Recent advancements in PARP inhibitors-based targeted cancer therapy

LP-184, a Novel Acylfulvene Molecule, Exhibits Anticancer Activity against Diverse Solid Tumors with Homologous Recombination Deficiency

Homologous recombination (HR)-related gene alterations are present in a significant subset of prostate, breast, ovarian, pancreatic, lung, and colon cancers rendering these tumors as potential responders to specific DNA damaging agents. A small molecule acylfulvene prodrug, LP-184, metabolizes to an active compound by the oxidoreductase activity of enzyme prostaglandin reductase 1 (PTGR1), which is frequently elevated in multiple solid tumor types. Prior work demonstrated that cancer cell lines deficient in a spectrum of DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway genes show increased susceptibility to LP-184. Here, we investigated the potential of LP-184 in targeting multiple tumors with impaired HR function and its mechanism of action as a DNA damaging agent. LP-184 induced elevated DNA double-strand breaks in HR deficient (HRD) cancer cells. Depletion of key HR components BRCA2 or ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) in cancer cells conferred up to 12-fold increased sensitivity to the LP-184. LP-184 showed nanomolar potency in a diverse range of HRD cancer models, including prostate cancer organoids, leiomyosarcoma cell lines, and patient-derived tumor graft models of lung, pancreatic, and prostate cancers. LP-184 demonstrated complete, durable tumor regression in 10 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of HRD triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) including those resistant to PARP inhibitors (PARPi). LP-184 further displayed strong synergy with PARPi in ovarian and prostate cancer cell lines as well as in TNBC PDX models. These preclinical findings illustrate the potential of LP-184 as a pan-HRD cancer therapeutic. Taken together, our results support continued clinical evaluation of LP-184 in a large subset of HRD solid tumors.

SIGNIFICANCE

New agents with activity against DDR-deficient solid tumors refractory to standard-of-care therapies are needed. We report multiple findings supporting the potential for LP-184, a novel alkylating agent with three FDA orphan drug designations, to fill this void clinically: strong nanomolar potency; sustained, durable regression of solid tumor xenografts; synthetic lethality with HR defects. LP-184 adult phase IA trial to assess safety in advanced solid tumors is ongoing.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Senaparib, a Novel PARP1/2 Inhibitor, in Chinese Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase I Trial

BACKGROUND

Senaparib, a novel poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 inhibitor, demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical studies. This phase I, first-in-human, dose-escalation/-expansion study explored the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of senaparib in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults with advanced solid tumors who had failed ³1 line of prior systemic treatment were enrolled. Senaparib (once daily [QD]) dose was escalated from 2 mg until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose (RP2D) using a modified 3 + 3 design. Dose expansion included: dose groups with ≥1 objective response and one dose higher, as well as those at the MTD/RP2D. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability, and determine the MTD and/or RP2D of senaparib.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were enrolled across 10 dose groups (2-120 mg QD, and 50 mg twice daily). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The most common senaparib-related adverse events were anemia (80.9%), white blood cell count decreased (43.9%), platelet count decreased (28.1%), and asthenia (26.3%). Senaparib exposure increased dose proportionately at 2-80 mg; absorption saturated at 80-120 mg. Senaparib accumulation was minimal after repeated QD administration (accumulation ratio=1.1-1.5). The objective response rate was 22.7% (n=10/44) overall (all partial responses) and 26.9% (n=7/26) for patients harboring BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Disease control rates were 63.6% and 73.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Senaparib was well tolerated and demonstrated promising antitumor activity in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. The RP2D for this clinical study in China was identified as 100 mg QD.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03508011.

Biallelic BRCA Loss and Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Nonbreast/Ovarian Tumors in Germline BRCA1/2 Carriers

PURPOSE

Breast and ovarian tumors in germline BRCA1/2 carriers undergo allele-specific loss of heterozygosity, resulting in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and sensitivity to poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. This study investigated whether biallelic loss and HRD also occur in primary nonbreast/ovarian tumors that arise in germline BRCA1/2 carriers.

METHODS

A clinically ascertained cohort of BRCA1/2 carriers with a primary nonbreast/ovarian cancer was identified, including canonical (prostate and pancreatic cancers) and noncanonical (all other) tumor types. Whole-exome sequencing or clinical sequencing results (n = 45) were analyzed. A pan-cancer analysis of nonbreast/ovarian primary tumors from germline BRCA1/2 carriers from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, n = 73) was used as a validation cohort.

RESULTS

Ages of nonbreast/ovarian cancer diagnosis in germline BRCA1/2 carriers were similar to controls for the majority of cancer types. Nine of 45 (20%) primary nonbreast/ovarian tumors from germline BRCA1/2 carriers had biallelic loss of BRCA1/2 in the clinical cohort, and 23 of 73 (32%) in the TCGA cohort. In the combined cohort, 35% and 27% of primary canonical and noncanonical BRCA tumor types, respectively, had biallelic loss. High HRD scores (HRDex > 42) were detected in 81% of tumors with biallelic BRCA loss compared with 22% (P < .001) of tumors without biallelic BRCA loss. No differences in genomic profile, including mutational signatures, mutation spectrum, tumor mutational burden, or microsatellite instability, were found in primary nonbreast/ovarian tumors with or without biallelic BRCA1/2 loss.

