Metformin for patients with diabetes and concomitant renal restrictions--is there an evidence base?

Interventions Against Posttransplantation Diabetes: A Scientific Rationale for Treatment Hierarchy Based on Literature Review

Posttransplant diabetes (PTD) is a common medical complication after solid organ transplantation. Because of adverse outcomes associated with its development and detrimental impact on long-term survival, strategies to prevent or manage PTD are critically important but remain underresearched. Treatment hierarchies of antidiabetic therapies in the general population are currently being revolutionized based on cardiovascular outcome trials, providing evidence-based rationale for optimization of medical management. However, opportunities for improving medical management of PTD are challenged by 2 important considerations: (1) translating clinical evidence data from the general population to underresearched solid organ transplant cohorts and (2) targeting treatment based on primary underlying PTD pathophysiology. In this article, the aim is to provide an overview of PTD treatment options from a new angle. Rationalized by a consideration of underlying PTD pathophysiological defects, which are heterogeneous among diverse transplant patient cohorts, a critical appraisal of the published literature and summary of current research in progress will be reviewed. The aim is to update transplant professionals regarding medical management of PTD from a new perspective tailored therapeutic intervention based on individualized characteristics. As the gap in clinical evidence between management of PTD versus type 2 diabetes widens, it is imperative for the transplant community to bridge this gap with targeted clinical trials to ensure we optimize outcomes for solid organ transplant recipients who are at risk or develop PTD. This necessary clinical research should help efforts to improve long-term outcomes for solid transplant patients from both a patient and graft survival perspective.

Safety and Efficacy of Long-Term Administration of Dipeptidyl peptidase IV Inhibitors in Patients With New Onset Diabetes After Kidney Transplant

OBJECTIVES

The appearance of new onset diabetes is common after kidney transplant. Treatment options are limited because of renal function-related contraindications, interactions with immunosuppressive drugs, and side effects. We investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors in renal transplant recipients with new onset diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We treated 12 patients with dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors, and 5 patients received insulin monotherapy as initial treatment of new onset diabetes after kidney transplant. All patients were followed for 12 months after diagnosis. Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c, estimated glomerular filtration rate (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation), plasma immunosuppressive trough levels, serum lipids, blood pressure, and body weight were measured during outpatient visits. Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors and insulin on the aforementioned parameters were measured to compare values at time of diagnosis versus mean values of the last 6 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients were treated with linagliptin (4 patients), sitagliptin (4 patients), vildagliptin (2 patients), and alogliptin (2 patients). Patients had a mean age of 59.4 ± 12 years and a mean glycosylated hemoglobin A1c of 6.6% at diagnosis, which was decreased to 6.1% (P = .03) at 1 year of follow-up. Renal function remained stable, and plasma tacrolimus levels did not appear to be affected. No significant differences were shown in serum total, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels aftertreatment. Nevertheless,triglyceride levels were significantly reduced (from 214.4 to 174.9 mg/dL; P = .0039). A decrease in body weight was also observed. Finally, patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase V inhibitors achieved better glycosylated hemoglobin A1c levels than those treated with insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors appear to be a safe, effective, and hypoglycemia-free option fortreatment of new onset diabetes in renaltransplant recipients and possibly provide better diabetes control than insulin therapy.

Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus: evaluation of treatment strategies

BACKGROUND

Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a serious complication after kidney transplantation, but evidence regarding long-term outcomes of treatment regimens remains scarce.

AIM AND METHODS

The aim of this retrospective cohort analysis was to assess the long-term efficiency and safety of antidiabetic treatments in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), who were diagnosed with PTDM by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

RESULTS

Of 561 KTRs that were screened for PTDM at our outpatient clinic, 71 (13%) had a diabetic OGTT and were included in this study. Mean follow-up was 34.2 ± 16.1 months. Thirty-six PTDM patients (51%) received antidiabetic treatment after diagnosis with either a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, a sulfonylurea, pioglitazone, or insulin. These patients had significantly higher fasting glucose and two-h plasma glucose (2HPG) values at baseline than those who remained without therapy. In contrast to lifestyle modification alone or sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors improved glycemic control significantly. Adverse events were generally mild and occurred at similar rates in all groups.

CONCLUSION

While sulfonylureas failed to improve glycemic control, DPP-4 inhibitors appeared effective and safe for the therapy of PTDM after kidney transplantation.

Clinical practice considerations and review of the literature for the Use of DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

Many commonly prescribed agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) have important restrictions on use in patients with renal impairment. Prescribing information and published data on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors indicate that these agents are suitable for use in this patient population. However, a recent database analysis indicated prevalent underrecognition of renal impairment and limited awareness of prescription considerations associated with DPP-4 inhibitor use in patients with renal impairment. Thus, this article reviews recent literature on the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with renal impairment and T2DM.

METHODS

PubMed searches were conducted for literature describing the use of DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with renal impairment.

RESULTS

Most DPP-4 inhibitors are characterized by significant renal clearance. As a result, pharmacokinetics are measurably affected by the presence of renal impairment; plasma exposure of DPP-4 inhibitors and their metabolites may increase by up to sevenfold in severe impairment/end-stage renal disease. The exception in this case is linagliptin, which is eliminated predominantly via the hepatobiliary system. Our search identified several studies that evaluated specific doses of DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with renal impairment and reported positive safety and efficacy results.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, DPP-4 inhibitors are an effective means of controlling blood glucose in patients with T2DM and renal impairment. Considering the restrictions associated with many other antihyperglycemic agents when used in patients with renal impairment, DPP-4 inhibitors should be a considered as a treatment option in this patient population.

Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin in new-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation--a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious complication after kidney transplantation, but therapeutic strategies remain underexplored. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors selectively foster insulin secretion without inducing hypoglycemia, which might be advantageous in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with NODAT. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial to assess safety and efficacy of the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin. Intraindividual differences in oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived 2-h plasma glucose (2HPG) from baseline to 3 months after treatment served as primary endpoint. Among secondary outcomes, we evaluated HbA1c, metabolic and safety parameters, as well as OGTTs at 1 month after drug discontinuation. Of 509 stable KTRs who were screened in our outpatient clinic, 63 (12.4%) had 2HPG ≥ 200 mg/dL, 33 of them were randomized and 32 completed the study. In the vildagliptin group 2HPG and HbA1c were profoundly reduced in comparison to placebo (vildagliptin: 2HPG = 182.7 mg/dL, HbA1c = 6.1%; placebo: 2HPG = 231.2 mg/dL, HbA1c = 6.5%; both p ≤ 0.05), and statistical significance was achieved for the primary endpoint (vildagliptin: 2HPG-difference -73.7 ± 51.3 mg/dL; placebo: -5.7 ± 41.4 mg/dL; p < 0.01). Adverse events were generally mild and occurred at similar rates in both groups. In conclusion, DPP-4 inhibition in KTRs with overt NODAT was safe and efficient, providing a novel treatment alternative for this specific form of diabetes.