Restrictive use of immunosuppressive treatment in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: high renal survival in a large patient cohort

Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy and Treatment Related Complications

Introduction:

Idiopathic Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) is an immune-complex mediated renal disease which is usually associated with the nephrotic syndrome (NS). The course of the disease is variable. Some patients maintain normal kidney function with or without a spontaneous remission of proteinuria, while others progress to end-stage renal failure or die from complications related to the nephrotic syndrome. Whether or not to treat a patient with idiopathic membranous nephropathy is still controversial. The controversy is mainly related to the toxicity of the therapy and the variable natural course of the disease-spontaneous remission occurs in 40–50% of patients.

Aim:

The aim of this study was to describe our experience of treatment of an idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN), efficacy and complications rate.

Case report:

Our patient was older, mail gender, in high-risk group with persistent proteinuria 10,68 g/day and stable renal function. We have taken these factors into consideration, along with age and other comorbidities, that may significantly elevate the risk of treatment. We chose to start with early treatment, following the Ponticelli’s group protocol based on high dose corticosteroids (odd months) alternating with clorambucil (even months) for six months. This treatment was accompanied by the steroid side effects, including hyperglycaemia dependance on insulin therapy and pulmonary thromboembolism despite administered prophylactically low molecular weight heparin. The six-month treatment was successfully completed with the reduction of proteinuria to nephritic values 2,86 g/day, despite many complications. Complete remission of the disease with non-significant proteinuria and with stable renal function was achieved in 14 months which has been maintained for 2 years.

Conclusion:

We suggest that decisions on the timing of start of therapy, whom to treat, best sequence of the use of the various immunosuppressive drugs must be based on an individualized assessment of risks and benefits.

Response to immunosuppressive therapy in PLA2R- associated and non-PLA2R- associated idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study

Background

According to renal M type phospholipase A₂ receptor (PLA₂R) immunohistochemistry, idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) could be categorized into PLA₂R-associated and non-PLA₂R-associated IMN. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study with 91 patients to compare the effect of immunosuppressive therapy between PLA₂R-associated and non-PLA₂R-associated IMN patients.

Methods

A total of 91 biopsy-proven IMN patients from Huashan hospital and People’s Hospital of Wuxi in past 5 years were collected into this study. IMN with positive PLA₂R immunohistochemistry in kidney biopsies were designated as PLA₂R-associated IMN. Seventy-eight of the 91 IMN patients was PLA₂R-associated IMN and 13 were non-PLA₂R-associated IMN. Forty-five patients were treated with prednisone plus cyclophosphamide (CTX), and 46 with prednisone plus calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). The follow-up duration was 15 months.

Results

The total remission rate (76.9% versus 44.9%, p = 0.032) and complete remission rate (30.8% versus 2.6%, p = 0.003) were both significantly higher in the non-PLA₂R-associated group than in the PLA₂R-associated group at the 3rd month visit point, and at the 6th month time point, the complete remission rate was still significantly higher in the non-PLA₂R-associated group (46.2% versus 11.5%,p = 0.007). But similar remission rates were found after the 9th month. Relapses were observed in 8 patients in PLA₂R-associated group and none in non-PLA₂R-associated group, although there was no significant difference between these two groups.

Conclusion

Compared with the PLA₂R-associated IMN, the non-PLA₂R-associated IMN responded quicker to the immunosuppressive therapy.

Pathological predictors of renal outcomes in nephrotic idiopathic membranous nephropathy with decreased renal function

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The outcome of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) in adults with nephrotic-range proteinuria and decreased renal function has seldom been described and the predictive value of pathological features is debated. This study aimed to describe the clinical course of this patient subgroup and to identify independently predictive pathological features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 129 adults with biopsy-proven IMN diagnosed from 2002 to 2011. All patients had chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 2-4 and nephrotic-range proteinuria (≥3.5 g/day). Primary outcomes were a 20 or 50 % decline in renal function, progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Of 129 patients, 38 (30 %) presented with proteinuria ≥8.0 g/day and 37 (29 %) with CKD stages 3-4. Thirteen (10 %) presented with segmental sclerosis, 97 (75 %) with arteriosclerosis, 42 (33 %) with moderate-to-severe tubulointerstitial injury, and 86 (67 %) with C3 deposition. Over a median follow-up of 34 months (range 12-135), 51 patients (40 %) had a 20 % decline in renal function, 27 (21 %) a 50 % decline, 14 (11 %) developed ESRD, and 19 (15 %) died. Segmental sclerosis and tubulointerstitial injury but not arteriosclerosis or C3 deposition were independent risk factors for 20 and 50 % renal function decline and progression to ESRD.

