CGRP Plasma Levels Decrease in Classical Trigeminal Neuralgia Patients Treated with Botulinum Toxin Type A: A Pilot Study

Trigeminal neuralgia and its comorbidities: a nationwide disease trajectory study

ABSTRACT

There is a limited understanding of risk factors and comorbidities in trigeminal neuralgia, a disease characterized by paroxysms of severe unilateral facial pain and a higher incidence in women. We aim to identify temporally associated comorbidities involving trigeminal neuralgia by analyzing nationwide disease trajectories. Using data from 7.2 million unique individuals in the Danish National Patient Register between 1994 and 2018, each individual diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia was compared with 10,000 matched controls to identify co-occurring diseases. The sequential disease associations were identified in sex-stratified disease trajectories. A Cox-regression analysis investigated whether treatment with carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine, as compared with gabapentin, pregabalin, or lamotrigine, was associated with stroke risk. Finally, we investigated the stroke polygenic risk score and its association with stroke incidence in a subset of genotyped individuals with trigeminal neuralgia. We included 7141 individuals with trigeminal neuralgia (64.2% female, mean age at diagnosis 58.7 years) and identified 18 diseases associated with subsequent trigeminal neuralgia. After diagnosis, trigeminal neuralgia was associated with 9 diseases, including ischemic stroke (relative risk 1.55). Carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine treatment increased the ischemic stroke risk (hazard ratio 1.78; 95% confidence interval 1.47-2.17); however, the polygenic risk of stroke showed no association. In the Danish population, a trigeminal neuralgia diagnosis is temporally associated with 27 diseases revealed in systematic disease trajectories. Trigeminal neuralgia itself and its first-line treatment, but not a stroke polygenic risk score, was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke indicating that vascular risk factors should be routinely assessed in individuals with trigeminal neuralgia.

Botulinum toxin type A is a potential therapeutic drug for chronic orofacial pain

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A), produced by the gram-positive anaerobic bacterium Clostridium botulinum, acts by cleaving synaptosome-associated protein-25 (SNAP-25), an essential component of the presynaptic neuronal membrane that is necessary for fusion with the membrane proteins of neurotransmitter-containing vesicles. Recent studies have highlighted the efficacy of BTX-A in treating chronic pain conditions, including lower back pain, chronic neck pain, neuropathic pain, and trigeminal neuralgia, particularly when patients are unresponsive to traditional painkillers. This review focuses on the analgesic effects of BTX-A in various chronic pain conditions, with a particular emphasis on the orofacial region.

HIGHLIGHT

This review focuses on the mechanisms by which BTX-A induces analgesia in patients with inflammatory and temporomandibular joint pain. This review also highlights the fact that BTX-A can effectively manage neuropathic pain and trigeminal neuralgia, which are difficult-to-treat chronic pain conditions. Herein, we present a comprehensive assessment of the central analgesic effects of BTX-A and a discussion of its various applications in clinical dental practice.

CONCLUSION

BTX-A is an approved treatment option for various chronic pain conditions. Although there is evidence of axonal transport of BTX-A from peripheral to central endings in motor neurons, the precise mechanism underlying its pain-modulating effects remains unclear. This review discusses the evidence supporting the effectiveness of BTX-A in controlling chronic pain conditions in the orofacial region. BTX-A is a promising therapeutic agent for treating pain conditions that do not respond to conventional analgesics.

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: An Update on Systematic Review With Meta-analyses

OBJECTIVE

Pain management in patients with TN is challenging, as facial pain often does not respond well to conventional therapies. Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) has been suggested as a potential treatment option, but there is limited evidence regarding its long-term efficacy. This review aimed to analyze the current data for the use of in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and highlight the evidence for its efficacy and safety.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in various databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ClinicalTrials, and Cochrane Library) to identify clinical studies evaluating the use of BTX-A in TN until October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), single-arm studies, and stratified studies were included in the analysis. The mean difference (MD), effect size (ES), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated for visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, pain episode frequency, and the proportion of responders.