CONCLUSION

A proportion of noncanonical primary tumors have biallelic loss and evidence of HRD. Our data suggest that assessment of biallelic loss and HRD could supplement identification of germline BRCA1/2 mutations in selection of patients for platinum or PARP inhibitor therapy.

Insights on the Role of Polyphenols in Combating Cancer Drug Resistance

Chemotherapy resistance is still a serious problem in the treatment of most cancers. Many cellular and molecular mechanisms contribute to both inherent and acquired drug resistance. They include the use of unaffected growth-signaling pathways, changes in the tumor microenvironment, and the active transport of medicines out of the cell. The antioxidant capacity of polyphenols and their potential to inhibit the activation of procarcinogens, cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenesis, as well as to promote the inhibition or downregulation of active drug efflux transporters, have been linked to a reduced risk of cancer in epidemiological studies. Polyphenols also have the ability to alter immunological responses and inflammatory cascades, as well as trigger apoptosis in cancer cells. The discovery of the relationship between abnormal growth signaling and metabolic dysfunction in cancer cells highlights the importance of further investigating the effects of dietary polyphenols, including their ability to boost the efficacy of chemotherapy and avoid multidrug resistance (MDR). Here, it is summarized what is known regarding the effectiveness of natural polyphenolic compounds in counteracting the resistance that might develop to cancer drugs as a result of a variety of different mechanisms.

Potential role for protein kinase D inhibitors in prostate cancer

Protein kinase D (PrKD), a novel serine-threonine kinase, belongs to a family of calcium calmodulin kinases that consists of three isoforms: PrKD1, PrKD2, and PrKD3. The PrKD isoforms play a major role in pathologic processes such as cardiac hypertrophy and cancer progression. The charter member of the family, PrKD1, is the most extensively studied isoform. PrKD play a dual role as both a proto-oncogene and a tumor suppressor depending on the cellular context. The duplicity of PrKD can be highlighted in advanced prostate cancer (PCa) where expression of PrKD1 is suppressed whereas the expressions of PrKD2 and PrKD3 are upregulated to aid in cancer progression. As understanding of the PrKD signaling pathways has been better elucidated, interest has been garnered in the development of PrKD inhibitors. The broad-spectrum kinase inhibitor staurosporine acts as a potent PrKD inhibitor and is the most well-known; however, several other novel and more specific PrKD inhibitors have been developed over the last two decades. While there is tremendous potential for PrKD inhibitors to be used in a clinical setting, none has progressed beyond preclinical trials due to a variety of challenges. In this review, we focus on PrKD signaling in PCa and the potential role of PrKD inhibitors therein, and explore the possible clinical outcomes based on known function and expression of PrKD isoforms at different stages of PCa.

Chk1 inhibition-induced BRCAness synergizes with olaparib in p53-deficient cancer cells

Although targeting DNA-damage repair by inhibition of PARP exhibits weak or modest single-agent activity due to the existence of functional BRCA1/2 alleles, PARP inhibitors have been gradually applicable in BRCA-proficient cancers. Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) inhibition selectively disrupts homologous recombination (HR)-mediated DNA repair and confers synthetic lethality in p53-deficient tumors, we therefore aim at expounding the chemopotentiating effects of Chk1 inhibition on PARPi in BRCA-proficient and p53-deficient cancer cells. Initially, BRCA wild-type, p53-null cells including AsPC-1 and H1299 demonstrated innate resistance to PARP inhibitor olaparib compared to BRCA1-mutant, p53-null MDA-MB-436 cells. We quantified the interaction between olaparib and a selective Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776, which produced synergistic effects under sub-IC50 concentrations in p53-depleted AsPC-1 and H1299 cells. Olaparib in combination with MK-8776 showed enhanced antitumor effects through prohibiting proliferation and secondarily inducing apoptosis in two cell lines. Of note, we observed that MK-8776 significantly sensitized cells to olaparib by broad DNA and chromosomal breaks. Mechanistically, MK-8776 abrogated olaparib-induced BRCA1 intranuclear foci formation, MCM7-mediated replication machineries, and ultimately triggered an accumulation of γH2AX, a well-recognized marker of DNA double-strand breaks. Additionally, we established ectopic expression of hotspot mutant p53 in H1299 cells. Introduction of p53R175 H promoted olaparib resistance as single-agent treatment, but the synergy between olaparib and MK-8776 was still achievable and the region of synergy was produced by lower combination concentrations. These data provide insight into how Chk1 inhibition could be effectively targeted and confer sensitivity to olaparib toward p53-deficient and HR-proficient cancers.

