Evolution and Diversification of Small RNA Pathways in Flowering Plants

Drought-tolerance of transgenic winter wheat with partial suppression of the proline dehydrogenase gene

The global climate changes and the consequent increase in the number of soil and air droughts during the vegetation period of grain crops require the development of new strategies to adapt plants to those yield-decreasing stressors. A relevant way of increasing drought-tolerance of cereals is the use of biotechnological methods, particularly RNA interference, which can down-regulate the activity of plants’ genes and increase concentration of stress metabolites that perform osmoprotective functions during drought. We studied the tolerance to soil moisture shortage in transgenic plants of winter wheat with partial suppression of the proline dehydrogenase gene, obtained using the technology of short interfering RNAs. We analyzed physiological and biochemical parameters and structural elements of yield productivity of 4 wild genotypes and their transgenic lines with reduced activity of proline dehydrogenase in the conditions of 7-day drought during the late booting–ear emergence. We determined that the presence of double-stranded RNA suppressor of the proline dehydrogenase gene in transgenic lines led to increase in the level of accumulation of free proline in flag leaves. At the same time, its concentration in transgenic lines was higher than in untransformed plants of the wild genotypes in both drought conditions and conditions of sufficient moisture. We found that against the background of water deficiency, the total chlorophyll content in leaves of plants of transgenic lines was significantly higher, and the ratio of carotenoids to chlorophyll was lower than in plants of the wild genotypes, suggesting mitigation of the negative impact of drought on the plants of transgenic lines. Lacking soil moisture, genetically altered lines of wheat had significantly higher parameters of the structure of grain yield compared with untransformed genotypes. At the same time, we observed genotypic difference according to grain productivity in biotechnological plants. Therefore, the results we obtained confirm the perspectives of using the technology of short interfering RNAs to increase tolerance of winter wheat to water deficiency.

Comparative phylogeny and evolutionary analysis of Dicer-like protein family in two plant monophyletic lineages

BACKGROUND

Small RNAs (sRNAs) that do not get untranslated into proteins exhibit a pivotal role in the expression regulation of their cognate gene(s) in almost all eukaryotic lineages, including plants. Hitherto, numerous protein families such as Dicer, a unique class of Ribonuclease III, have been reported to be involved in sRNAs processing pathways and silencing. In this study, we aimed to investigate the phylogenetic relationship and evolutionary history of the DCL protein family.

RESULTS

Our results illustrated the DCL family of proteins grouped into four main subfamilies (DCLs 1-4) presented in either Eudicotyledons or Liliopsids. The accurate observation of the phylogenetic trees supports the independent expansion of DCL proteins among the Eudicotyledons and Liliopsids species. They share the common origin, and the main duplication events for the formation of the DCL subfamilies occurred before the Eudicotyledons/Liliopsids split from their ancestral DCL. In addition, shreds of evidence revealed that the divergence happened when multicellularization started and since the need for complex gene regulation considered being a necessity by organisms. At that time, they have evolved independently among the monophyletic lineages. The other finding was that the combination of DCL protein subfamilies bears several highly conserved functional domains in plant species that originated from their ancestor architecture. The conservation of these domains happens to be both lineage-specific and inter lineage-specific.

CONCLUSIONS

DCL subfamilies (i.e., DCL1-DCL4) distribute in their single clades after diverging from their common ancestor and before emerging into higher plants. Therefore, it seems that the main duplication events for the formation of the DCL subfamilies occurred before the Eudicotyledons/Liliopsida split and before the appearance of moss, and after the single-cell green algae. We also observed the same trends among the main DCL subfamilies from functional unit composition and architecture. Despite the long evolutionary course from the divergence of Liliopsida lineage from the Eudicotyledons, a significant diversifying force to domain composition and orientation was absent. The results of this study provide a deeper insight into DCL protein evolutionary history and possible sequence and structural relationships between DCL protein subfamilies in the main higher plant monophyletic lineages; i.e., Eudicotyledons and Liliopsida.

