1
|
Grigas AT, Liu Z, Logan JA, Shattuck MD, O'Hern CS. Protein folding as a jamming transition. ARXIV 2024:arXiv:2405.09646v1. [PMID: 38800654 PMCID: PMC11118678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Proteins fold to a specific functional conformation with a densely packed hydrophobic core that controls their stability. We develop a geometric, yet all-atom model for proteins that explains the universal core packing fraction of ϕ c = 0.55 found in experimental measurements. We show that as the hydrophobic interactions increase relative to the temperature, a novel jamming transition occurs when the core packing fraction exceeds ϕ c . The model also recapitulates the global structure of proteins since it can accurately refold to native-like structures from partially unfolded states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex T Grigas
- Graduate Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA
| | - Zhuoyi Liu
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA
| | - Jack A Logan
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA
| | - Mark D Shattuck
- Benjamin Levich Institute and Physics Department, The City College of New York, New York, New York 10031, USA
| | - Corey S O'Hern
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA
- Graduate Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA
- Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anderson DM, Jayanthi LP, Gosavi S, Meiering EM. Engineering the kinetic stability of a β-trefoil protein by tuning its topological complexity. Front Mol Biosci 2023; 10:1021733. [PMID: 36845544 PMCID: PMC9945329 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1021733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Kinetic stability, defined as the rate of protein unfolding, is central to determining the functional lifetime of proteins, both in nature and in wide-ranging medical and biotechnological applications. Further, high kinetic stability is generally correlated with high resistance against chemical and thermal denaturation, as well as proteolytic degradation. Despite its significance, specific mechanisms governing kinetic stability remain largely unknown, and few studies address the rational design of kinetic stability. Here, we describe a method for designing protein kinetic stability that uses protein long-range order, absolute contact order, and simulated free energy barriers of unfolding to quantitatively analyze and predict unfolding kinetics. We analyze two β-trefoil proteins: hisactophilin, a quasi-three-fold symmetric natural protein with moderate stability, and ThreeFoil, a designed three-fold symmetric protein with extremely high kinetic stability. The quantitative analysis identifies marked differences in long-range interactions across the protein hydrophobic cores that partially account for the differences in kinetic stability. Swapping the core interactions of ThreeFoil into hisactophilin increases kinetic stability with close agreement between predicted and experimentally measured unfolding rates. These results demonstrate the predictive power of readily applied measures of protein topology for altering kinetic stability and recommend core engineering as a tractable target for rationally designing kinetic stability that may be widely applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lakshmi P. Jayanthi
- Simons Centre for the Study of Living Machines, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India
| | - Shachi Gosavi
- Simons Centre for the Study of Living Machines, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India
| | - Elizabeth M. Meiering
- Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada,*Correspondence: Elizabeth M. Meiering,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mortensen JC, Damjanovic J, Miao J, Hui T, Lin Y. A backbone-dependent rotamer library with high (ϕ, ψ) coverage using metadynamics simulations. Protein Sci 2022; 31:e4491. [PMID: 36327064 PMCID: PMC9679973 DOI: 10.1002/pro.4491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
Backbone-dependent rotamer libraries are commonly used to assign the side chain dihedral angles of amino acids when modeling protein structures. Most rotamer libraries are created by curating protein crystal structure data and using various methods to extrapolate the existing data to cover all possible backbone conformations. However, these rotamer libraries may not be suitable for modeling the structures of cyclic peptides and other constrained peptides because these molecules frequently sample backbone conformations rarely seen in the crystal structures of linear proteins. To provide backbone-dependent side chain information beyond the α-helix, β-sheet, and PPII regions, we used explicit-solvent metadynamics simulations of model dipeptides to create a new rotamer library that has high coverage in the (ϕ, ψ) space. Furthermore, this approach can be applied to build high-coverage rotamer libraries for noncanonical amino acids. The resulting Metadynamics of Dipeptides for Rotamer Distribution (MEDFORD) rotamer library predicts the side chain conformations of high-resolution protein crystal structures with similar accuracy (~80%) to a state-of-the-art rotamer library. Our ability to test the accuracy of MEDFORD at predicting the side chain dihedral angles of amino acids in noncanonical backbone conformation is restricted by the limited structural data available for cyclic peptides. For the cyclic peptide data that are currently available, MEDFORD and the state-of-the-art rotamer library perform comparably. However, the two rotamer libraries indeed make different rotamer predictions in noncanonical (ϕ, ψ) regions. For noncanonical amino acids, the MEDFORD rotamer library predicts the χ1 values with approximately 75% accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jiayuan Miao
- Department of ChemistryTufts UniversityMedfordMassachusettsUSA