Integrated proteomics identifies PARP inhibitor-induced prosurvival signaling changes as potential vulnerabilities in ovarian cancer

BRCA1/2-deficient ovarian carcinoma (OC) has been shown to be particularly sensitive to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis). Furthermore, BRCA1/2 mutation status is currently used as a predictive biomarker for PARPi therapy. Despite providing a major clinical benefit to the majority of patients, a significant proportion of BRCA1/2-deficient OC tumors do not respond to PARPis for reasons that are incompletely understood. Using an integrated chemical, phospho- and ADP-ribosylation proteomics approach, we sought here to develop additional mechanism-based biomarker candidates for PARPi therapy in OC and identify new targets for combination therapy to overcome primary resistance. Using chemical proteomics with PARPi baits in a BRCA1-isogenic OC cell line pair, as well as patient-derived BRCA1-proficient and BRCA1-deficient tumor samples, and subsequent validation by coimmunoprecipitation, we showed differential PARP1 and PARP2 protein complex composition in PARPi-sensitive, BRCA1-deficient UWB1.289 (UWB) cells compared to PARPi-insensitive, BRCA1-reconstituted UWB1.289+BRCA1 (UWB+B) cells. In addition, global phosphoproteomics and ADP-ribosylation proteomics furthermore revealed that the PARPi rucaparib induced the cell cycle pathway and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway in UWB cells but downregulated ErbB signaling in UWB+B cells. In addition, we observed AKT PARylation and prosurvival AKT-mTOR signaling in UWB+B cells after PARPi treatment. Consistently, we found the synergy of PARPis with DNAPK or AKT inhibitors was more pronounced in UWB+B cells, highlighting these pathways as actionable vulnerabilities. In conclusion, we demonstrate the combination of chemical proteomics, phosphoproteomics, and ADP-ribosylation proteomics can identify differential PARP1/2 complexes and diverse, but actionable, drug compensatory signaling in OC.

Preclinical Assessment of the Combination of PSMA-Targeting Radionuclide Therapy with PARP Inhibitors for Prostate Cancer Treatment

Prostate specific membrane antigen targeted radionuclide therapy (PSMA-TRT) is a promising novel treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, PSMA-TRT cannot be used for curative intent yet, thus additional research on how to improve the therapeutic efficacy is warranted. A potential way of achieving this, is combining TRT with poly ADP-ribosylation inhibitors (PARPi), which has shown promising results for TRT of neuroendocrine tumor cells. Currently, several clinical trials have been initiated for this combination for PCa, however so far, no evidence of synergism is available for PCa. Therefore, we evaluated the combination of PSMA-TRT with three classes of PARPi in preclinical PCa models. In vitro viability and survival assays were performed using PSMA-expressing PCa cell lines PC3-PIP and LNCaP to assess the effect of increasing concentrations of PARPi veliparib, olaparib or talazoparib in combination with PSMA-TRT compared to single PARPi treatment. Next, DNA damage analyses were performed by quantifying the number of DNA breaks by immunofluorescent stainings. Lastly, the potential of the combination treatments was studied in vivo in mice bearing PC3-PIP xenografts. Our results show that combining PSMA-TRT with PARPi did not synergistically affect the in vitro clonogenic survival or cell viability. DNA-damage analysis revealed only a significant increase in DNA breaks when combining PSMA-TRT with veliparib and not in the other combination treatments. Moreover, PSMA-TRT with PARPi treatment did not improve tumor control compared to PSMA-TRT monotherapy. Overall, the data presented do not support the assumption that combining PSMA-TRT with PARPi leads to a synergistic antitumor effect in PCa. These results underline that extensive preclinical research using various PCa models is imperative to validate the applicability of the combination strategy for PCa, as it is for other cancer types.

Novel Therapeutic Approaches with DNA Damage Response Inhibitors for Melanoma Treatment

Targeted therapies against components of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and immunotherapies, which block immune checkpoints, have shown important clinical benefits in melanoma patients. However, most patients develop resistance, with consequent disease relapse. Therefore, there is a need to identify novel therapeutic approaches for patients who are resistant or do not respond to the current targeted and immune therapies. Melanoma is characterized by homologous recombination (HR) and DNA damage response (DDR) gene mutations and by high replicative stress, which increase the endogenous DNA damage, leading to the activation of DDR. In this review, we will discuss the current experimental evidence on how DDR can be exploited therapeutically in melanoma. Specifically, we will focus on PARP, ATM, CHK1, WEE1 and ATR inhibitors, for which preclinical data as single agents, taking advantage of synthetic lethal interactions, and in combination with chemo-targeted-immunotherapy, have been growing in melanoma, encouraging the ongoing clinical trials. The overviewed data are suggestive of considering DDR inhibitors as a valid therapeutic approach, which may positively impact the future of melanoma treatment.

