1
|
Schultheis BC, Ross-Steinhagen N, Jerosch J, Breil-Wirth A, Weidle PA. The Impact of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation on Pain Levels and Functionality in Patients With Chronic Postsurgical Knee Pain. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:151-159. [PMID: 36464561 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.10.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic postsurgical pain is a considerable source of disabling neuropathic pain. Rates of knee replacement surgeries are increasing, and many patients report chronic postsurgical pain in their wake. When conventional therapies prove ineffective, neuromodulation options such as dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) may be used. However, little is known about the effect of DRGS on improvements in quantitative functional outcome parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a prospective observational study at two pain centers, patients with chronic postsurgical knee pain underwent implantation with a DRGS system after an interdisciplinary multimodal pain program. Ratings of pain, mood, quality of life, and function were captured at baseline and through 12 months of treatment. Quantitative measures (range of motion, walking distance, and pain medication usage) were also recorded. RESULTS Visual analog scale ratings of pain decreased from 8.6 to 3.0 (p < 0.0001; N = 11), and other pain measures agreed. Quality of life on the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire improved from 69.3 to 87.6 (p < 0.0001), whereas the improvement in depression ratings was nonsignificant. International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire ratings of function improved from 27.7 to 51.7 (p < 0.0001), which aligned with other functional measures. On average, knee range of motion improved by 24.5°, and walking distance dramatically increased from 125 meters to 1481. Cessation of opioids, antidepressants, and/or anticonvulsants was achieved by 73% of participants. CONCLUSIONS Both subjective-based questionnaire and quantitative examination-based variables were in broad agreement on the value of DRGS in improving functionality and chronic postsurgical pain in the knee. Although this finding is limited by the small sample size, this intervention may have utility in the many cases in which pain becomes problematic after orthopedic knee surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Carsten Schultheis
- Hospital Neuwerk, Muscular-Skeletal Center, Spinalsurgery and Departement of Interventional Pain Management, Dünnerstrasse, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
| | - Nikolas Ross-Steinhagen
- Hospital Neuwerk, Muscular-Skeletal Center, Spinalsurgery and Departement of Interventional Pain Management, Dünnerstrasse, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Joerg Jerosch
- Johanna Etienne Hospital Neuss, Endoprthetic Center, Neuss, Germany
| | | | - Patrick A Weidle
- Hospital Neuwerk, Muscular-Skeletal Center, Spinalsurgery and Departement of Interventional Pain Management, Dünnerstrasse, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dembek DJ, Bicket MC. Advances in the management of persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2023; 36:560-564. [PMID: 37338943 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures, with additional growth anticipated as the US population ages. Because the prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain ranges from 15 to 25%, identifying persons at risk for persistent pain following surgery allows for preoperative optimization of risk factors as well as early identification and intervention in the postsurgical period. RECENT FINDINGS Clinical understanding of available management techniques is critical to management, which should focus on improving patient mobility and satisfaction while reducing patient disability and healthcare costs. Current evidence supports a multimodal management strategy. This includes pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions, procedural techniques, and identification and optimization of psychosocial and behavioral contributors to chronic pain. Procedural techniques known to confer analgesia include radiofrequency and watercooled neurotomy techniques. More recently, case reports have been published describing analgesic benefit with central or peripheral neuromodulation as a novel, though more invasive analgesic therapy. SUMMARY Identification and early intervention to address persistent pain after TKA is important to optimize patient outcomes. The anticipated growth in TKA underscores the need for future investigations to more fully define potential therapies for chronic pain following TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark C Bicket
- Department of Anesthesiology
- Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bakr SM, Knight JA, Shlobin NA, Budnick H, Desai V, Hill H, Johnson SK, Williams AE, Tolley JA, Raskin JS. Spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in adolescent patients: a single-institution series, systematic review, and individual participant data meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 53:E13. [DOI: 10.3171/2022.7.focus22330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Neuropathic pain is undertreated in children. Neurosurgical treatments of pediatric chronic pain are limited by the absence of both US Food and Drug Administration approval and pediatric-specific hardware, as well as weak referral patterns due to a lack of physician education. This study presents a single-institution retrospective case series of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in children ≤ 19 years of age and a systematic review of SCS in children. The authors’ findings may further validate the role of SCS as an effective treatment modality for varied neuropathic pain syndromes found in pediatric patients.
