of the recent evidence concerning CI-AKI incidence, diagnosis, and sheds light on prevention methods for reducing contrast use and avoiding AKI during endovascular procedures. In conclusion, despite the lack of a specific treatment protocol, cautious screening, assessment, identification of the high-risk patients, and thus the application of simple interventions -concerning modifiable risk factors- can significantly reduce CI-AKI risk.

Risk factors for hemodialysis and mortality in patients with contrast-induced nephropathy

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for renal failure requiring hemodialysis and mortality in patients who developed contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after cardiac catheterization. Out of 13,742 patients who received cardiac catheterization at Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College from 2005 to 2008, 268 patients (2%) with a discharge diagnosis of renal failure were screened for CIN. CIN was defined as either a >25% increase of the serum creatinine or an absolute increase in serum creatinine of 0.5 mg/dL within the first 48 hours of the procedure. Chart reviews were performed on 80 patients (1%) who met the criteria for CIN. The 80 patients in the study included 46 men and 34 women, mean age 69 ± 14 years. Of the 80 patients, 18 patients (23%) died, and 22 patients (28%) developed renal failure requiring hemodialysis. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that independent risk factors for mortality were the use of calcium channel blockers [odds ratio = 0.0025, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.0001-0.1210, P < 0.01], catecholamine use (odds ratio = 71.2177, 95% CI, 4.2153-1203, P < 0.01), circulatory failure with lactic acidosis (odds ratio = 32.1405, 95% CI, 2.6331-392, P < 0.01), and renal failure requiring hemodialysis (odds ratio = 17.0376, 95% CI, 1.2344-235, P < 0.05). Significant independent risk factors for renal failure requiring hemodialysis were smoking (odds ratio = 0.06, 95% CI, 0.0045-0.8080, P < 0.05), N-acetylcysteine use (odds ratio = 0.08, 95% CI, 0.0148-0.4179, P < 0.01), anemia (odds ratio = 11.32, 95% CI, 2.57-50, P < 0.01), and circulatory failure with lactic acidosis (odds ratio = 9.76, 95% CI, 2.37-40, P < 0.01). Our data showed that risk factors for mortality in patients with CIN were catecholamine use, circulatory failure with lactic acidosis, and renal failure requiring hemodialysis. Risk factor for reducing mortality in patients with CIN was calcium channel blocker use. Significant risk factors for renal failure requiring hemodialysis were anemia, and circulatory failure with lactic acidosis. Risk factors for reducing renal failure requiring hemodialysis were N-acetylcysteine use and smoking.

Role of intracellular Ca2+ and Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in the pathogenesis of contrast-induced acute kidney injury

The precise mechanisms underlying contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) are not well understood. Intracellular Ca²⁺ overload is considered to be a key factor in CI-AKI. Voltage-dependent Ca²⁺ channel (VDC) and Na⁺/Ca²⁺ exchanger (NCX) system are the main pathways of intracellular Ca²⁺ overload in pathological conditions. Here, we review the potential underlying mechanisms involved in CI-AKI and discuss the role of NCX-mediated intracellular Ca²⁺ overload in the contrast media-induced renal tubular cell injury and renal hemodynamic disorder.

Cardiological Society of India practice guidelines for angiography in patients with renal dysfunction

PREAMBLE: The potential risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) has made utilization of coronary angiography in the work-up for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in CKD quite low.(1) This is in contrast to increasing prevalence and severity of CAD as the serum creatinine rises.(2) In fact most CKD patients will succumb to CAD and not to ESRD.(3) Thus the judicious use of CAG/PCI in this setting is of prime importance but underused. The CSI began to develop guidelines for Indian context as most guidelines are those developed by ACC/AHA or ESC. The aim was to assist the physicians in selecting the best management strategy for an individual patient under his care based on an expert committee who would review the current data and write the guidelines with relevance to the Indian context. The guidelines were developed initially in June 2010 as an initiative of Delhi CSI. Three interventional cardiologist (SB, AS, KKS), one nephrologist (SCT) and two clinical cardiologists (ST, RG) along with Dr. Roxana Mehran (New York) and Dr. Peter McCullough (Missouri), U.S.A.; were involved in a three-way teleconference to discuss/debate the data. This was presented by SB, and over the next two hours each data subset was debated/agreed/deleted and this resulted in the "Guidelines for CAG in Renal Dysfunction Patients". These were then written and re- circulated to all for final comments. Further, these guidelines were updated and additional Task Force Members nominated by Central CSI were involved in the formation of the final CSI Guidelines. Both (Roxana Mehran and Peter McCullough) reviewed these updated Guidelines in October 2012 and after incorporating the views of all the Task Force members-the final format is as it is presented in this final document.

Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Contrast Induced Nephropathy (CIN) is a feared complication of numerous radiological procedures that expose patients to contrast media. The most notorious of these procedures is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Not only is this a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, but it also adds to increased costs in high risk patients undergoing PCI. It is thought to result from direct cytotoxicity and hemodynamic challenge to renal tissue. CIN is defined as an increase in serum creatinine by either ≥0.5 mg/dL or by ≥25% from baseline within the first 2-3 days after contrast administration, after other causes of renal impairment have been excluded. The incidence is considerably higher in diabetics, elderly and patients with pre-existing renal disease when compared to the general population. The nephrotoxic potential of various contrast agents must be evaluated completely, with prevention as the mainstay of focus as no effective treatment exists. The purpose of this article is to examine the pathophysiology, risk factors, and clinical course of CIN, as well as the most recent studies dealing with its prevention and potential therapeutic interventions, especially during PCI. The role of gadolinium as an alternative to iodinated contrast is also discussed.

Contrast-induced nephropathy: pathogenesis and prevention

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is the third most common cause of acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients. Diagnostic and interventional cardiovascular procedures generate nearly half the cases. Elderly patients and those with chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease are at greatest risk. Procedure-related risk factors include large volumes of contrast and agents with a high osmolality. Renal medullary ischemia arising from an imbalance of local vasoconstrictive and vasodilatory influences coupled with increased demand for oxygen-driven sodium transport may be the key to its pathogenesis. Contrast agents may also have a direct cytotoxic effect that operates through the generation of reactive oxygen species. Pre- and post-procedure administration of normal saline, isotonic sodium bicarbonate, N-acetylcysteine, and a variety of other pharmacologic agents have been used to prevent or mitigate CIN. While normal saline is generally accepted as protective against CIN, uncertainty still surrounds the role of sodium bicarbonate and N-acetylcysteine. Dialytic therapies before, during, and after exposure to contrast have been tested with mixed results. Logistical and economic disincentives argue against these modalities.

Contrast-induced nephropathy

Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is an iatrogenic disorder, resulting from exposure to contrast media. Contrast-induced hemodynamic and direct cytotoxic effects on renal structures are highly evident in its pathogenesis, whereas other mechanisms are still poorly understood. CIN is typically defined as an increase in serum creatinine by either > or =0.5 mg/dl or by > or =25% from baseline within the first 2-3 days after contrast administration. Although rare in the general population, CIN has a high incidence in patients with an underlying renal disorder, in diabetics, and the elderly. The risk factors are synergistic in their ability to produce CIN. The best way to prevent CIN is to identify the patients at risk and to provide adequate peri-procedural hydration. The role of various drugs in prevention of CIN is still controversial and warrants future studies. Despite remaining uncertainty regarding the degree of nephrotoxicity produced by various contrast agents, in current practice non-ionic low-osmolar contrast media are preferred over the high-osmolar contrast media in patients with renal impairment.

