1
|
Saltiel F, Miranda-Gazzola APG, Vieira GF, Figueiredo EM. Advancing women's pelvic floor muscle function diagnosis: the EFSMAP examination and its reliability evaluation. Braz J Phys Ther 2024; 28:101067. [PMID: 38815549 PMCID: PMC11166699 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The accurate diagnosis of pelvic floor muscle impairments is essential. The plethora of terms and the lack of evidence to support widely used pelvic floor muscle function (PFMF) measurements hinder diagnostic labels. OBJECTIVE To structure an examination of PFMF using visual observation and digital palpation and terms consistent with the ICF terminology, and to test its intra and interrater reliability/agreement. METHODS A panel of 9 physical therapists applied Delphi method to structure the PFMF exam under ICF terminology and to verify its measurements reproducibility. For reliability and agreement, a convenience sample of women aged 51.2 ± 14.7 years had the sensitivity to pressure, pain, muscle tone, involuntary movement reaction, control of voluntary movement (contraction/relaxation), coordination, strength, and endurance examined by two raters, in the same day for interrater (n = 40), and one week apart, for intrarater reliability (n = 25). Percent agreement, linear weighted kappa, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman's limits of agreement were calculated (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS Four round Delphi discussion structured the PFMF exam, named EFSMAP (Exame das Funções Sensoriais e Motoras do Assoalho Pélvico/Examination of Pelvic Floor Sensory and Motor Functions), set a list of concepts and instructions targeted at reproducibility and established PFMF diagnostic labels. Reliability, except for pain and tone, were moderate to excellent (Kw= 0.67-1.0 and ICC=0.48-0.82). Agreement was substantial for most PFMF features (0.64-1.00), except pain. CONCLUSIONS The EFSMAP was successfully developed as a valid and reliable exam to be used in research and clinical practice; it provides labels for the diagnosis of pelvic floor muscle impairments. It might be easily adopted worldwide as it uses ICF terminology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda Saltiel
- Rehabilitation Sciences Program, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil. (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (FCMMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | | | - Gabriella Ferreira Vieira
- Rehabilitation Sciences Program, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil. (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | - Elyonara Mello Figueiredo
- Physical Therapy Department, Rehabilitation Sciences Program, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Audrain A, Cornu JN, Kerdelhue G, Combret Y, Steenstrup B. Do pelvic floor muscle function parameters differ in women according to continence status? A systematic review. THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102592. [PMID: 38377645 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current literature highlights the difficulty in identifying which pelvic floor muscle (PFM) functions are correlated with urinary incontinence (UI). AIM In this study, we compared parameters of PFM function (strength, endurance, tone, control, reaction, and/or coordination) according to continence status in women (presence or absence, type and/or severity of urinary incontinence). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review was conducted following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Three databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, and LiSSa) were searched from inception to December 31, 2021. Assessment of risk of bias was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The initial research yielded 4733 studies. Forty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, including 4015 participants. No statistical association was found between PFM function and the presence or absence of UI, the different type of UI or the different levels of severity of UI. The heterogeneity in methodologies and analyzes of the results only with the P-value are important limitations of this review. CONCLUSION It appears that muscle function is not always associated with presence or absence of UI. No association is found between PFM function and type or severity of UI. These results reinforce the need to carry out a bio-psycho-social evaluation of UI that does not only focus on PFM functions. As such, the results reported herein can be considered a resource for more specific research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gaëtan Kerdelhue
- Department of Biomechanical Informatics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Yann Combret
- Physiotherapy Department, Le Havre Hospital, La Havre, France; ERPHAN, Paris-Saclay University, UVSQ, Versailles, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clarke L, Ridgewell E, Dillon MP. Identifying and linking prosthetic outcomes to the ICF framework: a step to inform the benefits measured in prosthetic health economic evaluations. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:1103-1113. [PMID: 35298340 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2049902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prosthetic research seems focused on measuring gait-related outcomes that may not adequately measure real-world benefits of prosthetic interventions. Systematically cataloguing a comprehensive range of outcomes is an important steppingstone towards developing a holistic way to measure the benefits of prosthetic interventions for future health economic evaluations. The purpose of this research was to identify and catalogue the outcomes measured in lower-limb prosthetic research using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework and a custom clinical framework, and thereby describe the existing research focus and identify evidence gaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS A structured literature search identified systematic reviews of lower-limb prosthetic interventions. Reported outcomes were extracted from included studies and linked to the ICF- and clinical-frameworks. RESULTS Of the 1297 extracted outcomes, 1060 were linked to the ICF framework. Most outcomes linked to second- (63.8%) or third-level categories (33.4%), such as Gait Pattern Functions (b770, 49.8%). Most of these outcomes (31.2%) describe temporospatial, kinematic or kinetic gait measures as categorised by the clinical framework. CONCLUSIONS Lower-limb prosthetic research is focused on laboratory-based measures of gait. There are evidence gaps describing participation in real-world activities - important outcomes to inform policy and investment decisions that determine the prosthetic interventions available for people with limb-loss.Implications for rehabilitationCataloguing the outcomes used in prosthetic research to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) allows important evidence gaps to be illuminated given the holistic description of function and disability.Establishing a comprehensive list of prosthetic outcomes, described using an internationally recognised framework with unified and consistent language, is an important steppingstone towards developing a core outcome set (COS) for prosthetic interventions and informing the benefits measured in future prosthetic health economic evaluations (HEEs).Being able to measure the benefits of a prosthesis that are most important to prosthesis users and funders has potential to fundamentally change future HEEs that influence funding policies, and ultimately the prostheses made available to people living with limb-loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leigh Clarke
- Discipline of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- The Australian Orthotic Prosthetic Association, Camberwell, Australia
| | - Emily Ridgewell
- Discipline of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael P Dillon
- Discipline of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frawley H, Shelly B, Morin M, Bernard S, Bø K, Digesu GA, Dickinson T, Goonewardene S, McClurg D, Rahnama'i MS, Schizas A, Slieker-Ten Hove M, Takahashi S, Voelkl Guevara J. An International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for pelvic floor muscle assessment. Neurourol Urodyn 2021; 40:1217-1260. [PMID: 33844342 DOI: 10.1002/nau.24658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The terminology for female and male pelvic floor muscle (PFM) assessment has expanded considerably since the first PFM function and dysfunction standardization of terminology document in 2005. New terms have entered assessment reports, and new investigations to measure PFM function and dysfunction have been developed. An update of this terminology was required to comprehensively document the terms and their definitions, and to describe the assessment method and interpretation of the finding, to standardize assessment procedures and aid diagnostic decision making. METHODS This report combines the input of members of the Standardisation Committee of the International Continence Society (ICS) Working Group 16, with contributions from recognized experts in the field and external referees. A logical, sequential, clinically directed assessment framework was created against which the assessment process was mapped. Within categories and subclassifications, each term was assigned a numeric coding. A transparent process of 12 rounds of full working group and external review was undertaken to exhaustively examine each definition, plus additional extensive internal development, with decision making by collective opinion (consensus). RESULTS A Terminology Report for the symptoms, signs, investigations, and diagnoses associated with PFM function and dysfunction, encompassing 185 separate definitions/descriptors, has been developed. It is clinically based with the most common assessment processes defined. Clarity and user-friendliness have been key aims to make it interpretable by clinicians and researchers of different disciplines. CONCLUSION A consensus-based Terminology Report for assessment of PFM function and dysfunction has been produced to aid clinical practice and be a stimulus for research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Frawley
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Beth Shelly
- Beth Shelly Physical Therapy, Moline, Illinois, USA.,Department of Physical Therapy, Saint Ambrose University Davenport, Iowa, USA
| | - Melanie Morin
- School of Rehabilitation Faculty of Medecine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Stéphanie Bernard
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kari Bø
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Giuseppe Alessandro Digesu
- Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Mary's Hospital, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Tamara Dickinson
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Mohammad S Rahnama'i
- Uniklinik RWTH, University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.,Society of Urological Research and Education (SURE), Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Alexis Schizas
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guy's and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marijke Slieker-Ten Hove
- Department Gynaecology, University of Erasmus, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Pelvic Floor Physiotherapy, ProFundum Instituut, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|