METHODS
The study was a single-center, single-surgeon, retrospective case series of individuals treated between July 2017 and May 2022. The outcomes for pediatric patients with chronic neuropathic pain syndromes indicated by the multidisciplinary pain clinic for evaluation for SCS were cataloged. A systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis was performed for cases treated until May 2022, using PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus to characterize outcomes of children with neuropathic pain treated with SCS.
RESULTS
Twelve patients were evaluated and 9 were indicated for percutaneous or buried lead trials. Seven female and 2 male patients between the ages of 13 and 19 years were implanted with trial leads. Eight of 9 (89%) patients went on to receive permanent systems. The average trial length was 6 days, and the length of stay for both trial and implant was less than 1 day. Complication rates due to CSF leaks were 22% and 0% for trial and implant, respectively. Visual analog scale pain scores decreased from 9.2 to 2.9 (p = 0.0002) and the number of medications decreased from 4.9 to 2.1 (p = 0.0005). Functional status also improved for each patient. A systematic review identified 13 studies describing pediatric patients with SCS, including 12 providing IPD on 30 patients. In the IPD meta-analysis, pain was reduced in 16/16 (100%) of patients following surgery and in 25/26 (96.2%) at last follow-up. Medication use was decreased in 16/21 (76.2%), and functional outcomes were improved in 29/29 (100%). The complication rate was 5/30 (16.7%).
CONCLUSIONS
SCS effectively decreases pain and medication use for pediatric neuropathic pain syndromes. Patients also report improved functional status, including improved matriculation, gainful employment, and physical activity. There is minimal high-quality literature describing neuromodulation for pain in children. Neuromodulation should be considered earlier as a viable alternative to escalating use of multiple drugs and as a potential mechanism to address tolerance, dependence, and addiction in pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma M. Bakr
- Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - James A. Knight
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Nathan A. Shlobin
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, Chicago
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Hailey Budnick
- Section of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine Department of Neurological Surgery, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Virendra Desai
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma School of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Haley Hill
- Section of Neurodiagnostics, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Sarah K. Johnson
- Section of Physical Therapy, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Amy E. Williams
- Department of Psychiatry, Riley Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinic, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis; and
| | - James A. Tolley
- Section of Pediatric Anesthesia, Department of Pediatrics, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Jeffrey S. Raskin
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, Chicago
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hunter CW, Deer TR, Jones MR, Chang Chien GC, D’Souza RS, Davis T, Eldon ER, Esposito MF, Goree JH, Hewan-Lowe L, Maloney JA, Mazzola AJ, Michels JS, Layno-Moses A, Patel S, Tari J, Weisbein JS, Goulding KA, Chhabra A, Hassebrock J, Wie C, Beall D, Sayed D, Strand N. Consensus Guidelines on Interventional Therapies for Knee Pain (STEP Guidelines) from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience. J Pain Res 2022; 15:2683-2745. [PMID: 36132996 PMCID: PMC9484571 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s370469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Knee pain is second only to the back as the most commonly reported area of pain in the human body. With an overall prevalence of 46.2%, its impact on disability, lost productivity, and cost on healthcare cannot be overlooked. Due to the pervasiveness of knee pain in the general population, there are no shortages of treatment options available for addressing the symptoms. Ranging from physical therapy and pharmacologic agents to interventional pain procedures to surgical options, practitioners have a wide array of options to choose from - unfortunately, there is no consensus on which treatments are "better" and when they should be offered in comparison to others. While it is generally accepted that less invasive treatments should be offered before more invasive ones, there is a lack of agreement on the order in which the less invasive are to be presented. In an effort to standardize the treatment of this extremely prevalent pathology, the authors present an all-encompassing set of guidelines on the treatment of knee pain based on an extensive literature search and data grading for each of the available alternative that will allow practitioners the ability to compare and contrast each option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey W Hunter
- Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation & Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | | | | | - Ryan S D’Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Erica R Eldon
- Department of Rehabilitation & Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Johnathan H Goree
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Lissa Hewan-Lowe
- Department of Rehabilitation & Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jillian A Maloney
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Anthony J Mazzola
- Department of Rehabilitation & Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jeanmarie Tari
- Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Anikar Chhabra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Chris Wie
- Interventional Spine and Pain, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Douglas Beall
- Comprehensive Specialty Care, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carta G, Fornasari BE, Fregnan F, Ronchi G, De Zanet S, Muratori L, Nato G, Fogli M, Gambarotta G, Geuna S, Raimondo S. Neurodynamic Treatment Promotes Mechanical Pain Modulation in Sensory Neurons and Nerve Regeneration in Rats. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10061296. [PMID: 35740318 PMCID: PMC9220043 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10061296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Somatic nerve injuries are a rising problem leading to disability associated with neuropathic pain commonly reported as mechanical allodynia (MA) and hyperalgesia. These symptoms are strongly dependent on specific processes in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Neurodynamic treatment (NDT), consisting of selective uniaxial nerve repeated tension protocols, effectively reduces pain and disability in neuropathic pain patients even though the biological mechanisms remain poorly characterized. We aimed to define, both in vivo and ex vivo, how NDT could promote nerve regeneration and modulate some processes in the DRG linked to MA and hyperalgesia. Methods: We examined in Wistar rats, after unilateral median and ulnar nerve crush, the therapeutic effects of NDT and the possible protective effects of NDT administered for 10 days before the injury. We adopted an ex vivo model of DRG organotypic explant subjected to NDT to explore the selective effects on DRG cells. Results: Behavioural tests, morphological and morphometrical analyses, and gene and protein expression analyses were performed, and these tests revealed that NDT promotes nerve regeneration processes, speeds up sensory motor recovery, and modulates mechanical pain by affecting, in the DRG, the expression of TACAN, a mechanosensitive receptor shared between humans and rats responsible for MA and hyperalgesia. The ex vivo experiments have shown that NDT increases neurite regrowth and confirmed the modulation of TACAN. Conclusions: The results obtained in this study on the biological and molecular mechanisms induced by NDT will allow the exploration, in future clinical trials, of its efficacy in different conditions of neuropathic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Carta
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.C.); (B.E.F.); (G.R.); (S.D.Z.); (L.M.); (G.G.); (S.G.); (S.R.)
- Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.N.); (M.F.)
- Department of Rehabilitation, ASST (Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriali) Nord Milano, Sesto San Giovanni Hospital, Sesto San Giovanni, 20099 Milano, Italy
| | - Benedetta Elena Fornasari
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.C.); (B.E.F.); (G.R.); (S.D.Z.); (L.M.); (G.G.); (S.G.); (S.R.)
- Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.N.); (M.F.)
| | - Federica Fregnan
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.C.); (B.E.F.); (G.R.); (S.D.Z.); (L.M.); (G.G.); (S.G.); (S.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-(0)1-1670-5433; Fax: +39-(0)1-1903-8639
| | - Giulia Ronchi
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.C.); (B.E.F.); (G.R.); (S.D.Z.); (L.M.); (G.G.); (S.G.); (S.R.)
- Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.N.); (M.F.)
| | - Stefano De Zanet
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.C.); (B.E.F.); (G.R.); (S.D.Z.); (L.M.); (G.G.); (S.G.); (S.R.)
| | - Luisa Muratori
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.C.); (B.E.F.); (G.R.); (S.D.Z.); (L.M.); (G.G.); (S.G.); (S.R.)
- Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.N.); (M.F.)
| | - Giulia Nato
- Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.N.); (M.F.)
- Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy
| | - Marco Fogli
- Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.N.); (M.F.)
- Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy
| | - Giovanna Gambarotta
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.C.); (B.E.F.); (G.R.); (S.D.Z.); (L.M.); (G.G.); (S.G.); (S.R.)
- Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.N.); (M.F.)
| | - Stefano Geuna
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.C.); (B.E.F.); (G.R.); (S.D.Z.); (L.M.); (G.G.); (S.G.); (S.R.)
- Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.N.); (M.F.)
| | - Stefania Raimondo
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.C.); (B.E.F.); (G.R.); (S.D.Z.); (L.M.); (G.G.); (S.G.); (S.R.)
- Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, 10043 Torino, Italy; (G.N.); (M.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Akuamoah LA, Tupper C, Nagrani S, Chapman KB. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation to Treat Focal Postsurgical and Diffuse Chronic Pain: A Case Report. A A Pract 2022; 16:e01589. [DOI: 10.1213/xaa.0000000000001589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
7
|
D'Souza RS, Kubrova E, Her YF, Barman RA, Smith BJ, Alvarez GM, West TE, Abd-Elsayed A. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Lower Extremity Neuropathic Pain Syndromes: An Evidence-Based Literature Review. Adv Ther 2022; 39:4440-4473. [PMID: 35994195 PMCID: PMC9464732 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02244-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a form of selective neuromodulation therapy that targets the dorsal root ganglion. DRG-S offers analgesia in a variety of chronic pain conditions and is approved for treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There has been increasing utilization of DRG-S to treat various neuropathic pain syndromes of the lower extremity, although evidence remains limited to one randomized controlled trial and 39 observational studies. In this review, we appraised the current evidence for DRG-S in the treatment of lower extremity neuropathic pain using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria. The primary outcome was change in pain intensity after DRG-S compared to baseline. We stratified presentation of results based of type of neuropathy (CRPS, painful diabetic neuropathy, mononeuropathy, polyneuropathy) as well as location of neuropathy (hip, knee, foot). Future powered randomized controlled trials with homogeneous participants are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S D'Souza
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eva Kubrova
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Yeng F Her
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ross A Barman
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brandon J Smith
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Gabriel M Alvarez
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tyler E West
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chao D, Mecca CM, Yu G, Segel I, Gold MS, Hogan QH, Pan B. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation of injured sensory neurons in rats rapidly eliminates their spontaneous activity and relieves spontaneous pain. Pain 2021; 162:2917-2932. [PMID: 33990112 PMCID: PMC8486885 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Dorsal root ganglion field stimulation (GFS) relieves evoked and spontaneous neuropathic pain by use-dependent blockade of impulse trains through the sensory neuron T-junction, which becomes complete within less than 1 minute for C-type units, also with partial blockade of Aδ units. We used this tool in the spinal nerve ligation (SNL) rat model to selectively block sensory neuron spontaneous activity (SA) of axotomized neurons at the fifth lumbar (L5) level vs blockade of units at the L4 level that remain uninjured but exposed to inflammation. In vivo dorsal root single-unit recordings after SNL showed increased SA in L5 units but not L4 units. Ganglion field stimulation blocked this SA. Ganglion field stimulation delivered at the L5 dorsal root ganglion blocked mechanical hyperalgesia behavior, mechanical allodynia, and ongoing spontaneous pain indicated by conditioned place preference, whereas GFS at L4 blocked evoked pain behavior but not spontaneous pain. In vivo single-unit recordings of spinal cord dorsal horn (DH) wide-dynamic-range neurons showed elevated SA after SNL, which was reduced by GFS at the L5 level but not by GFS at the L4 level. In addition, L5 GFS, but not L4 GFS, increased mechanical threshold of DH units during cutaneous mechanical stimulation, while L5 GFS exceeded L4 GFS in reducing evoked firing rates. Our results indicate that SA in injured neurons supports increased firing of DH wide-dynamic-range neurons, contributing to hyperalgesia, allodynia, and ongoing pain. Ganglion field stimulation analgesic effects after nerve injury are at least partly attributable to blocking propagation of this SA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongman Chao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Christina M. Mecca