Differential effects of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists on doxorubicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats

The aim of this study was to compare the roles of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists nifedipine, nitrendipine, amlodipine on doxorubicin (DXR)-induced nephrotoxicity in rats using biochemical, histopathological and immunohistochemical approaches. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into five experimental groups: control; DXR; DXR+nifedipine (15 mg/kg); DXR+nitrendipine (10 mg/kg); DXR+amlodipine (5 mg/kg). Results showed that treatment with DXR alone caused significant changes in the levels of urinary protein, serum creatinine (SCr), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). Co-administration with amlodipine effectively reversed the effect of DXR on these parameters. In contrast, nifedipine and nitrendipine either had no effect or worsened DXR induced changes in the levels of urinary protein, SCr and BUN. Furthermore, DXR treatment caused significant increases in the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and significant decreases in the levels of reduced glutathione (GSH), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), and superoxide dismutase (SOD). These effects were significantly reduced by co-administration with amlodipine but not affected by nifedipine and worsened by nitrendipine. In addition to the biochemical changes, histopathological studies showed that DXR caused significant structural damages in the kidneys. Glomerular cell apoptosis, a decrease in Bcl-2 expression and an increase in Bax expression were observed in all rats treated with DXR. Co-administration with amlodipine effectively reversed the effect of DXR while nifedipine and nitrendipine had no effect. In conclusion, this study clearly indicated that amlodipine protected against DXR-induced nephrotoxicity while nifedipine and nitrendipine had no effect.

Strategies to reduce the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy

In view of the clinical importance of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), numerous potential risk-reduction strategies have been evaluated. Adequate intravenous volume expansion with isotonic crystalloid (1.0-1.5 mL/kg per hr) for 3-12 hours before the procedure and continued for 6-24 hours afterward can lessen the probability of CIN in patients at risk. There are insufficient data on oral fluids (as opposed to intravenous volume expansion) as a CIN-prevention strategy. No adjunctive medical or mechanical treatment has been proved to be efficacious in reducing risk for CIN. Prophylactic hemodialysis and hemofiltration have not been validated as effective strategies. The CIN Consensus Working Panel considered that, of the pharmacologic agents that have been evaluated, theophylline, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), ascorbic acid, and prostaglandin E(1) deserve further evaluation. N-acetylcysteine is not consistently effective in reducing the risk for CIN. Fenoldopam, dopamine, calcium channel blockers, atrial natriuretic peptide, and l-arginine have not been shown to be effective. Use of furosemide, mannitol, or an endothelin receptor antagonist is potentially detrimental. Nephrotoxic drugs should be withdrawn before contrast administration in patients at risk for CIN.

Epidemiology and prognostic implications of contrast-induced nephropathy

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), usually defined as an increase in serum creatinine of 0.5 mg/dL (44.2 mumol/L), or a 25% increase from the baseline value 48 hours after the procedure, is a common and potentially serious complication of the use of iodinated contrast media in patients at risk of acute renal injury. It is an important cause of hospital-acquired renal failure, responsible for approximately 11% of cases. CIN may be difficult to distinguish from cholesterol embolization, another cause of postprocedure renal impairment. The reported incidence of CIN varies depending on the patient population studied. The impact of postprocedural renal impairment on clinical outcomes has been evaluated most extensively in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. CIN is associated with increased mortality both in hospital and at 1 year. A higher incidence of in-hospital and late cardiovascular events, as well as longer hospital stays, has been reported in patients developing CIN. In a small proportion of patients, CIN is severe enough to require dialysis, and these patients have a particularly poor prognosis. Many of the risk markers for CIN are also predictive of a worse prognosis.

Uroangiographic Contrast Media-Induced Nephropathy: Correlations between Their Physicochemical Properties and Renal Damage

Contrast media-induced nephropathy (CN) is an important cause of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. Patients with both diabetes mellitus and renal impairment are at high risk. CN pathophysiology involves activation of the tubulo-glomerular feedback and vasoactive mediators such as renin-angiotensin 2, endothelin, adenosine, ADH, etc. The risk of CN can be minimized by the use of non-ionic, low or isoosmolar, contrast material, adequate hydration and prophylactic pharmacological measures. In patients with chronic renal failure who are undergoing arteriography (e.g. coronary angiography and angioplasty), periprocedural hemofiltration appears effective in preventing further renal damage due to contrast agents.

