Antagonism, non-native interactions and non-two-state folding in S6 revealed by double-mutant cycle analysis

Role of elongation and secondary pathways in S6 amyloid fibril growth

The concerted action of a large number of individual molecular level events in the formation and growth of fibrillar protein structures creates a significant challenge for differentiating between the relative contributions of different self-assembly steps to the overall kinetics of this process. The characterization of the individual steps is, however, an important requirement for achieving a quantitative understanding of this general phenomenon which underlies many crucial functional and pathological pathways in living systems. In this study, we have applied a kinetic modeling approach to interpret experimental data obtained for the aggregation of a selection of site-directed mutants of the protein S6 from Thermus thermophilus. By studying a range of concentrations of both the seed structures, used to initiate the reaction, and of the soluble monomer, which is consumed during the growth reaction, we are able to separate unambiguously secondary pathways from primary nucleation and fibril elongation. In particular, our results show that the characteristic autocatalytic nature of the growth process originates from secondary processes rather than primary nucleation events, and enables us to derive a scaling law which relates the initial seed concentration to the onset of the growth phase.

Nonnative interactions in coupled folding and binding processes of intrinsically disordered proteins

Proteins function by interacting with other molecules, where both native and nonnative interactions play important roles. Native interactions contribute to the stability and specificity of a complex, whereas nonnative interactions mainly perturb the binding kinetics. For intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), which do not adopt rigid structures when being free in solution, the role of nonnative interactions may be more prominent in binding processes due to their high flexibilities. In this work, we investigated the effect of nonnative hydrophobic interactions on the coupled folding and binding processes of IDPs and its interplay with chain flexibility by conducting molecular dynamics simulations. Our results showed that the free-energy profiles became rugged, and intermediate states occurred when nonnative hydrophobic interactions were introduced. The binding rate was initially accelerated and subsequently dramatically decreased as the strength of the nonnative hydrophobic interactions increased. Both thermodynamic and kinetic analysis showed that disordered systems were more readily affected by nonnative interactions than ordered systems. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the kinetic advantage of IDPs (“fly-casting” mechanism) was enhanced by nonnative hydrophobic interactions. The relationship between chain flexibility and protein aggregation is also discussed.

Competition between native topology and nonnative interactions in simple and complex folding kinetics of natural and designed proteins

We compared folding properties of designed protein Top7 and natural protein S6 by using coarse-grained chain models with a mainly native-centric construct that accounted also for nonnative hydrophobic interactions and desolvation barriers. Top7 and S6 have similar secondary structure elements and are approximately equal in length and hydrophobic composition. Yet their experimental folding kinetics were drastically different. Consistent with experiment, our simulated folding chevron arm for Top7 exhibited a severe rollover, whereas that for S6 was essentially linear, and Top7 model kinetic relaxation was multiphasic under strongly folding conditions. The peculiar behavior of Top7 was associated with several classes of kinetic traps in our model. Significantly, the amino acid residues participating in nonnative interactions in trapped conformations in our Top7 model overlapped with those deduced experimentally. These affirmations suggest that the simple ingredients of native topology plus sequence-dependent nonnative interactions are sufficient to account for some key features of protein folding kinetics. Notably, when nonnative interactions were absent in the model, Top7 chevron rollover was not correctly predicted. In contrast, nonnative interactions had little effect on the quasi linearity of the model folding chevron arm for S6. This intriguing distinction indicates that folding cooperativity is governed by a subtle interplay between the sequence-dependent driving forces for native topology and the locations of favorable nonnative interactions entailed by the same sequence. Constructed with a capability to mimic this interplay, our simple modeling approach should be useful in general for assessing a designed sequence's potential to fold cooperatively.

Aggregation as the basis for complex behaviour of cutinase in different denaturants

We have previously described the complexity of the folding of the lipolytic enzyme cutinase from F. solani pisi in guanidinium chloride. Here we extend the refolding analysis by refolding from the pH-denatured state and analyze the folding behaviour in the presence of the weaker denaturant urea and the stronger denaturant guanidinium thiocyanate. In urea there is excellent consistency between equilibrium and kinetic data, and the intermediate accumulating at low denaturant concentrations is off-pathway. However, in GdmCl, refolding rates, and consequently the stability of the native state, vary significantly depending on whether refolding takes place from the pH- or GdmCl-denatured state, possibly due to transient formation of aggregates during folding from the GdmCl-denatured state. In GdmSCN, stability is reduced by several kcal/mol with significant aggregation in the unfolding transition region. The basis for the large variation in folding behaviour may be the denaturants' differential ability to support formation of exposed hydrophobic regions and consequent changes in aggregative properties during refolding.