1
|
Hasoon J, Vu PD, Mousa B, Markaryan AR, Sarwary ZB, Pinkhasova D, Chen GH, Gul F, Robinson CL, Simopoulos TT, Gill J, Viswanath O. Device-Related Complications Associated with Cylindrical Lead Spinal Cord Stimulator Implants: A Comprehensive Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024; 28:941-947. [PMID: 38850491 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01280-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an increasingly utilized therapy for the treatment of neuropathic pain conditions. Though minimally invasive and reversable, there are several important device-related complications that physicians should be aware of before offering this therapy to patients. The aim of this review is to synthesize recent studies in device-related SCS complications pertaining to cylindrical lead implantation and to discuss etiologies, symptoms and presentations, diagnostic evaluation, clinical implications, and treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS Device-related complications are more common than biologic complications. Device-related complications covered in this review include lead migration, lead fracture, lead disconnection, generator failure, loss of charge, generator flipping, hardware related pain, and paresthesia intolerance. The use of SCS continues to be an effective option for neuropathic pain conditions. Consideration of complications prior to moving forward with SCS trials and implantation is a vital part of patient management and device selection. Knowledge of these complications can provide physicians and other healthcare professionals the ability to maximize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamal Hasoon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Peter D Vu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bakir Mousa
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Grant H Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA
| | - Farah Gul
- Department of Internal Medicine, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan
| | - Christopher L Robinson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas T Simopoulos
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jatinder Gill
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Omar Viswanath
- Department of Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
He Q, Yang C, Xu Y, Niu H, Wu H, Huang H, Chai X, Cao T, Wang N, Wong P, He J, Yang Y, Zhao J. Anatomical-related factors and outcome of percutaneous short-term spinal cord stimulation electrode shift in patients with disorders of consciousness: a retrospective study. Front Aging Neurosci 2024; 16:1403156. [PMID: 39015472 PMCID: PMC11249574 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1403156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Disorders of consciousness (DoC) represent a spectrum of neurological conditions that pose significant treatment challenges. Percutaneous short-term spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a promising experimental diagnostic treatment to assess and potentially improve consciousness levels. However, the effectiveness of this intervention is frequently compromised by the shift of electrodes, particularly in the cervical region, which can negatively affect therapeutic outcomes. Methods This retrospective study aimed to study if electrodes shift in percutaneous short-term SCS in patients with DoC would affect the outcome. We analyzed the relationship between electrode shift length and patient outcome, as well as the correlation with various anatomical parameters, including the actual length of the cervical spine, linear length, spinal canal transverse diameter, spinal canal diameter, and C2 cone height, in a cohort of patients undergoing the procedure. Results Our findings revealed that in patients with better outcome, there are significant less patient with electrode shift (p = 0.019). Further, a linear correlation was found between the length of electrode shift and patients' outcome (Rho = 0.583, p = 0.002), with longer shift lengths associated with poorer outcomes. Contrary to our expectations, there was no significant association between the measured anatomical parameters and the extent of electrode shift. However, a trend was found between the actual length of the cervical spine and the shift of the electrode (p = 0.098). Notably, the shorter spinal canal transverse diameter was found to be significantly associated with better outcome in patients with DoC receiving percutaneous short-term SCS (p = 0.033). Conclusion These results highlight the clinical importance of electrode stability in the cervical region during SCS treatment for patients with DoC. Ensuring secure placement of electrodes may play a crucial role in enhancing patients' outcome and minimize postoperative complications. Given the lack of association with expected anatomical parameters, future research should investigate other factors that could impact electrode stability to optimize this therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiheng He
- Brain Computer Interface Transitional Research Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chaozhi Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| | - Yangxi Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The People’s Hospital of Liaoning Province, Shengyang, China
| | - Hongchuan Niu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Haitao Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| | - Haitao Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The People’s Hospital of Liaoning Province, Shengyang, China
| | - Xiaoke Chai
- Brain Computer Interface Transitional Research Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing, China
| | - Tianqing Cao
- Brain Computer Interface Transitional Research Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Nan Wang
- Brain Computer Interface Transitional Research Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Peiling Wong
- Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Jianghong He
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Yang
- Brain Computer Interface Transitional Research Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Beijing, China
| | - Jizong Zhao
- China National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
da Cunha PHM, de Andrade DC. The deep and the deeper: Spinal cord and deep brain stimulation for neuropathic pain. Presse Med 2024; 53:104231. [PMID: 38636785 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2024.104231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Neuropathic pain occurs in people experiencing lesion or disease affecting the somatosensorial system. It is present in 7 % of the general population and may not fully respond to first- and second-line treatments in up to 40 % of cases. Neuromodulation approaches are often proposed for those not tolerating or not responding to usual pharmacological management. These approaches can be delivered surgically (invasively) or non-invasively. Invasive neuromodulation techniques were the first to be employed in neuropathic pain. Among them is spinal cord stimulation (SCS), which consists of the implantation of epidural electrodes over the spinal cord. It is recommended in some guidelines for peripheral neuropathic pain. While recent studies have called into question its efficacy, others have provided promising data, driven by advances in techniques, battery capabilities, programming algorithms and software developments. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is another well-stablished neuromodulation therapy routinely used for movement disorders; however, its role in pain management remains limited to specific research centers. This is not only due to variable results in the literature contesting its efficacy, but also because several different brain targets have been explored in small trials, compromising comparisons between these studies. Structures such as the periaqueductal grey, posterior thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex, ventral striatum/anterior limb of the internal capsule and the insula are the main targets described to date in literature. SCS and DBS present diverse rationales for use, mechanistic backgrounds, and varying levels of support from experimental studies. The present review aims to present their methodological details, main mechanisms of action for analgesia and their place in the current body of evidence in the management of patients with neuropathic pain, as well their particularities, effectiveness, safety and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel Ciampi de Andrade
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van de Minkelis J, Peene L, Cohen SP, Staats P, Al-Kaisy A, Van Boxem K, Kallewaard JW, Van Zundert J. 6. Persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2. Pain Pract 2024. [PMID: 38616347 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS) refers to chronic axial pain and/or extremity pain. Two subtypes have been defined: PSPS-type 1 is chronic pain without previous spinal surgery and PSPS-type 2 is chronic pain, persisting after spine surgery, and is formerly known as Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) or post-laminectomy syndrome. The etiology of PSPS-type 2 can be gleaned using elements from the patient history, physical examination, and additional medical imaging. Origins of persistent pain following spinal surgery may be categorized into an inappropriate procedure (eg a lumbar fusion at an incorrect level or for sacroiliac joint [SIJ] pain); technical failure (eg operation at non-affected levels, retained disk fragment, pseudoarthrosis), biomechanical sequelae of surgery (eg adjacent segment disease or SIJ pain after a fusion to the sacrum, muscle wasting, spinal instability); and complications (eg battered root syndrome, excessive epidural fibrosis, and arachnoiditis), or undetermined. METHODS The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of PSPS-type 2 was retrieved and summarized. RESULTS There is low-quality evidence for the efficacy of conservative treatments including exercise, rehabilitation, manipulation, and behavioral therapy, and very limited evidence for the pharmacological treatment of PSPS-type 2. Interventional treatments such as pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the dorsal root ganglia, epidural adhesiolysis, and spinal endoscopy (epiduroscopy) might be beneficial in patients with PSPS-type 2. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be an effective treatment for chronic, intractable neuropathic limb pain, and possibly well-selected candidates with axial pain. CONCLUSIONS The diagnosis of PSPS-type 2 is based on patient history, clinical examination, and medical imaging. Low-quality evidence exists for conservative interventions. Pulsed radiofrequency, adhesiolysis and SCS have a higher level of evidence with a high safety margin and should be considered as interventional treatment options when conservative treatment fails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan van de Minkelis
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Laurens Peene
- Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Belgium
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Anesthesiology, Neurology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Anesthesiology and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Peter Staats
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Spine and Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, New Jersey, USA
| | - Adnan Al-Kaisy
- Pain Management Department, Gassiot House, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Koen Van Boxem
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Belgium
| | - Jan Willem Kallewaard
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rijnstate Ziekenhuis, Velp, The Netherlands
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Van Zundert
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Krog L, Maloney J, Pew S, Adeleye O, Johnson B, Glenn B, Gill B, Tieppo Francio V, Pagan-Rosado R, Whitney M, Sinha N, Strand N. Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024; 28:239-249. [PMID: 38147282 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01200-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This literature review critically examines existing studies on cervical spinal cord stimulation (cSCS) for the treatment of chronic pain. The objective is to evaluate the current evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and collate data to inform clinical decision-making and suggest future research avenues. The review covers indications, contraindications, surgical and anesthetic approaches, trials, efficacy, and complications of cSCS. RECENT FINDINGS Recent advancements highlight the evolving role of cSCS in chronic pain management. New neuromodulation techniques involve optimal placement of leads based on the pain's innervation level, maximizing therapeutic outcomes. Contemporary studies underscore the broadening benefits of cSCS, including enhanced functional abilities and sleep quality. However, alongside these innovations come challenges; emerging data bring attention to complications such as hardware issues and infections. Significantly, modern research emphasizes the crucial role of accurate patient selection, factoring in prior therapy responses and comprehensive evaluations. cSCS emerges as a promising tool for chronic pain management, with benefits beyond mere pain relief. As surgical techniques, patient selection criteria, and postoperative care refine, the potential of cSCS expands to benefit a broader patient demographic. However, further comprehensive research is necessary to enhance its application, validate its role earlier in treatment, and ultimately ameliorate the lives of those with chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucky Krog
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
| | | | - Scott Pew
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Brooks Johnson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Brett Glenn
- College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, AR, USA
| | - Benjamin Gill
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Vinicius Tieppo Francio
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | | | - Neil Sinha
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Natalie Strand
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Burke L, Desai MJ. Pocket pain following spinal cord stimulator generator implantation: A narrative review of this under-reported risk. Pain Pract 2024; 24:659-669. [PMID: 38102862 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established treatment option for chronic pain. Pain over the implantable pulse generator, or pocket pain, is an incompletely understood risk of SCS implantation which may limit the efficacy of treatment and patient quality of life. The goal of this narrative review is to analyze the literature to gain a more thorough understanding of the incidence and risk factors for the development of pocket pain to help guide treatment options and minimize its occurrence in the future. METHODS A literature review was conducted investigating the development of pocket pain in patients with SCS for the management of a variety of pain conditions. RESULTS In total, 305 articles were included in the original database search and 50 met the criteria for inclusion. The highest level of evidence for papers that specifically investigated pocket pain was level III. Four retrospective, observational analyses included pocket pain as a primary outcome. The remainder of the included studies listed pocket pain as an adverse event of SCS implantation. CONCLUSIONS There is a relative dearth of primary literature that examines the incidence, characteristics, and health economic implications of pocket pain in patients with SCS. This highlights the need for large-scale, high-quality prospective or randomized controlled trials examining pocket pain. This may ultimately help prevent and reduce pocket pain leading to improved efficacy of treatment and greater patient quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Burke
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Mehul J Desai
- International Spine, Pain & Performance Center, Washington, DC, USA