PARP inhibitors as single agents and in combination therapy: the most promising treatment strategies in clinical trials for BRCA-mutant ovarian and triple-negative breast cancers

INTRODUCTION

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are an exciting class of agents that have shown efficacy, particularly for BRCA-mutant triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). However, most patients who receive PARPi as their standard of care therapy inevitably develop resistance and this underscores the need to identify additional targets that can circumvent such resistance. Combination treatment strategies have been developed in preclinical and clinical studies to address the challenges of efficacy and resistance.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines completed or ongoing clinical trials of PARPi mono- and combination therapies. PARPi monotherapy in HER2 negative breast (HR+ and TNBC subtypes) and ovarian cancer is a focal point. The authors propose potential strategies that might overcome resistance to PARPi and discuss key questions and future directions.

EXPERT OPINION

While the advent of PARPis has significantly improved the treatment of tumors with defects in DNA damage and repair pathways, careful patient selection will be essential to enhance these treatments. The identification of molecular biomarkers to predict disease response and progression is an endeavor.

Perspective on the Use of DNA Repair Inhibitors as a Tool for Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy of Glioblastoma

Simple Summary

The current routine treatment for glioblastoma (GB), the most lethal high-grade brain tumor in adults, aims to induce DNA damage in the tumor. However, the tumor cells might be able to repair that damage, which leads to therapy resistance. Fortunately, DNA repair defects are common in GB cells, and their survival is often based on a sole backup repair pathway. Hence, targeted drugs inhibiting essential proteins of the DNA damage response have gained momentum and are being introduced in the clinic. This review gives a perspective on the use of radiopharmaceuticals targeting DDR kinases for imaging in order to determine the DNA repair phenotype of GB, as well as for effective radionuclide therapy. Finally, four new promising radiopharmaceuticals are suggested with the potential to lead to a more personalized GB therapy.

Abstract

Despite numerous innovative treatment strategies, the treatment of glioblastoma (GB) remains challenging. With the current state-of-the-art therapy, most GB patients succumb after about a year. In the evolution of personalized medicine, targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is gaining momentum, for example, to stratify patients based on specific biomarkers. One of these biomarkers is deficiencies in DNA damage repair (DDR), which give rise to genomic instability and cancer initiation. However, these deficiencies also provide targets to specifically kill cancer cells following the synthetic lethality principle. This led to the increased interest in targeted drugs that inhibit essential DDR kinases (DDRi), of which multiple are undergoing clinical validation. In this review, the current status of DDRi for the treatment of GB is given for selected targets: ATM/ATR, CHK1/2, DNA-PK, and PARP. Furthermore, this review provides a perspective on the use of radiopharmaceuticals targeting these DDR kinases to (1) evaluate the DNA repair phenotype of GB before treatment decisions are made and (2) induce DNA damage via TRT. Finally, by applying in-house selection criteria and analyzing the structural characteristics of the DDRi, four drugs with the potential to become new therapeutic GB radiopharmaceuticals are suggested.

Inhibitors of PARP: Number crunching and structure gazing

PARP is an important target in the treatment of cancers, particularly in patients with breast, ovarian, or prostate cancer that have compromised homologous recombination repair (i.e., BRCA^−/−). This review about inhibitors of PARP (PARPi) is for readers interested in the development of next-generation drugs for the treatment of cancer, providing insights into structure–activity relationships, in vitro vs. in vivo potency, PARP trapping, and synthetic lethality.

Selective inhibitors of PARP1 and PARP2 (PARP1/2) are used to treat cancer patients with deficiencies in the repair of DNA via homologous recombination. Here we provide a perspective on the reported potencies of the most studied of these inhibitors (olaparib, talazoparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and veliparib) in vitro and in vivo and how these numbers relate to the known structures of these inhibitors bound to the active sites of PARP1 and PARP2. We suggest that the phenomenon of PARP trapping is primarily due to the inhibition of the catalytic activity of PARP1 and that the basis for the higher potency of talazoparib compared to the other inhibitors lies in its more extensive network of interactions with conserved residues in the active site. We also consider the potential role of the recently characterized protein “Histone PARylation Factor 1” (HPF1), which interacts with PARP1/2 to form a shared active site, for the design of the next generation of inhibitors of PARP1/2.

DNA Methylation Malleability and Dysregulation in Cancer Progression: Understanding the Role of PARP1

Mammalian genomic DNA methylation represents a key epigenetic modification and its dynamic regulation that fine-tunes the gene expression of multiple pathways during development. It maintains the gene expression of one generation of cells; particularly, the mitotic inheritance of gene-expression patterns makes it the key governing mechanism of epigenetic change to the next generation of cells. Convincing evidence from recent discoveries suggests that the dynamic regulation of DNA methylation is accomplished by the enzymatic action of TET dioxygenase, which oxidizes the methyl group of cytosine and activates transcription. As a result of aberrant DNA modifications, genes are improperly activated or inhibited in the inappropriate cellular context, contributing to a plethora of inheritable diseases, including cancer. We outline recent advancements in understanding how DNA modifications contribute to tumor suppressor gene silencing or oncogenic-gene stimulation, as well as dysregulation of DNA methylation in cancer progression. In addition, we emphasize the function of PARP1 enzymatic activity or inhibition in the maintenance of DNA methylation dysregulation. In the context of cancer remediation, the impact of DNA methylation and PARP1 pharmacological inhibitors, and their relevance as a combination therapy are highlighted.