| | - Tiffani Hui
- Department of ChemistryTufts UniversityMedfordMassachusettsUSA
| | - Yu‐Shan Lin
- Department of ChemistryTufts UniversityMedfordMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kisiela DI, Magala P, Interlandi G, Carlucci LA, Ramos A, Tchesnokova V, Basanta B, Yarov-Yarovoy V, Avagyan H, Hovhannisyan A, Thomas WE, Stenkamp RE, Klevit RE, Sokurenko EV. Toggle switch residues control allosteric transitions in bacterial adhesins by participating in a concerted repacking of the protein core. PLoS Pathog 2021; 17:e1009440. [PMID: 33826682 PMCID: PMC8064603 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Critical molecular events that control conformational transitions in most allosteric proteins are ill-defined. The mannose-specific FimH protein of Escherichia coli is a prototypic bacterial adhesin that switches from an 'inactive' low-affinity state (LAS) to an 'active' high-affinity state (HAS) conformation allosterically upon mannose binding and mediates shear-dependent catch bond adhesion. Here we identify a novel type of antibody that acts as a kinetic trap and prevents the transition between conformations in both directions. Disruption of the allosteric transitions significantly slows FimH's ability to associate with mannose and blocks bacterial adhesion under dynamic conditions. FimH residues critical for antibody binding form a compact epitope that is located away from the mannose-binding pocket and is structurally conserved in both states. A larger antibody-FimH contact area is identified by NMR and contains residues Leu-34 and Val-35 that move between core-buried and surface-exposed orientations in opposing directions during the transition. Replacement of Leu-34 with a charged glutamic acid stabilizes FimH in the LAS conformation and replacement of Val-35 with glutamic acid traps FimH in the HAS conformation. The antibody is unable to trap the conformations if Leu-34 and Val-35 are replaced with a less bulky alanine. We propose that these residues act as molecular toggle switches and that the bound antibody imposes a steric block to their reorientation in either direction, thereby restricting concerted repacking of side chains that must occur to enable the conformational transition. Residues homologous to the FimH toggle switches are highly conserved across a diverse family of fimbrial adhesins. Replacement of predicted switch residues reveals that another E. coli adhesin, galactose-specific FmlH, is allosteric and can shift from an inactive to an active state. Our study shows that allosteric transitions in bacterial adhesins depend on toggle switch residues and that an antibody that blocks the switch effectively disables adhesive protein function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dagmara I. Kisiela
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Pearl Magala
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Gianluca Interlandi
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Laura A. Carlucci
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Angelo Ramos
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Veronika Tchesnokova
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Benjamin Basanta
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy
- Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America
| | - Hovhannes Avagyan
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Anahit Hovhannisyan
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Wendy E. Thomas
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Ronald E. Stenkamp
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Rachel E. Klevit
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Evgeni V. Sokurenko
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grigas AT, Mei Z, Treado JD, Levine ZA, Regan L, O'Hern CS. Using physical features of protein core packing to distinguish real proteins from decoys. Protein Sci 2020; 29:1931-1944. [PMID: 32710566 PMCID: PMC7454528 DOI: 10.1002/pro.3914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The ability to consistently distinguish real protein structures from computationally generated model decoys is not yet a solved problem. One route to distinguish real protein structures from decoys is to delineate the important physical features that specify a real protein. For example, it has long been appreciated that the hydrophobic cores of proteins contribute significantly to their stability. We used two sources to obtain datasets of decoys to compare with real protein structures: submissions to the biennial Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction competition, in which researchers attempt to predict the structure of a protein only knowing its amino acid sequence, and also decoys generated by 3DRobot, which have user-specified global root-mean-squared deviations from experimentally determined structures. Our analysis revealed that both sets of decoys possess cores that do not recapitulate the key features that define real protein cores. In particular, the model structures appear more densely packed (because of energetically unfavorable atomic overlaps), contain too few residues in the core, and have improper distributions of hydrophobic residues throughout the structure. Based on these observations, we developed a feed-forward neural network, which incorporates key physical features of protein cores, to predict how well a computational model recapitulates the real protein structure without knowledge of the structure of the target sequence. By identifying the important features of protein structure, our method is able to rank decoy structures with similar accuracy to that obtained by state-of-the-art methods that incorporate many additional features. The small number of physical features makes our model interpretable, emphasizing the importance of protein packing and hydrophobicity in protein structure prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex T. Grigas
