1
|
Jayakumar P, Crijns TJ, Misciagna W, Manickas-Hill O, Malay M, Jiranek W, Mather RC, Lentz TA. What Are the Underlying Mental Health Constructs Associated With Level of Capability in People With Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2024; 482:633-644. [PMID: 38393957 PMCID: PMC10937005 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000003003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health characteristics such as negative mood, fear avoidance, unhelpful thoughts regarding pain, and low self-efficacy are associated with symptom intensity and capability among patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). Knowledge gaps remain regarding the conceptual and statistical overlap of these constructs and which of these are most strongly associated with capability in people with OA. Further study of these underlying factors can inform us which mental health assessments to prioritize and how to incorporate them into whole-person, psychologically informed care. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) What are the distinct underlying factors that can be identified using statistical grouping of responses to a multidimensional mental health survey administered to patients with OA? (2) What are the associations between these distinct underlying factors and capability in knee OA (measured using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement [KOOS JR]) and hip OA (measured using Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement [HOOS JR]), accounting for sociodemographic and clinical factors? METHODS We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of adult patients who were referred to our program with a primary complaint of hip or knee pain secondary to OA between October 2017 and December 2020. Of the 2006 patients in the database, 38% (760) were excluded because they did not have a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis, and 23% (292 of 1246) were excluded owing to missing data, leaving 954 patients available for analysis. Seventy-three percent (697) were women, with a mean age of 61 ± 10 years; 65% (623) of patients were White, and 52% (498) were insured under a commercial plan or via their employer. We analyzed demographic data, patient-reported outcome measures, and a multidimensional mental health survey (the 10-item Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome-Yellow Flag [OSPRO-YF] assessment tool), which are routinely collected for all patients at their baseline new-patient visit. To answer our first question about identifying underlying mental health factors, we performed an exploratory factor analysis of the OSPRO-YF score estimates. This technique helped identify statistically distinct underlying factors for the entire cohort based on extracting the maximum common variance among the variables of the OSPRO-YF. The exploratory factor analysis established how strongly different mental health characteristics were intercorrelated. A scree plot technique was then applied to reduce these factor groupings (based on Eigenvalues above 1.0) into a set of distinct factors. Predicted factor scores of these latent variables were generated and were subsequently used as explanatory variables in the multivariable analysis that identified variables associated with HOOS JR and KOOS JR scores. RESULTS Two underlying mental health factors were identified using exploratory factor analysis and the scree plot; we labeled them "pain coping" and "mood." For patients with knee OA, after accounting for confounders, worse mood and worse pain coping were associated with greater levels of incapability (KOOS JR) in separate models but when analyzed in a combined model, pain coping (regression coefficient -4.3 [95% confidence interval -5.4 to -3.2], partial R 2 0.076; p < 0.001) had the strongest relationship, and mood was no longer associated. Similarly, for hip OA, pain coping (regression coefficient -5.4 [95% CI -7.8 to -3.1], partial R 2 0.10; p < 0.001) had the strongest relationship, and mood was no longer associated. CONCLUSION This study simplifies the multitude of mental health assessments into two underlying factors: cognition (pain coping) and feelings (mood). When considered together, the association between capability and pain coping was dominant, signaling the importance of a mental health assessment in orthopaedic care to go beyond focusing on unhelpful feelings and mood (assessment of depression and anxiety) alone to include measures of pain coping, such as the Pain Catastrophizing Scale or Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, both of which have been used extensively in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, prognostic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Jayakumar
- The Musculoskeletal Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Practice Transformation Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Tom J. Crijns
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Will Misciagna
- The Musculoskeletal Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Olivia Manickas-Hill
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Practice Transformation Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Morven Malay
- Practice Transformation Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - William Jiranek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Practice Transformation Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Richard C. Mather
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Practice Transformation Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Trevor A. Lentz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cabell GH, Kwon NF, Sutton KF, Lentz TA, Lewis BD, Olson S, Mather RC. Pain-Associated Psychological Distress Is of High Prevalence in Patients With Hip Pain: Characterizing Psychological Distress and Phenotypes. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2024; 6:100846. [PMID: 38260823 PMCID: PMC10801259 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To identify common pain-related psychological factors among patients seeking care for athletic hip pain, as well as characterize psychological distress phenotypes and compare hip-specific quality-of-life measures across those phenotypes. Methods A total of 721 patients were recruited from hip preservation clinics. The Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome-Yellow Flag Assessment Tool (OSPRO-YF) was used to identify the presence or absence of 11 different pain-associated psychological distress characteristics (yellow flags), while the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) was used to assess hip-related quality of life. Latent class analysis identified patient subgroups (phenotypes) based on naturally occurring combinations of distress characteristics. An analysis of variance was used to compare demographics, number of yellow flags, and iHOT-12 scores across phenotypes. Results The median (interquartile range) number of yellow flags was 6 (3-9), with 13.5% of the sample reporting 11 yellow flags. Latent class analysis (L2 = 543.3, classification errors = 0.082) resulted in 4 phenotypes: high distress (n = 299, 41.5%), low distress (n = 172, 23.9%), low self-efficacy and acceptance (n = 74, 10.3%), and negative pain coping (n = 276, 24.4%). Significant differences in mean yellow flags existed between all phenotypes except low self-efficacy and negative pain coping. There were no differences in demographics between phenotypes. The high distress class had the lowest mean iHOT-12 score (mean [SD], 23.5 [17.6]), with significant differences found between each phenotypic class. Conclusions There was a high prevalence of pain-associated psychological distress in patients presenting to tertiary hip arthroscopy clinics with hip pain. Furthermore, hip quality-of-life outcome scores were uniformly lower in patients with higher levels of psychological distress. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant H Cabell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Nicholas F Kwon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Redwood City, California, U.S.A
