1
|
Chattopadhyay T, Ozarkar SS, Buwa K, Joshy NA, Komandur D, Naik J, Thomopoulos SI, Ver Steeg G, Ambite JL, Thompson PM. Comparison of deep learning architectures for predicting amyloid positivity in Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy aging, from T1-weighted brain structural MRI. Front Neurosci 2024; 18:1387196. [PMID: 39015378 PMCID: PMC11250587 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1387196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Abnormal β-amyloid (Aβ) accumulation in the brain is an early indicator of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is typically assessed through invasive procedures such as PET (positron emission tomography) or CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) assays. As new anti-Alzheimer's treatments can now successfully target amyloid pathology, there is a growing interest in predicting Aβ positivity (Aβ+) from less invasive, more widely available types of brain scans, such as T1-weighted (T1w) MRI. Here we compare multiple approaches to infer Aβ + from standard anatomical MRI: (1) classical machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, XGBoost, and shallow artificial neural networks, (2) deep learning models based on 2D and 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs), (3) a hybrid ANN-CNN, combining the strengths of shallow and deep neural networks, (4) transfer learning models based on CNNs, and (5) 3D Vision Transformers. All models were trained on paired MRI/PET data from 1,847 elderly participants (mean age: 75.1 yrs. ± 7.6SD; 863 females/984 males; 661 healthy controls, 889 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 297 with Dementia), scanned as part of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. We evaluated each model's balanced accuracy and F1 scores. While further tests on more diverse data are warranted, deep learning models trained on standard MRI showed promise for estimating Aβ + status, at least in people with MCI. This may offer a potential screening option before resorting to more invasive procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamoghna Chattopadhyay
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Saket S. Ozarkar
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Ketaki Buwa
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Neha Ann Joshy
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Dheeraj Komandur
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Jayati Naik
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Sophia I. Thomopoulos
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | | | - Jose Luis Ambite
- Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Paul M. Thompson
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang R, Bashyam V, Yang Z, Yu F, Tassopoulou V, Chintapalli SS, Skampardoni I, Sreepada LP, Sahoo D, Nikita K, Abdulkadir A, Wen J, Davatzikos C. Applications of generative adversarial networks in neuroimaging and clinical neuroscience. Neuroimage 2023; 269:119898. [PMID: 36702211 PMCID: PMC9992336 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are one powerful type of deep learning models that have been successfully utilized in numerous fields. They belong to the broader family of generative methods, which learn to generate realistic data with a probabilistic model by learning distributions from real samples. In the clinical context, GANs have shown enhanced capabilities in capturing spatially complex, nonlinear, and potentially subtle disease effects compared to traditional generative methods. This review critically appraises the existing literature on the applications of GANs in imaging studies of various neurological conditions, including Alzheimer's disease, brain tumors, brain aging, and multiple sclerosis. We provide an intuitive explanation of various GAN methods for each application and further discuss the main challenges, open questions, and promising future directions of leveraging GANs in neuroimaging. We aim to bridge the gap between advanced deep learning methods and neurology research by highlighting how GANs can be leveraged to support clinical decision making and contribute to a better understanding of the structural and functional patterns of brain diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongguang Wang
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
| | - Vishnu Bashyam
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Zhijian Yang
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Fanyang Yu
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Vasiliki Tassopoulou
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Sai Spandana Chintapalli
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Ioanna Skampardoni
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Lasya P Sreepada
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Dushyant Sahoo
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Konstantina Nikita
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ahmed Abdulkadir
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Junhao Wen
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
| |
Collapse
|