Cervical screening interval: costing the options in one health authority

Activity-Based Costing and Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing for Assessing the Costs of Cancer Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

A review of the literature on economic analyses in cancer (prevention, diagnosis, and treatment) using activity-based costing (ABC) or time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) for measuring costs and to examine how these approaches have been applied to assess and manage cancer costs.

METHODS

This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We conducted a search for studies that used ABC or TDABC to calculate the cost of cancer in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Only English- and Portuguese-language articles were retrieved from Medline, Lilacs, ScieLO, and Embase (January 1990 to August 2016).

RESULTS

In total, 421 studies were evaluated. However, only 27 papers were included. The first publications were from the early 2000s, but most of the studies were published in 2016 (n = 10). Most of the studies were carried out in the United States (n = 6) and Belgium (n = 6). Cancer treatment was the major focus of all studies (n = 20), followed by screening programs evaluations (n = 4) and diagnosis (n = 3). Among treatment modalities, economic analysis of radiotherapy was the most common topic of study. Retrospective clinical data represented 57.6% of the studies. More than 50% of the studies presented unspecified economic analysis. The hospital perspective was the most prevalent perspective among the studies (46.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

ABC and TDABC economic analyses are a promising area of studies in oncology costs.

Early withdrawal from cervical cancer screening: the question of cost-effectiveness

In countries such as the UK, mass population screening for cervical cancer has been undertaken since the 1960s. Although of established effectiveness, no formal evaluation of the screening protocol was carried out prior to its implementation. On the basis of a published mathematical modelling exercise, it has been speculated that withdrawing women from the screening programme at an earlier age than at present, whilst leading to a higher rate of invasive cervical cancer (ICC), could reduce resource use. Using estimates of screening and treatment costs, and of expected life-years lost following earlier withdrawal, we simulated cost-effectiveness ratios for various scenarios described by the model. Median cost savings resulting from a life-year lost never exceeded pound10000 for any scenario, although the estimates were particularly sensitive to the assumed age at cancer presentation and the rate of cancer progression. Our findings seem to offer little economic support for the early withdrawal of subjects from the cervical screening programme.