The Influence of Glenohumeral Joint Posterior Capsule Tightness and Impingement Symptoms on Shoulder Impairments and Kinematics

Kinematic, electromyographic and isokinetic measurements for the management of shoulder subacromial pain syndrome: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Subacromial shoulder pain syndrome is a very common and challenging musculoskeletal disorder. Kinematics, electromyographic muscle activity and isokinetic dynamometry are promising non-invasive movement analysis tools to improve understanding of this condition. No review has combined their results to provide a better understanding of the effects of subacromial pain syndrome on shoulder movement. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the associations between exposure to shoulder pain due to subacromial pain syndromes or subacromial impingement and changes in shoulder movement measures.

METHODS

The databases were Scholar google, Pubmed, Science Direct, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. We included studies that observed the association of the presence of subacromial pain syndromes or subacromial impingement with changes in shoulder motion measures.

FINDINGS

Seventeen studies with 943 participants were included. The main kinematic change was a lower scapular posterior during abduction in the subacromial pain syndrome group with a "low" level of evidence (standardised mean difference = -0.61, 95% confidence interval [-0.80; -0.43]). The main electromyographic change was an earlier onset of activation of the upper trapezius in the subacromial pain syndrome group, with a "moderate" level of evidence (standardised mean difference = 1.01, 95% confidence interval: [-2.97; 0.96]). The main isokinetic change was a lower peak internal rotator torque in the subacromial pain syndrome group, with a 'low' level of evidence (standardised mean difference = -0.41, 95% confidence interval: [-0.53; -0.29]).

INTERPRETATION

The variables measured during movement are associated with subacromial pain syndrome or subacromial impingement syndrome. Consistency between the results supports the importance of scapula biomechanics measurements in these conditions.

Comparison of the effectiveness of novel intervention on restricted range of motion of shoulder in young healthy subjects

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of four novel and pragmatic interventions on the restricted range of motion (ROM) of shoulder joint in healthy subjects.

Methods

The study was conducted at Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Mansehra, in 6-months duration. This quasi-experimental study recruited 120 young subjects with an equal proportion of males and females for four novel intervention groups (n=30 each group) including pragmatic posterior capsular stretch, Serratus anterior stretch, rotator cuff facilitation and acromioclavicular joint mobilization. Study variables included measurement of Reaching up behind the back (RUBTB), Reaching down behind the neck (RDBTN), and shoulder range of motion (flexion, abduction, external rotation, internal rotation). The paired t-test was used for the change in pretest and posttest variables and the Kruskal Wallis test was used to compare the change in each group of interventions.

Results

All the variables improved significantly (p< 0.05) from their baseline scores for the interventions. The mean difference among the intervention groups for the variables was statistically significant (p<0.001) on the Kruskal Wallis test. Pragmatic posterior capsular stretch (PPCS) and serratus anterior stretch (SAS) improved the RUBTB and RDBTN more than the other interventions. Rotator cuff facilitation (RFC) improved shoulder rotation more than the rest of the intervention. Acromioclavicular joint mobilization (ACJM) was effective in improving the abduction and flexion ROM.

Conclusion

Pragmatic interventions are effective in improving shoulder ROM in young healthy adults and recommended for the trials on prevention and rehabilitation of shoulder pathologies.

Comparison of specific and non-specific treatment approaches for individuals with posterior capsule tightness and shoulder impingement symptoms: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Posterior capsule tightness (PCT) is associated with shoulder pain and altered shoulder kinematics, range of motion (ROM), external rotation (ER) strength, and pain sensitization.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of two interventions on shoulder kinematics, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores, ROM, strength, and pressure pain threshold (PPT) in individuals with PCT and shoulder impingement symptoms.

METHODS

In this prospectively registered randomized controlled trial 59 individuals were randomized to either an Experimental Intervention Group (EIG, n=31) or a Control Intervention Group (CIG, n=28). The low flexion (LF) test was used to determine the presence of PCT. Shoulder kinematics, SPADI scores, internal rotation (IR) and ER ROM, ER strength, and PPT were measured pre- and post-treatment. Those in the EIG received an intervention specific to pain and PCT and those in the CIG received a non-specific intervention, both 4 weeks in duration.

RESULTS

Individuals in the EIG demonstrated more scapular upward rotation (P=.03; mean difference (MD)=3.3°; 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=1.3°, 4.9°) and improved value on the LF test (P=.02; MD=4.6°; 95%CI=0.7°, 8.6°) than those in the CIG after treatment. Both groups presented less anterior (P<.01; MD=-0.7mm; 95%CI=-1.3mm, -0.2mm) and superior (P<.01; MD=-0.5mm; 95%CI=-0.9mm, -0.2mm) humeral translations, decreased SPADI score (P<.01; MD=-23.6; 95%CI=-28.7, -18.4), increased IR ROM (P<.01; MD=4.6°; 95%CI=1.8°, 7.8°) and PPTs for upper trapezius (P<.01; MD=60.1kPa; 95%CI=29.3kPa, 90.9kPa), infraspinatus (P=.04; MD=47.3kPa; 95%CI=2.1kPa, 92.5kPa), supraspinatus (P<.01; MD=63.7kPa; 95%CI=29.6kPa, 97.9kPa), and deltoid (P<.01; MD=40.9kPa; 95%CI=12.3kPa, 69.4kPa) after treatment.

CONCLUSION

The experimental intervention was more effective at improving PCT as measured through changes in the LF test. No benefit of the specific approach over the non-specific intervention was noted for the remaining variables.

