A randomized trial of iPad distraction to reduce children's pain and distress during intravenous cannulation in the paediatric emergency department

Benefits to Clinicians of Nonpharmacological Distraction During Pediatric Medical Procedure

CONTEXT

Nonpharmacologic distraction (NPD) during medical procedures in children is known to be beneficial to patients; however, no reviews have assessed their benefits to medical providers.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the benefits of NPD to medical providers.

DATA SOURCES

We searched 5 databases for relevant articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Peer-reviewed published randomized controlled trials comparing NPD with standard care that included children who had undergone medical procedures were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Primary outcomes were procedure time, number of medical staff involved, and initial success rate of venipuncture. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias by using the Cochrane Collaboration (Oxford, United Kingdom)'s Randomized Controlled Trials Risk of Bias Tool, and we performed a meta-analysis to assess efficacy.

RESULTS

We included 22 trials with 1968 participants. The main NPD was audiovisual distraction, such as tablets. No significant difference was found in venipuncture procedure time (mean difference: -9.79; 95% confidence interval: -22.38 to 2.81; low certainty). We found no studies on the number of medical staff.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review did not find any clear NPD-associated benefit for the medical provider. The review included a small amount of literature, analyzed a small number of cases, and had a low certainty of evidence regarding procedure duration; therefore, further studies are needed to conclude the benefits to clinicians of NPD.

The impact of music, play, and pet therapies in managing pain and anxiety in paediatric patients in hospital: a rapid systematic review

Background

Hospitalized children face pain and anxiety associated with the environment and procedures.

Objective

This review aimed to assess the impact of music, play, pet and art therapies on pain and anxiety in hospitalized paediatric patients. RCTs assessing the impact of music, play, pet, and/or art therapies on pain and/or anxiety in hospitalized paediatric patients were eligible.

Methods

Database searching and citation screening was completed to identify studies. A narrative synthesis was used to summarize study findings and certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Of the 761 documents identified, 29 were included spanning music (n = 15), play (n = 12), and pet (n = 3) therapies.

Results

A high certainty of evidence supported play in reducing pain and moderate certainty for music and pet. A moderate certainty of evidence supported music and play in reducing anxiety.

Conclusion

Complementary therapies utilized alongside conventional medical treatment may mitigate pain and anxiety in hospitalized paediatric patients.

Optimal Dose of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Laceration Repair in Children: A Phase II Dose-Ranging Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal sedative dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine for children undergoing laceration repair.

METHODS

This dose-ranging study employing the Bayesian Continual Reassessment Method enrolled children aged 0 to 10 years with a single laceration (<5 cm), requiring single-layer closure, who received topical anesthetic. Children were administered 1, 2, 3, or 4 mcg/kg intranasal dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome was the proportion with adequate sedation (Pediatric Sedation State Scale score of 2 or 3 for ≥90% of the time from sterile preparation to tying of the last suture). Secondary outcomes included the Observational Scale of Behavior Distress-Revised (range: 0 [no distress] to 23.5 [maximal distress]), postprocedure length of stay, and adverse events.

RESULTS

We enrolled 55 children (35/55 [64%] males; median [interquartile range {IQR}] age 4 [2, 6] years). At 1, 2, 3, and 4 mcg/kg intranasal dexmedetomidine, respectively, the proportion of participants "adequately" sedated was 1/3 (33%), 2/9 (22%), 13/21 (62%), and 12/21 (57%); the posterior mean (95% equitailed credible intervals) for the probability of adequate sedation was 0.38 (0.04, 0.82), 0.25 (0.05, 0.54), 0.61 (0.41, 0.80), and 0.57 (0.36, 0.76); the median (IQR) Observational Scale of Behavior Distress-Revised scores during suturing was 2.7 (0.3, 3), 0 (0, 3.8), 0.6 (0, 5), and 0 (0, 3.7); the median (IQR) postprocedure length of stay was 67 (60, 78), 76 (60, 100), 89 (76, 109), and 113 (76, 150) minutes. There was 1 adverse event, a decrease in oxygen saturation at 4 mcg/kg, which resolved with head repositioning.

CONCLUSION

Despite limitations, such as our limited sample size and subjectivity in Pediatric Sedation State Scale scoring, sedation efficacy for 3 and 4 mcg/kg were similarly based on equitailed credible intervals suggesting either could be considered optimal.

Tablet personal computer distraction during intravenous placement for young children in the pediatric emergency department: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Intravenous (IV) placement is a common procedure experienced by children visiting the pediatric emergency department (PED). However, uncontrolled anxiety and pain cause children to interfere with the procedure. In this pilot study, we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of tablet personal computers as a distraction method during IV placement.

METHODS

This is a single-center pilot study conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital. Children visiting the PED were eligible if they were aged 3-5 years and required IV placement during the PED visit. After written consent was obtained from the guardian, the child was randomly assigned to a control group or an intervention group. For the intervention group, an animated video was played via tablet PC during IV placement. For both groups, children's anxiety, heart rate, and pain scale scores (the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability and Evaluation Enfant Douleur) and guardian satisfaction were recorded.

RESULTS

22 children were eligible for the final analysis. There was no significant difference in the pain scale scores between the two groups, with the exception of the degree of pain relief after the procedure measured using Evaluation Enfant Douleur (intervention group: 6.0, interquartile range (IQR): 4.2-6.8, and control group; 3.0, IQR: 2.0-3.8, P = 0.011) and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (intervention group: 4.0, IQR: 4.0-4.2 and control group; 3.0, IQR: 1.5-3.5, P = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, distraction using tablet personal computers may have reduced children's distress during the recovery phase after venipuncture. Further study with a larger sample size and different methods of distraction is essential.