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Guoliang Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Ian Segel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Michael S. Gold
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, 3500 Terrace Street Rm E1440 BST, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Quinn H. Hogan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Bin Pan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aman MM, Mahmoud A, Deer T, Sayed D, Hagedorn JM, Brogan SE, Singh V, Gulati A, Strand N, Weisbein J, Goree JH, Xing F, Valimahomed A, Pak DJ, El Helou A, Ghosh P, Shah K, Patel V, Escobar A, Schmidt K, Shah J, Varshney V, Rosenberg W, Narang S. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Best Practices and Guidelines for the Interventional Management of Cancer-Associated Pain. J Pain Res 2021; 14:2139-2164. [PMID: 34295184 PMCID: PMC8292624 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s315585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Moderate to severe pain occurs in many cancer patients during their clinical course and may stem from the primary pathology, metastasis, or as treatment side effects. Uncontrolled pain using conservative medical therapy can often lead to patient distress, loss of productivity, shorter life expectancy, longer hospital stays, and increase in healthcare utilization. Various publications shed light on strategies for conservative medical management for cancer pain and a few international publications have reviewed limited interventional data. Our multi-institutional working group was assembled to review and highlight the body of evidence that exists for opioid utilization for cancer pain, adjunct medication such as ketamine and methadone and interventional therapies. We discuss neurolysis via injections, neuromodulation including targeted drug delivery and spinal cord stimulation, vertebral tumor ablation and augmentation, radiotherapy and surgical techniques. In the United States, there is a significant variance in the interventional treatment of cancer pain based on fellowship training. As a first of its kind, this best practices and interventional guideline will offer evidenced-based recommendations for reducing pain and suffering associated with malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansoor M Aman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Advocate Aurora Health, Oshkosh, WI, USA
| | - Ammar Mahmoud
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Northern Light Health Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor, ME, USA
| | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Shane E Brogan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Vinita Singh
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Amitabh Gulati
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Natalie Strand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Jacqueline Weisbein
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain Division, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Johnathan H Goree
- Interventional Pain Medicine, Napa Valley Orthopedic Medical Group, Napa, CA, USA
| | - Fangfang Xing
- Swedish Pain Services, Swedish Health Services, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ali Valimahomed
- Gramercy Pain Center, Holmdel, NJ, & Advanced Orthopedics Sports Medicine Institute, Freehold, NJ, USA
| | - Daniel J Pak
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Antonios El Helou
- Department of Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, The Moncton Hospital, Moncton, NB. Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Krishna Shah
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vishal Patel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Advocate Aurora Health, Oshkosh, WI, USA
| | - Alexander Escobar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Keith Schmidt
- AMITA Neurosciences Institute, Comprehensive Pain Management Program, St. Alexius Medical Center, Hoffman Estates, IL, USA
| | - Jay Shah
- SamWell Institute for Pain Management, Colonia, NJ, USA
| | - Vishal Varshney
- Department of Anesthesia, Providence Healthcare, Vancouver, BC, Canada & Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - William Rosenberg
- Center for the Relief of Pain, Midwest Neurosurgery Associates, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Sanjeet Narang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yu G, Segel I, Tran H, Park HJ, Ross E, Hogan QH, Pan B. Analgesic Effects of Tonic and Burst Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Rats With Painful Tibial Nerve Injury. Neuromodulation 2021; 25:970-979. [PMID: 34096146 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation is effective in treating chronic pain. While burst stimulation has been proven to enhance the therapeutic efficacy in spinal cord stimulation, currently only a tonic stimulation waveform is clinically used in DRG stimulation. We hypothesized that burst DRG stimulation might also produce analgesic effect in a preclinical neuropathic pain model. We evaluated both the therapeutic effects of burst DRG stimulation and the possible effects of DRG stimulation