Intervention of 3-aminobenzamide against Dextran Sulphate Sodium induced colitis in mice: Investigations on molecular mechanisms

Various preclinical and clinical studies reported that Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1 plays significant role in all acute and chronic inflammatory diseases with different etiopathogenesis. The present study aims to investigate the protective effect of 3-aminobenzamide in Dextran Sulphate Sodium induced ulcerative colitis and associated molecular mechanisms. Ulcerative colitis in male BALB/c mice was induced using Dextran sulphate sodium (3 %w/v) for 3 cycles with 7 days recovery period in-between. 3-aminobenzamide was administered at the doses of 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg starting from the I^st week of remission period and was continued till the termination of the experiment. The effect of 3-aminbenzamide was evaluated using biochemical parameters, histopathological evaluations, ELISA, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis. All the doses of 3-aminobenzamide (5 mg/kg; 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg) ameliorated the severity of ulcerative colitis by modulating various molecular targets such as poly[ADP-ribose] polymerase 1, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, NLR family pyrin domain containing 3, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase-recruitment domain, cysteine aspartases, interleukin-1β, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, sirtuin 1, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase, tumour necrosis factor-α and catalase. However, the lower doses (5 and 10 mg/kg) exerted more prominent effects in comparison to the high dose (20 mg/kg). Further, 3-aminobenzamide treatment restored the intestinal integrity by increasing the expression of occludin and significantly ameliorated ulcerative colitis associated elevated lipopolysaccharides, oxidative and nitrosative stress, cellular damage and apoptosis. Lower doses of 3-aminobenzamide showed more prominent protective effects against ulcerative colitis associated damage as compared to higher dose.

Artificial intelligence-assisted decision making for prognosis and drug efficacy prediction in lung cancer patients: a narrative review

Objective

In this review, we aim to present frontier studies in patients with lung cancer as it related to artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted decision-making and summarize the latest advances, challenges and future trend in this field.

Background

Despite increasing survival rate in cancer patients over the last decades, lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The early diagnosis, accurate evaluation and individualized treatment are vital approaches to improve the survival rate of patients with lung cancer. Thus, decision making based on these approaches requires accuracy and efficiency beyond manpower. Recent advances in AI and precision medicine have provided a fertile environment for the development of AI-based models. These models have the potential to assist radiologists and oncologists in detecting lung cancer, predicting prognosis and developing personalized treatment plans for better outcomes of the patients.

Methods

We searched literature from 2000 through July 31^th, 2021 in Medline/PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, ACM Digital Library, INSPEC and EMBASE. Key words such as “artificial intelligence”, “AI”, “deep learning”, “lung cancer”, “NSCLC”, “SCLC” were combined to identify related literatures. These literatures were then selected by two independent authors. Articles chosen by only one author will be examined by another author to determine whether this article was relative and valuable. The selected literatures were read by all authors and discussed to draw reliable conclusions.

Conclusions

AI, especially for those based on deep learning and radiomics, is capable of assisting clinical decision making from many aspects, for its quantitatively interpretation of patients’ information and its potential to deal with the dynamics, individual differences and heterogeneity of lung cancer. Hopefully, remaining problems such as insufficient data and poor interpretability may be solved to put AI-based models into clinical practice.

Pleiotropic role of PARP1: an overview

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) protein is encoded by the PARP1 gene located on chromosome 1 (1q42.12) in human cells. It plays a crucial role in post-translational modification by adding poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR) groups to various proteins and PARP1 itself by utilizing nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD +) as a substrate. Since the discovery of PARP1, its role in DNA repair and cell death has been its identity. This is evident from an overwhelmingly high number of scientific reports in this regard. However, PARP1 also plays critical roles in inflammation, metabolism, tumor development and progression, chromatin modification and transcription, mRNA stability, and alternative splicing. In the present study, we attempted to compile all the scattered scientific information about this molecule, including the structure and multifunctional role of PARP1 in cancer and non-cancer diseases, along with PARP1 inhibitors (PARPis). Furthermore, for the first time, we have classified PARP1-mediated cell death for ease of understanding its role in cell death pathways.

Ribosomal Protein S6: A Potential Therapeutic Target against Cancer?

