1
|
Fritsch CG, Ferreira ML, Halliday MH, Roberts K, Comachio J, Mittinty M, Sharpe L, Foster NE, Stamatakis E, Mork PJ, McLachlan AJ, Ferreira PH. Health coaching intervention with or without the support of an exercise buddy to increase physical activity of people with chronic low back pain compared to usual care: a feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 71:102941. [PMID: 38513337 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.102941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exercise buddies (people to exercise together with) might support people with low back pain (LBP) to become active. However, involving buddies in randomised controlled trials (RCT) might challenge recruitment, data collection and follow-up. OBJECTIVES To explore the feasibility of the intervention, recruitment and data collection approaches and potential effects of a health coaching intervention (focused on physical activity) with or without exercise buddies' support on physical activity of people with chronic LBP versus usual discharge care. DESIGN Feasibility and pilot RCT. METHODS Adults (n = 30) discharged from LBP treatment were randomised to the Buddy-Assisted (health coaching intervention with exercise buddy's support), Individual-Only (health coaching only), or usual care groups. Data were collected at baseline, three and six months. The feasibility of trial's procedures was assessed through recruitment rate (acceptable if >70%), data completion rate (acceptable if ≤ 20% missing data), and follow-up rate (successful if ≥ 85%). The intervention's acceptability was assessed via feedback questionnaires. Preliminary effects on physical activity and other outcomes were also explored. RESULTS Recruitment and baseline data completion were acceptable. However, data collection and follow-up rates post-randomisation were not. 85% of the Buddy-Assisted Group believed the buddies helped them to increase physical activity and would recommend the intervention. 70% of the Individual-Only and Control groups believed exercise buddies would help them to become further active. CONCLUSION The data collection and follow-up approaches were not successful and need amending before a large-scale RCT. Nonetheless, the buddy-assisted intervention was well-accepted. A future RCT will focus on differences in clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12620001118998).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina G Fritsch
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Manuela L Ferreira
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark H Halliday
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Katharine Roberts
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Musculoskeletal Health Research Group, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Health Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Josielli Comachio
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Musculoskeletal Health Research Group, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Health Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Manasi Mittinty
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Louise Sharpe
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Psychology, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nadine E Foster
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Health Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Emmanuel Stamatakis
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul J Mork
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Trondelag, Norway
| | - Andrew J McLachlan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paulo H Ferreira
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Musculoskeletal Health Research Group, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Health Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
MacKean A, Godfrey E, Jones GD, Kedroff L, Sparks L, Jones GL. Effectiveness of remotely delivered motivational conversations on health outcomes in patients living with musculoskeletal conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 123:108204. [PMID: 38402714 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of remotely delivered motivational conversations on health outcomes in musculoskeletal populations. METHODS Four electronic databases (inception-March 2022) were searched and combined with grey literature. Randomised control trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of remotely delivered motivational conversation-based interventions within musculoskeletal populations, using valid measures of pain, disability, quality of life (QoL), or self-efficacy were included. Overall quality was assessed using GRADE criteria. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models with pooled effect sizes expressed as standardised mean differences ( ± 95%CIs). RESULTS Twelve RCTs were included. Meta-analyses revealed very-low to moderate quality evidence that remote interventions have a positive effect on pain and disability both immediately post intervention and at long-term follow-up compared to control, and have a positive effect on self-efficacy immediately post intervention. There was no effect on QoL immediately post intervention or at long-term follow up. CONCLUSION Remotely delivered motivation-based conversational interventions have a positive effect on pain, disability, and self-efficacy but not on QoL. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Motivational conversations, delivered remotely, may be effective in improving some health-related outcomes in MSK populations. However, higher quality evidence is needed to determine optimal intervention durations, and dosing frequencies using sufficient sample sizes and follow-up time frames.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice MacKean
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Physiotherapy Department, London, UK
| | - Emma Godfrey
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK; Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Gareth D Jones
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Physiotherapy Department, London, UK; Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences (CHAPS), Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, UK
| | - Louise Kedroff
- Physiotherapy Dept, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lucinda Sparks
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Physiotherapy Department, London, UK
| | - Gareth L Jones
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Physiotherapy Department, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gregersen MHM, Nielsen KR, Lynge NH, Heiberg BD, Hartvigsen J, Kawchuk G, Kongsted A. Goal setting in people with low back pain attending an education and exercise program (GLA:D Back) and the impact of demographic factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:339. [PMID: 38678259 PMCID: PMC11055288 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07450-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individual goal setting is a fundamental element in self-management supportive interventions, serving to guide actions and enhance motivation for engagement. Despite this, little is known about the goals people with back pain have and to what extent these differ across genders, age groups and geographical location. This study aimed to elucidate this by first describing individual goals set by Danish and Canadian participants in a self-management intervention for people with back pain using the ICF framework; then, determining what proportion of these goals met criteria for being specific, measurable, acceptable, and time bound, and finally, by investigating differences between countries, sexes, and age groups. METHODS In a cross-sectional study conducted August 2018 to June 2020, 394 Danish and 133 Canadian (Alberta Province) participants defined their individual goals of participating in a self-management programme involving patient education and supervised exercises. The goals were linked to the ICF framework. Distribution of goals was compared between countries, sexes, and age groups. RESULTS Goals most often related to the ICF component of 'Activity and Participation'. The most prevalent goals were "Walking" (DK: 20%; CA: 15%) and "Maintaining a body position" (DK: 17%; CA: 22%). Only few goals differed between populations, age and sex. All elements of SMART goal setting were recorded for 88% of Danish and 94% of Alberta participants. CONCLUSIONS People with low back pain attending a self-management programme established goals according to the SMART criteria and focused primarily on activity. Goals were similar across countries and showed few differences across sex and age groups. The high number of different goals points to the need for individualised person-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette H M Gregersen
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark
| | - Kristine R Nielsen
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark
| | - Nana H Lynge
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark
| | - Bibi D Heiberg
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Campusvej 55, Odense, Denmark
| | - Greg Kawchuk
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Corbett Hall, 8205 114 St NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark.