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lam DV, Lindemann M, Yang K, Liu DX, Ludwig KA, Shoffstall AJ. An Open-Source 3D-Printed Hindlimb Stabilization Apparatus for Reliable Measurement of Stimulation-Evoked Ankle Flexion in Rat. eNeuro 2024; 11:ENEURO.0305-23.2023. [PMID: 38164555 PMCID: PMC10918511 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0305-23.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Currently there are numerous methods to evaluate peripheral nerve stimulation interfaces in rats, with stimulation-evoked ankle torque being one of the most prominent. Commercial rat ankle torque measurement systems and custom one-off solutions have been published in the literature. However, commercial systems are proprietary and costly and do not allow for customization. One-off lab-built systems have required specialized machining expertise, and building plans have previously not been made easily accessible. Here, detailed building plans are provided for a low-cost, open-source, and basic ankle torque measurement system from which additional customization can be made. A hindlimb stabilization apparatus was developed to secure and stabilize a rat's hindlimb, while allowing for simultaneous ankle-isometric torque and lower limb muscle electromyography (EMG). The design was composed mainly of adjustable 3D-printed components to accommodate anatomical differences between rat hindlimbs. Additionally, construction and calibration procedures of the rat hindlimb stabilization apparatus were demonstrated in this study. In vivo torque measurements were reliably acquired and corresponded to increasing stimulation amplitudes. Furthermore, implanted leads used for intramuscular EMG recordings complemented torque measurements and were used as an additional functional measurement in evaluating the performance of a peripheral nerve stimulation interface. In conclusion, an open-source and noninvasive platform, made primarily with 3D-printed components, was constructed for reliable data acquisition of evoked motor activity in rat models. The purpose of this apparatus is to provide researchers a versatile system with adjustable components that can be tailored to meet user-defined experimental requirements when evaluating motor function of the rat hindlimbs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danny V Lam
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland 44106, Ohio
- Advanced Platform Technology Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland 44106, Ohio
| | - Madeline Lindemann
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland 44106, Ohio
| | - Kevin Yang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland 44106, Ohio
| | - Derrick X Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland 44106, Ohio
| | - Kip A Ludwig
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 53705, Wisconsin
| | - Andrew J Shoffstall
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland 44106, Ohio
- Advanced Platform Technology Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland 44106, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Krishnan J, Joseph R, Vayalappil MC, Krishnan S, Kishore A. A Review on Implantable Neuroelectrodes. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2024; 52:21-39. [PMID: 37938182 DOI: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.2023049282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
The efficacy of every neuromodulation modality depends upon the characteristics of the electrodes used to stimulate the chosen target. The geometrical, chemical, mechanical and physical configuration of electrodes used in neurostimulation affects several performance attributes like stimulation efficiency, selectivity, tissue response, etc. The efficiency of stimulation in relation to electrode impedance is influenced by the electrode material and/or its geometry. The nature of the electrode material determines the charge transfer across the electrode-tissue interface, which also relates to neuronal tissue damage. Electrode morphology or configuration pattern can facilitate the modulation of extracellular electric field (field shaping). This enables selective activation of neurons and minimizes side effects. Biocompatibility and biostability of the electrode materials or electrode coating have a role in glial formation and tissue damage. Mechanical and electrochemical stability (corrosion resistance) determines the long-term efficacy of any neuromodulation technique. Here, a review of electrodes typically used for implantable neuromodulation is discussed. Factors affecting the performance of electrodes like stimulation efficiency, selectivity and tissue responses to the electrode-tissue interface are discussed. Technological advancements to improve electrode characteristics are also included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jithin Krishnan
- Department of Medical Devices Engineering, BMT Wing, SCTIMST, Kerala, India
| | - Roy Joseph
- Department of Medical Devices Engineering, BMT Wing, SCTIMST, Kerala, India
| | | | | | - Asha Kishore
- Aster Parkinson & Movement Disorder Centre, Senior Consultant Neurologist and Movement Disorder Specialist
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yeung AM, Huang J, Nguyen KT, Xu NY, Hughes LT, Agrawal BK, Ejskjaer N, Klonoff DC. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024; 18:168-192. [PMID: 36384312 PMCID: PMC10899837 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221133795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) technology has been recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). The treatment involves surgical implantation of electrodes and a power source that delivers electrical current to the spinal cord. This treatment decreases the perception of pain in many chronic pain conditions, such as PDN. The number of patients with PDN treated with SCS and the amount of data describing their outcomes is expected to increase given four factors: (1) the large number of patients with this diagnosis, (2) the poor results that have been obtained for pain relief with pharmacotherapy and noninvasive non-pharmacotherapy, (3) the results to date with investigational SCS technology, and (4) the recent FDA approval of systems that deliver this treatment. Whereas traditional SCS replaces pain with paresthesias, a new form of SCS, called high-frequency 10-kHz SCS, first used for pain in 2015, can relieve PDN pain without causing paresthesias, although not all patients experience pain relief by SCS. This article describes (1) an overview of SCS technology, (2) the use of SCS for diseases other than diabetes, (3) the use of SCS for PDN, (4) a comparison of high-frequency 10-kHz and traditional SCS for PDN, (5) other SCS technology for PDN, (6) deployment of SCS systems, (7) barriers to the use of SCS for PDN, (8) risks of SCS technology, (9) current recommendations for using SCS for PDN, and (10) future developments in SCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nicole Y. Xu
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | - Lorenzo T. Hughes
- Balance Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | | | - Niels Ejskjaer
- Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark and Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - David C. Klonoff
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
- Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abd-Elsayed A, Keith MK, Cao NN, Fiala KJ, Martens JM. Temporary Peripheral Nerve Stimulation as Treatment for Chronic Pain. Pain Ther 2023; 12:1415-1426. [PMID: 37737951 PMCID: PMC10616055 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-023-00557-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic pain is a growing problem across the world, and in the midst of an opioid epidemic, it is imperative that alternative treatment measures are identified to help alleviate the pain experienced by these patients. Chronic pain greatly affects ones quality of life and many patients do not experience adequate relief with conventional treatment measures. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to assess the efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) therapy in adult patients suffering from chronic pain refractory to conventional treatment measures who underwent therapy on various anatomical locations. METHODS This retrospective analysis consisted of data collected from electronic health records for n = 89 patients who underwent PNS therapy. Data collected relates to patient age, sex, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, targeted nerves, follow-up encounters, pain scores from before and after PNS therapy, and duration of improvement. Statistical analysis used SPSS software, version 26 (IBM), using a paired t test to assess significance between pre and post PNS therapy pain scores. P values were significant if found to be ≤ 0.05. Further analysis assessed the correlation between age and BMI with visual analog scale (VAS) pain improvement and subjective percentage pain relief. RESULTS The mean pre-operative (pre-op) pain score before PNS therapy was 6.36 (standard deviation (SD) = 2.18, SEM = 0.23) and the mean post-operative (post-op) pain score after PNS therapy was 4.19 (SD = 2.70, SEM = 0.29). The mean patient-reported percent improvement in pain following PNS therapy was 49.04% (SD = 34.79). The improvement in pain scores between pre-op and post-op was statistically significant (M = 2.17, SD = 2.82, SEM = 0.30, t(88) = 7.26, p < .001), 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.57, 2.76]. The mean duration of improvement for patients was 123 days after therapy initiation (min = 6, max = 683, SD = 126). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated the potential role for PNS therapy in improving patient-reported pain levels for various neuropathies, targeting various nerves. With PNS therapy's use as a chronic pain treatment and available research being limited, further study needs to be done on the efficacy of PNS therapy for pain management and complications associated with PNS device placements at various locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Chronic Pain Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, B6/319 CSC, Madison, WI, 53792-3272, USA.
| | - Mitchell K Keith
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Chronic Pain Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, B6/319 CSC, Madison, WI, 53792-3272, USA
| | - Nancy N Cao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Chronic Pain Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, B6/319 CSC, Madison, WI, 53792-3272, USA
| | - Kenneth J Fiala
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Chronic Pain Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, B6/319 CSC, Madison, WI, 53792-3272, USA
| | - Joshua M Martens
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Chronic Pain Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, B6/319 CSC, Madison, WI, 53792-3272, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pritzlaff SG, Goree JH, Hagedorn JM, Lee DW, Chapman KB, Christiansen S, Dudas A, Escobar A, Gilligan CJ, Guirguis M, Gulati A, Jameson J, Mallard CJ, Murphy MZ, Patel KV, Patel RG, Sheth SJ, Vanterpool S, Singh V, Smith G, Strand NH, Vu CM, Suvar T, Chakravarthy K, Kapural L, Leong MS, Lubenow TR, Abd-Elsayed A, Pope JE, Sayed D, Deer TR. Pain Education and Knowledge (PEAK) Consensus Guidelines for Neuromodulation: A Proposal for Standardization in Fellowship and Training Programs. J Pain Res 2023; 16:3101-3117. [PMID: 37727682 PMCID: PMC10505612 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s424589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The need to be competent in neuromodulation is and should be a prerequisite prior to completing a fellowship in interventional pain medicine. Unfortunately, many programs lack acceptable candidates for these advanced therapies, and fellows may not receive adequate exposure to neuromodulation procedures. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) desires to create a consensus of experts to set a minimum standard of competence for neurostimulation procedures, including spinal cord stimulation (SCS), dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S), and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). The executive board of ASPN accepted nominations for colleagues with excellence in the subject matter of neuromodulation and physician education. This diverse group used peer-reviewed literature and, based on grading of evidence and expert opinion, developed critical consensus guides for training that all accredited fellowship programs should adopt. For each consensus point, transparency and recusal were used to eliminate bias, and an author was nominated for evidence grading oversight and bias control. Pain Education and Knowledge (PEAK) Consensus Guidelines for Neuromodulation sets a standard for neuromodulation training in pain fellowship training programs. The consensus panel has determined several recommendations to improve care in the United States for patients undergoing neuromodulation. As neuromodulation training in the United States has evolved dramatically, these therapies have become ubiquitous in pain medicine. Unfortunately, fellowship programs and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) pain program requirements have not progressed training to match the demands of modern advancements. PEAK sets a new standard for fellowship training and presents thirteen practice areas vital for physician competence in neuromodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott G Pritzlaff
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Johnathan H Goree
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David W Lee
- Fullerton Orthopedic Surgery Medical Group, Fullerton, CA, USA
| | | | - Sandy Christiansen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Andrew Dudas
- Mays & Schnapp Neurospine and Pain, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Christopher J Gilligan
- Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maged Guirguis
- Division of Pain Management, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Amitabh Gulati
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kiran V Patel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | | | - Samir J Sheth
- Interventional Pain Management, Sutter Health, Roseville, CA, USA
| | | | - Vinita Singh
- Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Gregory Smith
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Natalie H Strand
- Interventional Pain Management, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Chau M Vu
- Evolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, CA, USA
| | - Tolga Suvar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Michael S Leong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Timothy R Lubenow
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bejarano MC, Clearfield DA. Platelet Releasate Injection as a Novel Treatment for Ulnar Neuritis at the Elbow: A Case Report. Cureus 2023; 15:e42223. [PMID: 37605660 PMCID: PMC10440148 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
This report examines the efficacy of platelet releasate injection as a treatment method for ulnar neuritis. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), an autologous product of concentrated platelets, has the potential to accelerate healing in injured peripheral nerves by releasing growth factors that promote nerve repair. Platelet releasate, the supernatant of thrombin-activated PRP, has yet to be thoroughly investigated as a treatment option for ulnar neuritis. In this report, a 42-year-old female patient presented with right-sided elbow and neck pain that was subsequently diagnosed as ulnar neuritis and neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Initial imaging at the right elbow demonstrated ulnar nerve entrapment within the arcade of Struthers. The patient's symptoms were first managed with home exercise and ulnar nerve hydrodissection at the elbow, which decreased but did not resolve her pain. Platelet releasate injection of the ulnar nerve at the elbow was subsequently performed. Six weeks post-procedure, the patient reported additional pain improvement. Provocative tests at the elbow were negative and imaging demonstrated a normal-appearing ulnar nerve. Despite these results, the patient was not completely symptom-free; persistent symptoms were attributed to her concomitant neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. While platelet releasate injection has not previously been explored as a treatment option for ulnar neuritis, this case demonstrates how platelet releasate injection may facilitate healing in an ulnar nerve injured by entrapment. Further investigation could support platelet releasate injection as an effective monotherapy or as an adjunct treatment for ulnar neuritis and similar peripheral neuropathies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Bejarano
- Medicine, Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine at University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, USA
| | - Daniel A Clearfield