RESULTS

The analysis included 23 studies, including 4 RCTs, 14 single-arm studies, and 5 stratified studies. In the RCTs, BTX-A was found to significantly reduce mean VAS scores compared with baseline (ES: -4.05; 95% CI: -6.13, -1.97; P =0.002). In 19 non-RCTs, the pooled single-arm analysis revealed that BTX-A decreased VAS scores (ES: -5.19, 95% CI: -6.05, -4.33, P <0.001) and pain attack frequency (ES: -17.85, 95% CI: -23.36, -12.34, P <0.001) from baseline to the end of follow-up. The overall proportion of responders to BTX-A treatment was also significant (95% CI: 0.653, 0.761, P =0.003).

DISCUSSION

Current evidence indicates that BTX-A injection is an effective and safe option for patients with refractory TN or not responding to medical or surgical management. However, more high-quality studies are needed to further confirm its efficacy.

Trigeminal neuralgia

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a facial pain disorder characterized by intense and paroxysmal pain that profoundly affects quality of life and presents complex challenges in diagnosis and treatment. TN can be categorized as classical, secondary and idiopathic. Epidemiological studies show variable incidence rates and an increased prevalence in women and in the elderly, with familial cases suggesting genetic factors. The pathophysiology of TN is multifactorial and involves genetic predisposition, anatomical changes, and neurophysiological factors, leading to hyperexcitable neuronal states, central sensitization and widespread neural plasticity changes. Neurovascular compression of the trigeminal root, which undergoes major morphological changes, and focal demyelination of primary trigeminal afferents are key aetiological factors in TN. Structural and functional brain imaging studies in patients with TN demonstrated abnormalities in brain regions responsible for pain modulation and emotional processing of pain. Treatment of TN involves a multifaceted approach that considers patient-specific factors, including the type of TN, with initial pharmacotherapy followed by surgical options if necessary. First-line pharmacological treatments include carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine. Surgical interventions, including microvascular decompression and percutaneous neuroablative procedures, can be considered at an early stage if pharmacotherapy is not sufficient for pain control or has intolerable adverse effects or contraindications.

Compared to oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine, botulinum toxin type A is a useful therapeutic option for trigeminal neuralgia symptoms: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to compare the effectiveness of three treatments: BTX A, CBZ, and OXB, in managing trigeminal neuralgia (TN).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a thorough search for research articles related to our issue using specific keywords on several databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Science Direct, Scopus, PubMed, Elsevier, Springer Journals, Ovid Medline, EBSCO, and Web of Science. Our focus was on publications from 1965 to 2023.

RESULTS

We retrieved 46 articles from the search and reviewed them carefully. Out of these, we selected 29 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Among the selected articles, 11 investigated the effects of CBZ and OXB, while 18 explored the impact of BTX A on the improvement of TN symptoms. The response rate ranged between 56% and 90.5% for CBZ and between 90.9% and 94% for OXB. The response rate for BTX A ranged between 51.4% and 100%. All these three treatments had a remarkable effect on the improvement of TN. Importantly, findings highlighted that side effects of CBZ and OXB could lead to treatment discontinuation in some cases, whereas BTX A's side effects have been minimal and less frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

Consequently, BTX A emerges as a promising alternative for TN treatment. However, additional clinical trials are necessary to validate this finding, and further research is required to establish a standardized protocol for administering BTX A in TN.

Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the analgesic effects of botulinum neurotoxin: A literature review

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs), derived from Clostridium botulinum, have been employed to treat a range of central and peripheral neurological disease. Some studies indicate that BoNT may be beneficial for pain conditions as well. It has been hypothesized that BoNTs may exert their analgesic effects by preventing the release of pain-related neurotransmitters and neuroinflammatory agents from sensory nerve endings, suppressing glial activation, and inhibiting the transmission of pain-related receptors to the neuronal cell membrane. In addition, there is evidence to suggest that the central analgesic effects of BoNTs are mediated through their retrograde axonal transport. The purpose of this review is to summarize the experimental evidence of the analgesic functions of BoNTs and discuss the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which they can act on pain conditions. Most of the studies reviewed in this article were conducted using BoNT/A. The PubMed database was searched from 1995 to December 2022 to identify relevant literature.

In situ tissue profile of rat trigeminal nerve in trigeminal neuralgia using spatial transcriptome sequencing

BACKGROUND

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is the most common neuropathic disorder in the maxillofacial region. The etiology and pathogenesis of TN have not been clearly determined to date, although there are many hypotheses.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to investigate the interactions between different types of cells in TN, particularly the impact and intrinsic mechanism of demyelination on the trigeminal ganglion, and to identify new important target genes and regulatory pathways in TN.