| | - Kent F Sutton
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Trevor A Lentz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Brian D Lewis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Steven Olson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Richard C Mather
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Allen KD, Huffman K, Cleveland RJ, van der Esch M, Abbott JH, Abbott A, Bennell K, Bowden JL, Eyles J, Healey EL, Holden MA, Jayakumar P, Koenig K, Lo G, Losina E, Miller K, Østerås N, Pratt C, Quicke JG, Sharma S, Skou ST, Tveter AT, Woolf A, Yu SP, Hinman RS. Evaluating Osteoarthritis Management Programs: outcome domain recommendations from the OARSI Joint Effort Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2023; 31:954-965. [PMID: 36893979 PMCID: PMC10565839 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.02.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop sets of core and optional recommended domains for describing and evaluating Osteoarthritis Management Programs (OAMPs), with a focus on hip and knee Osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN We conducted a 3-round modified Delphi survey involving an international group of researchers, health professionals, health administrators and people with OA. In Round 1, participants ranked the importance of 75 outcome and descriptive domains in five categories: patient impacts, implementation outcomes, and characteristics of the OAMP and its participants and clinicians. Domains ranked as "important" or "essential" by ≥80% of participants were retained, and participants could suggest additional domains. In Round 2, participants rated their level of agreement that each domain was essential for evaluating OAMPs: 0 = strongly disagree to 10 = strongly agree. A domain was retained if ≥80% rated it ≥6. In Round 3, participants rated remaining domains using same scale as in Round 2; a domain was recommended as "core" if ≥80% of participants rated it ≥9 and as "optional" if ≥80% rated it ≥7. RESULTS A total of 178 individuals from 26 countries participated; 85 completed all survey rounds. Only one domain, "ability to participate in daily activities", met criteria for a core domain; 25 domains met criteria for an optional recommendation: 8 Patient Impacts, 5 Implementation Outcomes, 5 Participant Characteristics, 3 OAMP Characteristics and 4 Clinician Characteristics. CONCLUSION The ability of patients with OA to participate in daily activities should be evaluated in all OAMPs. Teams evaluating OAMPs should consider including domains from the optional recommended set, with representation from all five categories and based on stakeholder priorities in their local context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K D Allen
- Department of Medicine & Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA; Durham Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, USA.
| | - K Huffman
- Department of Medicine & Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
| | - R J Cleveland
- Department of Medicine & Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
| | - M van der Esch
- Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Reade, Center for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J H Abbott
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand.
| | - A Abbott
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, SE 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
| | - K Bennell
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - J L Bowden
- Kolling Institute, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - J Eyles
- Kolling Institute, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - E L Healey
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, UK.
| | - M A Holden
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, UK.
| | - Prakash Jayakumar
- The Musculoskeletal Institute: Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
| | - K Koenig
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
| | - G Lo
- Section of Immunology, Allergy and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine and Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - E Losina
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Policy and Innovation EValuation in Orthopedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - K Miller
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - N Østerås
- Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - C Pratt
- Physiotherapy Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - J G Quicke
- Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, Chancery Exchange, London, UK; School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
| | - S Sharma
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
| | - S T Skou
- Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; The Research Unit PROgrez, Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark.
| | - A T Tveter
- Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - A Woolf
- Bone and Joint Research Group, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK.
| | - S P Yu
- Kolling Institute, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - R S Hinman
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jayakumar P, Duckworth E, Bozic KJ. Value-based Healthcare: Three Ways Healthcare Systems Can Get More Usage Out of Their Patient Engagement Tools. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:2136-2138. [PMID: 34546188 PMCID: PMC8445570 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Jayakumar
- Director of Value Based Health Care and Outcome Measurement, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth Duckworth
- Resident, Orthopaedic Surgery, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Kevin J. Bozic
- Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery and Chair of the Department of Surgery, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reconnecting the Brain With the Rest of the Body in Musculoskeletal Pain Research. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2020; 22:1-8. [PMID: 32553621 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
A challenge in understanding chronic musculoskeletal pain is that research is often siloed between neuroscience, physical therapy/rehabilitation, orthopedics, and rheumatology which focus respectively on 1) neurally mediated effects on pain processes, 2) behavior and muscle activity, 3) tissue structure, and 4) inflammatory processes. Although these disciplines individually study important aspects of pain, there is a need for more cross-disciplinary research that can bridge between them. Identifying the gaps in knowledge is important to understand the whole body, especially at the interfaces between the silos-between brain function and behavior, between behavior and tissue structure, between musculoskeletal and immune systems, and between peripheral tissues and the nervous system. Research on "mind and body" practices can bridge across these silos and encourage a "whole person" approach to better understand musculoskeletal pain by bringing together the brain and the rest of the body. PERSPECTIVE: Research on chronic musculoskeletal pain is limited by significant knowledge gaps. To be fully integrated, musculoskeletal pain research will need to bridge across tissues, anatomical areas, and body systems. Research on mind and body approaches encourages a "whole person" approach to better understand musculoskeletal pain.
Collapse
|