- Sports Medicine, Motion Is Medicine Sports Medicine, North Richland Hills, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Preston FG, Riley DR, Azmi S, Alam U. Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Practical Guidance and Challenges for Clinical Management. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2023; 16:1595-1612. [PMID: 37288250 PMCID: PMC10243347 DOI: 10.2147/dmso.s370050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is present in nearly a quarter of people with diabetes. It is estimated to affect over 100 million people worldwide. PDPN is associated with impaired daily functioning, depression, sleep disturbance, financial instability, and a decreased quality of life. Despite its high prevalence and significant health burden, it remains an underdiagnosed and undertreated condition. PDPN is a complex pain phenomenon with the experience of pain associated with and exacerbated by poor sleep and low mood. A holistic approach to patient-centred care alongside the pharmacological therapy is required to maximise benefit. A key treatment challenge is managing patient expectation, as a good outcome from treatment is defined as a reduction in pain of 30-50%, with a complete pain-free outcome being rare. The future for the treatment of PDPN holds promise, despite a 20-year void in the licensing of new analgesic agents for neuropathic pain. There are over 50 new molecular entities reaching clinical development and several demonstrating benefit in early-stage clinical trials. We review the current approaches to its diagnosis, the tools, and questionnaires available to clinicians, international guidance on PDPN management, and existing pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options. We synthesise evidence and the guidance from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology, American Academy of Neurology, American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Canada, German Diabetes Association, and the International Diabetes Federation into a practical guide to the treatment of PDPN and highlight the need for future research into mechanistic-based treatments in order to prioritise the development of personalised medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank G Preston
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences and the Pain Research Institute, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - David R Riley
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences and the Pain Research Institute, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Shazli Azmi
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University of Manchester and Manchester Diabetes Centre, Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Uazman Alam
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences and the Pain Research Institute, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lo Bianco G, Tinnirello A, Papa A, Marchesini M, Day M, Palumbo GJ, Terranova G, Di Dato MT, Thomson SJ, Schatman ME. Interventional Pain Procedures: A Narrative Review Focusing On Safety and Complications. PART 2 Interventional Procedures For Back Pain. J Pain Res 2023; 16:761-772. [PMID: 36925622 PMCID: PMC10010974 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s396215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
In patients where conservative approaches have failed to relieve from chronic pain, interventional procedures may be an option in well selected patients. In recent years there has been an increase in the use and development of invasive procedures. Concomitantly, there has also been an increase in the complications associated with these procedures. Taken this into consideration, it is important for healthcare providers to take a cautious and vigilant approach, with a focus on patient safety, in order to minimize the risk of adverse events and ensure the best possible outcome for the patient. This may include careful selection of patients for procedures, use of proper techniques and equipment, and close monitoring and follow-up after the procedure. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the primary complications associated with commonly performed image-guided (fluoroscopy or ultrasound-guided) interventional procedures and provide strategies to reduce the risk of these complications. We conclude that although complications from interventional pain procedures can be mitigated to a certain degree, they cannot be eliminated altogether. In order to avoid adverse events, patient safety should be given considerable attention and physicians should be constantly aware of the possibility of developing complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuliano Lo Bianco
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
- Anesthesiology and Pain Department, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Andrea Tinnirello
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Department, ASST Franciacorta, Ospedale di Iseo, Iseo, 25049, Italy
| | - Alfonso Papa
- Pain Department, AO “Ospedali dei Colli”, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Maurizio Marchesini
- Mininvasive Surgery Department, Unit of Pain Medicine IRCCS Maugeri Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy
| | - Miles Day
- Pain Research, The Pain Center at Grace Clinic, Texas Tech University HSC, Lubbock, TX, USA
| | - Gaetano Joseph Palumbo
- Azienda Ospedale - Università Padova, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Padova, Italy
| | - Gaetano Terranova
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Asst Gaetano Pini, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Simon J Thomson
- Pain Management, Mid and South Essex University Hospitals NHSFT, Basildon, SS16 5NL, UK
| | - Michael E Schatman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Population Health – Division of Medical Ethics, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Higashiyama N, Tamura S, Sugawara T. Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Study. Pain Res Manag 2023; 2023:2136562. [PMID: 37200968 PMCID: PMC10188261 DOI: 10.1155/2023/2136562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) refers to a condition where symptoms such as low back pain, leg pain, and numbness persist or recur after lumbar surgery; it has been reported to occur in 10%-40% of patients who have undergone lumbar surgery. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been reported useful for low back and leg pain due to FBSS. In this study, we studied the efficacy and safety of SCS for FBSS in older adults. Methods Among FBSS patients who underwent an SCS trial between November 2017 and December 2020, those with at least 50% pain reduction during the trial phase who requested spinal cord stimulator implantation underwent implantation of a stimulator under local anesthesia. The patients were divided into two groups: patients aged <75 years (<75-year-old group) and patients aged ≥75 years (≥75-year-old group). The male/female ratio, symptom duration, operative duration, visual analog scale (VAS) scores before and after one year of surgery, responder rate (RR), complications one year after surgery, and stimulator removal rate were analyzed. Results There were 27 cases in the <75-year-old group and 46 in the ≥75-year-old group, with no significant differences in male/female ratio, duration of pain, or operative time between the two groups. VAS scores for low back pain, leg pain, and overall pain one year after surgery were improved significantly from respective preoperative scores in both groups (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in low back pain VAS, leg pain VAS, overall pain VAS, RR, complications one year after surgery, or stimulator removal rate between the two groups. Conclusion SCS reduced pain effectively in both <75-year-old and ≥75-year-old groups with no differences in complications. Therefore, spinal cord stimulator implantation was considered a viable option for FBSS treatment in older adults because it can be performed under local anesthesia and is associated with a low incidence of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Higashiyama
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Akita Cerebrospinal and Cardiovascular Center, Akita, Japan
| | - Shinya Tamura
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Akita Cerebrospinal and Cardiovascular Center, Akita, Japan
| | - Taku Sugawara
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Akita Cerebrospinal and Cardiovascular Center, Akita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hagedorn JM, Bendel MA, Hoelzer BC, Aiyer R, Caraway D. Preoperative hemoglobin A1c and perioperative blood glucose in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing spinal cord stimulation surgery: A literature review of surgical site infection risk. Pain Pract 2023; 23:83-93. [PMID: 35748888 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of our study was to review the surgical literature regarding the relationship between hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM), and risk of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI). METHODS A librarian-assisted literature search was performed with two goals: (1) identify surgical publications related to SSI and HbA1c values, and (2) identify publications reporting infection risk with DM in spinal cord stimulation (SCS), intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS), and cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation surgeries. Published guidelines on perioperative management of DM are reviewed. RESULTS We identified 30 studies reporting SSI and HbA1c values. The literature review indicated that for many surgical procedures, elevated HbA1c is not correlated to rate of SSI. We identified 16 studies reporting infection rates within DM cohorts following SCS, IDDS, and CIED implantation surgeries. The data reviewed did not indicate DM as an independent risk factor for SSI. CONCLUSION Preoperative HbA1c levels in patients with a history of DM is not a singularly sufficient tool to estimate risk of perioperative infection in SCS implantation surgery. Published guidelines on perioperative management of DM do not suggest a specific HbA1c above which surgery should be delayed; intentional perioperative glycemic control is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Markus A Bendel
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Rohit Aiyer
- Richmond Interventional Pain Management, Zucker Hillside School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Staten Island, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sayed D, Grider J, Strand N, Hagedorn JM, Falowski S, Lam CM, Tieppo Francio V, Beall DP, Tomycz ND, Davanzo JR, Aiyer R, Lee DW, Kalia H, Sheen S, Malinowski MN, Verdolin M, Vodapally S, Carayannopoulos A, Jain S, Azeem N, Tolba R, Chang Chien GC, Ghosh P, Mazzola AJ, Amirdelfan K, Chakravarthy K, Petersen E, Schatman ME, Deer T. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain. J Pain Res 2022; 15:3729-3832. [PMID: 36510616 PMCID: PMC9739111 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s386879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Painful lumbar spinal disorders represent a leading cause of disability in the US and worldwide. Interventional treatments for lumbar disorders are an effective treatment for the pain and disability from low back pain. Although many established and emerging interventional procedures are currently available, there exists a need for a defined guideline for their appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety. Objective The ASPN Back Guideline was developed to provide clinicians the most comprehensive review of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Clinicians should utilize the ASPN Back Guideline to evaluate the quality of the literature, safety, and efficacy of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Methods The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for a comprehensive clinical guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations. Experts from the fields of Anesthesiology, Physiatry, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Radiology, and Pain Psychology developed the ASPN Back Guideline. The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Scopus, and meeting abstracts to identify and compile the evidence (per section) for back-related pain. Search words were selected based upon the section represented. Identified peer-reviewed literature was critiqued using United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria and consensus points are presented. Results After a comprehensive review and analysis of the available evidence, the ASPN Back Guideline group was able to rate the literature and provide therapy grades to each of the most commonly available interventional treatments for low back pain. Conclusion The ASPN Back Guideline represents the first comprehensive analysis and grading of the existing and emerging interventional treatments available for low back pain. This will be a living document which will be periodically updated to the current standard of care based on the available evidence within peer-reviewed literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA,Correspondence: Dawood Sayed, The University of Kansas Health System, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA, Tel +1 913-588-5521, Email
| | - Jay Grider
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Natalie Strand
- Interventional Pain Management, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | - Steven Falowski
- Functional Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, PA, USA
| | - Christopher M Lam
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Vinicius Tieppo Francio
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Nestor D Tomycz
- AHN Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Rohit Aiyer
- Interventional Pain Management and Pain Psychiatry, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - David W Lee
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Pain Medicine, Fullerton Orthopedic Surgery Medical Group, Fullerton, CA, USA
| | - Hemant Kalia
- Rochester Regional Health System, Rochester, NY, USA,Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Soun Sheen
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Mark N Malinowski
- Adena Spine Center, Adena Health System, Chillicothe, OH, USA,Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH, USA
| | - Michael Verdolin
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pain Consultants of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Shashank Vodapally
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Alexios Carayannopoulos
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rhode Island Hospital, Newport Hospital, Lifespan Physician Group, Providence, RI, USA,Comprehensive Spine Center at Rhode Island Hospital, Newport Hospital, Providence, RI, USA,Neurosurgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Sameer Jain
- Interventional Pain Management, Pain Treatment Centers of America, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Nomen Azeem
- Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA,Florida Spine & Pain Specialists, Riverview, FL, USA
| | - Reda Tolba
- Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates,Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - George C Chang Chien
- Pain Management, Ventura County Medical Center, Ventura, CA, USA,Center for Regenerative Medicine, University Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Krishnan Chakravarthy
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA,Va San Diego Healthcare, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Erika Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Science, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Michael E Schatman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA,Department of Population Health - Division of Medical Ethics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Simonetta C, Bissacco J, Mercuri NB, Schirinzi T. Abdominal myoclonus in a patient implanted with spinal cord stimulator. Neurol Sci 2022; 43:7001-7002. [PMID: 35969286 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06329-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Simonetta
- Unit of Neurology, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Jacopo Bissacco
- Unit of Neurology, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Biagio Mercuri
- Unit of Neurology, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Schirinzi
- Unit of Neurology, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
A Comprehensive Review of Spinal Cord Stimulator Infections. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:877-882. [PMID: 36454429 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01090-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulator (SCS) is approved to treat various pain conditions and is commonly seen in the chronic pain patient population. Due to the nature of the device and its location, infections associated with SCS have a particularly high morbidity. According to post-market data and medical device reports, 87% of patients receiving SCS implants were given perioperative antibiotics as the implantable neurostimulator or receiver pocket serve as the most common sites of infection. The most common antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis given are first-generation cephalosporins (cefalexin, cefazolin) at the time of implantation. If deep infection is suspected, imaging in the form of CT scan should be obtained as physical exam is not always sufficient. For infections involving the epidural space, vertebra, or intervertebral discs, MRI is the preferred imaging modality. If meningitis is suspected, a lumbar puncture is recommended. Positive cultures can help guide antibiotic therapy.
