Impact of Implementing an Academic Detailing Program on Opioid-Benzodiazepine Co-Prescribing Trends at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Benzodiazepine Prescriptions for Homeless Veterans Affairs Service Users With Mental Illness

OBJECTIVE

Despite elevated risk for substance use disorder and overdose death in the homeless population, benzodiazepine prescribing for this population has not been examined. In this study, the authors used data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system to examine benzodiazepine prescribing and risky and potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine prescribing practices for homeless VA service users.

METHODS

Using national VA administrative data (2018-2019), the authors conducted logistic regression to compare likelihood of benzodiazepine prescribing and t tests to compare indicators of risky and potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine prescribing patterns for homeless service users with mental illness (N=244,113) and their housed peers (N=2,763,513).

RESULTS

Unadjusted analyses showed that benzodiazepines were prescribed for 7.5% of homeless VA service users with mental illness, versus 9.4% of their housed peers (p<0.001). Analyses adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and health care utilization showed that homeless service users were less likely than their housed peers to receive a benzodiazepine prescription (AOR=0.70, 99% CI=0.68-0.72). However, compared with their housed peers, homeless service users received higher rates of risky and potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine prescriptions, including multiple concurrent benzodiazepine prescriptions (9.4% vs. 7.0%, p<0.001) and concurrent prescriptions for benzodiazepines and opioids (36.9% vs. 31.2%, p<0.001) or sedatives (61.9% vs. 45.9%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although homeless VA service users with mental illness were less likely than their housed peers to receive a benzodiazepine prescription, benzodiazepine prescriptions for these service users had more characteristics of risky and potentially inappropriate prescribing.

Concurrent opioid and alcohol withdrawal management

Concurrent alcohol and opioid withdrawal syndrome is a common and challenging clinical scenario with little published evidence or guidance to inform pharmacotherapy strategies. Concurrent use of benzodiazepines and opioid agonists, which are considered first-line agents for management of each withdrawal syndrome independently, is controversial and often avoided in clinical practice. Strategies to provide effective, simultaneous medication treatment of alcohol and opioid withdrawal while optimizing patient safety are demonstrated through 3 patient cases.

Trends in substance use disorder diagnoses among Veterans, 2009-2019

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Substance use disorder (SUD) represents a substantial health burden to US Veterans. We aimed to quantify recent time trends in Veterans' substance-specific disorders using Veterans Health Administration (VA) data.

METHODS

We identified Veteran VA patients for fiscal years (FY) 2010-2019 (October 1, 2009-September 9, 2019) and extracted patient demographics and diagnoses from electronic health records (~6 million annually). We defined alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, opioid, sedative, and stimulant use disorders with ICD-9 (FY10-FY15) or ICD-10 (FY16-FY19) codes and variables for polysubstance use disorder, drug use disorder (DUD), and SUD.

RESULTS

Diagnoses for substance-specific disorders (excluding cocaine), polysubstance use disorder, DUD, and SUD increased 2%-13% annually for FY10-FY15. Alcohol, cannabis, and stimulant use disorders increased 4%-18% annually for FY16-FY19, while cocaine, opioid, and sedative use disorders changed by ≤1%. Stimulant and cannabis use disorder diagnoses increased most rapidly, and older Veterans had the largest increases across substances.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Rapid increases in cannabis and stimulant use disorder present a treatment challenge and key subgroups (e.g., older adults) may require tailored screening and treatment options. Diagnoses for SUD are increasing among Veterans overall, but there is important heterogeneity by substance and subgroup. Efforts to ensure access to evidence-based treatment for SUD may require greater focus on cannabis and stimulants, particularly for older adults.

SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

These findings represent the first assessment of time trends in substance-specific disorders among Veterans, overall and by age and sex. Notable findings include large increases in diagnoses for cannabis and stimulant use disorder and among older adults.

Implementation of a pharmacy-led virtual academic detailing program at the US Veterans Health Administration

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

To provide a summary of the implementation of a virtual academic detailing pilot program at the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

SUMMARY

In September 2018, VA Pharmacy Benefits Management implemented a virtual academic detailing ("e-Detailing") pilot program across three regional networks. Academic detailing involves multifaceted collaborative outreach delivered by trained healthcare clinicians to other clinicians using targeted educational interventions that improve clinical decision-making. Across VA, academic detailing programs are primarily staffed by specially trained clinical pharmacist specialists. Implementation began with an in-person meeting to train academic detailers on using the virtual academic detailing platform (VA Video Connect) and virtual soft skills, which was followed by regular facilitation meetings to address issues and share experiences. During e-Detailing program implementation, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged, prompting the US Department of Health and Human Services to declare a public health emergency. VA followed with restrictions on nonessential travel for all employees, thus hampering in-person academic detailing activities. Fortunately, e-Detailing provided an alternative channel for academic detailers across VA to continue delivering critical outreach to providers during the pandemic. Qualitative assessment of academic detailers' and providers' perceptions on e-Detailing highlighted the need for local leadership support for e-Detailing and telehealth, the efficiency of virtual compared to in-person visits, and potential time savings resulting from avoidance of long commutes.

CONCLUSION

The timing of e-Detailing implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic illustrates the need and potential for a virtual platform to deliver timely provider outreach.