Contrast nephropathy: review focusing on prevention

Contrast nephropathy (CN) accounts for significant morbidity and mortality. Patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency, especially those with diabetic nephropathy, are at particular risk. Medullary hypoxia due to decreased renal blood flow and direct cytotoxicity contribute to the pathogenesis. Contrast nephropathy is usually defined as an increase in serum creatinine concentration >0.5 mg/dl or 25% above the baseline level within 48 h. Intravenous hydration (saline 0.45%, if tolerated 0.9% at a rate of 1 ml/kg/h) 12 h before and after contrast exposure and the use of low or iso-osmolality contrast agents are advisable. The benefit of low-dose dopamine as well as the selective dopamine-1 receptor agonist fenoldopam is unproven. Studies on the effectiveness of the adenosine antagonist theophylline have led to conflicting results. Because theophylline has a narrow therapeutic range and may be associated with adverse effects, it is not a prophylactic agent of first choice. The administration of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been evaluated in several trials with inconsistent results. Newer data suggest a benefit of high-dose NAC (1,200 mg twice daily) for patients receiving high doses (>140 ml) of contrast agent, or those with advanced renal insufficiency (creatinine >2.5 mg/dl). Whereas prophylactic hemodialysis does not prevent CN, a recent study demonstrated a marked benefit of prophylactic hemofiltration.

Prevention of Contrast Media–induced Nephrotoxicity after Angiographic Procedures

Contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity (ie, contrast nephrotoxicity [CN]) remains an important complication of angiographic procedures. If administration of iodinated contrast medium is deemed necessary in patients at high risk of CN, volume expansion should be offered and the lowest possible dose of nonionic isosmolar dimeric or nonionic low-osmolar monomeric contrast medium should be used. Prophylactic administration of fenoldopam or acetylcysteine has not offered consistent protection against CN. Intravenous acetylcysteine could be considered in emergency situations. Recently, sodium bicarbonate infusion has been shown to reduce the risk of CN. Hemofiltration for several hours before and after contrast medium injection may offer good protection against CN in patients with advanced renal disease. Prophylactic hemodialysis does not offer any protection against CN.

Clinical and Experimental Evidence for Prevention of Acute Renal Failure Induced by Radiographic Contrast Media

Acute renal failure still occurs as a complication after radiographic examination using iodinated radiocontrast medium. The incidence rate of radiocontrast medium-induced nephropathy (radiocontrast nephropathy) is low (2 - 3%) in general. However, the rate is remarkably elevated in patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency. Radiocontrast nephropathy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with percutaneous coronary interventions. Although the reduction in renal blood flow and direct toxic action on renal tubular cells are considered to be involved, little is known about the etiology of radiocontrast nephropathy. A number of agents that improve renal circulation have been clinically tested for prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy, but none of them has succeeded. Protection of renal tubular cells against oxidative stress is another approach to avoid radiocontrast nephropathy. Prophylactic effects of antioxidants such as N-acetylcysteine and ascorbic acid have been reported by several investigators, although the effectiveness of these compounds is still a matter of debate. At present, hydration is regarded as the only effective, though incomplete, prophylactic regimen for radiocontrast nephropathy. Recently, we have shown that caspase-dependent apoptosis is an important factor in the pathogenesis of radiocontrast nephropathy and clarified cellular mechanisms underlying the radiocontrast media-induced apoptosis. This review summarizes clinical and experimental evidence for the etiology and prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy.

Prevention of contrast media nephrotoxicity--the story so far

Contrast media nephrotoxicity (CMN) in patients with pre-existing renal impairment remains a clinically significant problem. The first step to reduce the chance of CMN is to identify patients at risk through the use of screening questionnaires and renal function measurement. Patients at risk requiring injection of contrast medium (CM) because of important clinical indications should receive a small dose of either non-ionic iso-osmolar dimeric or non-ionic low osmolar monomeric CM and hydration. Intravenous infusion (1 ml/kg body weight/h) of 0.9% saline starting 4 h before CM injection and continuing for at least 12 h afterwards is effective in reducing the incidence of CMN. Prophylactic haemodialysis does not lower the risk of this complication. The value of pharmacological manipulation with renal vasodilators (calcium channel blockers, dopamine, atrial natriuretic peptide, fenoldopam (selective dopamine-1 receptor agonist), prostaglandin E(1), non-selective adenosine receptors antagonist (theophylline), non-selective endothelin receptor antagonist or the antioxidant acetylcysteine has not been fully proven. However, haemofiltration for several hours before and after contrast medium injection offers good protection against CMN in patients with advanced renal disease.