Collapse
|
20
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR. Lumbar Spine Osteomyelitis After Permanent Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation: A Case Report. Cureus 2022; 14:e30967. [PMID: 36465200 PMCID: PMC9714127 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
A spinal cord stimulator (SCS) is an intervention that has become increasingly popular due to its efficacy in treating pain. With the increasing number of SCSs implanted annually, there has been an equal increase in complications, which include infections. We present a patient who underwent an uncomplicated permanent placement of SCS and later developed worsening back pain, weakness, and fever after a mechanical fall and was subsequently found to have vertebral osteomyelitis without an identifiable infection source. While no source or definitive pathogen was discovered, if there is a concern for osteomyelitis radiographically, even in an uncommon situation when medical workup returns inconclusive, explant of the SCS is warranted.
Collapse
|
21
|
Hoelzer BC, Edgar D, Lu SP, Taylor RS. Indirect Comparison of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) versus Traditional Low-Frequency SCS for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Biomedicines 2022; 10:2630. [PMID: 36289892 PMCID: PMC9599433 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is increasingly used to treat painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). At the time of a recent meta-analysis in this field, data were only available from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS). However, outcomes from high-frequency 10 kHz SCS treatment are now available. Our study aimed to systematically review the contemporary evidence for SCS in patients with lower limb pain due to PDN and include an indirect comparison of the high- and low-frequency modalities. We searched the PubMed/CENTRAL databases up to 18 August 2022, for peer-reviewed RCTs of SCS that enrolled PDN patients with lower limb pain symptoms. The quality of the evidence was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Using SCS treatment arm data from the RCTs, we indirectly compared the absolute treatment effect of 10 kHz SCS and LF-SCS. Results are presented in tables and forest plots. This systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Three RCTs met our eligibility criteria, including the recent 10 kHz SCS RCT (N = 216, 90 implanted) and 2 others that examined LF-SCS (N = 36, 17 implanted; N = 60, 37 implanted). Our analysis of 6-month data found clinically meaningful pain relief with each SCS modality. However, significantly greater pain reduction was identified for 10 kHz SCS over LF-SCS: average pain reduction in the 10 kHz SCS cohort was 73.7% compared with 47.5% in the pooled LF-SCS group (p < 0.0001). In the permanent implant subset, the 50% pain reduction responder rate was 83.3% in the 10 kHz SCS cohort versus 63.0% in the pooled LF-SCS group (p = 0.0072). The overall risk of bias of each included RCT was deemed high, mainly due to the absence of patient blinding. Our analysis indicates that paresthesia-free 10 kHz SCS can provide superior pain relief and responder rate over LF-SCS for managing PDN patients refractory to conventional medical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan C. Hoelzer
- Medical Director, Southwest Spine and Pain Center, Provo, UT 84059, USA
| | | | | | - Rod S. Taylor
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health and Well Being, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
- Health Service Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK
- National Institute of Public Health, University of South Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bajaj G, Southerland WA, Badiola I, Bell R. Post-dural Puncture Headache After Removal of Trail Spinal Cord Stimulator Leads: A Case Report. Cureus 2022; 14:e29665. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
23
|
Biofeedback electrostimulation for bionic and long-lasting neural modulation. Nat Commun 2022; 13:5302. [PMID: 36085331 PMCID: PMC9463164 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33089-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Invasive electrical stimulation (iES) is prone to cause neural stimulus-inertia owing to its excessive accumulation of exogenous charges, thereby resulting in many side effects and even failure of nerve regeneration and functional recovery. Here, a wearable neural iES system is well designed and built for bionic and long-lasting neural modulation. It can automatically yield biomimetic pulsed electrical signals under the driven of respiratory motion. These electrical signals are full of unique physiological synchronization can give biofeedback to respiratory behaviors, self-adjusting with different physiological states of the living body, and thus realizing a dynamic and biological self-matched modulation of voltage-gated calcium channels on the cell membrane. Abundant cellular and animal experimental evidence confirm an effective elimination of neural stimulus-inertia by these bioelectrical signals. An unprecedented nerve regeneration and motor functional reconstruction are achieved in long-segmental peripheral nerve defects, which is equal to the gold standard of nerve repair -- autograft. The wearable neural iES system provides an advanced platform to overcome the common neural stimulus-inertia and gives a broad avenue for personalized iES therapy of nerve injury and neurodegenerative diseases. Designing wereable neural invasive electrical stimulation system remains a challenge. Here, researchers provide an effective technology platform for the elimination of tricky neural stimulus-inertia using bionic electronic modulation, which is a significant step forward for long-lasting treatment of nervous system diseases.
Collapse
|
24
|
Strand N, J M, Tieppo Francio V, M M, Turkiewicz M, El Helou A, M M, S C, N S, J P, C W. Advances in Pain Medicine: a Review of New Technologies. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:605-616. [PMID: 35904729 PMCID: PMC9334973 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01062-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review highlights the interventional musculoskeletal techniques that have evolved in recent years. RECENT FINDINGS The recent progress in pain medicine technologies presented here represents the ideal treatment of the pain patient which is to provide personalized care. Advances in pain physiology research and pain management technologies support each other concurrently. As new technologies give rise to new perspectives and understanding of pain, new research inspires the development of new technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Strand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
- NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
- University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Maloney J
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Vinicius Tieppo Francio
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), 3901 Rainbow Blvd. MS1046, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Murphy M
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), 3901 Rainbow Blvd. MS1046, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | | | - Antonios El Helou
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Moncton Hospital, Moncton, NB, Canada
| | - Maita M
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Covington S
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Singh N
- OrthoAlabama Spine and Sports, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Peck J
- Performing Arts Medicine Department, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA, USA
| | - Wie C
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hoffmann CM, D’Souza RS, Hagedorn JM. An Advanced Practice Provider Guide to Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. J Pain Res 2022; 15:2283-2291. [PMID: 35967468 PMCID: PMC9371467 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s370037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To describe the team approach of an interventional pain management practice, with particular emphasis on advanced practice providers (APPs), in the selection, education, care, and management of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) patients. Materials and Methods We devised an APP guide to PNS based on an in-depth search of multiple databases for studies on neuromodulation, pain management, and APPs. Results Of 65 articles captured in the search strategy, three articles were pertinent to the topic of APP involvement in neuromodulation. More specifically, only one of the three publications on neuromodulation discussed APP involvement in PNS. This single publication was from 1995 and focused on electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion using a permanent percutaneously placed electrode. Conclusion PNS is growing in clinical indication and use for both acute and chronic pain conditions. With the increasing need for APPs in both general and specialty medicine, it is imperative that APPs are well educated on PNS. Here, we have outlined ways in which APPs can optimize the care of PNS patients and how the skillset of the APP in a PNS practice can potentially improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsey M Hoffmann
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Correspondence: Chelsey M Hoffmann, Tel +1 507-422-6378, Fax +1 507-266-7732, Email
| | - Ryan S D’Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Plantaz YJGM, van Dongen RTM, Witkam RL, Vissers KCP, Timmerman H. Changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: an observational study with long-term follow-up. Eur J Pain 2022; 26:1581-1593. [PMID: 35638567 PMCID: PMC9546026 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Background Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can impact sensory, pain and tolerance thresholds in various ways, which can be accessed via quantitative sensory testing (QST). The objectives of this study were to (1) assess the subjective sensory responses using QST in patients following SCS therapy for PSPS and (2) to get a clinical impression of the results of SCS during an interview of these patients with PSPS and SCS during long term follow‐up. Methods Forty patients with PSPS who received SCS treatment underwent QST via electrical and mechanical pressure stimuli. QST was performed at four different moments (1) pre‐implantation SCS, (2) two weeks postoperatively, (3) three months after permanent SCS implantation and (4) six months after permanent SCS implantation. Patients’ perspectives on pain, use of drugs and quality of life were assessed via semi‐structured interviews during a follow‐up between 5 and 11 years. Results We found statistical significant differences in the changes of sensory, pain and tolerance thresholds. A decrease in pain complaints and analgesics use were reported by the patients during follow‐up. The quality of life in patients increased from three to eight (NRS 0 [worst QoL imaginable] ‐10 [best QoL imaginable]) after receiving SCS. Conclusions The increased thresholds on areas without pain or being covered by the SCS induced paresthesias may indicate that there are central changes contributing to these deviations in thresholds. The overall QoL in patients improved greatly after receiving SCS. Significance This study provides an overview of the effect of SCS on sensory, pain and tolerance thresholds in patients with PSPS throughout the SCS treatment process. In addition, this study presents data from 40 patients with PSPS treated with SCS, analysing several long‐term patient‐reported outcome measures. The results serve to give more insight into the mechanism of SCS and document SCS as a possible treatment for PSPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick J G M Plantaz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert T M van Dongen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Anesthesiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Richard L Witkam
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kris C P Vissers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Timmerman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Southerland WA, Hasoon J, Urits I, Viswanath O, Simopoulos TT, Imani F, Karimi-Aliabadi H, Aner MM, Kohan L, Gill J. Dural Puncture During Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Insertion: Analysis of Practice Patterns. Anesth Pain Med 2022; 12:e127179. [PMID: 36158140 PMCID: PMC9364517 DOI: 10.5812/aapm-127179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an important modality for intractable pain not amenable to less conservative measures. During percutaneous SCS lead insertion, a critical step is safe access to the epidural space, which can be complicated by a dural puncture. Objectives In this review, we present and analyze the practices patterns in the event of a dural puncture during a SCS trial or implantation. Methods We conducted a survey of the practice patterns regarding spinal cord stimulation therapy. The survey was administered to members of the Spine Intervention Society and American Society of Regional Anesthesia specifically inquiring decision making in case of inadvertent dural puncture during spinal cord stimulator lead insertion. Results A maximum of 193 responded to a question regarding dural punctures while performing a SCS trial and 180 responded to a question regarding dural punctures while performing a SCS implantation. If performing a SCS trial and a dural puncture occurs, a majority of physicians chose to continue the procedure at a different level (56.99%), followed by abandoning the procedure (27.98%), continuing at the same level (10.36%), or choosing another option (4.66%). Similarly, if performing a permanent implantation and a dural puncture occurs, most physicians chose to continue the procedure at a different level (61.67%), followed by abandoning the procedure (21.67%), continuing at the same level (10.56%), or choosing another option (6.11%). Conclusions Whereas the goals of the procedure would support abandoning the trial but continuing with the permanent in case of inadvertent dural puncture, we found that decision choices were minimally influenced by whether the dural puncture occurred during the trial or the permanent implant. The majority chose to continue with the procedure at a different level while close to a quarter chose to abandon the procedure. This article sets a time stamp in practice patterns from March 20, 2020 to June 26, 2020. These results are based on contemporary SCS practices as demonstrated by this cohort, rendering the options of abandoning or continuing after dural puncture as reasonable methods. Though more data is needed to provide a consensus, providers can now see how others manage dural punctures during SCS procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Warren A. Southerland
- Department of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jamal Hasoon
- Department of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
- Pain Specialists of America, Austin, TX, USA
- Corresponding Author: Department of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Ivan Urits
- Department of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Omar Viswanath
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
- Valley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants, Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, University of Arizona College of Medicine–Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Thomas T. Simopoulos
- Department of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Farnad Imani
- Pain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hakimeh Karimi-Aliabadi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
- Corresponding Author: Department of Anesthesiology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
| | - Musa M Aner
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Center for Pain and Spine, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Lynn Kohan
- Pain Management Center; University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jatinder Gill