- Graduate Program in Computational Biology and BioinformaticsYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering BiologyYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Zhe Mei
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering BiologyYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of ChemistryYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - John D. Treado
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering BiologyYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials ScienceYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Zachary A. Levine
- Department of PathologyYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and BiochemistryYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Lynne Regan
- Institute of Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Corey S. O'Hern
- Graduate Program in Computational Biology and BioinformaticsYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering BiologyYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials ScienceYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of PhysicsYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of Applied PhysicsYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Treado JD, Mei Z, Regan L, O’Hern CS. Void distributions reveal structural link between jammed packings and protein cores. Phys Rev E 2019; 99:022416. [PMID: 30934238 PMCID: PMC6902428 DOI: 10.1103/physreve.99.022416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Dense packing of hydrophobic residues in the cores of globular proteins determines their stability. Recently, we have shown that protein cores possess packing fraction ϕ≈0.56, which is the same as dense, random packing of amino-acid-shaped particles. In this article, we compare the structural properties of protein cores and jammed packings of amino-acid-shaped particles in much greater depth by measuring their local and connected void regions. We find that the distributions of surface Voronoi cell volumes and local porosities obey similar statistics in both systems. We also measure the probability that accessible, connected void regions percolate as a function of the size of a spherical probe particle and show that both systems possess the same critical probe size. We measure the critical exponent τ that characterizes the size distribution of connected void clusters at the onset of percolation. We find that the cluster size statistics are similar for void percolation in packings of amino-acid-shaped particles and randomly placed spheres, but different from that for void percolation in jammed sphere packings. We propose that the connected void regions are a defining structural feature of proteins and can be used to differentiate experimentally observed proteins from decoy structures that are generated using computational protein design software. This work emphasizes that jammed packings of amino-acid-shaped particles can serve as structural and mechanical analogs of protein cores, and could therefore be useful in modeling the response of protein cores to cavity-expanding and -reducing mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D. Treado
- Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical & Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - Zhe Mei
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical & Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - Lynne Regan
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical & Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Department of Molecular Biophysics & Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - Corey S. O’Hern
- Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical & Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gaines JC, Acebes S, Virrueta A, Butler M, Regan L, O'Hern CS. Comparing side chain packing in soluble proteins, protein-protein interfaces, and transmembrane proteins. Proteins 2018; 86:581-591. [PMID: 29427530 PMCID: PMC5912992 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2017] [Revised: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
We compare side chain prediction and packing of core and non-core regions of soluble proteins, protein-protein interfaces, and transmembrane proteins. We first identified or created comparable databases of high-resolution crystal structures of these 3 protein classes. We show that the solvent-inaccessible cores of the 3 classes of proteins are equally densely packed. As a result, the side chains of core residues at protein-protein interfaces and in the membrane-exposed regions of transmembrane proteins can be predicted by the hard-sphere plus stereochemical constraint model with the same high prediction accuracies (>90%) as core residues in soluble proteins. We also find that for all 3 classes of proteins, as one moves away from the solvent-inaccessible core, the packing fraction decreases as the solvent accessibility increases. However, the side chain predictability remains high (80% within 30°) up to a relative solvent accessibility, rSASA≲0.3, for all 3 protein classes. Our results show that ≈40% of the interface regions in protein complexes are "core", that is, densely packed with side chain conformations that can be accurately predicted using the hard-sphere model. We propose packing fraction as a metric that can be used to distinguish real protein-protein interactions from designed, non-binding, decoys. Our results also show that cores of membrane proteins are the same as cores of soluble proteins. Thus, the computational methods we are developing for the analysis of the effect of hydrophobic core mutations in soluble proteins will be equally applicable to analyses of mutations in membrane proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Gaines
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology (IGPPEB), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