CONCLUSIONS

Segmental sclerosis and tubulointerstitial injury predict renal outcomes independent of clinical data in nephrotic IMN patients with decreased renal function.

Long-term outcomes in idiopathic membranous nephropathy using a restrictive treatment strategy

Recently published Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend limiting the use of immunosuppressive drugs in idiopathic membranous nephropathy to patients at the highest risk of kidney failure. However, recommendations are based on natural history rather than direct assessment of a restrictive treatment strategy. Here, we describe the long-term outcomes of treating a large cohort of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy according to a restrictive treatment policy. We analyzed data for 254 patients who visited our outpatient clinic between 1995 and 2009. All patients were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers. Immunosuppressive therapy was recommended in cases of deteriorating renal function or untreatable nephrotic syndrome. Primary outcomes for the present study were renal replacement therapy and death. Secondary outcomes included adverse events during follow-up and remission of proteinuria. In total, 124 patients (49%) received immunosuppressive therapy, which predominantly consisted of cyclophosphamide combined with steroids. Ten-year cumulative incidence rates were 3% for renal replacement therapy and 10% for death. Partial remission rates were 39%, 70%, and 83% after 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively; complete remission rates were 5%, 24%, and 38% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. A serious adverse event occurred in 23% of all patients. The most notable complications were infections (17%), leukopenia (18%), cardiovascular events (13%), and malignancies (8%). In conclusion, the use of a restrictive treatment strategy in this cohort of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy yielded favorable outcomes while limiting the number of patients exposed to toxic drugs. These results support current KDIGO guidelines.

Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Immunosuppressive treatment of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) is heavily debated. The controversy is mainly related to the toxicity of the therapy and the variable natural course of the disease-spontaneous remission occurs in 40-50% of patients. The 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for Glomerulonephritis provides guidance for the treatment of iMN. The guideline suggests that immunosuppressive therapy should be restricted to patients with nephrotic syndrome and persistent proteinuria, deteriorating renal function or severe symptoms. Alkylating agents are the preferred therapy because of their proven efficacy in preventing end-stage renal disease. Calcineurin inhibitors can be used as an alternative although efficacy data on hard renal end points are limited. In this Review, we summarize the KDIGO guideline and address remaining areas of uncertainty. Better risk prediction is needed to identify patients who will benefit from immunosuppressive therapy, and the optimal timing and duration of this therapy is unknown because most of the randomized controlled trials were performed in low-risk or medium-risk patients. Alternative therapies, directed at B cells, are under study. The discovery of anti-M type phospholipase A2 receptor-antibodies is a major breakthrough and we envisage that in the near future, antibody-driven therapy will enable more individualized treatment of patients with iMN.

Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Exciting progress recently has been made in our understanding of idiopathic membranous nephropathy, as well as treatment of this disease. Here, we review important advances regarding the pathogenesis of membranous nephropathy. We will also review the current approach to treatment and its limitations and will highlight new therapies that are currently being explored for this disease including Rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil, and adrenocorticotropic hormone, with an emphasis on results of the most recent clinical trials.

The natural history of the non-nephrotic membranous nephropathy patient

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although early studies suggest that patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MGN) and subnephrotic range proteinuria overall do well, these studies were small and follow-up was short or difficult to discern.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Three hundred ninety-five cases of idiopathic MGN with at least 12 mo of follow-up from the Toronto Glomerulonephritis Registry were reviewed to determine the outcome of the subgroup of patients that presented with subnephrotic range proteinuria. Onset and follow-up data included mean arterial pressure (MAP) and creatinine clearance (CrCl) as determined by the Cockcroft-Gault equation. Outcome variables included the rate of progression (slope of CrCl), 50% reduction in initial CrCl, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

RESULTS

One hundred eight (27% of the total) patients presented with subnephrotic proteinuria and almost 40% (42 of 108) of this subgroup remained subnephrotic. Their long-term slope was -0.93 ml/min/yr. In contrast, those who subsequently developed nephrotic range proteinuria had a progression rate almost four times faster (-3.52 ml/min/yr). The majority who developed nephrotic syndrome did so within the first year of follow-up. The only distinguishing baseline feature between the two groups was a higher level of urine protein in the group that subsequently developed nephrotic syndrome (1.98 [0.3 to 3.4] versus 2.43 [0.5 to 3.4] g/d).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MGN and sustained subnephrotic range proteinuria have an excellent prognosis. Conservative management with close monitoring is recommended given the difficulty predicting which patients will develop nephrotic range proteinuria and then progress more rapidly.

