Spinal Cord Stimulation for Visceral Pain: Present Approaches and Future Strategies

Chronic Constipation Ameliorated by Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation

A male in his mid-50s with a history of cerebral palsy was referred to the neurosurgical department for the management of chronic abdominal visceral pain after nine years of suffering. He had refractory constipation in his youth. Following a permanent colostomy for intestinal obstruction, visceral pain emerged over the right abdominal area, which became refractory to medication. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was performed with a pair of electrodes placed over the right mid-dorsal column between the T11-12 segments. Low-frequency stimuli with enough intensity to induce abdominal twitching reduced pain and relieved constipation for at least one year's follow-up. As the effects were strong and persistent, our findings suggest a novel neuromodulation therapy for chronic constipation. However, clinicians should be aware of the potential risk of unwanted gastrointestinal symptoms when thoracic SCS is performed.

Chronic Abdominal Discomfort Syndrome (CADS): Defining and Discussing a Novel Diagnosis

In this article, we propose a new diagnostic paradigm known as Chronic Abdominal Discomfort Syndrome (CADS). Patient's presentation centers around chronic abdominal pain not explained by acute pathology with or without accompanying dyspepsia, bloating, nausea and vomiting among other symptoms. The pathophysiology is noted to be neurogenic, possibly stemming from visceral sympathetic nerves or abdominal wall afferent nerves. Diagnosis is supported by signs or symptoms traversing clinical, diagnostic and functional criteria. Included is a tool which can assist clinicians in diagnosing patients with CADS per those domains. We hope to facilitate primary care physicians' and gastroenterologists' utilization of our criteria to provide guidance for selecting which patients may benefit from further interventions or evaluation by a pain physician. The pain physician may then offer interventions to provide the patient with relief.

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Intractable Visceral Pain Originating from the Pelvic and Abdominal Region: A Narrative Review on a Possible New Indication for Patients with Therapy-Resistant Pain

Aim

Visceral pain, characterized by pain that is diffuse and challenging to localize, occurs frequently and is difficult to treat. In cases where the pain becomes intractable despite optimal medical management, it can affect patients' Quality of Life (QoL). Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a potential solution for intractable visceral pain.

Purpose

In this narrative review, we collected all evidence regarding the efficacy of SCS for visceral pain across various underlying conditions.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science in which articles published from October 1st, 1963 up to March 7th, 2023 were identified.

Results

Seventy articles were included in this review of which most were retrospective cohort studies, case series and case reports. The studies, often with a small number of participants, reported on SCS for chronic pancreatitis, anorectal pain and bowel disorders, gynaecological diagnoses, visceral pelvic pain, urological disorders and finally general visceral pain. They found positive effects on pain and/or symptom relief, opioid consumption, anxiety and depression and QoL. Complications occurred frequently but were often minor and reversible.

Conclusion

Better screening and selection criteria need to be established to optimally evaluate eligible patients who might benefit from SCS. A positive outcome of a sympathetic nerve block appears to be a potential indicator of SCS effectiveness. Additionally, women receiving SCS for endometriosis had a better outcome compared to other indications. Finally, SCS could also relief functional symptoms such as voiding problems and gastroparesis. Complications could often be resolved with revision surgery. Since SCS is expensive and not always covered by standard health insurance, the incorporation of cost-analyses is recommended. In order to establish a comprehensive treatment plan, including selection criteria for SCS, rigorous prospective, possibly randomized and controlled studies that are diagnosis-oriented, with substantial follow-up and adequate sample sizes, are needed.

Spinal cord stimulation for visceral pain associated with medullary sponge kidney

Chronic pain is a common reason for which people in the USA seek medical care. It is linked to opioid consumption, anxiety and a reduction in quality of life. Over the past 50 years, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has evolved as a safe and efficacious treatment for chronic pain etiologies. The authors present the first known case of SCS for pain due to medullary sponge kidney disease. This report adds to the growing body of literature supporting the use of SCS for treating visceral organ pain, while also highlighting the utility of ventral lead placement for treating visceral pain. As SCS utilization increases, it is expected that there will be a decrease in opioid consumption, and this will help us contain the opioid epidemic.

