Lumbar erector spinae plane block versus infrainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block for pain management after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided facia iliaca compartment (FIC) and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in managing postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty surgery.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients were randomized into 2 groups (n = 30): one that received FIC blocks and one that received ESP blocks. FIC and ESP blocks were performed with 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine at the end of the surgery. The patients received intravenous tramadol and patient-controlled postoperative analgesia. The pain scores, opioid consumption, and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

The dynamic pain scores on movement in the postoperative first hour were significantly lower in the ESP block group than in the FIC block group (3 [2-4] vs 4 [2-5], respectively; P = .035). Data are expressed as median (25th-75th percentiles). Postoperative opioid consumption within the first postoperative 8 hours was significantly higher in the FIC block group than in the ESP block group (80 mg [61-100] vs 100 mg [80-120], respectively; P = .010). The adverse effects of opioids did not differ between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

ESP and infrainguinal FIC blocks provided similar postoperative analgesia 24 hours after total hip arthroplasty. The ESP block is more beneficial than the FIC block in terms of pain scores and opioid consumption in the early hours of the postoperative period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05621161).

Current Trends and Future Directions for Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Review of the Anesthesia Choices and Analgesic Options

The aging population and the obesity epidemic have led to an increased rate of joint arthroplasty procedures, specifically total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. These surgeries are associated with increased hospital length of stay and, consequently, higher costs. Despite the benefits of outpatient surgery, only a small percentage of total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) are done in this manner. We reviewed the most up-to-date trends for outpatient TJA and discussed essential factors for a successful outpatient program, including the proper patient selection process and best available anesthetic and analgesic options, along with their risks and benefits. Risk stratification tools, such as the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment, are helpful for predicting outcomes regarding outpatient TJA, and neuraxial anesthesia should be considered to minimize complications and facilitate early discharge. A multimodal analgesia regimen could be effective for pain management in outpatient TJA, and the currently recommended peripheral nerve blocks for total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty are the fascia iliaca compartment block and adductor canal block, respectively. However, blocks should be carefully considered for outpatient procedures. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols help to guide perioperative care teams and allow for improved patient recovery, decreased length of stay, and increased patient satisfaction.

Deep fascia iliaca block combined with sacral plexus block for hip fracture surgery: A retrospective series of cases

This case series describes a novel anaesthetic approach for hip fracture surgery using the deep fascia iliaca block combined with the sacral plexus block. This single-centre, retrospective study involved 15 patients aged 85 years or older and having significant cardiac disease. All the patients were managed with single-shot deep fascia iliaca block (22 or 25 ml of ropivacaine 0.5%) and sacral plexus block (12 or 15 ml of ropivacaine 0.5%, according to the patients' weight) after the administration of 50 μg of fentanyl intravenously. Intraoperatively, the patients were also administered light-to-moderate sedation. All patients presented a successful sensory block and a high level of haemodynamic stability (nil vasopressor consumption). In hip fracture surgery, low volume deep fascia iliaca block may be combined with sacral plexus block as primary anaesthetic technque, without any neuraxial technique or sympathetic blockade.

Erector spinae block: beyond the torso

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article aims to summarize the current literature describing the application of erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks for regional anesthesia of upper and lower limbs and to discuss the advantages and limitations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Investigations are still at an early stage but results are promising. High thoracic ESP blockade can relieve acute and chronic shoulder pain through local anesthetic diffusion to cervical nerve roots, although it may not be as effective as direct local anesthetic injection around the brachial plexus. It does, however, preserve motor and phrenic nerve function to a greater extent. It will also block the T2 innervation of the axilla which can be a source of pain in complex arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Lumbar ESP blocks provide effective analgesia following hip arthroplasty and arthroscopy, and appear comparable to lumbar plexus, quadratus lumborum, and fascia iliaca blocks. Unlike the latter, they are motor-sparing and are associated with improved postoperative ambulation.

SUMMARY

High thoracic and lumbar ESP blocks have the potential to provide adequate analgesia of the upper and lower limbs respectively, without causing significant motor block. They are thus alternative methods of regional anesthesia when other techniques are not feasible or have undesirable adverse effects.

Effects of Lumbar Plexus Block Combined with Infiltration Anesthesia on Anesthesia Comfort Scores and Stress Responses in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Replacement

Objective. To investigate the effects of lumbar plexus block combined with infiltration anesthesia on anesthesia comfort scores and stress responses in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement. Methods. The materials of 100 elderly patients undergoing hip replacement who were treated in our hospital (January 2020-January 2021) were retrospectively analyzed, and they were equalized into the experimental group ( $n=50$ ) and control group ( $n=50$ ) according to the anesthesia methods. The experimental group received lumbar plexus block combined with infiltration anesthesia, and the control group received combined spinal-epidural anesthesia combined with infiltration anesthesia. The patients’ anesthesia comfort scores, stress responses, and postoperative pain indexes were compared between the two groups. Results. Compared with the control group, the experimental group achieved much lower scores of mood change, shivering response, and traction reaction ( $P<0.001$ ), indicating that the anesthesia comfort in the experimental group was higher. Compared with the control group, the experimental group had much better perioperative stress response indexes ( $P<0.05$ ) and eminently lower pain scores at 12 and 24 hours after surgery ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. Lumbar plexus block combined with infiltration anesthesia can relieve the stress responses and postoperative pain of elderly patients undergoing hip replacement and increase their anesthesia comfort. Therefore, this anesthesia method is translational in clinic.

Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Variation in care is associated with variation in outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Accordingly, much research into enhanced recovery efficacy for TJA has been devoted to linking standardization with better outcomes. This article focuses on recent advances suggesting that variation within a set of core protocol elements may be less important than providing the core elements within enhanced recovery pathways for TJA. Provided the core elements are associated with benefits for patients and health care system outcomes, variation in the details of their provision may contribute to a pathway's success. This article provides an updated review of the literature.

Role of regional anesthesia in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols and interventional locoregional anesthesia (LRA) techniques continuously evolve. This review outlines the latest recommendations for the use of regional anesthesia in ERAS protocols and emerging interventional analgesia techniques.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has led to a refinement of the traditional techniques and the introduction of a number of new approaches to complement ERAS strategies. The efficacy and versatility of LRA enable its use in an increasing number of ERAS indications.

SUMMARY

The implementation of ERAS protocols in different surgical procedures reduces overall complications and recovery time. Multimodal analgesia strategies with regional anesthesia techniques are some of the key interventions contributing to the improvement in postoperative outcomes.

Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lumbar spine surgery is one of the most widespread types of surgery for treating back and leg pain. However, the postoperative period always presents with severe pain due to the removal of skin, subcutaneous tissues, bones, and ligaments. Patients usually require high doses of opioids to relieve pain during the initial three days after operation, as well as experience drug-related complications and prolonged length of stay in hospital. We found that Erector spinae plane block significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores. The present systematic review revealed that ESPB was effective and safe for postoperative analgesia.

The erector spinae plane block for analgesia after lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review

Objective

To evaluate the available evidence for the utility of Erector Spinae Plane blocks (ESPB) after Lumbar surgery.

Methods

Databases were searched until December 20, 2020. ESPB was utilized as a MesH term and terms such as: lumbar spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, decompression and lumbar spine surgery.

Results

Studies demonstrate that ESPB are consistently found to be a safe and effective method of analgesia after lumbar surgery, with limited adverse effects.

Conclusion

ESPB appear to be an effective method to relieve pain after lumbar surgery. More RCTs will be needed to further investigate the clinical effectiveness of this intervention.