upon inflammation within the DRG in a preclinical neuropathic pain model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Rats received either a painful tibial nerve injury or sham surgery. Analgesic effects of DRG stimulation were evaluated by testing a battery of evoked pain-related behaviors as well as measuring the positive affective state associated with relief of spontaneous pain using conditioned place preference. Histological evidence for neuronal trauma or neuroinflammation was evaluated. RESULTS All of the waveforms tested (20 Hz-tonic, 20 Hz-burst, and 40 Hz-burst) have similar analgesic effects in sensory tests and conditioned place preference. Long-term DRG stimulation for two weeks does not change DRG expression of markers for nerve injury and neuroinflammation. CONCLUSIONS DRG stimulation using burst waveform might be also suitable for treating neuropathic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guoliang Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Ian Segel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Hai Tran
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | | | - Erika Ross
- Abbott Neuromodulation, Plano, TX, 75024, USA
| | - Quinn H Hogan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Bin Pan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Analgesic dorsal root ganglionic field stimulation blocks conduction of afferent impulse trains selectively in nociceptive sensory afferents. Pain 2021; 161:2872-2886. [PMID: 32658148 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Increased excitability of primary sensory neurons after peripheral nerve injury may cause hyperalgesia and allodynia. Dorsal root ganglion field stimulation (GFS) is effective in relieving clinical pain associated with nerve injury and neuropathic pain in animal models. However, its mechanism has not been determined. We examined effects of GFS on transmission of action potentials (APs) from the peripheral to central processes by in vivo single-unit recording from lumbar dorsal roots in sham injured rats and rats with tibial nerve injury (TNI) in fiber types defined by conduction velocity. Transmission of APs directly generated by GFS (20 Hz) in C-type units progressively abated over 20 seconds, whereas GFS-induced Aβ activity persisted unabated, while Aδ showed an intermediate pattern. Activity generated peripherally by electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve and punctate mechanical stimulation of the receptive field (glabrous skin) was likewise fully blocked by GFS within 20 seconds in C-type units, whereas Aβ units were minimally affected and a subpopulation of Aδ units was blocked. After TNI, the threshold to induce AP firing by punctate mechanical stimulation (von Frey) was reduced, which was reversed to normal during GFS. These results also suggest that C-type fibers, not Aβ, mainly contribute to mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity (von Frey, brush, acetone) after injury. Ganglion field stimulation produces use-dependent blocking of afferent AP trains, consistent with enhanced filtering of APs at the sensory neuron T-junction, particularly in nociceptive units.
Collapse
|
12
|
Willinger ML, Heimroth J, Sodhi N, Garbarino LJ, Gold PA, Rasquinha V, Danoff JR, Boraiah S. Management of Refractory Pain After Total Joint Replacement. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2021; 25:42. [PMID: 33864533 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-021-00956-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Chronic pain after total joint replacement (TJA), specifically total knee replacement (TKA), is becoming more of a burden on patients, physicians, and the healthcare system as the number of joint replacements performed increases year after year. The management of this type of pain is critical, and therefore, understanding the various modalities physicians can use to help patients with refractory pain after TJA is essential. RECENT FINDINGS The modalities by which chronic pain can be successfully managed include genicular nerve radioablation therapy (GN-RFA), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and peripheral subcutaneous field stimulation (PSFS). Meta-analyses and case reports have demonstrated the effectiveness of these treatment options in improving pain and functional outcomes in patients with chronic pain after TKA. The purpose of this paper is to review and synthesize the current literature investigating the different ways that refractory pain is managed after TJA, with the goal being to provide treatment recommendations for providers treating these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max L Willinger
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Ave, New Hyde Park, Queens, NY, 11040, USA
| | - Jamie Heimroth
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Ave, New Hyde Park, Queens, NY, 11040, USA
| | - Nipun Sodhi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Ave, New Hyde Park, Queens, NY, 11040, USA
| | - Luke J Garbarino
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Ave, New Hyde Park, Queens, NY, 11040, USA
| | - Peter A Gold
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Ave, New Hyde Park, Queens, NY, 11040, USA.