Dorsal root ganglion stimulation for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a difficult condition to treat. Due to complex pelvic innervation, dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has not been shown to produce the same effect as dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) given emerging evidence suggesting that applying DRGS may result in favorable outcomes for individuals with CPP. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the clinical use and effectiveness of DRGS for patients with CPP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of clinical studies demonstrating the use of DRGS for CPP. Searches were conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science) across August and September 2022.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies comprising 65 total patients with variable pelvic pain etiologies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of subjects implanted with DRGS reported >50% mean pain reduction at variable times of follow-up. Secondary outcomes reported throughout studies including quality of life (QOL) and pain medication consumption were reported to be significantly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Dorsal root ganglion stimulation for CPP continues to lack supportive evidence from well-designed, high-quality studies and recommendations from consensus committee experts. However, we present consistent evidence from level IV studies showing success with the use of DRGS for CPP in reducing pain symptoms along with reports of improved QOL through periods as short as 2 months to as long as 3 years. Because the available studies at this time are of low quality with a high risk of bias, we strongly recommend the facilitation of high-quality studies with larger sample sizes in order to better ascertain the utility of DRGS for this specific patient population. At the same time, from a clinical perspective, it may be reasonable and appropriate to evaluate patients for DRGS candidacy on a case-by-case basis, especially those patients who report CPP symptoms that are refractory to noninterventional measures and who may not be ideal candidates for other forms of neuromodulation.

Successful Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pancreatitis: A Case Report

Chronic pancreatitis represents an inflammatory condition occurring from repetitive pancreatic inflammation episodes ultimately causing patients intractable pain alongside pancreatic insufficiency and as a result, reduced quality of life. In addition to alcohol and smoking cessation, patients with chronic pancreatitis are treated conservatively with anti-depressants, anti-convulsant and analgesic medications including paracetamol and celecoxib - with limited success. Alternative to surgical resection, patients can opt for endoscopic treatment options including sphincterotomy or removal of calculi which have shown limited success. Celiac plexus blocks have had positive outcomes as well, however, are not long-lasting and carry significant risks, such as gastroparesis or organ damage. Evidence has shown alterations in the peripheral and central nervous system which causes these patients to often experience dysfunctional and neuropathic pain. The advent of this knowledge has introduced neuromodulation into the field with successful cases of spinal cord stimulation treating the pain associated with chronic pancreatitis. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation is similarly based upon the gate theory of pain but with more precision as it strictly targets the dorsal root ganglion. There have been no cases reported in the literature of this form of stimulation in treating chronic pancreatitis. We present a case of a patient with chronic pancreatitis who obtained 80% abdominal pain relief for two years after undergoing dorsal root ganglion stimulation.

Parametric Assessment of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Bladder Pain-Like Responses in Rats

OBJECTIVES

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of pelvic visceral pains has been understudied and underused. The goal of the current study was to examine multiple stimulation parameters of SCS to determine optimal settings for the inhibition of responses to urinary bladder distension (UBD) in animal models of bladder pain as a guide for human studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult, female isoflurane/urethane-anesthetized rats underwent a T13/L1 mini-laminectomy sufficient to implant an SCS paddle lead for neuromodulation. Silver wire electrodes were inserted into the external oblique musculature. A 22-gauge angiocatheter was placed transurethrally into the bladder and used to deliver phasic, air UBDs at pressures of 10 to 60 mm Hg and visceromotor (abdominal contractile) electromyographic responses to UBD measured in the presence and absence of SCS. Electromyographic activity was quantified using standard differential amplification and rectification. Parameter settings for SCS included both conventional (10, 50, 100 Hz) and high frequency (1,000, 5,000, and 10,000 Hz) biphasic square wave pulses with 50 to 200 μs durations. To create states of hypersensitivity, pretreatment of adult rats included an intravesical zymosan infusion 24 hours before testing with and without a preceding episode of neonatal bladder inflammation.

RESULTS

Low frequency (10, 50, and 100 Hz) 200 μs biphasic pulses at submotor thresholds demonstrated inhibition of visceromotor responses (VMRs) to UBD in rats made hypersensitive to UBD by a protocol that included neonatal cystitis. Onset of inhibitory effects occurred within 20 minutes of beginning SCS. Otherwise, SCS at all other parameters studied and in other tested rat models produced either no significant effect or augmentation of VMRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Demonstration of inhibitory effects of SCS in a clinically relevant model of bladder pain suggests the potential utility of this therapy in patients with painful bladder disorders.