Long-term outcomes of idiopathic membranous nephropathy in Japanese patients treated with low-dose cyclophosphamide and prednisolone

BACKGROUND

Treatment with cyclophosphamide and steroids for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is effective in Caucasian patients, but the cumulative cyclophosphamide dosage exceeds 10 g and includes steroid pulse therapy. Adverse effects and difficulties with repeating treatment are major limitations. We studied the long-term outcomes of low-dose cyclophosphamide and prednisolone therapy in Japanese patients, who were thought to have relatively benign IMN compared with Caucasian patients.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study of 103 consecutive Japanese patients with IMN and nephrotic syndrome. Patients were treated with cyclophosphamide (50 mg/day for the first 3 months and 25 mg/day for the next 3 months) and prednisolone (30 mg/day for the first week and the dosage was gradually tapered to withdraw by 2 years). Additional therapies were allowed for initial treatment failure or relapse.

RESULTS

With a mean observation period of 8.5 years, 90 patients (87.4%) achieved proteinuria of <1 g/day and 78 (75.7%) achieved complete remission. A total of 27 patients did not respond to initial treatment and 30 patients had relapses after remission. Of these patients, 39 received additional therapies. At the last observation, 12 patients had developed renal insufficiency (S-Cr >1.5 mg/dL) but only 2 patients had reached renal death. Multivariate analysis revealed that the duration without remission was the strongest risk factor for renal prognosis. There were 14 deaths, and 8 patients developed cancers during the observation period.

CONCLUSION

Treating nephrotic IMN in Japanese patients with low-dose cyclophosphamide and prednisolone is beneficial for long-term renal prognosis with relatively few adverse effects.

Introduction of a cyclophosphamide-based treatment strategy and the risk of ESRD in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a nationwide survey in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in preventing ESRD in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) is debated. From 1991 onwards, we have advocated a restrictive treatment strategy in our university hospital and regional referring hospitals. We advised the use of immunosuppressive therapy, consisting of a combination of steroids and oral cyclophosphamide for 12 months, in patients with iMN at high risk for ESRD.

METHODS

Primary renal diagnosis of all patients who start renal replacement therapy in the Netherlands is registered in the RENINE database. We studied the incidence of ESRD due to iMN in the Netherlands in the period 1991-2005. We mailed a questionnaire to all nephrology centres that entered a patient with ESRD and iMN in the RENINE database after 2000.

RESULTS

The introduction of the cyclophosphamide-based treatment strategy in the Nijmegen region resulted in a significant 70% reduction in the incidence of ESRD in patients with iMN as compared to an unchanged incidence in other parts of the Netherlands. The response rate to the questionnaire was 65%. There were 45 patients (34 M, 11 F) with a mean age of 49 +/- 17 years at diagnosis and a median serum creatinine of 138 micromol/l (range 60-1798). Overall, only 22 patients (49%) had been treated with immunosuppressive therapy, consisting of prednisone monotherapy in 7.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the introduction of a cyclophosphamide-based restrictive treatment policy has reduced the risk of ESRD in iMN. The questionnaires reflect the differences in opinion on the optimal treatment of high-risk patients with iMN.

Mycophenolate mofetil in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a clinical trial with comparison to a historic control group treated with cyclophosphamide

BACKGROUND

Cyclophosphamide can decrease proteinuria and improve renal function in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy, but has a high risk of side effects. We studied whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) could be a reasonable alternative with fewer side effects.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical trial with historic controls.

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS

32 cases and 32 controls with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and renal insufficiency at multiple centers. For comparison, we selected matched historic controls treated with cyclophosphamide.