| | - S Acebes
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
| | - A Virrueta
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology (IGPPEB), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
| | - M Butler
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, 90007
| | - L Regan
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology (IGPPEB), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
- Department of Molecular Biophysics & Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
- Department of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
| | - C S O'Hern
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology (IGPPEB), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
- Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Colbes J, Aguila SA, Brizuela CA. Scoring of Side-Chain Packings: An Analysis of Weight Factors and Molecular Dynamics Structures. J Chem Inf Model 2018; 58:443-452. [PMID: 29368924 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The protein side-chain packing problem (PSCPP) is a central task in computational protein design. The problem is usually modeled as a combinatorial optimization problem, which consists of searching for a set of rotamers, from a given rotamer library, that minimizes a scoring function (SF). The SF is a weighted sum of terms, that can be decomposed in physics-based and knowledge-based terms. Although there are many methods to obtain approximate solutions for this problem, all of them have similar performances and there has not been a significant improvement in recent years. Studies on protein structure prediction and protein design revealed the limitations of current SFs to achieve further improvements for these two problems. In the same line, a recent work reported a similar result for the PSCPP. In this work, we ask whether or not this negative result regarding further improvements in performance is due to (i) an incorrect weighting of the SFs terms or (ii) the constrained conformation resulting from the protein crystallization process. To analyze these questions, we (i) model the PSCPP as a bi-objective combinatorial optimization problem, optimizing, at the same time, the two most important terms of two SFs of state-of-the-art algorithms and (ii) performed a preprocessing relaxation of the crystal structure through molecular dynamics to simulate the protein in the solvent and evaluated the performance of these two state-of-the-art SFs under these conditions. Our results indicate that (i) no matter what combination of weight factors we use the current SFs will not lead to better performances and (ii) the evaluated SFs will not be able to improve performance on relaxed structures. Furthermore, the experiments revealed that the SFs and the methods are biased toward crystallized structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Colbes
- Computer Science Department, CICESE Research Center , 22860 Ensenada, Mexico
| | - Sergio A Aguila
- Centro de Nanociencias y Nanotecnologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico , Km. 107 Carretera Tijuana-Ensenada, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico , C.P. 22860
| | - Carlos A Brizuela
- Computer Science Department, CICESE Research Center , 22860 Ensenada, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gaines JC, Clark AH, Regan L, O'Hern CS. Packing in protein cores. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS. CONDENSED MATTER : AN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS JOURNAL 2017; 29:293001. [PMID: 28557791 DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/aa75c2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Proteins are biological polymers that underlie all cellular functions. The first high-resolution protein structures were determined by x-ray crystallography in the 1960s. Since then, there has been continued interest in understanding and predicting protein structure and stability. It is well-established that a large contribution to protein stability originates from the sequestration from solvent of hydrophobic residues in the protein core. How are such hydrophobic residues arranged in the core; how can one best model the packing of these residues, and are residues loosely packed with multiple allowed side chain conformations or densely packed with a single allowed side chain conformation? Here we show that to properly model the packing of residues in protein cores it is essential that amino acids are represented by appropriately calibrated atom sizes, and that hydrogen atoms are explicitly included. We show that protein cores possess a packing fraction of [Formula: see text], which is significantly less than the typically quoted value of 0.74 obtained using the extended atom representation. We also compare the results for the packing of amino acids in protein cores to results obtained for jammed packings from discrete element simulations of spheres, elongated particles, and composite particles with bumpy surfaces. We show that amino acids in protein cores pack as densely as disordered jammed packings of particles with similar values for the aspect ratio and bumpiness as found for amino acids. Knowing the structural properties of protein cores is of both fundamental and practical importance. Practically, it enables the assessment of changes in the structure and stability of proteins arising from amino acid mutations (such as those identified as a result of the massive human genome sequencing efforts) and the design of new folded, stable proteins and protein-protein interactions with tunable specificity and affinity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Gaines
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States of America. Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology (IGPPEB), Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States of America
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|