| | - Vijay Rasquinha
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Ave, New Hyde Park, Queens, NY, 11040, USA
| | - Jonathan R Danoff
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Sreevathsa Boraiah
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lo Bianco G, Papa A, Gazzerro G, Rispoli M, Tammaro D, Di Dato MT, Vernuccio F, Schatman M. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Postoperative Pain Following Thoracic Surgery: A Pilot Study. Neuromodulation 2020; 24:774-778. [PMID: 32909359 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is defined as persistent pain following a thoracotomy and has an incidence of 21-61%. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a form of neuromodulation that modulates pain signal transmission to the spinal cord. The aims of this study were to investigate the efficacy of DRG-S for the management of PTPS and to assess the role of thoracic paravertebral blocks (t-PVB) as a tool for prediction of success of DRG-S. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective study, we included all patients undergoing thoracic surgery, with PTPS not responding to pharmacotherapy and treated with DRG-S from September 2018 to February 2019. t-PVB followed by a percutaneous DRG-S trial was performed on all patients. Pain intensity was assessed through a numeric rating scale (NRS) and Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4) at baseline, post-trial, at 14 days, 90 days, and at one year after DRG-S implantation. Data summarized as continuous variables were expressed as means and standard deviations (SDs), and categorical variables were expressed as raw numbers and percentages. RESULTS Four patients out of 51 who underwent thoracic surgery at our institution surveyed were included (mean age ± SD, 56 ± 16 years old). Mean NRS and DN4 were, respectively, 7.2 ± 0.96 SD and 8.2 ± 0.5 SD at baseline, 2.5 ± 0.6 SD and 3.2 ± 0.5 SD after t-PVB, 2.2 ± 0.5 SD and 2.2 ± 0.5 SD at 14 days, 90 days, and at one year after DRG-S implantation. No complications or side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary results show that DRG-S is an effective therapy for PTPS after thoracic surgery. In addition, thoracic paravertebral blocks performed prior to DRG-S correlated with a positive outcome with treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuliano Lo Bianco
- Pain Department, A.O. Dei Colli - V. Monaldi Hospital, Napoli, Italy.,Università di Catania, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Biotecnologiche (BIOMETEC), Catania, Italy.,Anesthesiology and Pain Department, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù, Italy.,Pain Management and Neuromodulation, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHSFT, Orsett Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alfonso Papa
- Pain Department, A.O. Dei Colli - V. Monaldi Hospital, Napoli, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Gazzerro
- Pain Department, A.O. Dei Colli - V. Monaldi Hospital, Napoli, Italy
| | - Marco Rispoli
- Anesthesiology Department, Thoracic Surgery, A.O. Dei Colli - V. Monaldi Hospital, Napoli, Italy
| | - Dario Tammaro
- Pain Department, A.O. Dei Colli - V. Monaldi Hospital, Napoli, Italy.,Anesthesiology Department, Thoracic Surgery, A.O. Dei Colli - V. Monaldi Hospital, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Federica Vernuccio
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Michael Schatman
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chapman KB, Groenen PS, Vissers KC, van Helmond N, Stanton-Hicks MD. The Pathways and Processes Underlying Spinal Transmission of Low Back Pain: Observations From Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Treatment. Neuromodulation 2020; 24:610-621. [PMID: 32329155 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a novel approach to treat chronic pain. Lead placement at L2 has been reported to be an effective treatment for axial low back pain (LBP) primarily of discogenic etiology. We have recently shown, in a diverse cohort including cases of multilevel instrumentation following extensive prior back surgeries, that DRG-S lead placement at T12 is another promising target. Local effects at the T12 DRG, alone, are insufficient to explain these results. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a literature review to explore the mechanisms of LBP relief with T12 DRG-S. FINDINGS Branches of individual spinal nerve roots innervate facet joints and posterior spinal structures, while the discs and anterior vertebrae are carried via L2, and converge in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord at T8-T9. The T12 nerve root contains cutaneous afferents from the low back and enters the DH of the spinal cord at T10. Low back Aδ and C-fibers then ascend via Lissauer's tract (LT) to T8-T9, converging with other low back afferents. DRG-S at T12, then, results in inhibition of the converged low back fibers via endorphin-mediated and GABAergic frequency-dependent mechanisms. Therefore, T12 lead placement may be the optimal location for DRG-S to treat LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth B Chapman