METHODS

TN rat models were prepared by trigeminal root compression, and trigeminal nerve tissues were isolated for spatial transcriptome sequencing. The gene expression matrix was reduced dimensionally by PCA and presented by UMAP. Gene function annotation was analyzed by Metascape. The progression of certain clusters and the developmental pseudotime were analyzed using the Monocle package. Modules of the gene coexpression network between different groups were analyzed based on weighted gene coexpression network analysis and assigned AddModuleScore values. The intercellular communication of genes in these networks via ligand-receptor interactions was analyzed using CellPhoneDB analysis.

RESULTS

The results suggested that the trigeminal ganglion could affect Schwann cell demyelination and remyelination responses through many ligand-receptor interactions, while the effect of Schwann cells on the trigeminal ganglion was much weaker. Additionally, ferroptosis may be involved in the demyelination of Schwann cells.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides spatial transcriptomics sequencing data on TN, reveals new markers, and redefines the relationship between the ganglion and myelin sheath, providing a theoretical basis and supporting data for future mechanistic research and drug development.

The analgesic effects of botulinum neurotoxin by modulating pain-related receptors; A literature review

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs), produced by Clostridium botulinum, have been used for the treatment of various central and peripheral neurological conditions. Recent studies have suggested that BoNTs may also have a beneficial effect on pain conditions. It has been hypothesized that one of the mechanisms underlying BoNTs' analgesic effects is the inhibition of pain-related receptors' transmission to the neuronal cell membrane. BoNT application disrupts the integration of synaptic vesicles with the cellular membrane, which is responsible for transporting various receptors, including pain receptors such as TRP channels, calcium channels, sodium channels, purinergic receptors, neurokinin-1 receptors, and glutamate receptors. BoNT also modulates the opioidergic system and the GABAergic system, both of which are involved in the pain process. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying these effects can provide valuable insights for the development of novel therapeutic approaches for pain management. This review aims to summarize the experimental evidence of the analgesic functions of BoNTs and discuss the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which they can act on pain conditions by inhibiting the transmission of pain-related receptors.

Botulinum Toxin Treatment for Cancer-Related Disorders: A Systematic Review

This systematic review investigates the effect of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) therapy on cancer-related disorders. A major bulk of the literature is focused on BoNT's effect on pain at the site of surgery or radiation. All 13 published studies on this issue indicated reduction or cessation of pain at these sites after local injection of BoNTs. Twelve studies addressed the effect of BoNT injection into the pylorus (sphincter between the stomach and the first part of the gut) for the prevention of gastroparesis after local resection of esophageal cancer. In eight studies, BoNT injection was superior to no intervention; three studies found no difference between the two approaches. One study compared the result of intra-pyloric BoNT injection with preventive pyloromyotomy (resection of pyloric muscle fibers). Both approaches reduced gastroparesis, but the surgical approach had more serious side effects. BoNT injection was superior to saline injection in the prevention of esophageal stricture after surgery (34% versus 6%, respectively, p = 0.02) and produced better results (30% versus 40% stricture) compared to steroid (triamcinolone) injection close to the surgical region. All 12 reported studies on the effect of BoNT injection into the parotid region for the reduction in facial sweating during eating (gustatory hyperhidrosis) found that BoNT injections stopped or significantly reduced facial sweating that developed after parotid gland surgery. Six studies showed that BoNT injection into the parotid region prevented the development of or healed the fistulas that developed after parotid gland resection-parotidectomy gustatory hyperhidrosis (Frey syndrome), post-surgical parotid fistula, and sialocele. Eight studies suggested that BoNT injection into masseter muscle reduced or stopped severe jaw pain after the first bite (first bite syndrome) that may develop as a complication of parotidectomy.