The effects of restricted glenohumeral horizontal adduction motion on shoulder and elbow forces in collegiate baseball pitchers

BACKGROUND

Decreased glenohumeral (GH) horizontal adduction range of motion (ROM) among baseball pitchers has been associated with the development of various shoulder and elbow pathologies. No research has examined how this tightness may affect the forces placed on the shoulder and elbow during the pitching motion.

METHODS

Fifty-five asymptomatic National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I baseball pitchers participated. Twenty-five participants had -10° or less horizontal adduction ROM in their throwing shoulder. The remaining 30 participants had greater than -10° of horizontal adduction. A digital inclinometer was used to measure GH horizontal adduction, internal rotation, and external rotation ROM while in 90° of shoulder abduction. Forces produced in the throwing shoulder and elbow were assessed with a 3-dimension, high-speed video capture system and based on the sum of angular momenta of the kinetic chain segments around the center of gravity. Separate 2-tailed t tests were run to determine significant differences between groups (P < .05).

RESULTS

Both groups presented with significant bilateral differences in their total arcs of motion (P < .04). This suggests that the loss of horizontal adduction in these groups was at least partially due to soft tissue tightness. There were no significant between-group differences for shoulder external rotation torque or shoulder and elbow distraction (P > .10). The restricted ROM group had significantly more shoulder abduction torque (P = .04), shoulder horizontal abduction torque (P = .004), elbow flexion torque (P = .002), and elbow valgus torque (P = .02) compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that collegiate pitchers with -10° or less of horizontal adduction ROM in their throwing shoulder create significantly more shoulder abduction and horizontal abduction torque, as well as more elbow flexion and valgus torque, during the pitching motion than those with more ROM.

Pragmatic posterior capsular stretch and its effects on shoulder joint range of motion

Objective

To evaluate the immediate effects of pragmatic posterior capsular stretch (PPCS) on shoulder joint range of motion (ROM).

Method

A quasi-experimental design was used to recruit healthy subjects of age 21.43 (±1.960) years, height 165.8 (±2.1069) cm and weight 63.90 (±13.187) kg. Inclusion criteria were grade 1 and grade 2 of the shoulder mobility test of functional movement screening. Preintervention and postintervention measurement of flexion, abduction, internal rotation (IR), external rotation (ER), reaching up behind the back (RUBTB) and reaching down behind the neck (RDBTN) were compared. A therapist-administered PPCS was the only intervention applied.

Results

Paired t-test statistics showed improvement (mean°±SD) in shoulder flexion (13.5°±8.11), abduction (11°±8.35), IR (8.5°±10.27), ER (7.83°±7.15), RUBTB (17.34°±13.81) inches and RDBTN (2.93±1.52) inches. The changes in these ROM and functional movements were statistically significant (p<0.05).

Conclusion

PPCS can effectively improve the functional movement of RUBTB and shoulder ROM in healthy subjects. It is recommended for the trials on prevention and rehabilitation of shoulder pathologies.

Trial registration number

NCT04242888.

Agreement and reliability of a symptom modification test cluster for patients with subacromial pain syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To identify if a plausible theoretical construct exists for a test cluster in a group of patients with subacromial pain syndrome presenting with glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD); determine the intertester agreement and reliability of the proposed test cluster; determine if there are any meaningful relationships between the test cluster and the component tests for the entire sample; and determine if there are any differences in disability on the Dutch version of the shoulder pain and disability index between participants with a positive and negative test cluster.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective secondary analysis of data that were collected to determine the interrater agreement and reliability of clinical tests for assessment of patients with shoulder pain in primary care.

RESULTS

The test cluster total agreement and negative specific agreement was 87.8 and 90.4%, respectively. The prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa for the test cluster was substantial at 0.76. There were statistically significant meaningful relationships (≥0.50) between GIRD and the test cluster for Tester A (Phi = 0.71, p < .01) and Tester B (Phi = 0.82, p < .01). No differences in disability were identified between those with a positive and negative test cluster.

CONCLUSION

The test cluster described in this study may be a reliable means of identifying a subgroup of patients with subacromial pain syndrome related to GIRD. Future research should look to validate this test cluster prospectively.

Comparison of scapular kinematics and muscle strength between those with a positive and a negative Scapular Assistance Test

BACKGROUND

The Scapular Assistance Test was suggested to directly assess the influence of scapular motion on pain and indirectly measure the function of the scapular rotators. However, it is still not clear if individuals with a positive Scapular Assistance Test actually present changes in scapular motion and muscle strength. This study compared scapular kinematics and muscle strength between those with a positive Scapular Assistance Test and those with a negative Scapular Assistance Test.

METHODS

Fifty individuals with shoulder pain were randomly allocated to: positive (n = 25) or negative Scapular Assistance Test (n = 25) group. Scapular kinematics was measured during elevation and lowering of the arm. Strength of the serratus anterior and lower trapezius was also measured. Two-way analysis of variance was used to compare kinematics between groups. Unpaired Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare strength of serratus anterior and lower trapezius, respectively.

FINDINGS

There were no differences (P > 0.05) in scapular internal rotation and upward rotation between both groups. For scapular tilt, there was group main effect (P < 0.05) during elevation and lowering of the arm, whereas the positive Scapular Assistance Test group presented greater scapular anterior tilt. There was no difference (P > 0.05) in strength between groups.

INTERPRETATION

Individuals with a positive Scapular Assistance Test are more likely to present decreased scapular posterior tilt in those with shoulder pain. Strength of the scapular muscles seems to be same in those with a positive and a negative Scapular Assistance Test.