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York City, NY, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA.,Northwell Health Systems, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Pauline S Groenen
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York City, NY, USA.,College of Medicine, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Kris C Vissers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Noud van Helmond
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York City, NY, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schwarm FP, Stein M, Uhl E, Maxeiner H, Kolodziej MA. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome leads to improvement of quality of life, reduction of pain and psychological distress: a retrospective case series with 24 months follow up. Scand J Pain 2019; 20:253-259. [DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background and aims
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a common pain condition which is characterized by pain, functional impairment, and trophic changes. Neurosurgical treatment is not widely offered. In this study the treatment with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was evaluated over 24 months follow up.
Methods
A retrospective case analysis of six patients with severe CRPS was performed. Pain chronicity was recorded with the Mainz Pain Staging System (MPSS). Pain intensity (NRS), activity level and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), the actual mood state (ASTS), and treatment satisfaction (CSQ-8) were assessed. All patients received conventional pharmacological treatments including multimodal pain therapy through their local pain therapist or in specialized centers as well as physical therapy. A SCS electrode was implanted for trial stimulation. After successful trial a neurostimulator was implanted and connected to the electrode. Patients were retrospectively analyzed before implantation and 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Results
Patients median age was 43 years (IQR25−75 37–43 years). The median MPSS Score was 3 of 3 indicating a high pain chronicity. Median NRS before implantation of the neurostimulator was 8.8 (IQR25−75 7.6–9.3). A reduction to 7.8 (IQR25−75 4.8–8.1; p = 0.14) after 6 months, 6.5 (IQR25−75 3.8–8.1; p = 0.08) after 1 year, and 6.8 (IQR25−75 3.8–8.5; p = 0.15) after 2 years was achieved. Median EQ-5D-5L index value before treatment was 0.27 (IQR25−75 0.25–0.41) indicating a severely lowered quality of life. A significant improvement to 0.53 (IQR25−75 0.26–0.65; p = 0.03) after 6 months, 0.58 (IQR25−75 0.26–0.84; p = 0.03) after 1 year as well as after 2 years was seen. ASTS scale showed an increase of values for positive mood, and a reduction in values for sorrow, fatigue, anger and desperation during the whole follow up period. The treatment satisfaction in the whole cohort with a median CSQ-8 value of 29.5 of 32 was very high.
Conclusion
The results of this small case series showed a significant improvement of the EQ-5D-5L after implantation of a neurostimulator. NRS reduction was not significant but a clear tendency towards reduced values was observed. We therefore conclude that SCS is an alternative option to relieve chronic pain and psychological distress originating from CRPS if non-invasive managements of severe CRPS failed. The preoperative selection plays a crucial role for good results.
Implications
CRPS is difficult to treat. SCS is an alternative option to improve the quality of life and relieve chronic pain originating from severe CRPS if conservative treatment modalities fail. Further psychological distress is reduced in long-term follow up. SCS should be kept in mind for therapy refractory cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marco Stein
- Department of Neurosurgery , Justus-Liebig-University Giessen , Giessen , Germany
| | - Eberhard Uhl
- Department of Neurosurgery , Justus-Liebig-University Giessen , Giessen , Germany
| | - Hagen Maxeiner
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy , Justus-Liebig-University Giessen , Giessen , Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|