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Campusvej 55, Odense, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
D’Adamo CR, Kaplan MB, Campbell PS, McLaughlin K, Swartz JS, Wattles KR, Lukaczer D, Scheinbaum S. Functional medicine health coaching improved elimination diet compliance and patient-reported health outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e37148. [PMID: 38394515 PMCID: PMC11309605 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000037148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to determine whether an elimination diet with virtually provided functional medicine health coaching support would be more effective than a typical self-guided elimination diet with respect to dietary compliance and patient-reported health and quality of life. METHODS A parallel arm, randomized controlled trial was conducted among a sample of healthcare professionals. Participants were randomized to either an elimination diet with 5 sessions of functional medicine health coaching support (intervention arm) or a self-guided elimination diet (control arm). Outcomes assessed at baseline and at the conclusion of the 10-week study included PROMIS Global Health (GH) and medical symptoms questionnaire (MSQ). Compliance with the elimination diet was assessed at the conclusion of the study. Baseline and end of study outcomes were compared within study arms via paired t tests and between study arms with unpaired t tests. Subgroup analysis of symptomatology at baseline was performed. RESULTS 125 randomized participants (n = 64 intervention, n = 61 control) provided baseline outcomes data. There were statistically and clinically significant within-group improvements in patient-reported outcomes in both the intervention arm (PROMIS GH-physical = 4.68, PROMIS GH-mental = 3.53, MSQ = 28.9) and control arm (PROMIS GH-physical = 48.4, PROMIS GH-mental = 3.18, MSQ = 24.1). There were no between-group differences in the primary analysis (P > .1). However, participants with more symptoms at baseline had statistically and clinically significant between-group differences in PROMIS GH-mental health (3.90, P = .0038) and MSQ (12.3, P = .047) scores that favored the functional medicine health coaching arm. CONCLUSIONS An elimination diet, whether self-guided or with functional medicine health coaching support, may improve patient-reported health outcomes among relatively healthy healthcare professionals. While studies in more diverse samples are needed, functional medicine health coaching support appears to be superior to a self-guided approach with regard to both dietary compliance and improving health outcomes among those with greater symptomatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R. D’Adamo
- Center for Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Dan Lukaczer
- The Institute for Functional Medicine, Federal Way, WA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jadotte Y, Buchholz B, Carroll W, Frum-Vassallo D, MacPherson J, Cole S. Brief Action Planning in Health and Health Care: A Scoping Review. Med Clin North Am 2023; 107:1047-1096. [PMID: 37806724 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2023.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Achieving maximal health outcomes via health promotion and disease prevention requires the adoption of healthy behaviors. Brief action planning (BAP) is a method for patient self-management, health behavior change, and health coaching with potentially broad implications for and clinical applications in health and health care contexts. This scoping review presents 5 major findings about the literature on BAP: the principal geographic locations and the clinical contexts of its application, the types of research evaluations that it has undergone to date, the theoretic frameworks in which it is grounded, and the fidelity of its use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri Jadotte
- Department of Family, Population, and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA; Northeast Institute for Evidence Synthesis and Translation, Division of Nursing Science, School of Nursing, Rutgers University, Newark NJ, USA.