Single OnabotulinumtoxinA Session Add-On to Carbamazepine or Oxcarbazepine in Treatment-Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Case Series with 24-Week Follow Up

We sought to assess the efficacy of combining onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) as add-on therapy to carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine in treatment-refractory patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) who failed to respond (less than 30% response rate) to adequate monotherapy. We conducted a retrospective study on 15 patients with a definite diagnosis of TGN, according to the established criteria, and underwent BoNTA as part of their treatment plan. A single BoNTA session was administered subcutaneously, according to patients' perceived zone of pain, at different dosages ranging from 30 to 200 units (mean ± standard deviation: 87.3 ± 39.2). All patients (15/15; 100%) reported large reductions in the severity of their TGN-related neuropathic pain. The mean pain score on the VAS scale significantly decreased from 9.3 ± 1.1 to 3.7 ± 1.2 at 2 weeks after injecting BoNTA (p < 0.001) and remained stable at 4 and 24 weeks post-injection. Regarding the impact of BoNTA on patients' health-related quality of life, there were significant improvements in both the physical and mental health domains (p < 0.05) of SF-36 tool. BoNTA may be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with refractory TGN when added on to carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine. The use of a single BoNTA session for TGN treatment may be an alternative to surgical interventions and as add-on treatment to oral medications, providing patients with a minimally invasive, effective, safe and well-tolerated option.

Maresin-2 inhibits inflammatory and neuropathic trigeminal pain and reduces neuronal activation in the trigeminal ganglion

Pain is a common symptom associated with disorders involving the orofacial structures. Most acute orofacial painful conditions are easily recognized, but the pharmacological treatment may be limited by the adverse events of current available drugs and/or patients' characteristics. In addition, chronic orofacial pain conditions represent clinical challenges both, in terms of diagnostic and treatment. There is growing evidence that specialized pro-resolution lipid mediators (SPMs) present potent analgesic effects, in addition to their well characterized role in the resolution of inflammation. Maresins (MaR-1 and MaR-2) were the last described members of this family, and MaR-2 analgesic action has not yet been reported. Herein the effect of MaR-2 in different orofacial pain models was investigated. MaR-2 (1 or 10 ng) was always delivered via medullary subarachnoid injection, which corresponds to the intrathecal treatment. A single injection of MaR-2 caused a significant reduction of phases I and II of the orofacial formalin test in rats. Repeated injections of MaR-2 prevented the development of facial heat and mechanical hyperalgesia in a model of post-operative pain in rats. In a model of trigeminal neuropathic pain (CCI-ION), repeated MaR-2 injections reversed facial heat and mechanical hyperalgesia in rats and mice. CCI-ION increased c-Fos positive neurons and CGRP⁺ activated (nuclear pNFkB) neurons in the trigeminal ganglion (TG), which were restored to sham levels by MaR-2 repeated treatment. In conclusion, MaR-2 showed potent and long-lasting analgesic effects in inflammatory and neuropathic pain of orofacial origin and the inhibition of CGRP-positive neurons in the TG may account for MaR-2 action.

Refractory glossopharyngeal neuralgia successfully treated with onabotulinumtoxinA: A case report

BACKGROUND

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia is a rare but severe and disabling pain condition often caused by vascular compression of the glossopharyngeal nerve. Treatment is similar to that of trigeminal neuralgia, but some patients may be refractory to both medical and surgical approaches. Here we present a case of refractory glossopharyngeal neuralgia that responded well to onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A).

CASE

We report a case of a 65-year-old man with well-controlled human immunodeficiency virus disease with glossopharyngeal neuralgia symptoms since 2015. He had partial response to medications but was limited by side-effects. He underwent microvascular decompression twice with initial relief both times, but experienced recurrence of attacks 1-3 years after each surgery. He was treated with BTX-A using the chronic migraine PREEMPT protocol (i.e., 31-39 injection sites in head and neck muscles), which led to significant relief of his glossopharyngeal neuralgia pain.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first case to our knowledge of glossopharyngeal neuralgia treated with BTX-A. BTX-A can be an effective treatment for glossopharyngeal neuralgia, even when injections are not administered directly over the sensory distribution of the glossopharyngeal nerve.

Interplay of Oral, Mandibular, and Facial Disorders and Migraine

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Migraine and other primary headache disorders can be localized in the face resembling facial or dental pain, indicating the influence of the trigeminovascular system in the structures innervated by the maxillary (V2) and mandibulary (V3) branches of the trigeminal nerve. Disorders of oral and craniofacial structures may influence primary headache disorders. In the current article, we review the potential links of this interplay.