- Department of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Conic RRZ, Caylor J, Cui CL, Reyes Z, Nelson E, Yin S, Lerman I. Sex-specific differences in the efficacy of traditional low frequency versus high frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain. Bioelectron Med 2022; 8:8. [PMID: 35484578 PMCID: PMC9052649 DOI: 10.1186/s42234-022-00090-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), an FDA-approved therapy for chronic pain, uses paresthesia (low frequency SCS (LF-SCS)) or paresthesia-free (such as high-frequency SCS (HF-SCS)) systems, providing analgesia through partially-elucidated mechanisms, with recent studies indicating a sexual dimorphism in pain pathogenesis (Bretherton et al., Neuromodulation, 2021; Paller et al., Pain Med 10:289–299, 2009; Slyer et al., Neuromodulation, 2019; Van Buyten et al., Neuromodulation 20:642–649, 2017; Mekhail et al., Pain Pract, 2021). We aim to evaluate SCS therapy sex effects based on paradigm, utilizing visual analog scores (VAS), perceived pain reduction (PPR), and opioid use. Methods A retrospective cohort study of SCS patients implanted between 2004 and 2020 (n = 237) was conducted. Descriptive statistics and linear mixed methods analyses were used. Results HF-SCS (10 kHz) was implanted in 94 patients (40 females, 54 males), and LF-SCS in 143 (70 females, 73 males). At 3 months and 6 months, HF-SCS (p < 0.001) and LF-SCS (p < 0.005) had lower VAS scores compared to baseline (p < 0.005), with no differences across groups. PPR improved in both post-implantation (p < 0.006) and at 3 months (p < 0.004 respectively), compared to baseline persisting to 6 (p < 0.003) and 12 months (p < 0.01) for HF-SCS, with significantly better PPR for HF-SCS at 3 (p < 0.008) and 6 (p < 0.001) months compared to LF-SCS. There were no differences in opioid use from baseline for either modality; however LF-SCS patients used more opioids at every time point (p < 0.05) compared to HF-SCS. VAS was improved for all modalities in both sexes at 3 months (p = 0.001), which persisted to 6 months (p < 0.05) for HF-SCS males and females, and LF-SCS females. Female HF-SCS had improved PPR at 3 (p = 0.016) and 6 (p = 0.022) months compared to baseline, and at 6 (p = 0.004) months compared to LF-SCS. Male HF-SCS and LF-SCS had improved PPR post-implantation (p < 0.05) and at 3 months (p < 0.05), with HF-SCS having greater benefit at 3 (p < 0.05) and 6 (p < 0.05) months. LF-SCS males but not females used less opioids at 6 months (p = 0.017) compared to baseline; however this effect did not persist. On linear mixed model analyses, including age, sex and stimulator type, VAS decreased with age, at each timepoint, and had a trend towards increasing with female sex, while PPR increased at 3 and 6 months and lastly HF-SCS was associated with decreased opioid use. Discussion PPR at 3 and 6 months improved to a greater extent in HF-SCS. HF-SCS females had improved PPR at 3 and 6 months, and only LF-SCS males used less opioids at 6 months, potentially indicating sex-based pathway. Future studies should further elucidate differences in sex-based pathways and identify optimal SCS opioid-sparing paradigms for chronic pain patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42234-022-00090-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalynn R Z Conic
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Center for Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jacob Caylor
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center for Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Northwest Pain Care, PS, Spokane, WA, USA
| | - Christina L Cui
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zabrina Reyes
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Eric Nelson
- College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, USA
| | - Sopyda Yin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center for Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Imanuel Lerman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center for Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA. .,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. .,VA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA. .,Affiliate Electrical and Computer Engineering, VA San Diego Healthcare System, Center for Stress and Mental Health, Center for Pain Medicine, UC San Diego Health, Qualcomm Institute, California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology (Calit2), VA San Diego, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr, (MC116A), San Diego, CA, 92161, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Álvarez DMC, Serrano-Muñoz D, Fernández-Pérez JJ, Gómez-Soriano J, Avendaño-Coy J. Effect of Percutaneous Electric Stimulation with High-Frequency Alternating Currents on the Sensory-Motor System of Healthy Volunteers: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11071832. [PMID: 35407438 PMCID: PMC8999650 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Former studies investigated the application of high-frequency alternating currents (HFAC) in humans for blocking the peripheral nervous system. The present trial aims to assess the effect of HFAC on the motor response, somatosensory thresholds, and peripheral nerve conduction when applied percutaneously using frequencies of 10 kHz and 20 kHz in healthy volunteers. A parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted. Ultrasound-guided HFAC at 10 kHz and 20 kHz and sham stimulation were delivered to the median nerve of 60 healthy volunteers for 20 min. The main assessed variables were the maximum isometric flexion strength (MFFS) of the index finger, myotonometry, pressure pain threshold (PPT), mechanical detection threshold (MDT), and sensory nerve action potential (SNAP). A decrease in the MFFS is observed immediately postintervention compared to baseline, both in the 10 kHz group (−8.5%; 95% CI −14.9 to −2.1) and the 20 kHz group (−12.0%; 95% CI −18.3 to −5.6). The between-group comparison of changes in MFFS show a greater reduction of −10.8% (95% CI −19.8 to −1.8) immediately postintervention in the 20 kHz compared to the sham stimulation group. The percutaneous stimulation applying 20 kHz HFAC to the median nerve produces a reversible postintervention reduction in strength with no adverse effects.
Collapse
|
30
|
Rahman MA, Tharu NS, Gustin SM, Zheng YP, Alam M. Trans-Spinal Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Functional Rehabilitation after Spinal Cord Injury: Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:1550. [PMID: 35329875 PMCID: PMC8954138 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most debilitating injuries in the world. Complications after SCI, such as respiratory issues, bowel/bladder incontinency, pressure ulcers, autonomic dysreflexia, spasticity, pain, etc., lead to immense suffering, a remarkable reduction in life expectancy, and even premature death. Traditional rehabilitations for people with SCI are often insignificant or ineffective due to the severity and complexity of the injury. However, the recent development of noninvasive electrical neuromodulation treatments to the spinal cord have shed a ray of hope for these individuals to regain some of their lost functions, a reduction in secondary complications, and an improvement in their life quality. For this review, 250 articles were screened and about 150 were included to summarize the two most promising noninvasive spinal cord electrical stimulation methods of SCI rehabilitation treatment, namely, trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) and trans-spinal pulsed current stimulation (tsPCS). Both treatments have demonstrated good success in not only improving the sensorimotor function, but also autonomic functions. Due to the noninvasive nature and lower costs of these treatments, in the coming years, we expect these treatments to be integrated into regular rehabilitation therapies worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Md. Akhlasur Rahman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China; (M.A.R.); (N.S.T.); (Y.-P.Z.)
- Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP), Savar Union 1343, Bangladesh
| | - Niraj Singh Tharu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China; (M.A.R.); (N.S.T.); (Y.-P.Z.)
| | - Sylvia M. Gustin
- NeuroRecovery Research Hub, School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Yong-Ping Zheng
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China; (M.A.R.); (N.S.T.); (Y.-P.Z.)
| | - Monzurul Alam
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China; (M.A.R.); (N.S.T.); (Y.-P.Z.)
- NeuroRecovery Research Hub, School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 12:CD013756. [PMID: 34854473 PMCID: PMC8638262 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013756.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implanted spinal neuromodulation (SNMD) techniques are used in the treatment of refractory chronic pain. They involve the implantation of electrodes around the spinal cord (spinal cord stimulation (SCS)) or dorsal root ganglion (dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS)), and a pulse generator unit under the skin. Electrical stimulation is then used with the aim of reducing pain intensity. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness, adverse events, and cost-effectiveness of implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for people with chronic pain. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, Web of Science (ISI), Health Technology Assessments, ClinicalTrials.gov and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry from inception to September 2021 without language restrictions, searched the reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SNMD interventions with placebo (sham) stimulation, no treatment or usual care; or comparing SNMD interventions + another treatment versus that treatment alone. We included participants ≥ 18 years old with non-cancer and non-ischaemic pain of longer than three months duration. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were disability, analgesic medication use, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and health economic outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened database searches to determine inclusion, extracted data and evaluated risk of bias for prespecified results using the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Outcomes were evaluated at short- (≤ one month), medium- four to eight months) and long-term (≥12 months). Where possible we conducted meta-analyses. We used the GRADE system to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included 15 unique published studies that randomised 908 participants, and 20 unique ongoing studies. All studies evaluated SCS. We found no eligible published studies of DRGS and no studies comparing SCS with no treatment or usual care. We rated all results evaluated as being at high risk of bias overall. For all comparisons and outcomes where we found evidence, we graded the certainty of the evidence as low or very low, downgraded due to limitations of studies, imprecision and in some cases, inconsistency. Active stimulation versus placebo SCS versus placebo (sham) Results were only available at short-term follow-up for this comparison. Pain intensity Six studies (N = 164) demonstrated a small effect in favour of SCS at short-term follow-up (0 to 100 scale, higher scores = worse pain, mean difference (MD) -8.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) -15.67 to -1.78, very low certainty). The point estimate falls below our predetermined threshold for a clinically important effect (≥10 points). No studies reported the proportion of participants experiencing 30% or 50% pain relief for this comparison. Adverse events (AEs) The quality and inconsistency of adverse event reporting in these studies precluded formal analysis. Active stimulation + other intervention versus other intervention alone SCS + other intervention versus other intervention alone (open-label studies) Pain intensity Mean difference Three studies (N = 303) demonstrated a potentially clinically important mean difference in favour of SCS of -37.41 at short term (95% CI -46.39 to -28.42, very low certainty), and medium-term follow-up (5 studies, 635 participants, MD -31.22 95% CI -47.34 to -15.10 low-certainty), and no clear evidence for an effect of SCS at long-term follow-up (1 study, 44 participants, MD -7 (95% CI -24.76 to 10.76, very low-certainty). Proportion of participants reporting ≥50% pain relief We found an effect in favour of SCS at short-term (2 studies, N = 249, RR 15.90, 95% CI 6.70 to 37.74, I2 0% ; risk difference (RD) 0.65 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.74, very low certainty), medium term (5 studies, N = 597, RR 7.08, 95 %CI 3.40 to 14.71, I2 = 43%; RD 0.43, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.73, low-certainty evidence), and long term (1 study, N = 87, RR 15.15, 95% CI 2.11 to 108.91 ; RD 0.35, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.49, very low certainty) follow-up. Adverse events (AEs) Device related No studies specifically reported device-related adverse events at short-term follow-up. At medium-term follow-up, the incidence of lead failure/displacement (3 studies N = 330) ranged from 0.9 to 14% (RD 0.04, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.11, I2 64%, very low certainty). The incidence of infection (4 studies, N = 548) ranged from 3 to 7% (RD 0.04, 95%CI 0.01, 0.07, I2 0%, very low certainty). The incidence of reoperation/reimplantation (4 studies, N =5 48) ranged from 2% to 31% (RD 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.21, I2 86%, very low certainty). One study (N = 44) reported a 55% incidence of lead failure/displacement (RD 0.55, 95% CI 0.35, 0 to 75, very low certainty), and a 94% incidence of reoperation/reimplantation (RD 0.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.07, very low certainty) at five-year follow-up. No studies provided data on infection rates at long-term follow-up. We found reports of some serious adverse events as a result of the intervention. These included autonomic neuropathy, prolonged hospitalisation, prolonged monoparesis, pulmonary oedema, wound infection, device extrusion and one death resulting from subdural haematoma. Other No studies reported the incidence of other adverse events at short-term follow-up. We found no clear evidence of a difference in otherAEs at medium-term (2 studies, N = 278, RD -0.05, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.06, I2 0%) or long term (1 study, N = 100, RD -0.17, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.02) follow-up. Very limited evidence suggested that SCS increases healthcare costs. It was not clear whether SCS was cost-effective. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found very low-certainty evidence that SCS may not provide clinically important benefits on pain intensity compared to placebo stimulation. We found low- to very low-certainty evidence that SNMD interventions may provide clinically important benefits for pain intensity when added to conventional medical management or physical therapy. SCS is associated with complications including infection, electrode lead failure/migration and a need for reoperation/re-implantation. The level of certainty regarding the size of those risks is very low. SNMD may lead to serious adverse events, including death. We found no evidence to support or refute the use of DRGS for chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil E O'Connell
- Department of Health Sciences, Centre for Health and Wellbeing Across the Lifecourse, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Michael C Ferraro
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - William Gibson
- School of Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Australia
| | - Andrew Sc Rice
- Pain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lene Vase
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Doug Coyle
- Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Health Economics Research Group, Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Department of Clinical Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Pain Relief and Safety Outcomes with Cervical 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis. Pain Ther 2021; 10:849-874. [PMID: 34031856 PMCID: PMC8586436 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00269-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain in head, neck, shoulders and upper limbs is debilitating, and patients usually rely on pain medications or surgery to manage their symptoms. However, given the current opioid epidemic, non-pharmacological interventions that reduce pain, such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS), are needed. The purpose of this study was to review the evidence on paresthesia-free 10 kHz SCS therapy for neck and upper extremity pain. METHODS Systematic literature search was performed for studies reporting outcomes for cervical 10 kHz SCS using date limits from May 2008 to November 2020. The study results were analyzed and described qualitatively. Additionally, when feasible, meta-analyses of the outcome data, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were conducted using both the fixed-effects (FE) and random-effects (RE) models. RESULTS A total of 15 studies were eligible for inclusion. The proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 50% pain reduction was 83% (95% CI 77-89%) in both the FE and RE models. The proportion of patients who reduced/eliminated their opioid consumption was 39% (95% CI 31-46%) in the FE model and 39% (95% CI 31-48%) in the RE model. Pain or discomfort with the implant, lead migration, and infections were potential risks following cervical SCS. Explant rate was 0.1 (95% CI 0.0-0.2) events per 100 person-months, and no patients in the included studies experienced a neurological complication or paresthesia. CONCLUSION Findings suggest 10 kHz SCS is a promising, safe, minimally invasive alternative for managing chronic upper limb and neck pain.
