Accelerated total dose infusion of low molecular weight iron dextran is safe and efficacious in chronic kidney disease patients

Intravenous Irons: From Basic Science to Clinical Practice

Iron is an essential trace mineral necessary for life, and iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is one of the most common haematological problems worldwide, affecting a sixth of the global population. Principally linked to poverty, malnutrition and infection in developing countries, in Western countries the pathophysiology of IDA is primarily linked to blood loss, malabsorption and chronic disease. Oral iron replacement therapy is a simple, inexpensive treatment, but is limited by gastrointestinal side effects that are not inconsequential to some patients and are of minimal efficacy in others. Third generation intravenous (IV) iron therapies allow rapid and complete replacement dosing without the toxicity issues inherent with older iron preparations. Their characteristic, strongly-bound iron-carbohydrate complexes exist as colloidal suspensions of iron oxide nanoparticles with a polynuclear Fe(III)-oxyhydroxide/oxide core surrounded by a carbohydrate ligand. The physicochemical differences between the IV irons include mineral composition, crystalline structure, conformation, size and molecular weight, but the most important difference is the carbohydrate ligand, which influences complex stability, iron release and immunogenicity, and which is a unique feature of each drug. Recent studies have highlighted different adverse event profiles associated with third-generation IV irons that reflect their different structures. The increasing clinical evidence base has allayed safety concerns linked to older IV irons and widened their clinical use. This review considers the properties of the different IV irons, and how differences might impact current and future clinical practice.

State of the iron: how to diagnose and efficiently treat iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) frequently occurs in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and negatively impacts their quality of life. Nevertheless, the condition appears to be both under-diagnosed and undertreated. Regular biochemical screening of patients with IBD for anemia by the gastroenterology community has to be advocated. Oral iron is a low cost treatment however its effectiveness is limited by low bioavailability and poor tolerability. Intravenous (IV) iron rapidly replenishes iron stores and has demonstrated its safe use in a number of studies in various therapeutic areas. A broad spectrum of new IV iron formulations is now becoming available offering improved tolerability and patient convenience by rapidly restoring the depleted iron status of patients with IBD. The following article aims to review the magnitude of the problem of IDA in IBD, suggest screening standards and highlight existing and future therapies.

Efficacy and tolerability of accelerated-dose low-molecular-weight iron dextran (Cosmofer) in patients with chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

The Renal NSF advocates correction of anaemia in chronic kidney disease patients. Oral iron is often insufficient, while intravenous supplementation replenishes and maintains iron stores. There is a need to administer high doses of iron in a single rapid infusion to enable efficient costs, effective utilisation of time for patients and staff and optimal use of resources.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of consecutive patients referred for iron dextran (Cosmofer) therapy. This was administered over 2 h 40 min compared with the normal regime of 4-6 h. Blood pressure was recorded throughout administration. Adverse drug reactions were recorded over 2 weeks. Serum ferritin, haemoglobin and estimated glomerular filtration rate were measured at baseline and 3 months.

RESULTS

One hundred patients (59 male, mean age 69 years), received a median dose of 1,000 mg Cosmofer in a median time of 2 h 40 min. Mean serum ferritin rose from 178 at baseline to 413 μg/l (p < 0.001). Mean haemoglobin rose by 1.5 g/dl (p < 0.001). There was no decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate after 3 months. No adverse reactions were noted.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that accelerated administration of iron dextran is safe and effective with no short-term effects on renal function. This resulted in a time saving of approximately 67 hours.

A hospital-based cost minimization study of the potential financial impact on the UK health care system of introduction of iron isomaltoside 1000

Background:

The clinical need to be able to administer high doses of intravenous iron conveniently in a single rapid infusion has been addressed by the recent introduction of ferric carboxymaltose and subsequently iron isomaltoside 1000. Neither requires a test dose. Ferric carboxymaltose can be administered at 15 mg/kg body weight to a maximum dose of 1000 mg, whereas iron isomaltoside 1000 can be administered at 20 mg/kg body weight. The ability to give high doses of iron is important in the context of managing iron deficiency anemia in a number of clinical conditions where demands for iron are high (including chronic blood loss associated with inflammatory bowel disease, menorrhagia, and chronic kidney disease). It is also an important component in the strategy as an alternative to a blood transfusion. Affordability is a key issue for health services.

Methods:

This study was a comparative analysis of the costs of administering the newly available intravenous iron formulations against standard practice (blood transfusion, intravenous iron sucrose) by considering the cost of this treatment option plus nursing costs associated with administration, equipment for administration, and patient transportation in the secondary care (hospital) setting across three dosage levels (600 mg, 1000 mg, and 1600 mg).

Results and conclusion:

The analysis indicates that the use of iron isomaltoside 1000 results in a net saving when compared with iron sucrose, blood, and ferric carboxymaltose. At 600 mg and 1000 mg doses, it is cheaper than low-molecular-weight iron dextran but more expensive at a dose of 1600 mg. However, it takes six hours to administer low-molecular-weight iron dextran at this dose level, which is inconvenient and reduces patient throughput (productivity).