Ribosomal protein S6 (RPS6) is a component of the 40S small ribosomal subunit and participates in the control of mRNA translation. Additionally, phospho (p)-RPS6 has been recognized as a surrogate marker for the activated PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 pathway, which occurs in many cancer types. However, downstream mechanisms regulated by RPS6 or p-RPS remains elusive, and the therapeutic implication of RPS6 is underappreciated despite an approximately half a century history of research on this protein. In addition, substantial evidence from RPS6 knockdown experiments suggests the potential role of RPS6 in maintaining cancer cell proliferation. This motivates us to investigate the current knowledge of RPS6 functions in cancer. In this review article, we reviewed the current information about the transcriptional regulation, upstream regulators, and extra-ribosomal roles of RPS6, with a focus on its involvement in cancer. We also discussed the therapeutic potential of RPS6 in cancer.

The BRCT domain of PARP1 binds intact DNA and mediates intrastrand transfer

PARP1 is a key player in the response to DNA damage and is the target of clinical inhibitors for the treatment of cancers. Binding of PARP1 to damaged DNA leads to activation wherein PARP1 uses NAD+ to add chains of poly(ADP-ribose) onto itself and other nuclear proteins. PARP1 also binds abundantly to intact DNA and chromatin, where it remains enzymatically inactive. We show that intact DNA makes contacts with the PARP1 BRCT domain, which was not previously recognized as a DNA-binding domain. This binding mode does not result in the concomitant reorganization and activation of the catalytic domain. We visualize the BRCT domain bound to nucleosomal DNA by cryogenic electron microscopy and identify a key motif conserved from ancestral BRCT domains for binding phosphates on DNA and phospho-peptides. Finally, we demonstrate that the DNA-binding properties of the BRCT domain contribute to the "monkey-bar mechanism" that mediates DNA transfer of PARP1.

Integrated, Integral, and Exploratory Biomarkers in the Development of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

ABSTRACT

In this article, we highlight biomarkers for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) sensitivity and resistance and discuss their implications for the clinic. We review the predictive role of a range of DNA repair genes, genomic scars, mutational signatures, and functional assays available or in development. The biomarkers used for patient selection in the specific Food and Drug Administration-approved indications for breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer vary across tumor type and likely depend on disease-specific DNA repair deficiencies but also the specifics of the individual clinical trials that were conducted. Mutations in genes involved in homologous recombination and/or replication fork protection are synthetic lethal with PARPi. Cancers with homologous recombination deficiency exhibit high genomic instability, characterized by genome-wide loss of heterozygosity, among other genomic aberrations. Next-generation sequencing can identify multiple patterns of genomic changes including copy number variations, single-nucleotide variations, insertions/deletions, and structural variations rearrangements characteristic of homologous recombination deficiency. Clinical trial evidence supports the use of BRCA mutation testing for patient selection, and for ovarian cancer, there are 3 commercial assays available that additionally incorporate genomic instability for identifying subgroups of patients that derive different magnitudes of benefit from PARPi therapy. Finally, we summarize new strategies for extending the benefit of PARPi therapy toward broader populations of patients through the use of novel biomarkers. Ultimately, design of a composite biomarker test combining multiple mutational signatures or development of a dynamic assay for functional assessments of homologous recombination may help improve the test accuracy for future patient stratification.

Epigenetic Reprogramming and Landscape of Transcriptomic Interactions: Impending Therapeutic Interference of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Molecular Medicine

The mechanisms governing the development and progression of cancers are believed to be the consequence of hereditary deformities and epigenetic modifications. Accordingly, epigenetics has become an incredible and progressively explored field of research to discover better prevention and therapy for neoplasia, especially triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). It represents 15-20% of all invasive breast cancers and will, in general, have bellicose histological highlights and poor clinical outcomes. In the early phases of triple-negative breast carcinogenesis, epigenetic deregulation modifies chromatin structure and influences the plasticity of cells. It up-keeps the oncogenic reprogramming of malignant progenitor cells with the acquisition of unrestrained selfrenewal capacities. Genomic impulsiveness in TNBC prompts mutations, copy number variations, as well as genetic rearrangements, while epigenetic remodeling includes an amendment by DNA methylation, histone modification, and noncoding RNAs of gene expression profiles. It is currently evident that epigenetic mechanisms assume a significant part in the pathogenesis, maintenance, and therapeutic resistance of TNBC. Although TNBC is a heterogeneous malaise that is perplexing to describe and treat, the ongoing explosion of genetic and epigenetic research will help to expand these endeavors. Latest developments in transcriptome analysis have reformed our understanding of human diseases, including TNBC at the molecular medicine level. It is appealing to envision transcriptomic biomarkers to comprehend tumor behavior more readily regarding its cellular microenvironment. Understanding these essential biomarkers and molecular changes will propel our capability to treat TNBC adequately. This review will depict the different aspects of epigenetics and the landscape of transcriptomics in triple-negative breast carcinogenesis and their impending application for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment decision with the view of molecular medicine.

PARP Inhibitors in Melanoma-An Expanding Therapeutic Option?