Roles of RNA silencing in viral and non-viral plant immunity and in the crosstalk between disease resistance systems

RNA silencing is a well-established antiviral immunity system in plants, in which small RNAs guide Argonaute proteins to targets in viral RNA or DNA, resulting in virus repression. Virus-encoded suppressors of silencing counteract this defence system. In this Review, we discuss recent findings about antiviral RNA silencing, including the movement of RNA through plasmodesmata and the differentiation between plant self and viral RNAs. We also discuss the emerging role of RNA silencing in plant immunity against non-viral pathogens. This immunity is mediated by transkingdom movement of RNA into and out of the infected plant cells in vesicles or as extracellular nucleoproteins and, like antiviral immunity, is influenced by the silencing suppressors encoded in the pathogens' genomes. Another effect of RNA silencing on general immunity involves host-encoded small RNAs, including microRNAs, that regulate NOD-like receptors and defence signalling pathways in the innate immunity system of plants. These RNA silencing pathways form a network of processes with both positive and negative effects on the immune systems of plants.

Transition from Seeds to Seedlings: Hormonal and Epigenetic Aspects

Transition from seed to seedling is one of the critical developmental steps, dramatically affecting plant growth and viability. Before plants enter the vegetative phase of their ontogenesis, massive rearrangements of signaling pathways and switching of gene expression programs are required. This results in suppression of the genes controlling seed maturation and activation of those involved in regulation of vegetative growth. At the level of hormonal regulation, these events are controlled by the balance of abscisic acid and gibberellins, although ethylene, auxins, brassinosteroids, cytokinins, and jasmonates are also involved. The key players include the members of the LAFL network-the transcription factors LEAFY COTYLEDON1 and 2 (LEC 1 and 2), ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3 (ABI3), and FUSCA3 (FUS3), as well as DELAY OF GERMINATION1 (DOG1). They are the negative regulators of seed germination and need to be suppressed before seedling development can be initiated. This repressive signal is mediated by chromatin remodeling complexes-POLYCOMB REPRESSIVE COMPLEX 1 and 2 (PRC1 and PRC2), as well as PICKLE (PKL) and PICKLE-RELATED2 (PKR2) proteins. Finally, epigenetic methylation of cytosine residues in DNA, histone post-translational modifications, and post-transcriptional downregulation of seed maturation genes with miRNA are discussed. Here, we summarize recent updates in the study of hormonal and epigenetic switches involved in regulation of the transition from seed germination to the post-germination stage.

Epigenetic Mechanisms of Plant Adaptation to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses

Unlike animals, plants are immobile and could not actively escape the effects of aggressive environmental factors, such as pathogenic microorganisms, insect pests, parasitic plants, extreme temperatures, drought, and many others. To counteract these unfavorable encounters, plants have evolved very high phenotypic plasticity. In a rapidly changing environment, adaptive phenotypic changes often occur in time frames that are too short for the natural selection of adaptive mutations. Probably, some kind of epigenetic variability underlines environmental adaptation in these cases. Indeed, isogenic plants often have quite variable phenotypes in different habitats. There are examples of successful “invasions” of relatively small and genetically homogenous plant populations into entirely new habitats. The unique capability of quick environmental adaptation appears to be due to a high tendency to transmit epigenetic changes between plant generations. Multiple studies show that epigenetic memory serves as a mechanism of plant adaptation to a rapidly changing environment and, in particular, to aggressive biotic and abiotic stresses. In wild nature, this mechanism underlies, to a very significant extent, plant capability to live in different habitats and endure drastic environmental changes. In agriculture, a deep understanding of this mechanism could serve to elaborate more effective and safe approaches to plant protection.

Arabidopsis shoot stem cells display dynamic transcription and DNA methylation patterns

In plants, aerial organs originate continuously from stem cells in the center of the shoot apical meristem. Descendants of stem cells in the subepidermal layer are progenitors of germ cells, giving rise to male and female gametes. In these cells, mutations, including insertions of transposable elements or viruses, must be avoided to preserve genome integrity across generations. To investigate the molecular characteristics of stem cells in Arabidopsis, we isolated their nuclei and analyzed stage‐specific gene expression and DNA methylation in plants of different ages. Stem cell expression signatures are largely defined by developmental stage but include a core set of stem cell‐specific genes, among which are genes implicated in epigenetic silencing. Transiently increased expression of transposable elements in meristems prior to flower induction correlates with increasing CHG methylation during development and decreased CHH methylation, before stem cells enter the reproductive lineage. These results suggest that epigenetic reprogramming may occur at an early stage in this lineage and could contribute to genome protection in stem cells during germline development.