Prophylaxis of Iodinated Contrast Media-Induced Nephropathy

Iodinated contrast media are a frequent cause of acute renal failure, especially in patients whose renal function is already impaired. In addition to hydration, which remains the most commonly acknowledged means of protection, numerous pharmacological approaches for the prophylaxis of contrast nephropathy have been tested so far. They include diuretics, calcium channel blockers, adenosine receptor antagonists, N-acetylcysteine, low-dose dopamine and the dopamine D1 receptor agonist fenoldopam, endothelin receptor antagonists, and even captopril. The present review of the literature critically discusses the drugs used to prevent contrast nephropathy from a pharmacological point of view.

Contrast nephropathy after coronary angiography

Contrast nephropathy after coronary angiography is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. We discuss the incidence, definition, and pathologic mechanisms of contrast nephropathy; provide an overview of risk factors; highlight proven preventive interventions; clarify which interventions have shown no benefit; and discuss future possibilities. The prevention of contrast nephropathy is crucial for the care of patients undergoing coronary angiography and should be possible with an understanding of risk factors and proven management strategies.

Effect of theophylline on contrast material-nephropathy in patients with chronic renal insufficiency: controlled, randomized, double-blinded study

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the adenosine antagonist theophylline reduces the incidence of contrast material-induced nephropathy (serum creatinine level increase of at least 0.5 mg/dL [44.2 micromol/L] in 48 hours) in high-risk patients who have chronic renal insufficiency and have received at least 100 mL of contrast medium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients with serum creatinine levels of 1.3 mg/dL (114.3 micromol/L) or greater were randomly assigned to intravenously receive 200 mg theophylline or saline 30 minutes before administration of 100 mL or more of low-osmolarity contrast medium arterially (72 [72%] patients) or intravenously (28 [28%] patients).

RESULTS

Patients receiving theophylline and control subjects were comparable with regard to risk factors for contrast-induced nephropathy such as mean serum creatinine level before contrast medium administration (2.07 mg/dL +/- 0.94 [SD] [182.9 micromol/L +/- 83.1] vs 1.92 mg/dL +/- 0.76 [169.7 micromol/L +/- 67.2], respectively), amount of contrast medium (196.5 mL +/- 84.1 vs 216.6 mL +/- 95.0, respectively), and diabetes prevalence. Theophylline prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of contrast material-induced nephropathy (4% vs 16%; P =.046). With theophylline, the mean serum creatinine level decreased nonsignificantly 12 (1.98 mg/dL +/- 0.77 [175.0 micromol/L +/- 68.1]; P =.09), 24 (1.97 mg/dL +/- 0.75 [174.1 micromol/L +/- 68.1]; P =.99), and 48 (1.94 mg/dL +/- 0.77 [171.5 micromol/L +/- 68.1]; P =.99)(1.94 mg/dL +/- 0.77 [171.5 micromol/L +/- 68.1]; P =.99) hours after contrast medium administration. With a placebo, serum creatinine level significantly increased 24 hours after contrast medium administration (2.01 mg/dL +/- 0.89 [177.7 micromol/L +/- 78.7]; P =.006). Urinary N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase level did not change with theophylline administration but significantly (P =.034) increased 24 hours after contrast medium administration with the placebo.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic administration of 200 mg theophylline reduces the incidence of contrast material-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

Radiographic contrast media induced nephropathy: experimental observations and the protective effect of calcium channel blockers