Simple Summary

Melanomas with homologous recombination DNA damage repair pathways represent a subset of melanoma that may benefit from PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy. PARP inhibitors have an established role in treating cancers with underlying BRCA mutation through synthetic lethality; however, there is increasing evidence that it can be applied to a larger population including other types of homologous recombination defects. These gene mutations can be found in 20–40% of cutaneous melanoma. To date, PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy have been overlooked in the management of melanoma. This review explores the reasons for combining PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy. There is evidence to suggest that PARP inhibitors can improve the therapeutic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Therefore, this combination approach has the potential to impact future treatment of patients with melanoma, particularly those with homologous recombination DNA damage repair defects.

Abstract

Immunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape of melanoma; however, despite improvements in patient outcomes, monotherapy can often lead to resistance and tumour escape. Therefore, there is a need for new therapies, combination strategies and biomarker-guided decision making to increase the subset of patients most likely to benefit from treatment. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors act by synthetic lethality to target tumour cells with homologous recombination deficiencies such as BRCA mutations. However, the application of PARP inhibitors could be extended to a broad range of BRCA-negative cancers with high rates of DNA damage repair pathway mutations, such as melanoma. Additionally, PARP inhibition has the potential to augment the therapeutic effect of immunotherapy through multi-faceted immune-priming capabilities. In this review, we detail the immunological role of PARP and rationale for combining PARP and immune checkpoint inhibitors, with a particular focus on a subset of melanoma with homologous recombination defects that may benefit most from this targeted approach. We summarise the biology supporting this combined regimen and discuss preclinical results as well as ongoing clinical trials in melanoma which may impact future treatment.

Discovery of Novel Apigenin-Piperazine Hybrids as Potent and Selective Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 (PARP-1) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Cancer

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is a potential target for the discovery of chemosensitizers and anticancer drugs. Amentoflavone (AMF) is reported to be a selective PARP-1 inhibitor. Here, structural modifications and trimming of AMF have led to a series of AMF derivatives (9a-h) and apigenin-piperazine/piperidine hybrids (14a-p, 15a-p, 17a-h, and 19a-f), respectively. Among these compounds, 15l exhibited a potent PARP-1 inhibitory effect (IC50 = 14.7 nM) and possessed high selectivity to PARP-1 over PARP-2 (61.2-fold). Molecular dynamics simulation and the cellular thermal shift assay revealed that 15l directly bound to the PARP-1 structure. In in vitro and in vivo studies, 15l showed a potent chemotherapy sensitizing effect against A549 cells and a selective cytotoxic effect toward SK-OV-3 cells through PARP-1 inhibition. 15l·2HCl also displayed good ADME characteristics, pharmacokinetic parameters, and a desirable safety margin. These findings demonstrated that 15l·2HCl may serve as a lead compound for chemosensitizers and the (BRCA-1)-deficient cancer therapy.

Cytocidal Antitumor Effects against Human Ovarian Cancer Cells Induced by B-Lactam Steroid Alkylators with Targeted Activity against Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Enzymes in a Cell-Free Assay

We evaluated three newly synthesized B-lactam hybrid homo-aza-steroidal alkylators (ASA-A, ASA-B and ASA-C) for their PARP1/2 inhibition activity and their DNA damaging effect against human ovarian carcinoma cells. These agents are conjugated with an alkylating component (POPA), which also served as a reference molecule (positive control), and were tested against four human ovarian cell lines in vitro (UWB1.289 + BRCA1, UWB1.289, SKOV-3 and OVCAR-3). The studied compounds were thereafter compared to 3-AB, a known PARP inhibitor, as well as to Olaparib, a standard third-generation PARP inhibitor, on a PARP assay investigating their inhibitory potential. Finally, a PARP1 and PARP2 mRNA expression analysis by qRT-PCR was produced in order to measure the absolute and the relative gene expression (in mRNA transcripts) between treated and untreated cells. All the investigated hybrid steroid alkylators and POPA decreased in vitro cell growth differentially, according to the sensitivity and different gene characteristics of each cell line, while ASA-A and ASA-B presented the most significant anticancer activity. Both these compounds induced PARP1/2 enzyme inhibition, DNA damage (alkylation) and upregulation of PARP mRNA expression, for all tested cell lines. However, ASA-C underperformed on average in the above tasks, while the compound ASA-B induced synthetic lethality effects on the ovarian cancer cells. Nevertheless, the overall outcome, leading to a drug-like potential, provides strong evidence toward further evaluation.

Proteins from the DNA Damage Response: Regulation, Dysfunction, and Anticancer Strategies

Cells respond to genotoxic stress through a series of complex protein pathways called DNA damage response (DDR). These monitoring mechanisms ensure the maintenance and the transfer of a correct genome to daughter cells through a selection of DNA repair, cell cycle regulation, and programmed cell death processes. Canonical or non-canonical DDRs are highly organized and controlled to play crucial roles in genome stability and diversity. When altered or mutated, the proteins in these complex networks lead to many diseases that share common features, and to tumor formation. In recent years, technological advances have made it possible to benefit from the principles and mechanisms of DDR to target and eliminate cancer cells. These new types of treatments are adapted to the different types of tumor sensitivity and could benefit from a combination of therapies to ensure maximal efficiency.