Integrated Analysis of Small RNA, Transcriptome and Degradome Sequencing Provides New Insights into Floral Development and Abscission in Yellow Lupine (Lupinus luteus L.)

The floral development in an important legume crop yellow lupine (Lupinus luteus L., Taper cv.) is often affected by the abscission of flowers leading to significant economic losses. Small non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs), which have a proven effect on almost all developmental processes in other plants, might be of key players in a complex net of molecular interactions regulating flower development and abscission. This study represents the first comprehensive sncRNA identification and analysis of small RNA, transcriptome and degradome sequencing data in lupine flowers to elucidate their role in the regulation of lupine generative development. As shedding in lupine primarily concerns flowers formed at the upper part of the inflorescence, we analyzed samples from extreme parts of raceme separately and conducted an additional analysis of pedicels from abscising and non-abscising flowers where abscission zone forms. A total of 394 known and 28 novel miRNAs and 316 phased siRNAs were identified. In flowers at different stages of development 59 miRNAs displayed differential expression (DE) and 46 DE miRNAs were found while comparing the upper and lower flowers. Identified tasiR-ARFs were DE in developing flowers and were strongly expressed in flower pedicels. The DEmiR-targeted genes were preferentially enriched in the functional categories related to carbohydrate metabolism and plant hormone transduction pathways. This study not only contributes to the current understanding of how lupine flowers develop or undergo abscission but also holds potential for research aimed at crop improvement.

Epigenetic Regulation of Plant Gametophyte Development

Unlike in animals, the reproductive lineage cells in plants differentiate from within somatic tissues late in development to produce a specific haploid generation of the life cycle-male and female gametophytes. In flowering plants, the male gametophyte develops within the anthers and the female gametophyte-within the ovule. Both gametophytes consist of only a few cells. There are two major stages of gametophyte development-meiotic and post-meiotic. In the first stage, sporocyte mother cells differentiate within the anther (pollen mother cell) and the ovule (megaspore mother cell). These sporocyte mother cells undergo two meiotic divisions to produce four haploid daughter cells-male spores (microspores) and female spores (megaspores). In the second stage, the haploid spore cells undergo few asymmetric haploid mitotic divisions to produce the 3-cell male or 7-cell female gametophyte. Both stages of gametophyte development involve extensive epigenetic reprogramming, including siRNA dependent changes in DNA methylation and chromatin restructuring. This intricate mosaic of epigenetic changes determines, to a great extent, embryo and endosperm development in the future sporophyte generation.

Effects of Abscisic Acid and Salicylic Acid on Gene Expression in the Antiviral RNA Silencing Pathway in Arabidopsis

The RNA silencing pathways modulate responses to certain stresses, and can be partially tuned by several hormones such as salicylic acid (SA) and abscisic acid (ABA). Although SA and ABA are often antagonistic and often modulate different stress responses, they have similar effects on virus resistance, which are partially achieved through the antiviral RNA silencing pathway. Whether they play similar roles in regulating the RNA silencing pathway is unclear. By employing coexpression and promoter analyses, we found that some ABA- and SA-related transcription factors (TFs) are coexpressed with several AGO, DCL, and RDR genes, and have multiple binding sites for the identified TFs in the queried promoters. ABA and SA are antagonistic with respect to the expression of AGO1 and RDRs because ABA was able to induce these genes only in the SA mutant. Nevertheless, both hormones showed similarities in the regulation of other genes, for example, the induction of AGO2 by ABA was SA-dependent, indicating that ABA acts upstream of SA in this regulation. We inferred that the similar effects of ABA and SA on some genes resulted in the redundancy of their roles in resistance to bamboo mosaic virus, but that the two hormones are antagonistic with respect to other genes unrelated to their biosynthesis pathways.