Collapse
|
33
|
Helm S, Shirsat N, Calodney A, Abd-Elsayed A, Kloth D, Soin A, Shah S, Trescot A. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness and Safety. Pain Ther 2021; 10:985-1002. [PMID: 34478120 PMCID: PMC8586061 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00306-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) was the first application of neuromodulation. Widespread application of PNS was limited by technical concerns. Recent advances now allow the percutaneous placement of leads with ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance, while the transcutaneous powering of these leads removes the need for leads to cross major joints. This systematic review was written to assess the current status of high-quality evidence supporting the use of PNS for pain conditions treated by interventional pain physicians. The available literature on PNS, limited to conditions treated by interventional pain physicians, was reviewed and the quality assessed. Literature from 1966 to June 2021 was reviewed. The outcome measures were pain relief and functional improvement. One hundred and two studies were identified. Five randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four observational studies, all case series, met the inclusion criteria. One RCT was of high quality and four were of moderate quality; all four case series were of moderate quality. Three of the RCTs and all four case series evaluated peripheral nerve neuropathic pain. Based upon these studies, there is level II evidence supporting the use of PNS to treat refractory peripheral nerve injury. One moderate-quality RCT evaluated tibial nerve stimulation for pelvic pain, providing level III evidence for this indication. One moderate-quality RCT evaluated surgically placed cylindrical leads for cluster headaches, providing level III evidence for this indication. The evidence suggests that approximately two-thirds of patients with peripheral neuropathic pain will have at least 50% sustained pain relief. Adverse events from PNS are generally minor. A major advantage of PNS over spinal cord stimulation is the absence of any risk of central cord injury. The study was limited by the paucity of literature for some indications. No studies dealt with joint-related osteoarthritic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Standiford Helm
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
| | - Nikita Shirsat
- School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | | | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | | | - Shalini Shah
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rigoard P, Ounajim A, Goudman L, Bouche B, Roulaud M, Page P, Lorgeoux B, Baron S, Nivole K, Many M, Adjali N, Charrier E, Rannou D, Poupin L, Wood C, David R, Héraud D, Moens M, Billot M. The Added Value of Subcutaneous Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation Combined with SCS, as Salvage Therapy, for Refractory Low Back Pain Component in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Implanted Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study (CUMPNS Study) Based on 3D-Mapping Composite Pain Assessment. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5094. [PMID: 34768614 PMCID: PMC8584602 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
While Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) provides satisfaction to almost 2/3 of Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome-Type 2 (PSPS-T2) patients implanted for refractory chronic back and/or leg pain, when not adequately addressed the back pain component, leaves patients in a therapeutic cul-de-sac. Peripheral Nerve field Stimulation (PNfS) has shown interesting results addressing back pain in the same population. Far from placing these two techniques in opposition, we suggest that these approaches could be combined to better treat PSPS-T2 patients. We designed a RCT (CUMPNS), with a 12-month follow-up, to assess the potential added value of PNfS, as a salvage therapy, in PSPS-T2 patients experiencing a "Failed SCS Syndrome" in the back pain component. Fourteen patients were included in this study and randomized into 2 groups ("SCS + PNfS" group/n = 6 vs. "SCS only" group/n = 8). The primary objective of the study was to compare the percentage of back pain surface decrease after 3 months, using a computerized interface to obtain quantitative pain mappings, combined with multi-dimensional SCS outcomes. Back pain surface decreased significantly greater for the "SCS + PNfS" group (80.2% ± 21.3%) compared to the "SCS only" group (13.2% ± 94.8%) (p = 0.012), highlighting the clinical interest of SCS + PNfS, in cases where SCS fails to address back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Rigoard
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
- Department of Spine Surgery & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France
- Pprime Institute UPR 3346, CNRS, ISAE-ENSMA, University of Poitiers, 86360 Chasseneuil-du-Poitou, France
| | - Amine Ounajim
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Lisa Goudman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; (L.G.); (M.M.)
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Benedicte Bouche
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Manuel Roulaud
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Philippe Page
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Bertille Lorgeoux
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Sandrine Baron
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Kevin Nivole
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Mathilde Many
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Nihel Adjali
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Elodie Charrier
- Pain Evaluation and Treatment Centre, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (E.C.); (D.R.); (L.P.)
| | - Delphine Rannou
- Pain Evaluation and Treatment Centre, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (E.C.); (D.R.); (L.P.)
| | - Laure Poupin
- Pain Evaluation and Treatment Centre, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (E.C.); (D.R.); (L.P.)
| | - Chantal Wood
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Romain David
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, University of Poitiers, 86021 Poitiers, France
| | - Dylan Héraud
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Maartens Moens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; (L.G.); (M.M.)
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Maxime Billot
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gilligan C, Volschenk W, Russo M, Green M, Gilmore C, Mehta V, Deckers K, De Smedt K, Latif U, Georgius P, Gentile J, Mitchell B, Langhorst M, Huygen F, Baranidharan G, Patel V, Mironer E, Ross E, Carayannopoulos A, Hayek S, Gulve A, Van Buyten JP, Tohmeh A, Fischgrund J, Lad S, Ahadian F, Deer T, Klemme W, Rauck R, Rathmell J, Levy R, Heemels JP, Eldabe S. An implantable restorative-neurostimulator for refractory mechanical chronic low back pain: a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial. Pain 2021; 162:2486-2498. [PMID: 34534176 PMCID: PMC8442741 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Chronic low back pain can be caused by impaired control and degeneration of the multifidus muscles and consequent functional instability of the lumbar spine. Available treatment options have limited effectiveness and prognosis is unfavorable. We conducted an international randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial at 26 multidisciplinary centers to determine safety and efficacy of an implantable, restorative neurostimulator designed to restore multifidus neuromuscular control and facilitate relief of symptoms (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02577354). Two hundred four eligible participants with refractory mechanical (musculoskeletal) chronic LBP and a positive prone instability test indicating impaired multifidus control were implanted and randomized to therapeutic (N = 102) or low-level sham (N = 102) stimulation of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus nerve (multifidus nerve supply) for 30 minutes twice daily. The primary endpoint was the comparison of responder proportions (≥30% relief on the LBP visual analogue scale without analgesics increase) at 120 days. After the primary endpoint assessment, participants in the sham-control group switched to therapeutic stimulation and the combined cohort was assessed through 1 year for long-term outcomes and adverse events. The primary endpoint was inconclusive in terms of treatment superiority (57.1% vs 46.6%; difference: 10.4%; 95% confidence interval, -3.3% to 24.1%, P = 0.138). Prespecified secondary outcomes and analyses were consistent with a modest but clinically meaningful treatment benefit at 120 days. Improvements from baseline, which continued to accrue in all outcome measures after conclusion of the double-blind phase, were clinically important at 1 year. The incidence of serious procedure- or device-related adverse events (3.9%) compared favorably with other neuromodulation therapies for chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Gilligan
- Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Marc Russo
- Hunter Pain Specialists, Newcastle, Australia
| | | | - Christopher Gilmore
- Center for Clinical Research, Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Vivek Mehta
- Barts Neuromodulation Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kristiaan Deckers
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, GZA - Sint Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Kris De Smedt
- Department of Neurosurgery, GZA - Sint Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Usman Latif
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Peter Georgius
- Sunshine Coast Clinical Research, Noosa Heads, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Frank Huygen
- Department of Anaesthesiology Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ganesan Baranidharan
- Leeds Pain and Neuromodulation Centre,Leeds Teaching Hopsitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Vikas Patel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Eugene Mironer
- Carolinas Center for the Advanced Management of Pain, Spartanburg, NC, United States
| | - Edgar Ross
- Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alexios Carayannopoulos
- Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University Medical School, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Salim Hayek
- Division of Pain Medicine, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Ashish Gulve
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | | | - Antoine Tohmeh
- Multicare Neuroscience Institute, Spokane, WA, United States
| | - Jeffrey Fischgrund
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oakland University, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Shivanand Lad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Farshad Ahadian
- Center for Pain Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, United States
| | - William Klemme
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Richard Rauck
- Carolinas Pain Institute, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - James Rathmell
- Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Robert Levy
- Anesthesia Pain Care Consultant, Tamarac, FL, United States
| | | | - Sam Eldabe
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Difficult removal of exposed peripheral nerve stimulator leads: a report of 2 cases. Pain Rep 2021; 6:e946. [PMID: 34396018 PMCID: PMC8357246 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Peripheral nerve stimulators serve as an alternative modality to treat chronic pain conditions; however, long-term complications, specifically lead migration, may occur. Introduction: Peripheral nerve stimulators have emerged as a new generation of advanced modalities to treat chronic pain and avoid opioids. They transmit electrical stimulation through implanted leads and wireless, wearable, external generators. Common complications include infection, nerve damage, and migration of stimulating leads. This article describes 2 cases of complications from lead migration. Methods: Case 1 describes a 61-year-old man with chronic groin pain who underwent an uncomplicated ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal peripheral nerve lead implantation. Case 2 describes a 54-year-old woman with left shoulder pain who underwent an uncomplicated ultrasound-guided percutaneous lead placement near the axillary nerve through a deltoid approach. Both peripheral nerve stimulators were confirmed with fluoroscopy, and each patient was followed up every 2 months for the following 2 years. Results: Both patients experienced lead migration to the skin resulting in erythema and need for lead removal. Initial unsuccessful removal by traction resulted in retained fragments and need for open surgical removal. Discussion: Neurologic complications of peripheral nerve stimulator implantation are rare, but device-associated complications, specifically lead migration, remain a source of long-term problems that can result in decreased coverage of the intended neural target. Conclusion: Thorough patient education, early postimplantation assessment, and extended routine follow-up are necessary to decrease lead-associated complications. If migration does occur, the potential impact of scar tissue on removal should be considered.