Poly adenosine diphosphate-ribosylation, a promising target for colorectal cancer treatment

The development of colorectal cancer (CRC) can result from changes in a variety of cellular systems within the tumor microenvironment. Particularly, it is primarily associated with genomic instability that is the gradual accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes consisting of a characteristic set of mutations crucial for pathways in CRC progression. Based on this background, the potential to focus on poly [adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose] polymerase (PARP)-1 and poly-ADP ribosylation (PARylation) as the main causes of malignant formation of CRC may be considered. One of the important functions of PARP-1 and PARylation is its deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair function, which plays a pivotal role in the DNA damage response and prevention of DNA damage maintaining the redox homeostasis involved in the regulation of oxidation and superoxide. PARP-1 and PARylation can also alter epigenetic markers and chromatin structure involved in transcriptional regulation for the oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes by remodeling histone and chromatin enzymes. Given the high importance of these processes in CRC, it can be considered that PARP-1 and PARylation are at the forefront of the pathological changes required for CRC progression. Therefore, this review addresses the current molecular biological features for understanding the multifactorial function of PARP-1 and PARylation in CRC related to the aforementioned roles; furthermore, it presents a summary of recent approaches with PARP-1 inhibition in non-clinical and clinical studies targeting CRC. This understanding could help embrace the importance of targeting PARP-1 and PARylation in the treatment of CRC, which may present the potential to identify various research topics that can be challenged both non-clinically and clinically.

Poly adenosine diphosphate-ribosylation, a promising target for colorectal cancer treatment

The development of colorectal cancer (CRC) can result from changes in a variety of cellular systems within the tumor microenvironment. Particularly, it is primarily associated with genomic instability that is the gradual accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes consisting of a characteristic set of mutations crucial for pathways in CRC progression. Based on this background, the potential to focus on poly [adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose] polymerase (PARP)-1 and poly-ADP ribosylation (PARylation) as the main causes of malignant formation of CRC may be considered. One of the important functions of PARP-1 and PARylation is its deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair function, which plays a pivotal role in the DNA damage response and prevention of DNA damage maintaining the redox homeostasis involved in the regulation of oxidation and superoxide. PARP-1 and PARylation can also alter epigenetic markers and chromatin structure involved in transcriptional regulation for the oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes by remodeling histone and chromatin enzymes. Given the high importance of these processes in CRC, it can be considered that PARP-1 and PARylation are at the forefront of the pathological changes required for CRC progression. Therefore, this review addresses the current molecular biological features for understanding the multifactorial function of PARP-1 and PARylation in CRC related to the aforementioned roles; furthermore, it presents a summary of recent approaches with PARP-1 inhibition in non-clinical and clinical studies targeting CRC. This understanding could help embrace the importance of targeting PARP-1 and PARylation in the treatment of CRC, which may present the potential to identify various research topics that can be challenged both non-clinically and clinically.

Perspectives on PARP inhibitors as pharmacotherapeutic strategies for breast cancer

Introduction Approximately 10% of all breast cancer cases occur in individuals who have germline pathogenic variants of the BRCA 1, BRCA 2, and other genes associated with impaired DNA damage repair that is associated with an increased risk of breast, ovarian, and other cancers. Inhibitors of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) induce synthetic lethality in cancer cells harboring such pathogenic variants.Area covered In this review, the authors review the mechanisms of action, antitumor activity, and adverse events associated with PARP inhibitors for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. The authors then summarize the area and provide their expert perspectives on the area.Expert opinion Two PARP inhibitors are approved in metastatic breast cancer, including olaparib and talozaparib. Both agents were approved based on phase III trials demonstrating that they were associated with improved progression-free survival compared with treatment of physician's choice in patients receiving second-third line therapy for locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic breast cancer in patients with germline pathogenic BRCA 1 or BRCA2 variants.

PARP inhibitors in head and neck cancer: Molecular mechanisms, preclinical and clinical data

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) have revolutionized the treatment landscape in several cancers. PARPi increase DNA damage particularly in tumors with underlying defects in DNA repair. In addition to PARPi-induced DNA damage, PARPi enhance immune priming and induce adaptive upregulation of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are characterized by aberrant DNA repair pathways, including nucleotide excision repair (NER), base excision repair (BER) and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) repair and these deregulated repair mechanisms are implicated in both the pathogenesis of the disease and the outcome of therapy. Cisplatin represents the cornerstone of treatment of HNSCC and cisplatin resistance impedes successful treatment outcomes. To this end, research strategies that are testing modulation of cisplatin sensitivity by PARPi are of particular interest. Moreover, given the immune modulating effects of PARPi and the recent approval of Programmed Cell Death- 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors in HNSCC, the design of trials combining PARPi and PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors represent a rational research strategy. In this review, we summarize data supporting the integration of PARP inhibitors into HNSCC therapeutic strategy.