RECENT FINDINGS

This interplay may be related to anatomy, with the trigeminal pathway and the involvement of both peripheral and central mechanisms, and the presence of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a key mediator in migraine pathophysiology. CGRP is also involved in the pathophysiology of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and their comorbidity with migraine and is also implicated in dental and periodontal pathology. Inflammatory and pathological processes of these structures and their trigeminal nociceptive pathways may influence the trigeminovascular system and consequently may exacerbate or even potentially trigger migraine.

A critical review of the neurovascular nature of migraine and the main mechanisms of action of prophylactic antimigraine medications

INTRODUCTION

Migraine involves neurovascular, functional, and anatomical alterations. Migraineurs experience an intense unilateral and pulsatile headache frequently accompanied with vomiting, nausea, photophobia, etc. Although there is no ideal preventive medication, frequency in migraine days may be partially decreased by some prophylactics, including antihypertensives, antidepressants, antiepileptics, and CGRPergic inhibitors. However, the mechanisms of action involved in antimigraine prophylaxis remain elusive.

AREAS COVERED

This review recaps some of the main neurovascular phenomena related to migraine and currently available preventive medications. Moreover, it discusses the major mechanisms of action of the recommended prophylactic medications.

EXPERT OPINION

In the last three years, migraine prophylaxis has evolved from nonspecific to specific antimigraine treatments. Overall, nonspecific treatments  mainly involve neural actions, whereas specific pharmacotherapy (represented by CGRP receptor antagonists and CGRPergic monoclonal antibodies) is predominantly mediated by neurovascular mechanisms that may include, among others: (i) reduction in the cortical spreading depression (CSD)-associated events; (ii) inhibition of pain sensitization; (iii) blockade of neurogenic inflammation; and/or (iv) increase in cranial vascular tone. Accordingly, the novel antimigraine prophylaxis promises to be more effective, devoid of significant adverse effects (unlike nonspecific treatments), and more beneficial for the quality of life of migraineurs.

Exploring the roles of neuropeptides in trigeminal neuropathic pain: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of animal studies

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to explore the changes in expression of neuropeptides and/or their receptors following experimental trigeminal neuropathic pain in animals.

DESIGN

MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched for publications up to 31st March 2021. Study selection and data extraction were completed by two independent reviewers based on the eligibility criteria. The quality of articles was judged based on the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) risk-of-bias tool.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies satisfied the eligibility criteria and were included for narrative synthesis. Methods of trigeminal neuropathic pain induction were nerve ligation, nerve compression/crush, nerve transection and dental pulp injury. Animal behaviours used for pain verification were evoked responses to mechanical and thermal stimuli. Non-evoked behaviours, including vertical exploration, grooming and food consumption, were also employed in some studies. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P were the most frequently reported neuropeptides. Overall, unclear to high risk of bias was identified in the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence has suggested the pro-nociceptive role of CGRP in trigeminal neuropathic pain. In order to further translational pain research, animal models of trigeminal neuropathic pain and pain validation methods need to be optimised. Complete reporting of future studies based on available guidelines to improve confidence in research is encouraged.

Chronic Facial Pain: Trigeminal Neuralgia, Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain, and Myofascial Pain Syndrome-An Evidence-Based Narrative Review and Etiological Hypothesis

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN), the most common form of severe facial pain, may be confused with an ill-defined persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP). Facial pain is reviewed and a detailed discussion of TN and PIFP is presented. A possible cause for PIFP is proposed. (1) Methods: Databases were searched for articles related to facial pain, TN, and PIFP. Relevant articles were selected, and all systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. (2) Discussion: The lifetime prevalence for TN is approximately 0.3% and for PIFP approximately 0.03%. TN is 15-20 times more common in persons with multiple sclerosis. Most cases of TN are caused by neurovascular compression, but a significant number are secondary to inflammation, tumor or trauma. The cause of PIFP remains unknown. Well-established TN treatment protocols include pharmacotherapy, neurotoxin denervation, peripheral nerve ablation, focused radiation, and microvascular decompression, with high rates of relief and varying degrees of adverse outcomes. No such protocols exist for PIFP. (3) Conclusion: PIFP may be confused with TN, but treatment possibilities differ greatly. Head and neck muscle myofascial pain syndrome is suggested as a possible cause of PIFP, a consideration that could open new approaches to treatment.