Pain and Functional Outcomes After Sacroiliac Joint Injection with Anesthetic and Corticosteroid at Six Months, Stratified by Anesthetic Response and Physical Exam Maneuvers

Manipulations of Oblique Pulling Affect Sacroiliac Joint Displacements and Ligament Strains: A Finite Element Analysis

Objective

Clinical studies have found that manipulation of oblique pulling has a good clinical effect on sacroiliac joint pain. However, there is no uniform standard for manipulation of oblique pulling at present. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of four manipulations of oblique pulling on sacroiliac joint and surrounding ligaments.

Methods

A three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvis was established. Four manipulations of oblique pulling were simulated. The stresses and displacements of sacroiliac joint and the strains of surrounding ligaments were analyzed under four manipulations of oblique pulling.

Results

Manipulation of oblique pulling F2 and F3 caused the highest and lowest stress on the pelvis, at 85.0 and 52.6 MPa, respectively. Manipulation of oblique pulling F3 and F1 produced the highest and lowest stress on the left sacroiliac joint, at 6.6 and 5.6 MPa, respectively. The four manipulations of oblique pulling mainly produced anterior-posterior displacement. The maximum value was 1.21 mm, produced by manipulation of oblique pulling F2, while the minimal value was 0.96 mm, produced by manipulation of oblique pulling F3. The four manipulations of oblique pulling could all cause different degrees of ligament strain, and manipulation of oblique pulling F2 produced the greatest ligament strain.

Conclusions

The four manipulations of oblique pulling all produced small displacements of sacroiliac joint. However, they produced different degrees of ligament strain. Manipulation of oblique pulling F2 produced the largest displacement of sacroiliac joint and the greatest ligament strain, which could provide a certain reference for physiotherapists.

A Retrospective Study on Patient-Specific Predictors for Non-Response to Sacroiliac Joint Injections

Intra-articular or peri-articular corticosteroid injections are often used for treatment of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. However, response to these injections is variable and many patients require multiple injections for sustained benefit. In this study, we aim to identify patient-specific predictors of response or non-response to SIJ injections. Identification of these predictors would allow providers to better determine what treatment would be appropriate for a patient with SIJ pain. A retrospective review of 100 consecutive patient charts spanning a 2-year period at an academic multi-specialty pain center was conducted and a multivariate regression analysis was used to identify patient-specific predictors of response to SIJ injections. Our analysis identified that a history of depression and anxiety (OR: 0.233, 95%CI: 0.057-0.954) and increased age (OR: 0.946, 95%CI: 0.910-0.984) significantly reduced the odds of responding to injections. We also found that the associated NPRS score change for SIJ injection responders was less than the minimally clinically significant value of a 2-point differential, suggesting that reported changes in pain scores may not accurately represent a patient's perception of success after SIJ injection. These findings warrant further investigation through a prospective study and can potentially influence clinical decision making and prognosis for patients receiving SIJ injections.

Ultrasound-guided platelet-rich-plasma injections for reducing sacroiliac joint pain: A paradigmatic case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Sacro-iliac joint (SIJ) pain is an often-misdiagnosed cause (up to 30% cases) of atypical low back pain (LBP) that might be treated with a wide range of conservative interventions. However, Platelet-Rich-Plasma (PRP) ultrasound-guided injections at SIJ level in subjects with mitochondrial disorders have not yet been investigated.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 52-year-old Caucasian male with fluoroquinolone-related mitochondrial dysfunction referred to a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Outpatient, complaining of severe SIJ pain (Numeric Pain Related Scale, NPRS=8). We performed two bilateral PRP ultrasound-guided injections at the sacro-iliac level. PRP is a simple, efficient, and minimally invasive approach. After the first PRP injection, there was a considerable reduction of pain (NPRS=8 vs 5). The second PRP infiltration was performed after 2 weeks and in both cases no adverse events. At the 6-month follow-up evaluation, the patient showed good physical recovery, with the absence of pain (NPRS=0).