Combined acute inhibition of the synthesis of nitric oxide with L-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and of prostacycline synthesis with indomethacin predisposes rats to severe renal injury from radiographic contrast media. The reliability of this pharmacological manipulation in the study of radiographic contrast medium induced nephropathy (RCMN) was investigated. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with iv L-NAME (10 mg kg(-1)) and iv indomethacin (10 mg kg(-1)) 15 min apart and prior to injection of RCM or normal saline (control group). A dose-dependent reduction in renal function was observed after intravascular injection of the high osmolar RCM diatrizoate (Angiografin, 306 mgI ml(-1)). A significant (p<0.01) increase in serum creatinine (Cr) (from 54.66+/-8.39 micromol l(-1) to 171.96+/-24.49 micromol l(-1) and from 80.95+/-6.73 micromol l(-1) to 204.76+/-16.73 micromol (-1), n=5 per group) was observed 24 h after injection of 6 ml and 8 ml of diatrizoate, respectively. The increase in serum Cr after injection of 8 ml of diatrizoate recovered spontaneously to 80.87+/-8.70 micromol l(-1) 7 days after injection. No significant change in renal function was observed in the control group (n=5) receiving 8 ml kg(-1) of normal saline or after injection of 4 ml of diatrizoate (serum Cr 69.84+/-5.5 micromol l(-1) pre contrast injection and 66.67+/-13.47 micromol l(-1) 24 h post contrast injection, n=5). The increase in serum Cr observed with 6 ml of diatrizoate was significantly higher (p<0.01) than the rise induced by equivolume of the low osmolar non-ionic monomer iopromide (Ultravist, 300 mgI ml(-1)) (serum CR 68.47+/-8.39 micromol l(-1) pre contrast injection and 143.59+/-32.03 micromol l(-1) 24 h post contrast injection, n=5). The calcium channel blocker diltiazem (10 mg kg(-1) injected intraperitoneally 30 min prior to RCM injection) prevented the rise in serum Cr observed with 6 ml of diatrizoate (serum Cr pre contrast injection 70.31+/-7.28 micromol(-1) and 78.21+/-17.81 micromol(-1) 24 h post contrast injection in animals pre-treated with diltiazem, n=5). The protective effect against RCM-induced reduction in renal function was less with lower doses of diltiazem. In conclusion, the animal model used is reliable and reproduced previously established observations in the field of RCMN. The protective effect of a calcium channel blocker at the appropriate dose against RCMN has also been shown. The clinical effectiveness of this class of drugs in preventing RCMN requires further evaluation.

Prediction and prevention of contrast nephropathy

Over the last 10 years, the main advances in RCN have come in our ability to predict outcomes for an individual patient. Treatment trials have been almost all uniformly disappointing. Recent positive trials with acetylcysteine and PGE1 will require confirmation in larger trials that are adequately powered for meaningful end points in the PCI population. In the meantime, adequate prehydration and maintenance of post-PCI urine flow rates of > 150 mL/min remain the most prudent measures. As the population ages, breakthroughs with respect to new contrast agents or effective prevention measures will be needed to offer PCI to the spectrum of patients at risk for renal injury.

Contrast media-induced nephrotoxicity--questions and answers

The intravascular administration of contrast media (CM) can produce acute haemodynamic changes in the kidney characterized by an increase in renal vascular resistance and a decrease in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). These changes may lead to clinically significant reduction in renal function in patients with pre-existing risk factors such as diabetic nephropathy, congestive heart failure and dehydration. The pathophysiology of the renal haemodynamic effects of CM involves activation of the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) mechanism and the modulation of the intrarenal production of vasoactive mediators such as prostaglandins, nitric oxide, endothelin and adenosine. The TGF response is osmolality-dependent and accounts for about 50% of the acute functional effects of high osmolar CM on the kidney. Reduction in the synthesis of the endogenous vasodilators nitric oxide and prostaglandins increases the nephrotoxicity of CM. Endothelin and adenosine play a crucial role in mediating the acute functional effects of CM. Antagonists of these mediators attenuate the reduction in renal function induced by contrast agents. Vacuolization of the cells of the proximal tubules and necrosis of those of the medullary ascending limbs of loops of Henle are the main structural effects of CM in the kidney. The reduction in renal function induced by CM could be minimized by the use of low osmolar CM and adequate hydration. The prophylactic administration of calcium channel blockers and adenosine antagonists such as theophylline may also offer some protective effect.