INTERVENTION

MMF, 1 g twice daily, for 12 months versus cyclophosphamide, 1.5 mg/kg/d, for 12 months. Both groups also received intermittent methylprednisolone and alternate-day prednisone.

OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS

Serum creatinine, proteinuria, and side effects during and after treatment.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 23 months (range, 11 to 46 months). Median serum creatinine levels were 1.8 mg/dL (159 micromol/L) in both groups at baseline and 1.4 mg/dL (124 micromol/L) in the MMF group versus 1.3 mg/dL (115 micromol/L) in the cyclophosphamide group at 12 months (P = 0.4). Proteinuria values at baseline and 12 months were protein of 8.40 and 1.41 g/d in the MMF group versus 9.19 and 1.13 g/d in the cyclophosphamide group (P = 0.5 at 12 months), respectively. Cumulative incidences of remission of proteinuria at 12 months were 66% in the MMF group versus 72% in the cyclophosphamide group (P = 0.3). Five patients (16%) in the MMF group versus none in the cyclophosphamide group had disease that did not respond to therapy (P = 0.05). Twelve patients (38%) experienced a relapse and 9 patients (31%) were re-treated in the MMF group compared with 4 (13%) and 2 patients (6%) in the cyclophosphamide group (P < 0.01 and P = 0.024, respectively). Side effects occurred in 24 patients (75%) in the MMF group and 22 patients (69%) in the cyclophosphamide group (P = 0.6).

LIMITATIONS

Nonrandomized control group, short duration of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A 12-month course of MMF decreased proteinuria and improved renal function in the majority of patients, but did not appear as effective or better tolerated than cyclophosphamide. Long-term data and randomized controlled trials are needed to ascertain the efficacy of MMF in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy: Outline and Rationale of a Treatment Strategy

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome. The treatment of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy is heavily debated. Based on literature data and our own experience, we propose a rational treatment strategy. Patients with renal insufficiency (serum creatinine level > 1.5 mg/dL [> 135 micromol/L]) are at greatest risk for the development of end-stage renal disease and should receive immunosuppressive therapy. In patients with normal renal function (serum creatinine level < 1.5 mg/dL [< 135 micromol/L]), risk for developing end-stage renal disease can be estimated by measuring urinary excretion of beta2-microglobulin or alpha1-microglobulin and immunoglobulin G. For low-risk patients, a wait-and-see policy is advised. High-risk patients likely benefit from immunosuppressive therapy. Currently, combinations of steroids with chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide are the best studied. We prefer cyclophosphamide in view of its fewer side effects. Cyclosporine may be an alternative option in patients with well-preserved renal function, although long-term data are lacking. Other immunosuppressive agents, such as mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab, currently are under study; however, data are insufficient to support their routine use.

Urinary Excretion of β2-Microglobulin and IgG Predict Prognosis in Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy: A Validation Study

An accurate prediction of the prognosis of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) should allow restriction of immunosuppressive treatment to patients who are at highest risk for ESRD. On the basis of retrospective studies, it has previously been suggested that the urinary excretions of beta2-microglobulin (Ubeta2m) and IgG (UIgG) are useful predictors of renal insufficiency in patients with iMN. The threshold values of 0.5 micro/min (Ubeta2m) and 250 mg/24 h (UIgG) have been validated in a new and larger patient cohort. From 1995 onward, 57 patients with iMN (38 men, 19 women; age 48 +/- 16 yr), a nephrotic syndrome, and a serum creatinine level </=1.5 mg/dl were studied prospectively. At baseline, a standardized measurement was carried out to determine renal function and protein excretion. The end point renal death was defined as a serum creatinine exceeding 1.5 mg/dl or a rise of serum creatinine of >50%. Mean (+/-SD) follow-up was 53 +/- 23 mo. Thus far, 25 (44%) of the patients have reached the end point renal death. Multivariate analysis confirmed Ubeta2m as the strongest independent predictor for the development of renal insufficiency. Sensitivity and specificity were 88 and 91%, respectively, for Ubeta2m, and both were 88% for UIgG. When the excretions of both proteins were combined, specificity improved to 97%. It is concluded that the present data validate the accuracy of Ubeta2m and of UIgG in predicting renal outcome in patients with iMN. These markers can be used to guide decisions on the start of immunosuppressive treatment.