Deep-learning microscopy image reconstruction with quality control reveals second-scale rearrangements in RNA polymerase II clusters

Amphiphiles Formed from Synthetic DNA-Nanomotifs Mimic the Stepwise Dispersal of Transcriptional Clusters in the Cell Nucleus

Stem cells exhibit prominent clusters controlling the transcription of genes into RNA. These clusters form by a phase-separation mechanism, and their size and shape are controlled via an amphiphilic effect of transcribed genes. Here, we construct amphiphile-nanomotifs purely from DNA, and we achieve similar size and shape control for phase-separated droplets formed from fully synthetic, self-interacting DNA-nanomotifs. Increasing amphiphile concentrations induce rounding of droplets, prevent droplet fusion, and, at high concentrations, cause full dispersal of droplets. Super-resolution microscopy data obtained from zebrafish embryo stem cells reveal a comparable transition for transcriptional clusters with increasing transcription levels. Brownian dynamics and lattice simulations further confirm that the addition of amphiphilic particles is sufficient to explain the observed changes in shape and size. Our work reproduces key aspects of transcriptional cluster formation in biological cells using relatively simple DNA sequence-programmable nanostructures, opening novel ways to control the mesoscopic organization of synthetic nanomaterials.

RNA polymerase II dynamics shape enhancer-promoter interactions

How enhancers control target gene expression over long genomic distances remains an important unsolved problem. Here we investigated enhancer-promoter communication by integrating data from nucleosome-resolution genomic contact maps, nascent transcription and perturbations affecting either RNA polymerase II (Pol II) dynamics or the activity of thousands of candidate enhancers. Integration of new Micro-C experiments with published CRISPRi data demonstrated that enhancers spend more time in close proximity to their target promoters in functional enhancer-promoter pairs compared to nonfunctional pairs, which can be attributed in part to factors unrelated to genomic position. Manipulation of the transcription cycle demonstrated a key role for Pol II in enhancer-promoter interactions. Notably, promoter-proximal paused Pol II itself partially stabilized interactions. We propose an updated model in which elements of transcriptional dynamics shape the duration or frequency of interactions to facilitate enhancer-promoter communication.