Collapse
|
37
|
Yang L, Huang Y, Ma J, Li Z, Han R, Guo G, Ni Y, Hu R, Yan X, Zhou H, Huang D. Clinical Outcome of Pulsed-Radiofrequency Combined With Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Caused by Distinct Etiology. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:683298. [PMID: 34393706 PMCID: PMC8355890 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.683298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lumbosacral radicular pain (LSRP) can be caused by disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and failed back surgery syndrome. The clinical effect of pulsed-radiofrequency (PRF) combined with transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TESI) for radiating pain in different population remains unclear. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical recordings of patients with LSRP caused by different etiologies, who underwent PRF and TESI treatment. The primary clinical outcome was assessed by a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pre- and post-treatment. RESULTS A total of 34 LSRP patients were identified and classified into 3 subgroups (disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and failed back surgery syndrome). The overall immediate pain reduction was 4.4 ± 1.1 after procedure. After a median follow-up of 9.5 months, the VAS decreased from 6.5 ± 1.0 to 2.4 ± 1.9 at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION PRF combined with TESI is an effective approach to treat persistent LSRP in distinct population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liuqing Yang
- Department of Pain, The Third Xiangya Hospital and Institute of Pain Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yuzhao Huang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jiahui Ma
- Department of Pain, The Third Xiangya Hospital and Institute of Pain Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhenxing Li
- Department of Pain, The Third Xiangya Hospital and Institute of Pain Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Rui Han
- Department of Pain, The Third Xiangya Hospital and Institute of Pain Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Gangwen Guo
- Department of Pain, The Third Xiangya Hospital and Institute of Pain Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yuncheng Ni
- Department of Pain, The Third Xiangya Hospital and Institute of Pain Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Rong Hu
- Department of Pain, The Third Xiangya Hospital and Institute of Pain Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xuebin Yan
- Department of Pain, The Third Xiangya Hospital and Institute of Pain Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Haocheng Zhou
- Department of Pain, The Third Xiangya Hospital and Institute of Pain Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Brain Homeostasis, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Dong Huang
- Department of Pain, The Third Xiangya Hospital and Institute of Pain Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Brain Homeostasis, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Therapies to Restore Consciousness in Patients with Severe Brain Injuries: A Gap Analysis and Future Directions. Neurocrit Care 2021; 35:68-85. [PMID: 34236624 PMCID: PMC8266715 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-021-01227-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background/Objective For patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) and their families, the search for new therapies has been a source of hope and frustration. Almost all clinical trials in patients with DoC have been limited by small sample sizes, lack of placebo groups, and use of heterogeneous outcome measures. As a result, few therapies have strong evidence to support their use; amantadine is the only therapy recommended by current clinical guidelines, specifically for patients with DoC caused by severe traumatic brain injury. To foster and advance development of consciousness-promoting therapies for patients with DoC, the Curing Coma Campaign convened a Coma Science Work Group to perform a gap analysis. Methods We consider five classes of therapies: (1) pharmacologic; (2) electromagnetic; (3) mechanical; (4) sensory; and (5) regenerative. For each class of therapy, we summarize the state of the science, identify gaps in knowledge, and suggest future directions for therapy development. Results Knowledge gaps in all five therapeutic classes can be attributed to the lack of: (1) a unifying conceptual framework for evaluating therapeutic mechanisms of action; (2) large-scale randomized controlled trials; and (3) pharmacodynamic biomarkers that measure subclinical therapeutic effects in early-phase trials. To address these gaps, we propose a precision medicine approach in which clinical trials selectively enroll patients based upon their physiological receptivity to targeted therapies, and therapeutic effects are measured by complementary behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiologic endpoints. Conclusions This personalized approach can be realized through rigorous clinical trial design and international collaboration, both of which will be essential for advancing the development of new therapies and ultimately improving the lives of patients with DoC. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-021-01227-y.
Collapse
|
39
|
Katz N, Dworkin RH, North R, Thomson S, Eldabe S, Hayek SM, Kopell BH, Markman J, Rezai A, Taylor RS, Turk DC, Buchser E, Fields H, Fiore G, Ferguson M, Gewandter J, Hilker C, Jain R, Leitner A, Loeser J, McNicol E, Nurmikko T, Shipley J, Singh R, Trescot A, van Dongen R, Venkatesan L. Research design considerations for randomized controlled trials of spinal cord stimulation for pain: Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials/Institute of Neuromodulation/International Neuromodulation Society recommendations. Pain 2021; 162:1935-1956. [PMID: 33470748 PMCID: PMC8208090 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an interventional nonpharmacologic treatment used for chronic pain and other indications. Methods for evaluating the safety and efficacy of SCS have evolved from uncontrolled and retrospective studies to prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Although randomization overcomes certain types of bias, additional challenges to the validity of RCTs of SCS include blinding, choice of control groups, nonspecific effects of treatment variables (eg, paresthesia, device programming and recharging, psychological support, and rehabilitative techniques), and safety considerations. To address these challenges, 3 professional societies (Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials, Institute of Neuromodulation, and International Neuromodulation Society) convened a meeting to develop consensus recommendations on the design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation of RCTs of SCS for chronic pain. This article summarizes the results of this meeting. Highlights of our recommendations include disclosing all funding source and potential conflicts; incorporating mechanistic objectives when possible; avoiding noninferiority designs without internal demonstration of assay sensitivity; achieving and documenting double-blinding whenever possible; documenting investigator and site experience; keeping all information provided to patients balanced with respect to expectation of benefit; disclosing all information provided to patients, including verbal scripts; using placebo/sham controls when possible; capturing a complete set of outcome assessments; accounting for ancillary pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments in a clear manner; providing a complete description of intended and actual programming interactions; making a prospective ascertainment of SCS-specific safety outcomes; training patients and researchers on appropriate expectations, outcome assessments, and other key aspects of study performance; and providing transparent and complete reporting of results according to applicable reporting guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Katz
- Corresponding author. Address: WCG Analgesic Solutions, Wayland, MA, USA. Tel.: 1-617-948-5161. E-mail address: (N. Katz)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bao J, Khazen O, Olmsted ZT, Gechtman G, Shao MM, DiMarzio M, Topp G, Sukul VV, Staudt MD, Pilitsis JG. Treatment Strategies for Generator Pocket Pain. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 22:1305-1311. [PMID: 33502508 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Generator site pain is a relatively common phenomenon in patients undergoing spinal cord stimulation (SCS) that complicates management and effective pain relief. This pain may be managed conservatively, with repositioning of the battery and, in some cases, with explant. Here we explore our experience with management of generator site pain ("pocket pain") in a large single-center study. METHODS All SCS permanent implants and implantable pulse generator (IPG) placements over 9 years were reviewed. Of 785 cases, we identified 43 patients with pocket pain (5.5%). Demographics and treatments of the pocket pain cohort were analyzed. RESULTS The mean age (± SEM) of the pocket pain cohort was 46.86 ± 1.06, and there were 10/33 males/females. Females were overrepresented in pocket pain cohort (76.7%) when compared with the total SCS cohort (59.0%) (X2 = 5.93, P = 0.015). Diagnosis included failed back surgery syndrome (51.2%), complex regional pain syndrome (23.3%), and chronic neuropathic pain (25.5%). No patients improved with conservative therapy. All patients either went on to revision (n = 23) or explant (n = 20). Time from initial surgery to development of pocket pain was 7.5 months (range: 0.3-88) and from pocket pain to revision surgery was 4.5 months (range: 0.4-26). In addition, significantly more pocket pain patients (65.1%) had workers' compensation (WC) insurance compared with patients without pocket pain (24.9%) (X2 = 33.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION In our institutional experience, pocket pain was inadequately managed with conservative treatments. Being female and having SCS filed under WC increased risk of pocket pain. Future work will explore the nuances in device placement based on body shape and manual activity responsibilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Bao
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Olga Khazen
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Zachary T Olmsted
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Guy Gechtman
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Miriam M Shao
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Marisa DiMarzio
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Gregory Topp
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Vishad V Sukul
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Michael D Staudt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Julie G Pilitsis
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pena AE, Abbas JJ, Jung R. Channel-hopping during surface electrical neurostimulation elicits selective, comfortable, distally referred sensations. J Neural Eng 2021; 18. [PMID: 33770781 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abf28c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Lack of sensation from a hand or prosthesis can result in substantial functional deficits. Surface electrical stimulation of the peripheral nerves is a promising non-invasive approach to restore lost sensory function. However, the utility of standard surface stimulation methods has been hampered by localized discomfort caused by unintended activation of afferents near the electrodes and limited ability to specifically target underlying neural tissue. The objectives of this work were to develop and evaluate a novel channel-hopping interleaved pulse scheduling (CHIPS) strategy for surface stimulation that is designed to activate deep nerves while reducing activation of fibers near the electrodes.Approach.The median nerve of able-bodied subjects was activated by up to two surface stimulating electrode pairs placed around their right wrist. Subjects received biphasic current pulses either from one electrode pair at a time (single-channel), or interleaved between two electrode pairs (multi-channel). Percept thresholds were characterized for five pulse durations under each approach, and psychophysical questionnaires were used to interrogate the perceived modality, quality and location of evoked sensations.Main results.Stimulation with CHIPS elicited enhanced tactile percepts that were distally referred, while avoiding the distracting sensations and discomfort associated with localized charge densities. These effects were reduced after introduction of large delays between interleaved pulses.Significance.These findings demonstrate that our pulse scheduling strategy can selectively elicit referred sensations that are comfortable, thus overcoming the primary limitations of standard surface stimulation methods. Implementation of this strategy with an array of spatially distributed electrodes may allow for rapid and effective stimulation fitting. The ability to elicit comfortable and referred tactile percepts may enable the use of this neurostimulation strategy to provide meaningful and intuitive feedback from a prosthesis, enhance tactile feedback after sensory loss secondary to nerve damage, and deliver non-invasive stimulation therapies to treat various pain conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A E Pena
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States of America
| | - J J Abbas
- School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America
| | - R Jung
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Deer TR, Gilmore CA, Desai MJ, Li S, DePalma MJ, Hopkins TJ, Burgher AH, Spinner DA, Cohen SP, McGee MJ, Boggs JW. Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of the Medial Branch Nerves for the Treatment of Chronic Axial Back Pain in Patients After Radiofrequency Ablation. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2021; 22:548-560. [PMID: 33616178 PMCID: PMC7971467 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lumbar radiofrequency ablation is a commonly used intervention for chronic back pain. However, the pain typically returns, and though retreatment may be successful, the procedure involves destruction of the medial branch nerves, which denervates the multifidus. Repeated procedures typically have diminishing returns, which can lead to opioid use, surgery, or implantation of permanent neuromodulation systems. The objective of this report is to demonstrate the potential use of percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) as a minimally invasive, nondestructive, motor-sparing alternative to repeat radiofrequency ablation and more invasive surgical procedures. DESIGN Prospective, multicenter trial. METHODS Individuals with a return of chronic axial pain after radiofrequency ablation underwent implantation of percutaneous PNS leads targeting the medial branch nerves. Stimulation was delivered for up to 60 days, after which the leads were removed. Participants were followed up to 5 months after the start of PNS. Outcomes included pain intensity, disability, and pain interference. RESULTS Highly clinically significant (≥50%) reductions in average pain intensity were reported by a majority of participants (67%, n = 10/15) after 2 months with PNS, and a majority experienced clinically significant improvements in functional outcomes, as measured by disability (87%, n = 13/15) and pain interference (80%, n = 12/15). Five months after PNS, 93% (n = 14/15) reported clinically meaningful improvement in one or more outcome measures, and a majority experienced clinically meaningful improvements in all three outcomes (i.e., pain intensity, disability, and pain interference). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous PNS has the potential to shift the pain management paradigm by providing an effective, nondestructive, motor-sparing neuromodulation treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Deer
- Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| | | | - Mehul J Desai
- International Spine Pain and Performance Center, George Washington University, School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sean Li
- Premier Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Steven P Cohen