| | - Benjamin Buchholz
- Sickle Cell Center of Excellence, College of Medicine, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - William Carroll
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles CA, USA
| | - Deirdra Frum-Vassallo
- Health Promotion Disease Prevention, Northport VA Medical Center, Northport, NY, USA
| | | | - Steven Cole
- BAP Professional Network, US; Department of Psychiatry, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA; Department of Scientific Education, Zucker SOM at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Zucker SOM at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ulrich L, Thies P, Schwarz A. Availability, Quality, and Evidence-Based Content of mHealth Apps for the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain in the German Language: Systematic Assessment. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023; 11:e47502. [PMID: 37703072 PMCID: PMC10534285 DOI: 10.2196/47502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) carries significant socioeconomic relevance and leads to substantial difficulties for those who are affected by it. The effectiveness of app-based treatments has been confirmed, and clinicians are recommended to use such interventions. As 88.8% of the German population uses smartphones, apps could support therapy. The available apps in mobile app stores are poorly regulated, and their quality can vary. Overviews of the availability and quality of mobile apps for Australia, Great Britain, and Spain have been compiled, but this has not yet been done for Germany. OBJECTIVE We aimed to provide an overview of the availability and content-related quality of apps for the treatment of NSLBP in the German language. METHODS A systematic search for apps on iOS and Android was conducted on July 6, 2022, in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined before the search. Apps in the German language that were available in both stores were eligible. To check for evidence, the apps found were assessed using checklists based on the German national guideline for NSLBP and the British equivalent of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The quality of the apps was measured using the Mobile Application Rating Scale. To control potential inaccuracies, a second reviewer resurveyed the outcomes for 30% (3/8) of the apps and checked the inclusion and exclusion criteria for these apps. The outcomes, measured using the assessment tools, are presented in tables with descriptive statistics. Furthermore, the characteristics of the included apps were summarized. RESULTS In total, 8 apps were included for assessment. Features provided with different frequencies were exercise tracking of prefabricated or adaptable workout programs, educational aspects, artificial intelligence-based therapy or workout programs, and motion detection. All apps met some recommendations by the German national guideline and used forms of exercises as recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline. The mean value of items rated as "Yes" was 5.75 (SD 2.71) out of 16. The best-rated app received an answer of "Yes" for 11 items. The mean Mobile Application Rating Scale quality score was 3.61 (SD 0.55). The highest mean score was obtained in "Section B-Functionality" (mean 3.81, SD 0.54). CONCLUSIONS Available apps in the German language meet guideline recommendations and are mostly of acceptable or good quality. Their use as a therapy supplement could help promote the implementation of home-based exercise protocols. A new assessment tool to obtain ratings on apps for the treatment of NSLBP, combining aspects of quality and evidence-based best practices, could be useful. TRIAL REGISTRATION Open Science Framework Registries sq435; https://osf.io/sq435.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauro Ulrich
- Faculty of Social Sciences, City University of Applied Sciences Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Phillip Thies
- Faculty of Social Sciences, City University of Applied Sciences Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Annika Schwarz
- Faculty of Social Sciences, City University of Applied Sciences Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Araja D, Krumina A, Nora-Krukle Z, Schneider ME, Berkis U, Murovska M. Coaching to strengthen critical success factors in integrative care for chronic fatigue patients: the Patient Needs-Resources Model. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1202930. [PMID: 37547141 PMCID: PMC10400772 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1202930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Theoretical and empirical studies discover that an integrative approach is particularly important in chronic disorders and multiple long-term conditions, such as chronic fatigue. Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a classic example of a potentially severe, multisystemic illness with a wide diversity of symptoms and the corresponding diagnostic complexity. The prevalence of CFS-like syndromes expanded in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, increasing the disorder and treatment burden. Thus, this article aimed to draw attention to the possibilities to strengthen the integrative approach to diagnosing and treating chronic disorders and multiple long-term conditions. The main critical success factors identified for integrative approaches were: a holistic approach, that provides a more comprehensive diagnostic and personalized treatment strategy, a multidisciplinary team, and patient engagement. The strengths and weaknesses of these factors were explored and coaching was identified as a potential unifying and reinforcing element. Coaching has a wide spectrum of manifestations clearly representing a holistic approach, that has been successfully used in multidisciplinary team building. Moreover, coaching exposes support addressing the patient engagement issues identified by the Patient Needs-Resources Model (PN-R Model) such as low levels of self-efficacy, optimism, and subjective well-being. Coaching may assist patients to identify and prioritize their goals, becoming aware of their personal resources, developing strategies for managing symptoms, and building skills to increase their self-efficacy and active engagement in the treatment process. Therefore, the authors emphasize coaching as a perspective element of optimization of patient care, that requires additional theoretical and long-term empirical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Araja
- Institute of Microbiology and Virology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Angelika Krumina
- Department of Infectology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Zaiga Nora-Krukle
- Institute of Microbiology and Virology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | | | - Uldis Berkis
- Development and Project Department, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Modra Murovska
- Institute of Microbiology and Virology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| |
Collapse
|