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report in the literature assessing the safety and effectiveness of PRP ultrasound-guided injections for SIJ pain in a patient affected by mitochondrial disorders. Thus, this case report might have relevant clinical implications in the treatment of SIJ pain in patients affected by this rare pathological condition, albeit further observational studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Effect of Sacroiliac Joint Pain on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) may frequently have co-existing sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. It is known that patients with lower back pain undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) have inferior outcomes; however, it is unclear what the effect of SIJ pain is on outcomes after hip arthroscopy.

PURPOSE

To determine whether patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with SIJ pain either subjectively or on physical examination achieve similar postoperative improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) compared with patients without SIJ pain at 2-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS with SIJ pain were matched in a 1:2 ratio to controls without SIJ pain. Baseline demographics, as well as postoperative PROs and rates of achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) at 2-year follow-up were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients (75 hips) with SIJ pain were matched to 150 control patients (150 hips) without SIJ pain. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement in all PROs at 2 years (P < .05 for all). Patients with SIJ pain had significantly lower postoperative PRO scores for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) (SIJ pain: 80.4 ± 22.4 vs no SIJ pain: 88.0 ± 15.1; P = .006), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) (SIJ pain: 73.2 ± 22.8 vs no SIJ pain: 80.0 ± 17.3; P < .001), and International Hip Outcome Tool-12 questionnaire (iHOT-12) (SIJ pain: 61.7 ± 25.9 vs no SIJ pain: 73.7 ± 23.7; P = .008). There were no statistically significant differences in improvement (delta) in PRO scores between the 2 groups (P > .05 for all). The SIJ pain group had significantly lower achievement of MCID for the HOS-ADL (SIJ pain: 65.2% vs no SIJ pain: 80.5%; P = .044) but not HOS-SS, mHHS, or iHOT-12 (P > .05 for all). The SIJ pain group had significantly lower achievement of PASS for the mHHS (SIJ pain: 27.5% vs no SIJ pain: 45.3%; P = .030) and iHOT-12 (SIJ pain: 31.0% vs no SIJ pain: 56.0%; P = .010) but not the HOS-ADL and HOS-SS (P > .05 for both). Only 4.1% of patients with SIJ pain and 2.4% of controls required revision surgery or converted to THA at the time of final follow-up (P = .69).

CONCLUSION

Patients with FAIS and SIJ pain on history or physical examination experience significant improvement in PROs at 2 years after hip arthroscopy. However, they may be less likely to achieve the MCID or PASS and have significantly lower postoperative PROs compared with a matched cohort of patients without SIJ pain. Overall rates of revision and conversion to THA were similarly low in both groups.

Effect of Absorbable Collagen sponge and Steroid Injectionfor One or Two Segment Anterior Cervical Discectomy and fusion: A Retrospective comparison study

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia, mostly resulting from prevertebral soft tissue swelling (PSTS), is a common and refractory complication of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Although the symptoms are mild and moderate in most cases, severe dysphagia can incur significant mental burdens and morbidity in some patients. This retrospective study aims to analyze the effect of absorbable collagen sponge and steroid injection (ACS-SI) for patients with ACDF.

METHOD

150 patients in the ACS-SI group and 175 in the ANCS-SI group were enrolled in this study from the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University from January 2018 to November 2020. Baseline characteristics and operation parameters were collected from medical records. The swallowing function was evaluated by the Swallowing-Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) survey, odynophagia was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS), and prevertebral soft tissue swelling index (PSTSI) was measured.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics and operation parameters between the two groups. The improvement of PSTSI and recovery of swallowing function in the ACS-SI group was better than that in the ANCS-SI group at 1 day and 1 month follow-up visit (P<0.05). The VAS score was significantly higher at 2 and 7 days after operation in the ANCS-SI group than that in the ACS-SI group (6.61±0.68 VS 5.52±0.74 and 4.23±0.90 VS 2.08±0.56, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups after 1 month (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of ACS-SI is beneficial to relieve postoperative odynophagia, reduce PSTS and recover swallow function.