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Peripheral nerve interfaces (PNIs) record and/or modulate neural activity of nerves, which are responsible for conducting sensory-motor information to and from the central nervous system, and for regulating the activity of inner organs. PNIs are used both in neuroscience research and in therapeutical applications such as precise closed-loop control of neuroprosthetic limbs, treatment of neuropathic pain and restoration of vital functions (e.g. breathing and bladder management). Implantable interfaces represent an attractive solution to directly access peripheral nerves and provide enhanced selectivity both in recording and in stimulation, compared to their non-invasive counterparts. Nevertheless, the long-term functionality of implantable PNIs is limited by tissue damage, which occurs at the implant-tissue interface, and is thus highly dependent on material properties, biocompatibility and implant design. Current research focuses on the development of mechanically compliant PNIs, which adapt to the anatomy and dynamic movements of nerves in the body thereby limiting foreign body response. In this paper, we review recent progress in the development of flexible and implantable PNIs, highlighting promising solutions related to materials selection and their associated fabrication methods, and integrated functions. We report on the variety of available interface designs (intraneural, extraneural and regenerative) and different modulation techniques (electrical, optical, chemical) emphasizing the main challenges associated with integrating such systems on compliant substrates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Paggi
- Bertarelli Foundation Chair in Neuroprosthetic Technology, Laboratory for Soft Bioelectronic Interfaces, Institute of Microengineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Centre for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland. Equally contributing authors
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pohjonen M, Savolainen S, Arokoski J, Shulga A. Omitting TMS component from paired associative stimulation with high-frequency PNS: A case series of tetraplegic patients. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2021; 6:81-87. [PMID: 33748549 PMCID: PMC7970010 DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2021.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Earlier studies have shown how chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients have benefitted from paired associative stimulation (PAS), consisting of high-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and high-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Since high-frequency PNS is poorly characterized, its therapeutic effect without TMS should be evaluated. We tested the effect of PNS combined with motor imagery in chronic SCI patients using the same parameters of PNS as in earlier PAS-based studies that also used TMS. Methods Five patients with chronic incomplete SCI and tetraplegia received a 6-week treatment of PNS combined with motor imagery to the weaker upper limb. Patients were evaluated with Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), hand function tests (Box and block, grip and pinch strength dynamometry), and spasticity. Results There was no significant change in hand function tests or spasticity. MMT values improved significantly immediately after the PNS period (0.59 ± 0.17, p = 0.043) and in the 1-month follow-up visit (0.87 ± 0.18, p = 0.043). However, improvement of MMT values was weaker than in chronic tetraplegic patients in a corresponding PAS study that used identical PNS stimulation but also included the TMS component omitted here (Tolmacheva et al., 2019a, Clin Neurophysiol Pract). Conclusions The lack of effect on functional hand tests with the protocol presented here suggests that the synergistic effect of PNS and TMS components is essential for the full therapeutic effect previously observed with PAS intervention. The moderate improvement of the MMT score suggests the possible usefulness of PNS and motor imagery for some of those tetraplegic SCI patients who have contraindications to TMS. Significance These results add to the understanding of the PAS therapeutic mechanism by highlighting the importance of dual stimulation for achieving the full therapeutic effect of long-term PAS with a high-frequency PNS component.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Pohjonen
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,HUS Medical Imaging Center, BioMag Laboratory, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland
| | - Sarianna Savolainen
- HUS Medical Imaging Center, BioMag Laboratory, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland
| | - Jari Arokoski
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Clinicum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anastasia Shulga
- HUS Medical Imaging Center, BioMag Laboratory, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.,Clinical Neurosciences, Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Strand N, Mahdi L, Schatman ME, Maloney J, Wie C. Case Study: Neuropathic Itching Following S3 and S4 Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulator Trial. J Pain Res 2021; 14:501-504. [PMID: 33633463 PMCID: PMC7901405 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s302876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Strand
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Layth Mahdi
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Michael E Schatman
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jillian Maloney
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Christopher Wie
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Baranidharan G, Edgar D, Bretherton B, Crowther T, Lalkhen AG, Fritz AK, Vajramani G. Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Real-World Retrospective Studies. Biomedicines 2021; 9:180. [PMID: 33670252 PMCID: PMC7918133 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9020180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is increasingly utilized globally to treat chronic pain syndromes. Real-world evidence complementing randomized controlled trials supporting its use, has accumulated over the last decade. This systematic review aims to summarize the retrospective literature with reference to the efficacy and safety of 10 kHz SCS. We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed between 1 January 2009 and 21 August 2020 for English-language retrospective studies of ≥3 human subjects implanted with a Senza® 10 kHz SCS system and followed-up for ≥3 months. Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts of 327 studies and 46 full-text manuscripts. In total, 16 articles were eligible for inclusion; 15 reported effectiveness outcomes and 11 presented safety outcomes. Follow-up duration ranged from 6-34 months. Mean pain relief was >50% in most studies, regardless of follow-up duration. Responder rates ranged from 67-100% at ≤12 months follow-up, and from 46-76% thereafter. 32-71% of patients decreased opioid or nonopioid analgesia intake. Complication incidence rates were consistent with other published SCS literature. Findings suggest 10 kHz SCS provides safe and durable pain relief in pragmatic populations of chronic pain patients. Furthermore, it may decrease opioid requirements, highlighting the key role 10 kHz SCS can play in the medium-term management of chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganesan Baranidharan
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK; (B.B.); (T.C.)
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | | | - Beatrice Bretherton
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK; (B.B.); (T.C.)
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Tracey Crowther
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK; (B.B.); (T.C.)
| | | | - Ann-Katrin Fritz
- Pain Management Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK;
| | - Girish Vajramani
- Centre for Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire SO16 6YD, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Patel N, Calodney A, Kapural L, Province‐Azalde R, Lad SP, Pilitsis J, Wu C, Cherry T, Subbaroyan J, Gliner B, Caraway D. High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Nonsurgical Refractory Back Pain: Design of a Pragmatic, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Pract 2021; 21:171-183. [PMID: 33463027 PMCID: PMC7891432 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to provide pain relief for chronic back and leg pain due to failed back surgery syndrome. But many patients with chronic back pain have not had major back surgery or are not good candidates for surgery, and conventional medical management (CMM) provides limited relief. We have termed this condition nonsurgical refractory back pain (NSRBP). Level 1 evidence does not yet exist showing the therapeutic benefit of SCS for NSRBP. OBJECTIVE To compare 10-kHz SCS plus CMM (10-kHz SCS + CMM) to CMM alone for treatment of NSRBP in terms of clinical and cost effectiveness. STUDY DESIGN Multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT), with subjects randomized 1:1 to either 10-kHz SCS + CMM or CMM alone. Optional crossover occurs at 6 months if treatment does not achieve ≥50% pain relief. METHODS Patients with NSRBP as defined above may be enrolled if they are ineligible for surgery based on surgical consultation. Subjects randomized to 10-kHz SCS + CMM will receive a permanent implant if sufficient pain relief is achieved in a temporary trial. Both groups will receive CMM per standard of care and will undergo assessments at baseline and at follow-ups to 12 months. Self-report outcomes include pain, disability, sleep, mental health, satisfaction, healthcare utilization, and quality of life. RESULTS Enrollment was initiated on September 10, 2018. Prespecified independent interim analysis at 40% of the enrollment target indicated the sample size was sufficient to show superiority of treatment at the primary endpoint; therefore, enrollment was stopped at 211. CONCLUSIONS This large multicenter RCT will provide valuable evidence to guide clinical decisions in NSRBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Leonardo Kapural
- Carolina’s Pain InstituteWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaU.S.A.
- School of MedicineWake Forest UniversityWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaU.S.A.
| | | | | | | | - Chengyuan Wu
- Thomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaU.S.A.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
De Andres J, Formicola GL, Rubio-Haro R, De Andres-Serrano C. Updated management of occipital nerve stimulator lead migration: case report of a technical challenge. Scand J Pain 2021; 21:415-420. [PMID: 34387963 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Electrode migration is a challenge, even with adequate anchoring techniques, due to the high mechanical stress on components of occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) for headache disorders. When a lead displacement of an ONS implant is diagnosed, there are currently different approaches described for its management. Nevertheless current neuromodulation devices are designed like a continuum of components without any intermediate connector, and if a lead displacement is diagnosed, the solution is the complete removal of the electrode from its placement, and its repositioning through an ex-novo procedure. The described technique can allow ONS leads to be revised while minimizing the need to reopen incisions over the IPG, thus improving patients' intraoperative and postoperative discomfort, shortening surgical time and medical costs, reasonably reducing the incidence of infective postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose De Andres
- Anesthesia, Critical Care and Multidisciplinary Pain Management Department, Valencia University General Hospital, Avda. Tres Cruces, s/n 46014, Valencia, Spain.,Anesthesia Unit, Surgical Specialties Department, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Luca Formicola
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Pain Management Department of Valencia University General Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruben Rubio-Haro
- Anesthesia Critical Care and Pain Management Department, Valencia University General Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Multicentre, clinical trial of burst spinal cord stimulation for neck and upper limb pain NU-BURST: a trial protocol. Neurol Sci 2021; 42:3285-3296. [PMID: 33387056 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04907-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy for chronic neuropathic pain and most frequently utilised for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS). BurstDR™ also known as DeRidder Burst-SCS, a novel waveform, has demonstrated superiority to conventional tonic stimulation of the thoracic spine in FBSS. There are case reports of an improvement in multidimensional pain outcomes using DeRidder Burst-SCS in the cervical spine for chronic neck and cervical radicular pain. The safety and efficacy of cervical DeRidder Burst-SCS stimulation still however remain undetermined. METHODS/DESIGN This is a prospective, multicentre feasibility trial evaluating the safety and therapeutic efficacy of DeRidder Burst-SCS stimulation for the treatment of chronic intractable neck pain with or without radiation to the arm, shoulder, and upper back. After baseline evaluation, subjects will undergo an SCS trial using the Abbott Invisible Trial system according to standard clinical procedures. During the trial phase, SCS leads will be implanted in the cervical epidural space. At the end of the SCS trial, subjects experiencing at least 50% pain relief will be considered for permanent implant. Pain intensity, medication usage, and other multidimensional pain outcomes will be collected. The timing of these will be at baseline, end of the SCS trial and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits. Incidence of adverse events will be collected throughout the study duration. DISCUSSION The results of this feasibility study will validate the efficacy and safety of DeRidder Burst-SCS stimulation in the cervical spine. The results obtained in this study will potentially be used to generate a level 1 evidence-based study with formal statistical hypotheses testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03159169.
Collapse
|
50
|
Chen M, Wang S, Li X, Yu L, Yang H, Liu Q, Tang J, Zhou S. Non-invasive Autonomic Neuromodulation Is Opening New Landscapes for Cardiovascular Diseases. Front Physiol 2021; 11:550578. [PMID: 33384606 PMCID: PMC7769808 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.550578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Autonomic imbalance plays a crucial role in the genesis and maintenance of cardiac disorders. Approaches to maintain sympatho-vagal balance in heart diseases have gained great interest in recent years. Emerging therapies However, certain types of emerging therapies including direct electrical stimulation and nerve denervation require invasive implantation of a generator and a bipolar electrode subcutaneously or result in autonomic nervous system (ANS) damage, inevitably increasing the risk of complications. More recently, non-invasive neuromodulation approaches have received great interest in ANS modulation. Non-invasive approaches have opened new fields in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Herein, we will review the protective roles of non-invasive neuromodulation techniques in heart diseases, including transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, electromagnetic field stimulation, ultrasound stimulation, autonomic modulation in optogenetics, and light-emitting diode and transcutaneous cervical vagus nerve stimulation (gammaCore).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingxian Chen
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Songyun Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xuping Li
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lilei Yu
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Hui Yang
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qiming Liu
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jianjun Tang
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shenghua Zhou
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|